TDWG Annual Conference 2013, Florence Hannu Saarenmaa University of Eastern Finland Integrating observation and survey data for production of the Essential.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Infrastructures WP 2012 Call 10 e-Infrastructures part Topics: Construction of new infrastructures (or major upgrades) – implementation.
Advertisements

Maines Sustainability Solutions Initiative (SSI) Focuses on research of the coupled dynamics of social- ecological systems (SES) and the translation of.
EDIT General Meeting Carvoeiro, January 2008.
UPGRADE BS-SCENE Up-Grade Black Sea scientific network (INFRA) ENVIROGRIDS Building Capacity for a Black Sea Catchment Observation and Assessment (Environment)
Multidisciplinary interoperability To build Operating Capacity Initial (IOC): extend current GEO IP3/AIP-2 interoperability systems in Forest, Biodiversity,
EMECO-NOOS Planning Meeting June Background and Rationale Dave Mills Cefas.
Hannu Saarenmaa – University of Eastern Finland GEO BON, WG8 – Data Integration and Interoperability EU BON, WP2 – Data Integration and Interoperability.
Vision and Ambition for LifeWatch ICT Infrastructure Axel Poigné (Fraunhofer IAIS) Vera Hernández-Ernst (Fraunhofer IAIS) Alex Hardisty (Cardiff University)
BIS TDWG Conference 29 October 2014, Jönköping, Sweden Publishing sample-based data using Darwin Core Archives Éamonn Ó Tuama, Markus Döring, Kyle Braak,
BLUE GROWTH CALL AREA 3 : Ocean observation systems and technologies Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge 2 Info Day 17/01/2014 Dr Efthimios ZAGORIANAKOS.
EU BON citizen science gateway Veljo Runnel University of Tartu Natural History Museum.
Eye on Earth (EoE), Citizen Science and the Invasive Alien Species project Malene Bruun NRC’s for EIS June 17, 2011.
BIS TDWG Conference 28 October 2013, Florence Documenting data quality in a global network: the challenge for GBIF Éamonn Ó Tuama, Andrea Hahn, Markus.
MBON in the Global Community Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters (with thanks to Frank Muller-Karger for several slides) April 24, 2015.
RDA Wheat Data Interoperability Working Group Outcomes RDA Outputs P5 9 th March 2015, San Diego.
WP5 Strategy Domenico Giardini SED ETHZ. WP5 Objectives Harmonize national implementation Integrate the European scientific community Establish Centres.
1 Implementing GEO-BON: Plans for monitoring terrestrial biodiversity at the species level Henrique Miguel Pereira Center for Environmental Biology, University.
Fourth Annual Summit | Feb | Tucson, AZ Scratchpads for community involvement for natural history collections Dr Dimitris Koureas Biodiversity.
Species Banks a GBIF mechanism to provide electronic access to quality species information Peter H. Schalk, Marc Brugman ETI, University of Amsterdam Tinde.
STRENGTHENING the AFRICA ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION NETWORK An AMCEN initiative A framework to support development planning processes and increase access.
European Life Sciences Infrastructure for Biological Information ELIXIR
1 Common Challenges Across Scientific Disciplines Laurence Field CERN 18 th November 2013.
Resource Identification for a Biological Collection Information Service in Europe An introduction to the BioCISE project Walter G. Berendsohn Botanical.
European Nodes Meeting 2013 Wednesday 6 – 8 March Joensuu Finland Update on GBIF engagement issues Olaf Bánki Senior Programme Officer for Participation.
Prepared for the 3rd SBB telecon 20 Mar 2012 Michele Walters, BI-01 task coordinator.
Information and international biodiversity conventions Eliezer Frankenberg Nature and Parks Authority.
GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION FACILITY TDWG 2009, Montpelier, November 12, 2009 Dag Endresen (NordGen)Samy Gaiji (GBIF) Dag Endresen (NordGen) & Samy.
Standards and tools for publishing biodiversity data Yu-Huang Wang June 25, 2012.
Digitization of Natural History Collections (DIGIT) Larry Speers Program Officer Digitization of Natural History Collections Data TDWG Annual Meeting Oct.
