Andres Anzaldua Need Engaging Students Improving Assessment Scores Integrating Technology.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

 Students need to become more involved and engaged in lessons  Increase academic acheivement  Teachers need a way to assess students immediately.

Advertisements

Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.

Lesson Study Overview Unlocking Minds Preparing Osceola County Students for a Bright Future Gladys Moreta K-12 Program Specialist Curriculum & Instruction.

Diffusion and Integration of Technology in Education Cora Blades Walden University EDUC 7101 November 20, 2011.

Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.

Improving Sight Word Recognition

Improving Teaching and Learning For The Future..  Technology is becoming dominant aspect of our society (Harvey-Woodall, 2009).  Future occupations.

What Every SLMS Should Know about Collaborating with Other Literacy Professionals Prepared by the SLMS Role in Reading Task Force July 2009 July 2009.

Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2013/2014 Merriam Cherry Street.

SMART Board Shauna Cromwell. Need Education Education –People who used SMART technologies early on were mostly educators in need of giving lectures.

 SMART Technologies start off selling projectors. In the early nineties they wanted to create a product that would enable groups to interact and instantaneously.

1 Technology Integration in the Classroom Presented by: Samantha Thomas, Kathy West, Kimmie Gillespie.

Montgomery County Public Schools, Maryland Middle School Reform in Montgomery County Public Schools Linda Ferrell Director Director Middle School Instruction.

Interactive Whiteboards Shannon Burns-Casimier Dr. Robert Hancock Walden University August 2012.

Principal’s Forecast Tangipahoa Parish School System Leadership Focus Strategy June 2015 Gary T. Porter.

“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”

Cold Springs Middle. Our Kids at a Glance 1700 Students 6 th -8 th grade 50% ESL Students and Growing 50% Free and Reduced Lunch.

SMART Board Shauna Cromwell. Need Education Education –People who used SMART technologies early on were mostly educators in need of giving lectures at.

How does the “ActivClassroom” bring learning to life? INTERACTIVE WHITEBOARD.

A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.

Montgomery County R-II Schools November 8, 2012 School Board Report Title I Instructional Coaches introducing Mrs. Jeania Burton, Literacy Coach Mrs. MaryAnn.

Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.

Literacy Plan Kara Klokis and Carol Pippen Longwood University.

Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.

Storyboard for Video Presentation: Student/Learner Response Systems Sara Becker EDUC 7101.

FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.

Rose M. Martin-Turnage Diffusion and Integration of Educational Technology (EDUC ) Dr. Robert Hancock Walden University.

THE SMART BOARD. THE WORLD NEEDED INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY IN: EDUCATION-THE CLASSROOM BUSINESSES- GROUP MEETINGS GOVERNMENT- PRESENTATIONS ALSO SMARTBOARDS.

 Educators  Business  Government Organization:  Smart Technologies  Intel Corporation  Projector  Collaborative products for classrooms and meetings.

Diffusion of Innovation Multimedia Presentation SMART Board.

Interactive Whiteboards Charee Hampton EDUC Dr. Henry Pratt Walden University.

Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.

The Engaging Classroom: Interactive White Board Technology.

Diffusion of Innovation Multimedia Presentation SMART Board.

be.com/watch?v= kI8RRYTQKfM watch?v=_eFnzNw10Qc &feature=related ube.com/watch ?v=yFsUoGvJb DE&NR=1.

be.com/watch?v= kI8RRYTQKfM watch?v=_eFnzNw10Qc &feature=related ube.com/watch ?v=yFsUoGvJb DE&NR=1.

Walden University. By the year 2024 nearly 80% of learning will evolve through Distant Education. Online Learning Media & Technology Dynamic Communication.

Instruction and Technology December 10, What’s up? Preview of learning gains and Excel “how-to” Final touches in bringing your unit together – Bulletin.

TABLET TECHNOLOGY IN THE CLASSROOM. The uses of tablets in the classroom are an emerging technology that is challenging traditional pedagogy and school.

Cora Blades EDUC 8841 In the mid 1980's, Nancy Knowlton and David Martin brainstormed ideas that could make presentations, meetings and classroom activities.

SMART Boards A Multi-Media Presentation Created By Tawana Stiff EDUC Instructor: Dr. Amar Almasude.

Demonstration School LAWRENCE. Explanation of Support Assigned Executive Coach – Retired Administrator Forty Days of Coaching over 18 Months Unlimited.

Technology Integration Planning Guidelines for Development A Visual Guide.

Jeremy Gabborin IU28 PIIC Coaching Mentor

Literacy Plan Kara Klokis and Carol Pippen Longwood University.

Classroom Performance System (CPS) Lori Oren, EdS candidate Diffusion and Integration of Technology in Education, EDUC 7101/8841 Walden University Dec.

Eddie Martinez EDUC 533.  An innovation model is an opportunity to present a new way of teaching- with hopes that the new model will improve student.

Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,

Interactive Whiteboards Simone N. Millington-Motley Walden University.

Christopher Cannon EDUC Video games and electronic devices have found their way into many homes. Incorporating games into instruction makes sense.

PROMETHEAN BOARDS By Kaija Spencer EDUC 7102 : Diffusion and Integration of Educational Technology Instructor: Amar Almasude.

Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.

Ipod Project Initial Overview Training February 15, :30-5:30 PM (SEA #11 – 309 – Academic) Lenoir County Public Schools.

Storyboard for Diffusion and Integration of Educational Technology (EDUC ) Ametha Williams Walden University Amar Almasude.

“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.

Mock Board Meeting E. W. Chambliss Elementary School Grades K – 3 Diane Brown, Principal January 12, 2012 Home of The CES Tiger Cubs.

Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.

Question 1 Name an activity you can use with an interactive whiteboard.

SMART Board Shauna Cromwell. Need Education Education –People who used SMART technologies early on were mostly educators in need of giving lectures at.

MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.

SCHOOL DISTRICT UNIVERSITY COLLABORATIVE EFFORT (Educational Leadership Information Network K-12) is heavily involved in planning for school improvement,

Integrating SMART technology into the existing English Curriculum Michelle Weisgerber Northeast High School.

SMART Board Shauna Cromwell. Need Education Education –People who used SMART technologies early on were mostly educators in need of giving lectures at.

SMART Boards A Multi-Media Presentation Created By Tawana Stiff EDUC Instructor: Dr. Amar Almasude.

Personalized Learning

Mid-year Goals and Data Report

Making All Teachers Better Teachers for Students with Disabilities

Co-Teaching in the 21st Century

Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models

Presentation transcript:

Andres Anzaldua

Need Engaging Students Improving Assessment Scores Integrating Technology

Justification of SMART Boards Minimize Implementation Problems

Classrooms Interaction Meeting Rooms Team Work

Government Educators

Introduction and Presentation of SMART Boards Benefits Function Into-the-Classroom.htm

(SMART Technologies, 2008)

Create a Positive Attitude Colleague Speakers Research Findings 577F582262E1F5A 577F582262E1F5A

Research Advantages and Disadvantages Select Academic Team to Implement Technology

Professional Development Workshops Adaptation Support classroom.html %20products&Audience=Education&Budget=All%20budgets&Training%20Type =Live

Analyzing Data Evaluating Adaption Continuing Adaption Rejecting Adaption

1991 Introduction of SMART Boards 1998 Introduction of SMART Meeting Pro Software 2002 Introduction of SMART Ideas Concept – mapping software 2007 SMART earned Worlddidac Award year celebration 2008 SMART earned second Worlddidac Award 2005 Lunching of K-12 lesson activities 2000 Launching of Research Assistance Program 1992 Alliance with Intel Corporation 1986 Gestation of the SMART Boards Timeline

May 2013Aug Sep Oct Apr May 2014 Present to the principal Introduce SMART Board to teachers and set expectations for the school year Implementa- tion of SMART Boards and trainings for teachers Monitoring the implementation process Analysis of the effects of SMART Boards in state assess- ments

Change Agent Principal Team Leaders

Department Heads Administrators

Faculty Meetings Department Meetings Grade Level Meetings

Veteran Teachers

Addressing Students’ Needs Engaging Students Differentiating Instruction

Advantages Benefits

Centralized Approach Decentralized Approach

Andres Anzaldua Administrators

Relative Approach

Motivator Coach Facilitator

Mechling, L. C., Gast, D. L., & Krupa, K. (2007). Impact of SMART board technology: An investigation of sight word reading and observational learning. Journal Of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 37(10), doi: /s Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press. Schweder, W., Wissick, C. A., & Mounce, A. B. (2008). Teaching content with interactive white boards. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(1), SMART Technologies. (2008). Media releases: SMART leads interactive whiteboard category in education. Retrieved from dia+releases/English+US/Releases+by+year/2008+media+releases/ 2008/SMART+leads+interactive+whiteboard+category+in+educatio n dia+releases/English+US/Releases+by+year/2008+media+releases/ 2008/SMART+leads+interactive+whiteboard+category+in+educatio n SMART Technologies. (2008). SMART boards why are they so easy to use? Retrieved from

SMART Technologies. (2009). Media releases: SMART’s 2008 sales more than double its nearest competition. Retrieved from +releases/English+US/Releases+by+year/2009+media+releases/2009 /SMARTs+2008+sales+more+than+double+its+nearest+competition +releases/English+US/Releases+by+year/2009+media+releases/2009 /SMARTs+2008+sales+more+than+double+its+nearest+competition SMART Technologies. (2011). Media releases: SMART reports full year and fourth quarter 2011 financial results. Retrieved from SMART Technologies. (2012). Media releases: SMART reports full year and fourth quarter 2012 financial results. Retrieved from SMART Technologies. (2013). Media releases: SMART reports third quarter 2013 financial results. Retrieved from