Innovative Educators Webinar December 1, 2010 Jan Norton, Presenter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Online Course Design Online Course Design EVALUATION AND REVISION
Advertisements

Graduation and Employment: Program Evaluation Using Dr. Michele F. Ernst Chief Academic Officer Globe Education Network.
Daniel Peck January 28, SLOs versus Course Objectives Student Learning Outcomes for the classroom describe the knowledge, skills, abilities.
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Best Practices in Assessment, Workshop 2 December 1, 2011.
 Standards Based Grading Discussion- February 3, 2014.
OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT Developing and Implementing an Effective Plan.
Supplemental Instruction & Tutoring Center for Student Achievement January 16, 2013.
ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009 Veronica Jaramillo, Ph.D. Mona Panchal Anthony Cadavid ELAC SLO RETREAT 2009.
Presented by: Dr. Sue Courtney Janice Stoudemire, CPA, ATA, ABA Associate Degree Board of Commissioners Copyright Protected: Material can not be use or.
Effective Grading and Assessment:. Strategies to Enhance Student Learning.
Using Measurable Outcomes to Evaluate Tutor Programs Jan Norton, Presenter.
Catherine Wehlburg, Ph.D. Office for Assessment & Quality Enhancement.
Michael J. Badolato, EdD, Senior Academic Technology Officer Middlesex Community College | Bedford and Lowell MA.
Assessment Assessment Planning Assessment Improvements Assessment Data Dialogue & Reflection.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in Your Courses Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in.
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
Increasing Student Success Achieving the Dream Status Report June 2, 2009.
Evidence Based Teaching Strategy: Applied to Student Orientation
Department of Computing and Technology School of Science and Technology A.A.S. in Computer Aided Design Drafting (CADD) CIP Code Program Quality.
Does the use of math journals improve students retention and recall of math facts and formulas?
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
Assessing Student Learning Outcomes in Student Development – Part I Student Development Division Meeting SUNY Oneonta May 9, 2008.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Desired outcomes You will analyze your current learning strategies for Chemistry 1201 You will understand exactly what changes you need to implement to.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Identifying and Assessing Learning Outcomes for Professional Development Programming Diane E. Waryas, Ph.D. Kim E. VanDerLinden, Ph.D.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Science Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Student Services Assessment Workshop College of the Redwoods Angelina Hill & Cheryl Tucker Nov 28 th & 30 th, 2011.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
1 PROJECT EVALUATION IT’S ALL ABOUT STUDENTS. 2 In partnership, we help America’s students stay in school and graduate by: Reducing gaps in college access.
Assessment Workshop College of San Mateo February 2006.
Gwynn Mettetal.  Discuss different ways to assess outcomes  Help you decide which methods would be best for your project.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES Kimberly Gargiulo, Coordinator of Assessment Office of Institutional Research and Assessment.
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
The Change Proposal Review of the Elements Chuck Vergon / 6933.
MDC Quality Enhancement Plan Mathematics Discipline Meeting Update March 5, 2009.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Using Peer Reviewed Research to Teach Reading, Critical Thinking and Information Literacy in Student Success Courses Dr. Christine Harrington Middlesex.
Chapter 7 Instrumentation. Empirical Data We need DATA We can’t rely solely upon our senses We develop INSTRUMENTS to compensate for the limitations of.
College Preparatory Course Certification Pilot May 5th,
MAP the Way to Success in Math: A Hybridization of Tutoring and SI Support Evin Deschamps Northern Arizona University Student Learning Centers.
Assessment of Service Learning Projects Not necessarily the “answer” but some questions and suggestions David Mogk Dept. of Earth Sciences Montana State.
Syllabus Design and Resources, Part 1
SI, SLA, and YOU Your guide to CSU’s two new services for students.
Enhancing Learning and Teaching in HE People Performance Potential Staff Development Unit People Performance Potential Developing & supporting post graduates.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
Student Growth Goals for Coaching Conversations. Requirements for Student Growth Goals Time line Reference to an Enduring Skill Proficiency and Growth.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Algebra 1 Andrea Austin. Course Goals Improve/extend mathematical abilities and understanding Prepare students for math classes beyond Algebra 1 Build.
Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) Module #2: Writing SLOs Office of Academic Planning & Accountability Institutional Effectiveness Moderator: Dr. Cathy.
2009 TACUSPA Fall Conference October 5, 2009 El Paso, Texas.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
Programming Assessment. Why Do We Assess?!? Because Paul said so?!?
Professional Learning Communities:
Fullerton College SLOA Workshop:
Taia L.C. Reid, Assistant Director of the Peer Educator Program
Standards-Based Grading
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
Creating Meaningful Student Learning Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