Definition of an Observation In general, an observation represents the measurement of some attribute, of some thing, at a particular time and place. Observations.
A Provisional Observational Data Standard to Facilitate Data Sharing and Aggregation Lynn Kutner, Bruce Stein, and Donna Reynolds TDWG Annual Meeting,
Suggestions for the GEOSS Workplan C. Waldmann and R. Huber MARUM, Germany.
LifeWatch E-Science and Observatory Infrastructure for Biodiversity & Ecosystem Science Olaf Bánki.
Results of a Needs Assessment Survey of the Global Invasive Species Information Network Biodiversity Information Standards- Taxonomic Databases Working.
European Network for Biodiversity Information. Why ENBI ?
Gary GELLER NASA Ecological Forecasting Program Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology NASA Biodiversity Meeting Alexandria, VA 6.
Acronym Soup GBIF, TDWG & GUIDs Jerry Cooper. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Established in 2000 through non-binding MOU (25 countries.
 Milestones  Framework  Synthesis  CoML Legacies  Synthesis  Tasks CoML Benchmarks & Goals.
Integration and Reshaping of the Infrastructure Basis Work Package 3 Wouter Los & WP3 collaborators.
GBIFS Seminar with the Science Committee and the Nodes Strategy Group Analysis of the content published by the GBIF network – Better understanding what’s.
GEOBON Report of the breakout session. Challenge to GEO The global biodiversity community is coming together because of GEO bringing global tasks and.
Project number: ENVRI and the Grid Wouter Los 20/02/20161.
Splinter Session 1a : Identify topics Europe would like to have included in the GEO WP Chair: Luigi Fusco, ESA Reporting: Luca Demicheli, EuroGeoSurveys.
Introductory remarks Wouter Los LifeWatch Infrastructure for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research.
The Global Scene Wouter Los University of Amsterdam The Netherlands.
NVS New Zealand National Vegetation Survey. What is NVS? NVS (National Vegetation Survey) – New Zealand’s largest archive facility for plot-based vegetation.
Nordic Cooperation on Biodiversity Informatics Hannu Saarenmaa NordBIN meeting Uppsala /03.
GEOSS EVs workshop Bari, 11 – 12 June 2015, Biodiversity: EBVs versus policies Christoph L. Häuser Museum für Naturkunde – Leibniz Institute for Evolution.
12 th Meeting of the GBIF Participant Nodes Committee 6-7 October 2013, Berlin, Germany Data mobilization and use for international policy Olaf Bánki Senior.
COST Action and European GBIF Nodes Anne-Sophie Archambeau.
Sample-based data publication; reflections on semantics and logic 1(1) Hanna - GBIF Finland Lepidoptera collection of Hannu SaarenmaaPublicNo (but DwC.
Geo-energy Test Beds: part of the European Plate Observing System Michael H. Stephenson, David Schofield, Chris Luton, Florian Haslinger, Jan Henninges.
Biodiversity.europa.eu BISE EEA and ETC/BD Rania Spyropoulou.
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
GBIF Implementation Plan Highlights
Themes in Geosciences.
INTAROS WP5 Data integration and management
Essential Biodiversity Variables: towards an agreement on a common approach for biodiversity Rob Jongman, Wageningen UR Henrique Pereira, University of.
Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ)
EC FP7 - Cooperation Theme 6: Environment (incl. climate change)
Citizen Science’s contribution to GEO BON
Bringing Organism Observations Into Bioinformatics Networks
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
LifeWatch Cloud Computing Workshop
EMBRC - European Marine Biological Resource Center K. Deneudt, I. Nardello Pilot Blue Cloud Workshop March 28th, 2017 Brussels.
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
Bird of Feather Session
  1-A) How would Arctic science benefit from an improved GIS?
My name is VL, I work at the EEA, on EA, and particularly on developing a platform of exchange which aims at facilitating the planning and development.
Presentation transcript:

TDWG Annual Conference 2013, Florence Hannu Saarenmaa University of Eastern Finland Integrating observation and survey data for production of the Essential Biodiversity Variables – the EU BON approach

Main objective of EU BON  building a European contribution to GEO BON A key feature of EU BON delivery of relevant biodiversity information and analysis – from on-ground / in-situ observation and remote sensing – to various stakeholders and end users, ranging from local to global levels The new, integrative EU BON approach will facilitate (political) decisions in different sectors concerned with biodiversity for human well-being at different levels, ranging from local park management to national governments, and IPBES.

gap analysis for available data layers at different scales, mainly in/for Europe (WP1) strategies for targeted data mobilization (WP1) new and improved data standards for advancing interoperability and new generation of data provider tools (WP2) new, scalable/customized European Biodiversity Portal (WP2 / WP8) software tools for improved recording / mapping of habitats, species distributions and patterns (WP3) Improved models for impacts of different drivers on abundance & distribution, applicable at different scales (WP4) guidelines for improved, integrated monitoring schemes at different scales / levels (WP4) EU BON outputs and products (1)

EU BON and GEO BON: Integration of biodiversity data – across realms Collections Observations Surveys Remote sensing Statistics Biologic / socioeconomic

Conceived by GEO BON Collaborators (Pereira et.al. (2013) “Essential Biodiversity Variables”, Science, Vol. 339, 18 Jan 2013) EBVs facilitate data integration by providing an intermediate abstraction layer between primary observations and indicators. EBVs aim to help observation communities harmonise monitoring, by identifying how variables should be sampled and measured. EBVs standardise an ontology for biodiversity and harmonise measurements, observations, and protocols. Endorsed by Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and in line with the 2020 Aichi Targets Provide focus for GEO BON and hence for the interoperability thrust within GEO BON A Use Case for EU BON to focus on Essential Biodiversity Variables

Achillea millefolium According to GBIF visualising data gaps… Is this the reality in biodiversity monitoring?

Coordination of biodiversity observation CBD Adequacy Report: Observation systems related to the state of biodiversity all have significant global-scale observation systems, typically with national or better resolution, already in place. There are deficiencies in the evenness of global coverage and data quality, and some of the observations are too narrow in scope, but in the opinion of the experts, fit-for-purpose adequacy is technically achievable in all cases if sufficient resources are made available. EU BON description of work: The fragmentation and heterogeneity of environmental datasets and biodiversity observation systems remains a major challenge... Data-collection and observation systems are unbalanced in terms of geographic, temporal, topical, and taxonomic coverage. Information currently available differs across countries and continents due to their different traditions in, and societal frameworks for biodiversity monitoring, and is often heavily biased towards easily recognizable and high profile taxa. Terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments are studied and monitored by largely different independent communities, rarely sharing concepts, data or infrastructures.

Gap analysis EU BON is carrying out a gap analysis Data gap is a gap only in context of data use. Not same as data quality. In Europe there are about 2000 biodiversity observation networks (643 listed in EUMON) There is a massive duplication of effort in data management, and lack of data sharing

Change the way we are dealing with data Data generator User Data generator User Data storage Data storage Data generator User Data generator User Data generators User Data generators User Data generators User Data generators User Data storage Data storage Data storage Data storage Data storage Data storage Tool Interdisciplinary challenges Data infrastructure Support services Slide by courtesy of Wouter Los

Domestic storage Bring it to a Bank Direct transfer To a Bank Develop trust Slide by courtesy of Wouter Los

European vision of a collaborative Data Infrastructure Data Generators Data Generators Users Community Support Services Persistant storage, identification, authencity, workflow execution Data discovery & navigation, workflow generation, annotation, interpretability User functionalities, data capture and transfer, virtual research environments Trust & Curation Slide by courtesy of Wouter Los

LifeWatch architecture Virtual laboratories for scientific cooperation Select the data, software, computing power Integrate resources Linking to resources (databases, sensors, software, computing power) Slide by courtesy of Wouter Los

Sampling Event (DC) -Date Time -Agents -Methods MeasurementOrFact; DwC) -Attribute (examples: identification, quantity) -Value (examples: Aus beus, 1000) -Unit (examples: species, count) -Range (examples: certain, 200) Locality (GML, shared, external) -UUID Sampling Object – popular fields from DwC, VegCore, O&M which are not practical to put in MeasurementOrFacts, in classes such as: -Organism occurrence, vouchered specimen, image -Plot, subplot, transect -Instrument, machine Project or Survey (EML) -Protocol Taxon (DwC, shared external checklist) -UUID Need to reorganise our data standards to fit in common data services Collection or Experimental Site (shared, external)

New generation of data sharing tools Common data services will be based on networked data repositories and few portals. Repostories need to support basic biodiversity data, AND ecological measurements, AND [what?] Based on existing tools GBIF IPT: Beyond a fixed ”star schema” to a flexible relational model Metacat: Start requiring use of standard terms in data Both need to implement an extended Darwin Core standard EU BON is working on a review of standards

Thank you very much for your attention