Channel Sounding for ay

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1196r1 Submission Data Rate and Spectrum Requirements for IEEE aj (45 GHz) Date: Authors: Haiming Wang (SEU)Slide.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0272r0 Submission February 2011 Ron Porat, Broadcom Outdoor Path Loss Models for ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0296r0 March 2015 Cagatay Capar, EricssonSlide 1 Long range indoor channel measurements for the 60 GHz band Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0436r0 Submission February 2011 Mediatek Path Loss and Delay Spread Models for 11ah Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Doc.: IEEE /0685r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Channel Measurements Plan Proposal for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0636r0 May 2015 SangHyun Chang (Samsung Electronics)Slide 1 A View on IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0614r01 May 2015 NG60 channel modeling plan Slide 1Alexander Maltsev, Intel Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone Alexander.
Channel Sounding for ay
Submission doc.: IEEE /0329r0 Channel Sounding for NG60 Date: Authors: Slide 1.
NG60 channel modeling plan
July 2015 doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 July 2015
Doc.: IEEE /0323r0 SubmissionRon Porat, BroadcomSlide 1 Views on ah Use Cases Date: Authors: March 2011.
A Study into the Theoretical Appraisal of the Highest Usable Frequencies RA Contract AY 4329.
Doc.: IEEE c Submission January 2006 Slide 1 Hiroyo Ogawa, NICT Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0402r2 Submission May 2012 Haiming Wang, Xiaoming PengSlide 1 Date: Authors: Overview of CWPAN SG5 QLINKPAN.
Doc.: IEEE /1152r0 Submission November 2009 Tian-Wei Huang, National Taiwan UniversitySlide 1 60-GHz Living-Room Channel Measurements Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0586r0 May 2014 Igal Kotzer, General MotorsSlide 1 Automotive Considerations for the Simulation Scenarios Date: 12-May-2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0364r1 SubmissionEldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Date: Authors: Antenna Array Gain from Measured Data for n/ac.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0416r1 Slide 1 Broadband Indoor TVWS Channel Measurement and Characterization at 670 MHz Date: Mar 2012 Ming-Tuo.
Discussion on MU-MIMO based on Hybrid Beamforming System in ay
Submission doc.: /1320r00 Bo, Sun (ZTE Corp), et al Slide 1 11aj 45GHz Link Budget for use cases discussion Date: Authors: Nov 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2015 Camillo Gentile, NISTSlide 1 NIST Preliminary Channel Measurements at 83 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: d Stochastic Channel Model for Wireless Data Center Submission Match 2015 Bile Peng (TU Braunschweig). Slide 1 Project: IEEE P
Submission doc.: IEEE /1094 Overview and discussion about the next steps for ay channel modeling Date: Authors: Slide 1.
11ay Functional Requirements for Multi-Hop, Backhaul, and Fronthaul
Doc.: IEEE /1044r0 Submission September 2008 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 60 GHz WLAN Experimental Investigations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0133r0 Submission January 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Submission doc.: IEEE 19-15/0084r0 Nov 2015 Igal Kotzer, General MotorsSlide 1 On The Intra-Vehicle Channel Model Date: 21-Oct-2015 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /278r1-SG3a Submission 7/04/ :52 PM Saeed S. Ghassemzadeh, Vahid Tarokh Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2008 Vinko Erceg, BroadcomSlide 1 VHT 60 GHz Channel Model Recommendation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /327 Submission July 2002 Intel Research and Development Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE Submission Nov 2014 Link Budget Analysis for 40-50GHz Indoor Usage Date: Authors: Slide 1Jianhan Liu, Mediatek Inc.
Submission doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 July 2015 Camillo Gentile, NISTSlide 1 NIST Preliminary Channel Measurements at 83 GHz Date: YYYY-MM-DD Authors:
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1121r0 Submission November 2009 I. Siaud, Orange LabsSlide 1 Path Loss Models for TGad Channel Models: Antenna and Dispersion Impact.
IEEE q Submission Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Channel.
Doc.: IEEE /313r0 Submission May 2003 Val Rhodes, Cliff Prettie, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Intel SISO/MIMO WLAN Channel Propagation Results Val Rhodes.
March 2016 doc.: IEEE / ay SubmissionCamillo Gentile, NISTSlide 1 NIST Channel Model for Conference Room at 83 GHz Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0015r1 Submission Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement Authors/contributors: Date: Presenter:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1144 September 2015 Simulation Scenarios for TGay PHY Layer Evaluation Methodology Slide 1Alexander Maltsev, Intel Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0668r0 Analysis of Intra-Cluster Effects Using Pencil Beam Antennas Date: Authors: Slide 1 NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0664r0 Submission May 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Technische Universität Ilmenau
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
On the Suitability of Repetition for ah
Small-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
60 GHz Cubicle Wall Reflectivity
<month year> doc.: IEEE c January, 2006
Summery of Channel Measurement for the ay Channel Model Document
Technische Universität Ilmenau
6-10GHz Rate-Range and Link Budget
Potential TGbb task group documents
<month year> doc.: IEEE c January, 2006
Large-Scale Characteristics of 45 GHz Based on Channel Measurement
Overview of CWPAN SG5 QLINKPAN
Link Budget Analysis Date: Authors: November 2015
Outdoor measurement for a rooftop to street scenario at 60 GHz
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Proposed Merge of Simulation Scenarios
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Mar 2016
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
<month year> IEEE Jan
Presentation transcript:

