“New” Community Typology of Agricultural Holdings & the Calculation of Standard Outputs (SO) A.Kinsella.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prospects for EU-25 agricultural markets and income
Advertisements

How to measure the CMEF R2 Indicator about Gross Value Added in agricultural holdings without reliable accounting data ? A methodological proposal applied.
Projections of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture: an Irish example Trevor Donnellan FAPRI-Ireland Partnership Rural Economy Research Centre, Teagasc.
Typology Impacts and plan. Background EC has a set of rules about how to (i) value activity and (ii) allocate a farm type. These operate on a 10 year.
Balances of major agricultural products (slide to the report) Balances of major agricultural products (slide to the report) Aurora Garabazhiu-Head of Agricultural.
Using administrative data to model CAP reform Sinéad McPhillips Economics & Planning Division Department of Agriculture, Food & the Marine Kevin Hanrahan.
May 2001European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture - A2 1 European Commission - Agriculture Directorate-General 28th February 2003 Inventory.
Irish Dairying – A Competitive Industry? Fiona Thorne & Billy Fingleton Teagasc Glanbia Regional Seminars 2006.
Measurement of Farm Incomes Economics of Food Markets Lecture 4 Alan Matthews.
Measurement of Farm Incomes Economics of Food Markets Lecture 4 Alan Matthews.
Bio-Science Engineering Department of Agricultural Economics Impact of alternative implementations of the Agenda 2000 Mid Term Review An application of.
Agricultural policy objectives Measurement of support Economics of Food Markets Lecture 6 Alan Matthews.
Sample Design and Efficiency Considerations.  Sampling is a powerful statistical tool that can be used to provide good quality estimates at a lower cost.
CAPRI EU GHG Monitoring Workshop, 27th-28th February 2003, Copenhagen Projections of herd sizes with the CAPRI system - Wolfgang Britz - Institute for.
Data Sources and Quality Improvements for Statistics on Agricultural Household Income in 27 EU Countries Berkeley Hill Emeritus Professor of Policy Analysis.
Existing EU Regulations concerning pesticide statistics and Latvia experience in pesticide statistics Guna Karlsone, CSB of Latvia.
Medium-term prospects and impact assessment of the CAP reform EU - 15 & EU European Commission - Agriculture Directorate-General.
Regional GDP Workshop. Purpose of the Project October Regional GDP Workshop Regional GDP Scope Annual Current price (nominal) GDP By region.
Trends in Farm Household Economic Well-Being Jeremy Weber USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum, February 20-21, 2014.
The Status of EAA in China and Its Reform Ideas Mingmei Zhang, NBS, No.57, Yuetan Nanjie, Shanlihe, Beijing , P.R. China
Near East Regional Workshop - Linking Population and Housing Censuses with Agricultural Censuses. Amman, Jordan, June 2012 Population and Housing.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Handbook on Supply and Use Table: Compilation, Application, and Good Practices.
Farm Accounts Survey Update on Developments and beyond.
Measurement of Agricultural Output in the Australian System of National Accounts: Methods and Issues Authors: Rick Brunton and Carol Trickett Presenter:
OECD Network – Farm Level Analysis A.Kinsella. Introduction Network for distributional analysis set up by OECD 18 participants from 12 OECD countries.
Structure and Basic Methodology of Preparation and Taking of the Russian Agricultural Census 2016 Deputy Head of Rosstat Dr. Konstantin Laykam FEDERAL.
DOMESTIC ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION GIOVANNI SIGNORELLO GIUSEPPE CUCUZZA and GIOACCHINO PAPPALARDO UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA.
Review of June Agricultural Census of Minor Holdings Adam Krawczyk Rural & Environment Analytical Services Scottish Government 17 th November 2009.
What is the Best Indicator of Work Performed in Agriculture? IACS-4 Beijing October 2007 Pál Bóday - Éva Laczka.
4 May 2010 Towards a common revision for European statistics By Gian Luigi Mazzi and Rosa Ruggeri Cannata Q2010 European Conference on Quality in Official.
