Experimental study of the effects of Transmission Power Control and Blacklisting in Wireless Sensor Networks Dongjin Son, Bhaskar Krishnamachari and John.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Directed Diffusion for Wireless Sensor Networking
Advertisements

Shi Bai, Weiyi Zhang, Guoliang Xue, Jian Tang, and Chonggang Wang University of Minnesota, AT&T Lab, Arizona State University, Syracuse University, NEC.
A 2 -MAC: An Adaptive, Anycast MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Hwee-Xian TAN and Mun Choon CHAN Department of Computer Science, School of Computing.
Maximum Battery Life Routing to Support Ubiquitous Mobile Computing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks By C. K. Toh.
Sec-TEEN: Secure Threshold sensitive Energy Efficient sensor Network protocol Ibrahim Alkhori, Tamer Abukhalil & Abdel-shakour A. Abuznied Department of.
Understanding Packet Delivery Performance in Dense Wireless Sensor Networks Jerry Zhao & Ramesh Govindan SenSys ‘03.
Network Layer Routing Issues (I). Infrastructure vs. multi-hop Infrastructure networks: Infrastructure networks: ◦ One or several Access-Points (AP) connected.
Monday, June 01, 2015 ARRIVE: Algorithm for Robust Routing in Volatile Environments 1 NEST Retreat, Lake Tahoe, June
Background In designing communication protocols for use in wireless sensor networks, one must consider the limitations of wireless systems in general:
PORT: A Price-Oriented Reliable Transport Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Yangfan Zhou, Michael. R. Lyu, Jiangchuan Liu † and Hui Wang The Chinese.
PEDS September 18, 2006 Power Efficient System for Sensor Networks1 S. Coleri, A. Puri and P. Varaiya UC Berkeley Eighth IEEE International Symposium on.
Beneficial Caching in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Bin Tang, Samir Das, Himanshu Gupta Computer Science Department Stony Brook University.
Coping with Communication Gray Zones in IEEE b based Ad hoc Networks, H. Lundgren, E. Nordström, and C. Tschudin Anne Saaranen.
Impact of Radio Irregularity on Wireless Sensor Networks
1 Experimental Study of Concurrent Transmission in Wireless Sensor Networks Dongjin Son, Bhaskar Krishnamachari (USC/EE), and John Heidemann (USC/ISI)
Muhammad Mahmudul Islam Ronald Pose Carlo Kopp School of Computer Science & Software Engineering Monash University, Australia.
On the Construction of Energy- Efficient Broadcast Tree with Hitch-hiking in Wireless Networks Source: 2004 International Performance Computing and Communications.
1 Link Characteristics in Sensor Networks. 2 Why Such a Study? (in)validate whether the basic model used in design is accurate or not  Remember you have.
Robust Topology Control for Indoor Wireless Sensor Networks Greg Hackmann, Octav Chipara, and Chenyang Lu SenSys 2009 S Slides from Greg Hackmann at Washington.
1 Ultra-Low Duty Cycle MAC with Scheduled Channel Polling Wei Ye Fabio Silva John Heidemann Presented by: Ronak Bhuta Date: 4 th December 2007.
Taming the Underlying Challenges of Reliable Multihop Routing in Sensor Networks.
Adaptive Topology Discovery in Hybrid Wireless Networks
Online Data Gathering for Maximizing Network Lifetime in Sensor Networks IEEE transactions on Mobile Computing Weifa Liang, YuZhen Liu.
Empirical Analysis of Transmission Power Control Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks CENTS Retreat – May 26, 2005 Jaein Jeong (1), David Culler (1),
FBRT: A Feedback-Based Reliable Transport Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Yangfan Zhou November, 2004 Supervisors: Dr. Michael Lyu and Dr. Jiangchuan.
Energy Conservation in wireless sensor networks Kshitij Desai, Mayuresh Randive, Animesh Nandanwar.
1 Algorithms for Bandwidth Efficient Multicast Routing in Multi-channel Multi-radio Wireless Mesh Networks Hoang Lan Nguyen and Uyen Trang Nguyen Presenter:
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS 2007 (TPDS 2007)
SOAR: Simple Opportunistic Adaptive Routing Protocol for Wireless Mesh Networks Authors: Eric Rozner, Jayesh Seshadri, Yogita Ashok Mehta, Lili Qiu Published:
1 Power Control for Distributed MAC Protocols in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Wei Wang, Vikram Srinivasan, and Kee-Chaing Chua National University of Singapore.
A Simple and Effective Cross Layer Networking System for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Wing Ho Yuen, Heung-no Lee and Timothy Andersen.
2008/2/191 Customizing a Geographical Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Proceedings of the th International Conference on Information.
1 Core-PC: A Class of Correlative Power Control Algorithms for Single Channel Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Jun Zhang and Brahim Bensaou The Hong Kong University.
Wireless Sensor Networks COE 499 Energy Aware Routing
Patch Based Mobile Sink Movement By Salman Saeed Khan Omar Oreifej.
