Accenture Accelerated R&D Standards Metadata Management – version control and its governance Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 01/28/2015 We help our Clients.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dimitri Kutsenko (Entimo AG)
Advertisements

Experience and process for collaborating with an outsource company to create the define file. Ganesh Sankaran TAKE Solutions.
What’s New with CDISC Wayne R. Kubick CDISC CTO.
CDISC ADaM 2.1 Implementation: A Challenging Next Step in the Process Presented by Tineke Callant
HP Quality Center Overview.
An Introduction to Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization (CDASH) Loryn Thorburn © 2010 PAREXEL International | Confidential.
SE 555 Software Requirements & Specification Requirements Management.
Metadata Management – Our Journey Thus Far
© 2008 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 PhUSE 2010 Berlin * Accessing the metadata from the define.xml using XSLT transformations.
MDR Implementation: Drivers & Challenges Julie Smiley Director, Product Management for BioPharma Akana PhUSE SDE - May 14, 2015 Introductions.
© 2010 Octagon Research Solutions, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Initial Investment in CDISC Data Standards in Clinical Organisations © 2010 Octagon Research.
Bay Area CDISC Implmentation Network – July 13, 2009 How a New CDISC Domain is Made Carey Smoak Team Leader CDISC SDTM Device Team.
Electronic Records Management Repository Irma Trottier – Manager, Records and Electronic Information Management Mark Southron – Team Lead, Information.
Beyond regulatory submission - Standards Metadata Management Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 06/17/2015 We help our Clients deliver better outcomes, so.
23 August 2015Michael Knoessl1 PhUSE 2008 Manchester / Michael Knoessl Implementing CDISC at Boehringer Ingelheim.
Dominic, age 8, living with epilepsy SDTM Implementation Guide : Clear as Mud Strategies for Developing Consistent Company Standards PhUSE 2011 – CD02.
JumpStart the Regulatory Review: Applying the Right Tools at the Right Time to the Right Audience Lilliam Rosario, Ph.D. Director Office of Computational.
Regulatory Affairs Domain
Contents Integrating clinical trial data Working with CROs
CDISC Implementation Strategies: Lessons Learned & Future Directions MBC Biostats & Data Management Committee 12 March 2008 Kathleen Greene & A. Brooke.
Vertex and CDISC / MBC / 12March Vertex and CDISC Accomplishments and Strategy 12 March 2008 Lynn Anderson Associate Director Statistical Programming/Biometrics.
1CDISC 2002 RCRIM – Standard Domains Agenda NCI Presentation Standard Domains Working Group Goals Introduction to FDA Information Model (FIM) Discussion:
Overview and feed-back from CDISC European Interchange 2008 (From April 21 st to 25 th, COPENHAGEN) Groupe des Utilisateurs Francophones de CDISC Bagneux.
Confidential - Property of Navitas Accelerate define.xml using defineReady - Saravanan June 17, 2015.
MODULE B: Case Report Forms Jane Fendl & Denise Thwing April 7, Version: Final 07-Apr-2010.
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.
SDTM Validation Delaware Valley CDISC user network Ketan Durve Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Reasearch and Development May 11 th 2009.
Driving value through Standardization – Industry Challenges and Best Practices Henry Levy, partner-Life Sciences R&D European Lead.
Implementation of CDISC Standards at Nycomed PhUSE, Basel (19-21 October 2009) Nycomed GmbH, Dr. B Traub CDISC Implementation at Nycomed.
MERCURY BUSINESS PROCESS TESTING. AGENDA  Objective  What is Business Process Testing  Business Components  Defining Requirements  Creation of Business.
ArcGIS Data Reviewer: An Introduction
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Overview of CDISC standards and use cases along the E2E data management process Dr. Philippe Verplancke ESUG Marlow, UK 27 May 2009.
1. © CDISC 2014 SDS ELT Rules Team Update Stetson Line 08 Dec
Initiator & Approver Training PTA Manager. Welcome, Introductions & Agenda – 5 minutes Introduction– 5 minutes Learning Objectives (Common and Role Specific)
TERMINOLOGY TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT Increasing linguistic quality with our.
CDISC©2009 February CDISC INTRAchange Carey Smoak Device Team Leader Li Zheng Submission Data Standards Team Member Thurday, April 2, 2009.
From PDF to RDF – Representing the CDISC Foundational Standards
CDISC User Group in Deutschland/Japan Hajime Shimizu (nickname: Akiba) CDISC Japan User Group introduction to team activity.
1 Welcome CMS IV Workshop Employee Central.. 2 Project Sequence – Training, Workshops, Hands-on Sessions Overall Governance -- Completed/Ongoing Portal.
Emerging Technologies Semantic Web and Data Integration This meeting will start at 5 min past the hour As a reminder, please place your phone on mute unless.
Updates on CDISC Activities
Accurate  Consistent  Compliant Contact: i4i the structured content company the structured content company.
DIA Electronic Submissions Meeting Olga Alfieri 26 April 2016
Keys to a Successful Records Management Implementation One Firm, One Place for Records Presented by: Joanna Pashos.
How Good is Your SDTM Data? Perspectives from JumpStart Mary Doi, M.D., M.S. Office of Computational Science Office of Translational Sciences Center for.
An Introduction to Data Lifecycle Plans ® Kit Howard Kestrel Consultants Data Lifecycle Plan ® is a registered trademark of Kestrel Consultants.
Presented by Jenny Griffiths Data Standards Office, PD Biometrics,
Mark Wheeldon, Formedix CDISC UK Network June 7, 2016 PRACTICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF DEFINE.XML.
Submission Standards: The Big Picture Gary G. Walker Associate Director, Programming Standards, Global Data Solutions, Global Data Management.
© CDISC 2014 Sam Hume Sept 16 th, CAC eSHARE Update.
A need for prescriptive define.xml
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
Software Project Configuration Management
Presented by Jenny Griffiths Data Standards Office, PD Biometrics,
Accelerate define.xml using defineReady - Saravanan June 17, 2015.
Beyond regulatory submission - Standards Metadata Management Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 06/17/2015 We help our Clients deliver better outcomes, so.
Accenture Accelerated R&D Standards Metadata Management – version control and its governance Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 01/28/2015 We help our Clients.
Why use CDISC for trials not submitted to regulators?
MAKE SDTM EASIER START WITH CDASH !
Traceability between SDTM and ADaM converted analysis datasets
Patterns emerging from chaos
SDTM and ADaM Implementation FAQ
CDISC UK Network Jun-16 – Welwyn
A SAS macro to check SDTM domains against controlled terminology
Fabienne NOEL CDISC – 2013, December 18th
CAC Meeting Tuesday, 21 June, CAC Meeting Tuesday, 21 June, 2017.
Digitization and Modernization Project
SDTM and ADaM Implementation FAQ
Presenters Emily Woolley
Presentation transcript:

Accenture Accelerated R&D Standards Metadata Management – version control and its governance Kevin Lee CDISC NJ Meeting at 01/28/2015 We help our Clients deliver better outcomes, so they can improve the quality of people’s lives.

Happy New Year Year of Sheep 2015 2003 1991 1979 1967 1955 1943 © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Agenda Introduction of Standards Metadata Management Version Control Governance Final Thoughts © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Introduction of Standards Industry Standards Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) – CDASH, SDTM, ADaM and LAB NCI CT HL7 eCTD (electronic Common Technical Document) Company Standards Global Standards Therapeutic Standards Business Unit Standards © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Introduction of Metadata Management Definition Managing data about other data Examples of metadata Variable Name Variable Label Type CT Role Core STUDYID Study Identifier Char Identifier Req DOMAIN Domain Abbreviation DM USUBJID Unique Subject Identifier © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Examples of Metadata Management Creating new standards (e.g., variables and domains) Modifying the attributes (e.g., label, type) of current standards Adding the new attributes to current standards Archiving the standards Managing the information that transforms data into a new structure (e.g.: CDASH to SDTM) Leveraging the Schedule of Events table to determine the data domains required for a study Assigning versions (e.g., major or minor) to standards after changes Maintaining multiple versions of standards (e.g., SDTMIG 3.1.2, 3.1.3) © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Industry CDISC Standards versions CDASH – 1.1 SDTM (IG) – 1.2 (3.1.2), 1.3 (3.1.3), 1.4 (3.2) PRM – 1.0 LAB – 1.01 SENDIG – 3 ADaM (IG) – 2.1 (1.0) SMD-XML – 1.0 ODM-XML – 1.3.1, 1.3.2 Define-XML – 1.0, 2.0 DataSet-XML – 1.0 © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Company Standards versions Industry + company-specific standards Global standards version GS v1 – CDASH 1.1, SDTM (IG) 1.3(3.1.2), ADaM(IG) 2.1(1.0) GS v2 – CDASH 1.1, SDTM (IG) 1.4(3.2), ADaM(IG) 2.1(1.0) Annual global standards version GS v2013 GS v2014 GS v2015 © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Why version control is important? FDA Requirements CDISC Standards compliant data submission Data Standards Catalog Versions that FDA supports and requires. Submission document SDRG(Study Data Reviewer’s Guide) ADRG(Analysis Data Reviewer’s Guide) Multiple studies employed different versions across the duration of a submission Phase I used SDTMIG 3.1.2, but Phase II and III used SDTMIG 3.1.3. ISS/ISE © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

