“Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010)
Based on Paiget’s Model published in the 1920’s › Kohlberg’s early study of young males led him to revise Paiget’s original three stages › Kohlberg created three more stages Presented “dilemmas” and asked open ended questions to secure results of moral development
General cognitive structures Social Perspective taking – being able to put yourself in another's place Both areas are necessary for moral development, but in no means are everything needed to foster moral development
Exposure to high level cognitive thought › Exposure to thinking at any level higher than what an individual portrays is sufficient to foster growth and development Disequilibrium › Students faced with situations that cause internal conflict in their moral reasoning structure
Stage 1 – Heteronomous Mortality › Obeying the rules to avoid punishment › Do not consider the rights or concerns of others Stage 2 – Individualistic, Instrumental Mortality › Follow the rules if it is in a persons best interest – “What’s in it for me” mentality › Ensure satisfaction of a persons own needs but also understand others have needs as well
Stage 3 – Interpersonally Normative Morality › “Right” is defined by acceptable social roles The expectations the people around you have Gaining others approval Shared feelings for the first time are more important than individual feelings Stage 4 – Social System Mortality › Also known as law and order › Being defined as following the rules set forward by authority figures › Doing your duty as a citizen
Stage 5 – Human Rights and Social Welfare Mortality › Citizens recognize that rules set forward by authority figures are merely a contract based on the majority › People tend to disobey rules if they find them not in agreement with there personal beliefs Stage 6 – Morality of Universalizable, Reversible and Prescriptive General Ethical Principles › Moral obligations made by a person’s conscience › Seeing all sides of an issue and being unbiased › Following universally ethical rules Example – equality of human rights
Cultural Difference › Middle/upper class versus rural/working class › Western versus eastern philosophy Religious Difference › Strong religious beliefs usually foster an unwavering loyalty to a higher power which is consistent with conventional stages of moral development
Providing students with opportunities to discuss hypothetical moral dilemmas in a classroom setting Moral Judgment Interviews to gain knowledge of student’s development in academic programs Programs that foster personal development and reflection Supportive social network = growth in moral judgment
Postconvential level of mortality – putting ones personal beliefs above law and society › Arguing the validity of Stage 6 – is it possible? Sex – biased › Carol Gilligan was the one to point this out
Cromag. (2012, March 25). Lawrence Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development [Web Log Post]. Retrieved from stages-of-moral-development Evans, N.J., Forney, D.S., Guido, F.M., Patton, L.D., & Renn, K.A. (2010). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Khouanphet, S. (2010, September 24). Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development [Web Log Post] Retrieved from theory-of-moral-development.html Long, R. Lawrence Kohlberg. Retrieved from W.C. Crain. (1985). Theories of Development. Prentice-Hall. pp