Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
Advertisements

Work Zone Impact Strategies Module 6. TMP Overview3 Identification of TMP Strategies Should be based on: type of work zone traffic conditions anticipated.
Innovative Contracting
1 Roadway User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems Work Zone User Costs Nathaniel D. Coley Jr. Federal Highway Administration.
Life-Cycle Cost Analysis
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Innovative Contracting Techniques that Consider Driver Impacts Use of A+B Bidding Presented by: David L. Kent P.E. New York State Department of Transportation.
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
Alternative Project Delivery
ENSURING DRIVABILITY: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS FOR AMERICA’S ROADS A survey of pavement officials and the driving public The Asphalt Pavement Alliance.
LANE CLOSURE CHARTS CHART DEVELOPMENT AND DELAY DAMAGES (District 3) OBJECTIVE To become familiar with the lane closure chart development process.
Innovative Contracting Techniques “Partnering with Industry to Create a Better Roadway” Presented by Doyt Bolling Director Utah Technology Transfer Center.
Factors to Consider in Innovative Contracting Doyt Bolling and Jared Holland Utah Technology Transfer Center.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
Transportation Management Plan Overview Module 3.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 6 Specifications and Special Provisions Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Developing and Sustaining a Part C Finance System: Connecticut.
Chart 6. 12: Impact of Community Hospitals on U. S
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2003 CONFERENCE, BURLINGTON, VT SEPTEMBER 3-5, 2003 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
Selected Data for West Virginia Higher Education J. Michael Mullen WVFAA November 6, 2003.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
The United States.
ABC POLICY DEVELOPMENT IOWA DOT Norman McDonald, PE Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Bridges and Structures MID-CONTINENT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH.
Medicare Advantage Enrollment: State Summary Five Slide Series, Volume 2 July 2013.
Managed Lanes CE 550: Advanced Highway Design Damion Pregitzer.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
 As a group, we thought it be interesting to see how many of our peers drop out of school.  Since in the United States education is so important, we.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 4 Work Zone Applications Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Warm Up Complete the Coordinate Practice #10. Content Objective: – Compare the physical and political regions. Language Objectives: – SWBAT define region.
Advanced Technology Approach to Assessing Road User Charges: Research Progress  David J. Forkenbrock  Director, Public Policy Center  University of.
Materials, Pavements & Transportation Operations CONCEPTS FOR ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS Stuart Anderson Gerald Ullman Making.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
©SHRM 2008SHRM Poll: May 20, Number of Out-of-Town Job Candidates (from Distant Cities, States) in the Last 12 Months Compared With Previous Years.
H t t p : / / o p s. f h w a. d o t. g o v / w z / w o r k z o n e. h t m Slide 1 QuickZone — A Work Zone Delay Estimation and Analysis Tool Matthew H.
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SPRING SEMESTER ASSOC.PROF.DR. İBRAHİM YİTMEN CIVL 493 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT.
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
ABA Forum on Construction Division 4 Literature Review: The Impacts of Design-Build On the Public Workforce Authored by: Douglas D. Gransberg, PhD, PE.
1st Hour2nd Hour3rd Hour Day #1 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1987 – 2007
The States How many states are in the United States?
Innovative Contracting and Trns*Port
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Regions of the United States
Design-Build Acquisition and Contract Incentives July 19, 2018
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
National Memorial for Peace and Justice
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Design-Build Acquisition and Contract Incentives May 9, 2019
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

Determining Innovative Contracting Methods to Reduce User Costs Stuart Thompson Utah Technology Transfer Center

FHWA Road User Survey 32% dissatisfied with work zones Travelers rated highway improvements that would most help overcome delays. Of more than 20, the top 3 relate to work zones and how we build roads

FHWA Road User Survey Growth in reconstruction Growth in congestion Growth in crashes

Innovative Contracting The primary goal of Innovative Contracting is to provide timely delivery of a quality project or facility with limited User & Social Impacts. User & Social Impacts- Costs incurred by the road user or public that are not directly accounted for in Traditional Contracts.

Road User Impacts High Accident Rates Travel Delay Costs Additional Fuel Consumption

Product Quality Smoothness Extended Service Life Maintenance Objectives Improved Serviceability

Contracting Procedures Traditional Contract (Design-Bid-Build) Design-Build A+B Bidding Lane Rental Warranty

Traditional Contracts Projects with Third Party Conflicts Cookie Cutter Projects Projects with Negligible Impacts to the Road User, Public, & Environment Projects with Potential Risks

Design-Build Decrease Time (Emergency/Event) Complex Design Complex Construction Technical Integration Limited In-house Resources Projects Procured Just-In-Time

Design/Build Questionnaire Results

A+B Bidding Decrease Time (Emergency/Event) Potential for High Road User Cost Potential Impact to Local Businesses Public Perception Vital Corridor

A+B Bidding Definition: A cost plus time bidding procedure that selects the low bidder based on a monetary combination of the contract bid items (A) and the time (B) needed to complete the critical portion of the project.