Channel Sounding for 802.11ay October 2014 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Channel Sounding for 802.11ay Date: 2015-07-14 Authors: John Doe, Some Company

October 2014 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Abstract In this presentation, we show the first 60 GHz ultra-wide- band measurement results at a large entrance hall scenario. We show that the coverage of 60 GHz can be very large. Another points which we like to discuses are the calibration problems of the AGC. We like also to discuss the requirements for the outdoor measurement campaigns. John Doe, Some Company

Outline Motivation 60 GHz Entrance Hall Measurements Measurement results Result discussion Conclusion

Motivation ISM-band at 60 GHz Free and wide bandwidth available (up to 7 GHz) WLAN/WiGig (.11ad) and WPAN (.15.3.c) Advanced system concepts  define measurement and modelling requirements Massive MIMO/pencil beam-forming  large spatial bandwidth Adaptive or switched selection beam-forming to mitigate shadowing Channel bonding  large bandwidth Propagation channel measurements Double directional measurements are needed to characterized the full channel Polarization is an important aspect High dynamic range are essential to measure the different propagation effects Channel characterization for different usage cases

Summary of Measurement Activities # Applications and Characteristics Propagation conditions Experimental setup description Responsible companies 1 Ultra Short Range (USR) Communications -Static,D2D, -Streaming/Downloading   LOS only, Indoor <10cm TBD 2 8K UHD Wireless Transfer at Smart Home -Umcompressed 8K UHD Streaming Indoor, LOS with small NLOS chance, <5m Living room environment, 8 TX by 16 RX, stationary NIST 3 Augmented Reality/Virtual Reality Headsets and Other High-End Wearables -Low Mobility, D2D -3D UHD streaming Indoor, LOS with small NLOS chance <10m Living room environment, 8 TX by 16 RX, non-stationary 4 Data Center 11ay Inter-Rack Connectivity -Indoor Backhaul with multi-hop* Indoor, LOS only Server room environment, 8 TX by 16  RX, stationary 5 Video/Mass-Data Distribution/Video on Demand System - Multicast Streaming/Downloading - Dense Hotspots Indoor, LOS/NLOS <100m Entrance large hall, lecture room Huawei, Intel 6 Mobile Offloading and Multi-Band Operation (MBO) -Multi-band/-Multi-RAT Hotspot operation Indoor/Outdoor, LOS/NLOS Indoor: Entrance large hall/ Outdoor: Above roof top to street level Huawei 7 Mobile Fronthauling Outdoor, LOS <200m Above roof top to street level 8 Wireless Backhauling -Small Cell Backhauling with single/multi-hop Single hop: outdoor, LOS <1km Multi hop: Outdoor, LOS <150m Above roof top, street level