1 Introduction o Introduction o Innovation Agriculture Statistics in three phases:  Until end of 2007: Preliminary research Key issue: problems and possibilities.
Martin Pantel Business Surveys Methods Division Third International Conference on Establishment Surveys June 2007 Classifying Agricultural Operations for.
Organic Production Research Conference Tullamore, 2 nd December 2008 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF ORGANIC FARMING L. Connolly J. McDonnell B. Moran.
An overview of Italian agriculture and food industry Federica Piersimoni ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics Agriculture Service
Rural Economy Research Centre Situation and Outlook Conference, 9th December 2008 SITUATION AND OUTLOOK FOR CATTLE & SHEEP 2008/2009 J. Breen, K. Hanrahan,
Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content in Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE Pavel Ciaian, d'Artis Kancs and Jan.
Teagasc: National Farm Survey An Overview Agricultural Statistics Liaison Group (ASLG) Date: Wednesday October 12th, 2011 Time: 1.30pm Venue: Department.
Luxembourg, 25 June Meeting of the Task Force “Agricultural land prices and rents” 25 June 2009.
Structural characteristics of the Hungarian Agriculture and Food Industry Rome 29 June – July 2005 Éva Laczka Joint UNECE /EUROSTAT/FAO/OECD.
Developments in new farm typology. Background EC Farm Structure Survey in 2010 (full) and 2013 and 2016 (partial). Previously 2000 (full) and partial.
Gaseous Emissions from Irish Agriculture Trevor Donnellan FAPRI-Ireland Partnership Teagasc Dublin.
Name des Wissenschaftlers Sebastian Neuenfeldt, Alexander Gocht Thünen Institute of Rural Studies, Braunschweig, Germany The analysis of farm structural.
A Hedonic Price Model of Self-Assessed Agricultural Land Values Jeremey Lopez***, Stephen O’Neill, Cathal O'Donoghue*, Mary Ryan* * Teagasc Rural Economy.
Leading the way in Agriculture and Rural Research, Education and Consulting The impacts of CAP reform on Scottish farms Shailesh Shrestha, Bouda Vosough.
Developments in new farm typology. Background EC Farm Structure Survey in 2010 (full) and 2013 and 2016 (partial). Previously 2000 (full) and partial.
Census of Agriculture 2010 Summary & Current Position Fiona O’Callaghan 24 th April 2012.
Nataliya Skachek, Scientific and Technical Complex of Statistical Research, Ukraine EU Farm Accountancy Data Network (EU FADN) and Ukraine.
7-8-March 2011 Task Force "Organic farming statistics"-Luxembourg, 7-8 March Item 4 Harmonised questionnaire for data collection: State of the art.
1 Farm structure survey/ agricultural census – the backbone of the agricultural statistical system Danilovgrad/ Montenegro, 24 March 2011 Presentation.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and Rural Development.
Animal protection in Europe DE3-COM
HARMONISED CONSUMER PRICE INDEX Nadiežda Alejeva Head, Price Statistics Division Statistics Lithuania WORKSHOP, 13 JULY 2012, YEREVAN 1.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 18 – Statistics Bilateral screening: Chapter.
General features regarding Agricultural Census/ farm structure surveys in EU Presentation in a training workshop September 2011 “Preparing for Agricultural.
2009/12/02 Valuation of forage crops Valuation of forage crops (doc ASA/AAP/116)
Organic farming in CZ – more detailed description Research Institute of Agricultural Economics (VUZE)‏ Pavla Wollmuthová Andrea Hrabalová Summer Academy,
Typical farms and hybrid approaches
REGIONAL DIVERSIFICATION OF AGRICULTURE IN POLAND
TAIEX Workshop: Improving data collection and the Use of the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) National experiences in adopting new information needs.
Market price monitoring
The farm typology Kiev April 2014 Peter Vig Jensen Karsten Larsen from Statistics Denmark.
What is a farm? Peter Vig Jensen Karsten Larsen from Statistics Denmark Kiev April 2014.
Workshop 28th March 2014, EUROSTAT, Luxembourg
update: August 2003 Gumpenstein M. GREIMEL, A. Pöllinger
LAMAS Working Group October 2018
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION OF PESTICIDE USAGE STATISTICS A summary
Sampling and estimation
Agricultural Production Statistics Group
Organic Animal Production in Denmark
Presentation transcript:

“New” Community Typology of Agricultural Holdings & the Calculation of Standard Outputs (SO) A.Kinsella

Introduction In EU there is wide diversity of production structures & systems To ease analysis of the structural characteristics & economic results of the agricultural holdings, an appropriate Community classification of the agricultural holdings –per type of farming –& economic size class has been developed.

Introduction ·Farms classified into farming systems & size based on EU farm typology ·“Old” EU Farm Typology Classification based on Standard Gross Margins (SGM) ·“New” EU Farm Typology Classification based on Standard Output (SO)

Why EU Farm Typology ? Source: Official journal of the European Communities 85/377/CEE ·Method for standardised comparisons of farm data across EU – “harmonised data” – used by Farm Accountacy Data Network (FADN) –& CSO (Census) & EUROSTAT

“Old” EU Farm Typology Source: Official journal of the European Communities 85/377/CEE ·Assigned SGM to each type of farm animal and to each hectare of tillage crops ·Farms classified into systems according to % of total SGM of the farm coming from the main enterprises ·SGM classifies farms by Economic Size Units (ESU) 1ESU = €1200 SGM

2004 SGM €/head - Dairy Cow Output = Value of milk + calf value Direct costs = Replacement value + concentrates + coarse fodder + vet & med + miscellaneous

2004 SGM €/head - Suckler & Dairy Cow Source: Teagasc National Farm Survey

Total SGM & System type Sample Farm Total SGM € –10 Dairy Cows (€974*10)9740 –14 Sucklers (€212*14)2968 –20 Ewes (€68*20)1360 –5 Male Cattle > 2 years (€402*5)2010 –5 Female Cattle > 2 years (€183*5)915 Total SGM €16993 System: Dairy & Other ( 57% Total SGM Dairy Cows) Size: 14 ESU ( / 1200 = 14 ESU)

“New” Typology – Why? CAP drastically changed - majority of DPs decoupled Since 2005 not possible to maintain the previous typology (Commission decision 85/377/EEC) based on SGM SGM without subsidies could be negative Cannot be used as classification criteria

“New” Typology – Main innovations Main innovations “New” Typology are: Use of the Standard Output (SO) instead of the SGM. A 3-level "type of farming" classification (from 4 levels in the previous one). Expression of the economic size of the holdings directly in Euro (rather than ESU – Economic Size Units) Introduction of a new classification variable reflecting the importance of the other gainful activities (OGA) directly related to the holding.

“New” Typology – Basic Principles and Definitions Member States to apply the methodology to establish an appropriate & harmonised typology in the EU & to implement the new typology in a homogeneous way The basic principles to be followed are: Simplification Harmonisation between the Member States Comparability between the Member States

“New” Typology – Basic Principles and Definitions The Community typology of agricultural holdings is a uniform classification of holdings in the EU based on their type of farming and economic size determining these 2 elements based on the SO of the various types of agricultural production In addition holdings can be classified also according to the importance of the OGA of the holding & typology is arranged in a way that homogeneous groups of holdings can be assembled in a greater or lesser degree of aggregation.

Definitions Standard output" (SO), of an agricultural product (crop or livestock) is the average monetary value of the agricultural output at farm-gate price. The SO excludes DPs, VAT & taxes on products. Member States calculate regional SO coefficients for each product as average values over the reference period.