1 Cross-Layer, Energy-Efficient Design for Supporting Continuous Queries in Wireless Sensor Networks A Quorum-Based Approach Chia-Hung Tsai, Tsu-Wen Hsu,
1 Multicast Algorithms for Multi- Channel Wireless Mesh Networks Guokai Zeng, Bo Wang, Yong Ding, Li Xiao, Matt Mutka Michigan State University ICNP 2007.
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient and Low-Latency MAC for Data Gathering in Wireless Sensor Network Gang Lu, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, and Cauligi Raghavendra.
1/30 Energy-Efficient Forwarding Strategies for Geographic Routing in Lossy Wireless Sensor Networks Wireless and Sensor Network Seminar Dec 01, 2004.
Link Estimation, CTP and MultiHopLQI. Learning Objectives Understand the motivation of link estimation protocols – the time varying nature of a wireless.
ENERGY-EFFICIENT FORWARDING STRATEGIES FOR GEOGRAPHIC ROUTING in LOSSY WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Presented by Prasad D. Karnik.
Presentation of Wireless sensor network A New Energy Aware Routing Protocol for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks Supporting QoS 王 文 毅
Energy-Efficient Shortest Path Self-Stabilizing Multicast Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Ganesh Sridharan
Collision-free Time Slot Reuse in Multi-hop Wireless Sensor Networks
Secure and Energy-Efficient Disjoint Multi-Path Routing for WSNs Presented by Zhongming Zheng.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Qingchun Ren and Qilian Liang Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at.
Energy and Latency Control in Low Duty Cycle MAC Protocols Yuan Li, Wei Ye, John Heidemann Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California.
Junfeng Xu, Keqiu Li, and Geyong Min IEEE Globecom 2010 Speak: Huei-Rung, Tsai Layered Multi-path Power Control in Underwater Sensor Networks.
Network and Systems Laboratory nslab.ee.ntu.edu.tw Branislav Kusy, Christian Richter, Wen Hu, Mikhail Afanasyev, Raja Jurdak, Michael Brunig, David Abbott,
Dynamic Data Rate and Transmit Power Adjustment in IEEE Wireless LANs Pierre Chevillat, Jens Jelitto, and Hong Linh Truong IBM Zurich Research Laboratory.
Low Power, Low Delay: Opportunistic Routing meets Duty Cycling Olaf Landsiedel 1, Euhanna Ghadimi 2, Simon Duquennoy 3, Mikael Johansson 2 1 Chalmers University.
Tufts Wireless Laboratory School Of Engineering Tufts University Paper Review “An Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”,
Variable Bandwidth Allocation Scheme for Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Network SeongHwan Cho, Kee-Eung Kim Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
A Multi-Channel Cooperative MIMO MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks(MCCMIMO) MASS 2010.
An Energy-Efficient Geographic Routing with Location Errors in Wireless Sensor Networks Julien Champ and Clement Saad I-SPAN 2008, Sydney (The international.
Khaled Hatem Almotairi and Xuemin (Sherman) Shen IEEE Globecom 2010 Speak: Huei-Rung, Tsai Symmetrical Power Control for Multi- channel Multi-hop Wireless.
Throughput-Oriented MAC for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with Variable Packet Sizes Fan Wang, Ossama Younis, and Marwan Krunz Department of Electrical & Computer.
RM-MAC: A Routing-Enhanced Multi-Channel MAC Protocol in Duty-Cycle Sensor Networks Ye Liu, Hao Liu, Qing Yang, and Shaoen Wu In Proceedings of the IEEE.
Mitigating starvation in Wireless Ad hoc Networks: Multi-channel MAC and Power Control Adviser : Frank, Yeong-Sung Lin Presented by Shin-Yao Chen.
RBP: Robust Broadcast Propagation in Wireless Networks Fred Stann, John Heidemann, Rajesh Shroff, Muhammad Zaki Murtaza USC/ISI In SenSys 2006.
2012 1/6 NSDI’08 Harnessing Exposed Terminals in Wireless Networks Mythili Vutukuru, Kyle Jamieson, and Hari Balakrishnan MIT Computer Science and Artificial.
IEEE ICACT( Advanced Communication Technology ) 2014 conference Zhimu Huang, Ryo Yamamoto, Yoshiaki Tanaka 1.
Toward Reliable and Efficient Reporting in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors: Fatma Bouabdallah Nizar Bouabdallah Raouf Boutaba.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
Efficient Geographic Routing in Multihop Wireless Networks Seungjoon Lee*, Bobby Bhattacharjee*, and Suman Banerjee** *Department of Computer Science University.
Max do Val Machado Raquel A. F. Mini Antonio A. F. Loureiro DCC/UFMG DCC/PUC Minas DCC/UFMG IEEE ICC 2009 proceedings Advisor : Han-Chieh Chao Student.
-1/16- Maximum Battery Life Routing to Support Ubiquitous Mobile Computing in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks C.-K. Toh, Georgia Institute of Technology IEEE.
任課教授:陳朝鈞 教授 學生:王志嘉、馬敏修
High Throughput Route Selection in Multi-Rate Ad Hoc Wireless Networks
Yiannis Andreopoulos et al. IEEE JSAC’06 November 2006
Presentation transcript:

Experimental study of the effects of Transmission Power Control and Blacklisting in Wireless Sensor Networks Dongjin Son, Bhaskar Krishnamachari and John Heidemann Presented by Anandha Gopalan Nov. 3, 2004

Outline Introduction Experiments Transmission Power Control (TPC) with blacklisting Conclusion and Future work

Introduction Zikes !!! Yet another paper on power- management This one has a slightly different take about it  Thank goodness for that So, what’s different ???  Simulations usually assume idealized link conditions Experimentally evaluate the effect of transmission power on link conditions Sometimes, increasing TP may help  Aha !!! that’s a bit different

Experiments Effects of unreliable wireless links Effects of TPC Experimental study of varying TP on a single wireless link  One receiver and multiple transmitters  One transmitter and multiple receivers  Wireless link distance  Node location (Multi-Path and Interference)  Time (Environment change)

Experiments Testbed  PC104 testbed with mica2 motes  Directed diffusion routing  S-MAC MAC protocol Weak link  Packet Reception Rate (PRR) < Threshold Asymmetric link  PRR > Threshold in only one direction

Experiments Effect of unreliable wireless links  Having unreliable links is worse than having any links at all They tend to be utilized  Convert unreliable links to good links or prevent them from being used

Experiments Effects of TPC  Increased TP leads to more good links Unreliable links can be converted to good links  New communication links can be discovered and used for packet delivery  Problem: May lead to new unreliable links Taken care of by blacklisting  Problem: May use up more network capacity

Experiments New definitions:  Weak link Packet Reception Rate (PRR) < Threshold, even after TPC  Asymmetric link PRR > Threshold in only one direction, even after TPC