60 GHz Entrance Hall Measurements Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 60 GHz Entrance Hall Measurements John Doe, Some Company

Dual Polarimetric Ultra-Wideband Channel Sounder (DP-UMCS) Multiplier X8 PA min. 23 dBm 7 GHz Oscillator LNA Gain : 35 dB UWB Sounder RX 0 – 3.5 GHz 3.5 GHz - 10.5 GHz H Pol. V Pol. CH 1 CH 2 Switch TX Module RX Module 56 - 66 GHz PA min. 23dBm Step Attenuator UWB Sounder TX Optical link Step Attenuator 7 GHz BW up to 10 GHz measurable bandwidth Maximum excess delay of 606 ns (180 m) in CS version 1 Dual polarization measurement capability 25 dB AGC (Automatic Gain Control) with 3.5 dB steps High instantaneous dynamic range: up to 75 dB Multi-Link and Massive MIMO capabilities Double directional measurements (with 1 TX and 2 RX)

Entrance Hall Scenario Dimensions: 7 x 25m x 9m Class and metal 3 different floors

Entrance Hall Scenario Entrance Hall of Zuse – Bau at TU Ilmenau 1 Tx Positions (1 Tx in the ground floor) 9 Rx Positions (all in the ground floor)   Tx 1 Rx 14 Rx 10 Rx 4 Rx 9           Rx 2 Rx 3       Rx 1 Rx 2 Rx 1  

Measurement Set-Up Frequency range: Static access point scenario Tx: Located on the side of the wall Height from ground 2.5 m 30°HBW of the antenna Rx: Located at several points in the hall Height 1.4m Frequency range: 57.3 GHz – 64 GHz Scanning at Tx and Rx stage via positioners Tx: Azimuth -90°... 30° 90° Elevation -90°…30°…90° Rx: Azimuth -180°…30°…150° A B C + -   Tx X Rx 1 2.8m 5m Rx 2 Rx 3 Rx 4 Azimuth 0° Rx 9     Rx 10 Azimuth 0°   Rx 14   Rx 12   Rx 13

Measurement results

Data Set Data set Output of the channel sounder: ℎ 𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑙 𝑥,𝑦 𝜏 𝑙 , 𝜙 𝑖 𝑇𝑥 , 𝜃 𝑗 𝑇𝑥 , 𝜙 𝑘 𝑅𝑥 ∈ ℂ Where: x: Tx polarization (in direction of 𝜙 𝑖 𝑇𝑥 or 𝜃 𝑗 𝑇𝑥 ) y: Rx polarization (in direction of 𝜙 𝑘 𝑅𝑥 or 𝜃 𝑘 𝑅𝑥 ) 𝜏 𝑙 : 𝑙 𝑡ℎ delay sample 𝜙 𝑖 𝑇𝑥 : 𝑖 𝑡ℎ Tx azimuth position 𝜃 𝑗 𝑇𝑥 : 𝑗 𝑡ℎ Tx elevation position 𝜙 𝑘 𝑅𝑥 : 𝑘 𝑡ℎ Rx azimuth position

Data Pre-processing Calibration 2 steps calibration: Deconvolution + windowing with the UWB units back to back calibration Deconvolution with the in-situ LOS measurement calibration to eliminate antenna and up / down converter effects Noise floor estimation and removal Samples lower than the noise floor + 10dB are set to zero ℎ 𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑙 𝑥,𝑦 ℎ 𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑙 𝑥,𝑦 if 10 log 10 ℎ 𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑙 𝑥,𝑦 2 >N F dB +10 dB 0 a.o.c.

