TRENDS CONFERENCE OCTOBER 12, 2012 Developing Quality Online Courses for Successful Learning Experiences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND TRAINING Diversity, inclusion and participation.
Institutional Policy & Quality Matters Standards: The impact of policy on course quality Deb Adair, QM Director Sloan-C Conference November 9-11, 2011.
1 Distance Learning College Action Project UPDATE – September 22, 2011 Presented by: Eric Kunnen, M.A. Director, Distance Learning and Instructional Technologies.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Chapter Twelve - 12 Preparing for Tomorrow’s Challenges Instructional Technology and Media for Learning Presented By: Ms. Yohana Lopez.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
What should be the basis of
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
The New Initiative Michigan Student Success Network Mott Community College January 24, 2014.
CPD4k Skills Competitions, CIF & PS
The Accreditation: The Policies on Distance Learning.
Yes, You Can Raise Retention Rates in Online Courses Student Success Summit September 19, 2013.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
Franklin University Dr. Lewis Chongwony, Instructional Designer
MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
Technology Leadership
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
Accommodations in Oregon Oregon Department of Education Fall Conference 2009 Staff and Panel Presentation Dianna Carrizales ODE Mike Boyles Pam Prosise.
GSU Online Degree and Certificate Programs Preparation for North Central Association Accreditation Visit.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere.
Teachers and the Quality Imperative for EFA International Task Force on Teachers for EFA 6-7 July 2010 Amman, Jordan.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Asst. Prof. Thapanee Thammetar, Ph.D. Director of Thailand Cyber Univ. Quality Assurance, e-Learning content development and operation ASEAN-ROK Session.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Julie Maxwell-Jolly UC Davis Center for Applied Policy in Education (CAP-Ed)
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Recognition of Prior Learning for Individuals and Organisations Andy Gibbs October 2013.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Pedagogical Standards and Sustainable Distance Education Programming Karen Gersten Associate Provost for Academic Programs and Faculty Development Laura.
© 2012 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY T WENTY YEARS OF ENHANCING ONLINE STUDENT S UCCESS Amy Buechler-Steubing & Siri Sorensen Capella University – Learning Assistance.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
Inspection and Sustainable Development Melanie Hunt Director, Learning & Skills.
MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
MCCVLC – Providing Educational Access, Anytime, Anywhere MIACADA 2009 Conference May 11, 2009 Lansing Community College.
October 20 – November 6, 2014 Alovidin Bakhovidinov Alina Batkayeva
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
Expand Your Online Course Catalogue with a Capacity Building Approach Barbara Treacy, EDC/EdTech Leaders Online Tracy Sanders, South Carolina Virtual School.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Benefits of a Course Alignment Matrix: Avoid Ending up Someplace Else
Assurance in Open and Distance eLearning
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Atta Girl/Boy: Acing your Accreditation Review
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Presentation transcript:

TRENDS CONFERENCE OCTOBER 12, 2012 Developing Quality Online Courses for Successful Learning Experiences

Today’s Agenda Research to support Quality Initiatives Quality Toolbox Examples Questions and opportunities

Why Students Stay Personal variables – demographics, academic skills, motivation, commitment, locus of control (Rotter 1966, Parker 1999, Kember 1995) Institutional variables – academic, bureaucratic and institutional social variables (Willis 1994, Alexander, McKenzie, and Geissinger 1998) Circumstantial – socio-economic, academic interactions, social interactions and life situation.

Why Students Drop Students do not feel connected with the course, instructor or fellow classmates (Braxton, et. Al., 1997) Faculty are not responsive to student needs (Herbert, 1994) “Affiliation is the key to the development of a learning community” (Palloff & Pratt, 2001)

Why Students Drop Time constraints, lack of motivation, technical difficulties, inadequate student support services, poorly designed courses have been identified as reasons why adult learners drop out. (Frankola, 2001)

Why Students Drop Students indicate that poor course design, not understanding new medium, lack of consideration of learning styles and no support systems are reasons why they drop out (Frontline Group 2001) Inexperienced instructors have been identified as a reason why adult learners drop out. (Frankola, 2001) Not feeling connected to other students is cited as a major reason for students dropping out of online education. (Link & Scholtz, 2000)

What We Need To Be Aware Of The Higher Learning Commission – Guidelines for the Evaluation of Distance Education Programs  Developed with the Council of Regional Accrediting Commissions  Based on General Accounting Office, Evidence of Quality in Distance Education drawn from Interviews with the Accreditation Community, and  “Best Practice Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity in Online Education,” prepared by WCET.  Nine Hallmarks of Quality

HLC Guidelines On-line learning is appropriate to the institution’s mission and purposes.  The mission statement explains the role of on-line learning within the range of the institution’s programs and services.  The students enrolled in the institution's on-line learning courses and programs fit the profile of the students the institution intends to serve.  Senior administrators and staff can articulate how on-line learning is consonant with the institution's mission and goals.