Experiments One receiver and multiple transmitters  Difference is not obvious at close distances  Difference b/w node 27 and nodes (30,20) noticed after a distance of 17m  Difference b/w nodes 30 and 20 noticed after a distance of 23m

Experiments One transmitter and multiple receivers  In the TP range b/w -3 and 6 dBm, the link quality is different at the same TP level, while different TP is required for each link to reach the same PRR level Range of TP that generates this kind of variation is called unreliable transmission power range (UTPR)  UTPR can be avoided in two ways: Assign a TP high enough for every link to be outside UTPR Assign a distinct TP for each link

Experiments Effect of wireless link distance  Clear line of sight b/w transmitter and receiver  Distance b/w transmitter and receiver is varied  Experiments show that new reliable, communication links that are not available at default TP can be generated with TPC

Experiments Effect of node location  No clear line of sight b/w the sender and receiver  Receiver is placed in six different locations in the same indoor environment  Results: Multi-path interference effect are severe indoors, where signal is weak Severe link quality variation can be expected with small movement of sensor nodes

Experiments Effect of surrounding environment change  Variation in link quality is observed at different times of the day and night  Results: Variation in link quality observed during the day due to change in surrounding environment The difference in link quality is only b/w the TP of -7 to 2 dBm

TPC with blacklisting (PCBL) - Characteristics TPC for link quality control  Convert unreliable links to reliable links Packet-based TPC  TP is assigned to each packet based on its destination and type of packet, considering link quality requirement Metric-based link quality estimation  Link quality is measured based on PRR

PCBL - Characteristics Blacklisting at adjusted TP level  Not all links can be converted to a good link with TPC  New weak or asymmetric links can be generated at adjusted TP level  Blacklisting is used with TPC to remove remaining unreliable links after TPC

PCBL - Algorithm 1. Collect link statistics in PRR metric 2. Select a unicast power for each link 3. Blacklist unreliable links 4. Select a broadcast power for each node

PCBL - Algorithm 1. Collect link statistics  PRRs at pre-selected transmission power levels are collected 2. Select a unicast power for each link  Select a link quality control threshold (TH LQ )  Unicast power for each link is assigned such as: U i->j = P where PRR pi > TH LQ and P = min p i, otherwise U i->j is set to maximum TP (P max )

PCBL - Algorithm 3. Blacklist unreliable links  Links that cannot be converted to good links based on the blacklist threshold (TH BL ) are blacklisted and not used for any packet transmission or reception 4. Select a broadcast power for each node  Broadcast transmission power of node i (B i ) is selected to be max (U i->j ) Ensures that broadcast packets reach every node with a good wireless link

PCBL Algorithm – On-demand optimization for Long-lived Routing 1. Collect link statistics only at the maximum transmission power level 2. Blacklist unreliable links before using a routing protocol 3. Find a delivery path with a routing protocol 4. Identify unicast transmission powers to use only for links in the delivery path

PCBL – Analysis for Single Data Flows Packet Delivery Rates  PCBL is better than TPP-P0, TPP-P5 and TPP- P10, but worse than M-BL Energy Consumption  PCBL consumes more than TPP-P0 Energy consumption per packet  PCBL consumes less than TPP-P0

PCBL – Analysis for Multiple Data Flows Packet Delivery Rates  PCBL is better than M-BL for flows 1&2, but is slightly worse for flow 3  Improvement in flows 1&2 due to the saturation of the wireless link around node 11 for M-BL

Conclusion and Future work Presented an experimental study of the effects of TPC on wireless link quality A TPC scheme with blacklisting for link quality control was proposed Analysis of the proposed scheme was carried out using experiments Optimizations for the proposed algorithm is to be studied for future work

Issues with the paper Overhead of collecting link statistics ??? How are the statistics collected ??? Comparing PCBL with TPP-P0, TPP-P5 and TPP-P10 for multiple flows How do you get the threshold values ??? Mistakes in the paper ?????