Innovative Educators Webinar December 1, 2010 Jan Norton, Presenter

 Terminology  The Black Box  Timetables  Data/Measurement  Data/Measurement Cautions  Program Outcomes & Examples  Student Outcomes & Examples  Closing & Questions

 Visions  Missions  Values  Goals  Objectives  Outcomes  Program vs. Student Outcomes  Learning Outcomes

. Something Happens

 Actions leading to specific, observable results  What students can expect to learn  How students or programs will be different as a result of what happens in the box  What knowledge, skills, and abilities will be improved  What measurable changes occur in tutoring programs

 Scope of assessment  ≥ 6 years  2 years  1 year  1 semester  1 course  1 assignment  1 tutoring session

 Planning for Assessment  Continual processes  Multiple times per semester  Once or twice per semester  Two or three times per year  Once per year  Every two years  Every 4 years

 Why Measure  What to measure  Before (Benchmarks)  During  After (Outcomes)

 How to measure  Program-generated data  Course-specific data  Campus data  Campus surveys  Standardized tools  Locally developed tools

 More about locally developed tools  Surveys  Likert-type scales  Explicated scales  Behavioral rubrics  Self assessment by student  Tutor assessment  Observer assessment

 Direct vs. Indirect Measures  Data access and consistency  Realistic limitations  Cooperation  The Baseline Challenge  Time & money (and staff and comfort and ……)

 Possible Areas of Assessment Focus  Establishing baselines  Usage  Satisfaction or quality  Level/variety of services  Staff development  Reaching certification or meeting standards

 Outcome Statement  As a result of the new marketing strategy, the number of students attending group tutoring sessions will increase by 10% in Spring  Timetable  One semester  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Average of past attendance  Ending Measure  Workshop attendance records

 Outcome Statement  During , the number of tutors who earn CRLA Level I certification will increase by 5%.  Timetable  One academic year  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Number of tutors achieving Level I in previous year(s)  Ending Measure  Number of tutors achieving Level I in

 Outcome Statement  Outside reviewers using the NADE self-study process will score the tutoring program at 85% or above on all sections.  Timetable  One year  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Internal review & self-study  Ending Measure  External review

 Outcome Statement  As a result of tutor training sessions, tutors will demonstrate an improved understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy.  Timetable  One semester or year, depending on training schedule  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Pre-test  Ending Measure  Post-test

TYPES  Affective  Build confidence  Improve attitude  Reduce anxiety  Cognitive  Mastery of material  Conscious strategies use MEASURES  Qualitative  Interviews & focus groups  Opinion surveys  Observations or self reports  Quantitative  Assignment & course grades  Instrument scores  Observation rubrics

 Outcome Statement  After being tutored for at least one hour, clients will be more confident in their ability to accomplish the academic task they focused on in tutoring.  Timetable  One tutoring session  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Client self-report  Ending Measure  Client self report

 Outcome Statement  Students who work with the study skills tutors will demonstrate an increased ability to use memorization strategies.  Timetable  One tutoring session  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Tutor or observer checklist  Ending Measure  Tutor or observer checklist

 Outcome Statement  75% of the students who work with a reading tutor for at least two sessions will score at least 75% on the main ideas reading test.  Timetable  Within three weeks  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Reading quiz at start of tutoring  Ending Measure  Chapter reading test in class

 Outcome Statement  Students who attend at least 10 group tutoring sessions for Algebra Review 090 will earn an average grade of B or above in the course.  Timetable  One semester, length of course  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Placement score into course  Ending Measure  Course grade

 Outcome Statement  After attending mandatory tutoring for all 5 of their developmental education courses, students will be retained until the start of their junior year at a rate at least 25% higher than developmental students for whom tutoring was not required.  Timetable  Two years  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Developmental course placement  Ending Measure  Enrollment level

 Outcome Statement  Students attending SI for World Religions will “[apply] previously understood information, concepts, and experiences to a new situation or setting.” (CAS)  Timetable  Within one semester  Starting Measure (Benchmark)  Pre-survey  Ending Measure  Post-survey

 Check with your institutional research or assessment office  Review early drafts of outcomes statements with your supervisor  Pre-test any locally created measurement tool  Be prepared for outcomes that are not met or wildly exceeded  Remember the black box: we do not own or control the box, and our ability to see into it is very limited