HLC Guidelines The institution's plans for developing, sustaining and, if appropriate, expanding on-line learning offerings are integrated into its regular planning and evaluation processes.  Plans for on-line learning are linked effectively to budget and technology planning to ensure adequate support for current and future offerings. On-line learning is incorporated into the institution’s systems of governance and academic oversight.  On-line learning courses and programs are evaluated on a periodic basis.

HLC Guidelines Curricula for the institution's on-line learning offerings are coherent, cohesive, and comparable in academic rigor to programs offered in traditional instructional formats.  Course design and delivery supports student-student and faculty-student interaction.  Curriculum design and the course management system enable active faculty contribution to the learning environment.  Course and program structures provide schedule and support known to be effective in helping online learning students persist and succeed.

HLC Guidelines The institution evaluates the effectiveness of its on- line learning offerings, including the extent to which the on-line learning goals are achieved, and uses the results of its evaluations to enhance the attainment of the goals.  The institution sets appropriate goals for the retention/persistence of students using on-line learning, assesses its achievement of these goals, and uses the results for improvement.

HLC Guidelines Faculty responsible for delivering the on-line learning curricula and evaluating the students’ success in achieving the on-line learning goals are appropriately qualified and effectively supported.  On-line learning faculties are carefully selected, appropriately trained, frequently evaluated, and are marked by an acceptable level of turnover.  The institution's training program for on-line learning faculty is periodic, incorporates tested good practices in on-line learning pedagogy, and ensures competency with the range of software products used by the institution.

HLC Guidelines The institution provides effective student and academic services to support students enrolled in online learning offerings.  The institution provides an on-line learning orientation program. The institution provides sufficient resources to support and, if appropriate, expand its on-line learning offerings The institution assures the integrity of its on-line learning offerings.

Action to Impact Retention & Success MCCVLC Online Course Development Guidelines and Rubric  Developed using guidelines and documents from:  The American Council on Education,  The Higher Education Program and Policy Council of the American Federation of Teachers,  The North Central Association Higher Learning Commission,  American Association of Higher Education, and  The Michigan Virtual University.

Purpose of Guidelines and Rubric Institutions  developing online courses of quality.  Assure articulation agreements can be used without additional scrutiny. Faculty  issues they need to address when developing online courses.  Used as a self-assessment tool. Students  Assure we are providing them with exceptional learning experiences. All  Used as a guide to review online courses after they are developed.

Course Outcomes Are they clearly stated?  None, Some or All  Application Level or above Are they observable, measurable and achievable?  None, Some or All  Instructor and Student Are they closely correlated with real world performance expectations?  None, Some or All  Extended beyond educational context

Course Construction Course content, outcomes, practice and assessment are consistent. Course materials are presented to accommodate multiple learning styles. Presentation of content fosters active learning opportunities. Course design includes the necessary components of successful instruction at the module/lesson level. Course instructions and definitions are clear.

Course Interaction Are course interaction requirements clearly stated? Are a variety of opportunities designed for interaction between instructor-student? Are clear standards set for instructors' response to students? Are learning activities developed to foster instructor-student, student-content and, where appropriate, student-student interaction?

Course Assessment Are assessment methods appropriate to the outcomes, activities and technologies? Are assessments of student learning timely, appropriate and responsive to the needs of the individual learner? Are assessments of student achievement conducted by comparing student performance to the intended learning outcomes? Are policies and procedures designed to ensure the integrity of the student's work? Are students' achievement of learning outcomes documented?

Course Technologies Are technologies employed in ways that are appropriate for the course outcomes? Are student minimum technology requirements accurately and clearly stated?

Course Resources Are they accessible to the learners (all downloads are identified and made available to student)? Are they in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act? Are reading levels for instructional materials identified?

Course Maintenance Are courses evaluated regularly to determine if the learning design is effective - in terms of the student and instruction components? Are plans in place for continual review and improvement of courses?

Course Development and Support Are faculty provided with appropriate training and technical support? Are faculty able to access appropriate technical infrastructure? Are qualified instructional designers given an appropriate role in course development?

Thank You! Questions   Opportunities  MCCVLC ( )  Curriculum Development  Events (Webinar Series)  ETOM ( )  Online Teaching Certification and Advanced Certification  Events (e.g. Fall Conference)