Benefits of A+B Bidding A+B Bidding is used to motivate the contractor to minimize the delivery time for high priority and highly trafficked roadways. This encourages contractors to finish early by: Offering bonuses for early completion. Assessing disincentives for late completion.

Criteria for Selection of A+B Bidding as a Contracting Procedure Traffic restrictions, lane closures, or detours result in high road user costs. Safety concerns, or significant impacts to the local community or economy during construction warrant expediting the project. Traffic control phasing can be structured to maximize a contractor’s ability to reduce the duration of construction. The project is relatively free of third party conflicts. It is in the public interest to complete the project as soon as possible.

States Using A+B Bidding Maryland Colorado California Virginia Texas North Carolina Wisconsin Washington New York North Dakota Iowa New Jersey Missouri Idaho Indiana Kansas Maine

Multi-Parameter Bidding (A + B) Questionnaire Results

Lessons Learned – A + B

New York’s A+B Bidding New York has completed 33 projects since Projects were completed an average of 19 days earlier than bid and an average of 87 days earlier than the engineer’s estimate. An average of 9 days were added for change orders. Only one project took more days to complete than engineer’s estimate and only two took more days than bid. An estimated million dollars in road user costs were saved million dollars were paid for incentives.

Lane Rental Decrease Time (Emergency/Event) Potential for High Road User Cost Potential Impact to Local Businesses No Alternative Routes High ADT

Lane Rental Definition: An innovative contracting technique by which a contractor is charged a fee for occupying lanes or shoulders to do the work.

Why Pursue Lane Rental? Primary Objective To motivate the contractor to minimize the time that a lane, a shoulder, or a combination of lanes and shoulders are out of service so there is minimized traffic delay to highway users.

Lane Rental Uses Lane Rental has been used for projects that contain one or more of the following:

Lane Rental Uses Traffic restrictions or lane closures result in high road user costs. The use of alternate routes or off-site detours is impractical. The traffic control plan allows the contractor flexibility in scheduling work to minimize the impact of lane closures.

Lane Rental Uses The agency seeks contractor expertise to minimize the time that lanes are out of service. The project is relatively free of third party conflicts (I.e. right-way issues, utilities, etc.). The benefit in terms of reduced impact to the highway user is greater than the additional cost to minimize lane closures.

How are Lane Charges Calculated? Charges for lanes or shoulders can be on either an hourly or daily basis. Charges per lane can vary depending on time of day, amount of traffic, and other road user costs.

Oregon Example Traditionally the State of Oregon specified times at which lane closures were not allowed. State law did not permit the use of road user costs in the determination of liquidated damage amounts. Therefore: no disincentive for closures or incentive to keep lanes open.

Oregon DOT US 26 Reconstruction Lane Rental Project Major reconstruction of a 2.08 mile stretch of a primary commuter route from the west suburbs to downtown Portland. ADT ranges from about 100,000 to 130,000 vpd, with less than 2% trucks. Rates for every 15 minutes ranged from $0 to $21,000 for lane use.

States Using Lane Rental Colorado New York North Carolina Utah Oklahoma Oregon Washington

Lane Rental Questionnaire Results

Lessons Learned – Lane Rental

New York’s Lane Rental New York has completed 6 projects since Total project costs were 3.6 million dollars below the engineer’s estimate. Three projects were above and three projects were below the engineer’s estimate.

Warranty Projects in which Performance can be Measured Minimize Overall Life-Cycle Costs Project Conditions are Well-Defined Incorporation of New Technology in Materials, Equipment, and Construction Processes

Warranty Definition: “A guarantee of the integrity of a product and of the makers responsibility for the replacement or repair of deficiencies.”

Advantages of Warranty Contracting Less owner risk. Eliminates cost of owner QA/QC by transferring this responsibility to the contractor. Creates an incentive for overall project quality. Assures acceptable level of service or performance for a work item and/or major project element.

States Using Warranties Wisconsin Michigan North Carolina California Missouri Ohio Montana New Hampshire

Warranty Questionnaire Results

Lessons Learned - Warranty

Innovative Contracting Methods – Selection Flow Chart

Questions?