2004 SGM V SO €/head - Dairy Cow Source: Teagasc National Farm Survey

Definitions The "economic size of a holding" is the value of its total SO. It is the sum of the individual SO of all the agricultural products present on the holding, expressed in Euro - there are 14 economic size classes The "type of farming of a holding" is the production system of a holding which is characterised by the relative contribution of different enterprises to the holding's total SO. –3 nested levels of type of farming: 9 general types, 21 principal types and 62 particular types

Definitions The "importance of the Other Gainful Activity of the holding" is defined as the share of the OGA turnover in the total turnover of the holding (including direct payments). Depending on this estimated OGA share, the farms are classified according to three percentage bands (from 0 to 10%, from 10% to 50%, more than 50%).

Why SO? For practical reasons – SO an economic criterion the classification of farms cannot be based on financial information recorded individually for each holding Therefore, the classification is based on a financial coefficient calculated as a regional average: i.e the SO & on the structural information (hectares and heads) collected in the Farm Structure Survey (FSS) and in the Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN).

SO co-efficients & Classification SO coefficients used to calculate the typology, i.e. to classify the farms This classification is used to; – display the results of the FSS and the FADN – to weight the FADN results & – to facilitate the analyses and comparison between Member States The SO can also be used by Member States as indicators

Basis for Calculation of Classification The classification of agricultural holdings by type of farming is based on: (1)the definition of the five main groups of specialist agricultural holdings: field crops (general cropping) horticulture (vegetables and flowers) permanent crops (vines and fruit trees) grazing livestock (bovine animals for milk and for meat, sheep, goats) granivores (pigs, poultry and also rabbits)

Basis for Calculation of Classification The classification of agricultural holdings by type of farming is based on: (2)the acknowledgment of the importance of mixed holdings, which has two consequences: –the choice of a 2/3 threshold below which a holding is deemed not to be specialised; –the definition of three mixed groupings with various combinations: a combination of crop products, a combination of livestock products & a combination of crop and livestock products.

Basis for Calculation of Classification The classification has three levels of types of farming: 9 general types, including a type for non-classifiable holdings, 21 principal types, 62 particular types.

Determining the Type of Farming The type of farming of an agricultural holding is determined by the importance of each enterprise in the total SO of the farm: i.e. by the share of certain predefined partial SO in the total SO of the farm The "poles" P1 to P5 correspond to the five main groupings of specialist holdings, i.e. the five general types of farming: P1 specialist holdings with field crops P2 specialist horticultural holdings P3 specialist holdings with permanent crops P4 specialist grazing livestock holdings P5 specialist granivores holdings

Determining the Type of Farming P1 specialist holdings with field crops Example Is: P1 > 2/3 * total SO? YES: The general type of farming of the holding is 1. SPECIALIST FIELD CROPS Is: (P15 + P ) > 2/3 * total SO? YES: The principal type of farming of the holding is 15. SPECIALIST Cereals Oilseed & Protein Crops

Determining the Importance of the OGA Directly related to the holding The RATIO is not to be calculated precisely An order of magnitude is enough because the holdings are to be classified in 3 classes with wide range of limits: ClassesLimits in percentage IFrom 0% to 10% IIFrom more than 10% to 50% IIIFrom more than 50% to less than a 100%

Work in Progress – where are we now New Typology handbook has been reviewed and methodology/definitions applied to the Irish situation The SO per head of livestock and per Ha of crop have been calculated using NFS data for 2 Regions – Leinster/Munster & Connaught/Ulster These SO calculations - forwarded to CSO SO coefficients are being used to calculate the typology, i.e. to classify the farms CSO will reclassify farm population by size/system into new typology groupings

Work in Progress – where are we now On receipt of new population groupings from CSO, NFS will optimise farm sample based on new population New selection plan will be forwarded to FADN Farm classification based on SO will be used to; – display the results of the FSS and the FADN – to weight the FADN results & – to facilitate the analyses and comparison between Member States

Thank You