Tx 1 – Rx 1 pLOS Normalized Power Elevation / Azimuth Profile at Tx Normalized Power Azimuth / Azimuth Profile at Tx and Rx

Tx 1 – Rx 9 NLOS Normalized Power Elevation / Azimuth Profile at Tx Normalized Power Azimuth / Azimuth Profile at Tx and Rx

Tx 1 – Rx 12 pLOS Normalized Power Elevation / Azimuth Profile at Tx Normalized Power Azimuth / Azimuth Profile at Tx and Rx

Tx 1 – Rx 13 NLOS Normalized Power Elevation / Azimuth Profile at Tx Normalized Power Azimuth / Azimuth Profile at Tx and Rx

Power Angular Profile of all Receivers The azimuth plane have a bigger impact than the elevation plane on the Path loss of the 60 GHz channel But we use here antennas withe a 3dB beamwidth of 30°

Calculation Power Delay Profile 𝑃 𝜏 = 1 𝐼𝐽 𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑥,𝑦 ℎ 𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑙 𝑥,𝑦 𝜏 𝑙 , 𝜙 𝑖 𝑇𝑥 , 𝜃 𝑗 𝑇𝑥 , 𝜙 𝑘 𝑅𝑥 2

PDP Tx 1 Power Delay Profile Rx 1 Power Delay Profile Rx 2

PDP Tx 1 Power Delay Profile Rx 9 Power Delay Profile Rx 10

What is the right unambiguous range for 60 GHz measurements?

List of Parameters  Tx Rx LOS / NLOS DS [ns] MED [ns] AS at Tx [°] ES at Tx [°] AS at Rx [°] Rx Energy [dB] 1 pLOS 27,04 173,18 71,59 55,42 86,03 8,23 2 33,53 207,25 67,40 54,67 79,68 7,69 3 39,87 160,59 64,29 47,97 84,16 7,47 4 40,97 154,81 66,35 49,44 77,66 9,19 9 NLOS 28,10 116,14 53,50 41,22 73,38 2,77 10 44,08 213,62 69,15 46,17 80,89 2,68 12 34,99 160,14 52,91 43,71 36,17 3,35 13 58,35 200,00 70,25 50,74 34,47 -3,01 14 25,44 114,07 50,89 59,07 73,19 9,85 DS: delay spread. Calculated with a dynamic range of 20 dB. MED: maximum excess delay. Calculated with a dynamic range of 20 dB. AS: azimuth spread (at the Rx calculated for the cyclic angles since 360°measurements were available). ES: elevation spread. Rx Energy: un-calibrated data The AGC was not full de-embedded (only the theoretical values)

Result discussion Double directional measurements All was full polarimetric 9 positions The azimuth plane at Tx has a greater impact on the power Delay spread For LOS is the DS with a threshold of 20 dB smaller than 40ns For NLOS is the DS with a threshold of 20 dB smaller than 60ns Maximum Access Delay For LOS is the DS with a threshold of 20 dB smaller than 210ns For NLOS is the DS with a threshold of 20 dB smaller than 220ns Measurement issues AGC calibration wasn’t performed  problems in the Insitu calibration with the high power Only azimuth scan at the RX Outdoor measurement with 1 TX and 2 RX and azimuth and elevation scan on booth side

Conclusion/Discussion We present 60 GHz entrance hall measurements Measurement bandwidth of 7 GHz  analysis of channel bonding possible The capability of MIMO measurements The unambiguous range (606 ns) of the CS system is to small for this scenarios Polarization effects are clearly visible Next Steps Extension of the calibration  AGC calibration for dual pol. waveguide systems Outdoor: Above roof top to street level measurements How many measurement points are required/meaningful?  measuring time Which resolution for the azimuth and elevation scan? measuring time Which range for the azimuth and elevation for the different scenarios are useful?  measuring time 5G systems at mm-wave require SNR optimisation  and this will be only done with dual polarisation