How to control versions/ How to manage standards? © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Standards Metadata Management vs Governance Making decisions Governance Setting the environment where others can manage effectively © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

What is governance? Process Specified roles/responsibility According to a report by Boeing, from 2001 through 2010, the number of fatalities per one million flight hours is less than one.  It attributed the success rate of air traffic control to: Process Specified roles/responsibility Technology/system © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

What is standards governance? Standards governance is: Oversight for the development and maintenance of clinical data standards An instrument that ensures that a standard is developed efficiently, consistently, and properly used across the clinical trials organization Assurance that maximum process efficiency from a standards-based clinical data lifecycle is achievable Process – change requests and governance workflow Specified roles/responsibility – SMEs who ensure standards are applied appropriately Technology/system – technology and systems that support change requests and governance workflow © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Three key components of Standards Governance People Process Technology © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

People of Standards Governance Below is a general example of some roles and responsibilities that sponsors implement to effectively carry out their standards governance. Role Skillset Responsibility Requestors Programmers Data Management Request a new or revised standard Developers Standards SME Develop the metadata for the standard Approvers Approve the new or revised standard © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Standards Group/SME in Governance Types Functional SME Centralized Standards Group Advisory Group Responsibility SME for each business unit (e.g. DM) – develop the standards Advisory/Centralized Standards Group – approve the new/change standards © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Governance Process Workflow Definition An orchestrated and repeatable pattern of business activity enabled by the systematic organization of resources A sequence of operations, declared as work of a person or group. © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Examples of Governance Workflow SDTM DM (Developer) QC (Validator) CDISC compliance checks (OpenCDISC) © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Governance Process in Standards Systematic business activities by standards resources that manage the standards. Examples of Types: New Request, Modify and Retire Workflow: Request, Development and Approval Change Request Assessment Impact Development Technical Subject Matter Implementation Review Approval © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Examples of “Modification” workflow of Standards Governance © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Technology of Standards Governance Definition: The system/technology which people and workflow of standards governance operates on Evolution: Spreadsheet-based Team Site or Share point Metadata Repository © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Metadata Repository (MDR) General definition: a database created to store metadata. Its function in Standards Governance: Stores Standards metadata – Global, TA, Compound and Study level Defines the roles and responsibility of people Defines the business process Drives roles-based, system-driven business process Develop and maintain standards(e.g., version controls) Stores the history of all the activities(e.g., requestor, approvals, dates and time, duration) © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Metadata Repository (MDR) - continued Benefits Data-based management, not document-based More systemic/organized metadata management System-based governance workflow Control data flow, then control business process Improve business process Time-efficient, process-efficient History of all the activities Transparency © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Governance Final Thought Standards Management © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Sneak preview on 2015 Metadata Repository Data Modeling on Standards metadata Process metadata Study definition Metadata Automated E2E clinical data development © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.

Contacts and Questions Kevin Lee Email: kevin.s.lee@accenture.com Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/kevinlee 1995 Tweet: @HelloKevinLee Blogs: HiKevinLee.tumbrl.com © 2015 Accenture All Rights Reserved.