ICARTT Measurement Comparison NASA DC-8 vs. NOAA WP-3D Gao Chen Tom Ryerson Bill Brune and INTEX-NA Science Team.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Activity 2.3 Team CarboEurope-IP Meeting, Posen, Poland, 7-12 Oktober, 2007 Flask network (A 2.3) Multiple species measurement What is expected from A.

Advertisements

Fast time resolution airborne measurements of PANs during the New England Air Quality Study 2004 intensive. Frank Flocke, Aaron Swanson, Jim Roberts, Greg.

GEOS-CHEM Near-Real Time Full-Chemistry Simulations S. Turquety, D. J. Jacob, R. M. Yantosca, R. C. Hudman, L. Jaeglé, S. Wu Objectives : 1.ICARTT campaign.

Transpacific transport of pollution as seen from space Funding: NASA, EPA, EPRI Daniel J. Jacob, Rokjin J. Park, Becky Alexander, T. Duncan Fairlie, Arlene.

Budget Prep Budget Prep Dates Budgets will be released mid-May Budgets will be due to the Budget Office on June 18 th Budget will be finalized and.

Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1.

February 28, 2005 NOAA / NOS / CO-OPS An Oceanographic Processing Environment: From System Design to Data Quality Chris Paternostro, Oceanographer NOAA,

1 Surface nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) rd GEOS-Chem USERS ` MEETING, Harvard University.

Evaluating emissions from top-down observations T. Ryerson – NOAA Chemical Sciences Division Motivation Most inventories compiled from bottom-up estimates,

1 Surface O 3 over Beijing: Constraints from New Surface Observations Yuxuan Wang, Mike B. McElroy, J. William Munger School of Engineering and Applied.

ITCT 2K2 Field Study (Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation) ITCT 2K2 Introduction Today (briefly): Examine a major Asian emission transport.

ROUGH SENSITIVITY ESTIMATES USING DIRECT SUN BETWEEN 1.5 AND 2 AIRMASSES AIRMASS CHANGE = 0.5 CO 2 RATIO CHANGE=.024 SINCE 1 AIRMASS IS ~ 380 PPM WE GET.

PRELIMINARY RESULTS from PIE 2005 the PAN Intercomparison Exercise F. Flocke, G. Tyndall, E. Apel (NCAR) E. Williams (NOAA)

Donald R. Blake (PI), Nicola J. Blake, Simone Meinardi, Angela Young, Andreas Beyersdorf, Lambert A. Doezema, Brian Novak, Barbara Barletta, Jason Midyett,

User-Friendly Website for Accessing NOAA/ESRL Chemical Sciences Division (CSD) Tropospheric Airborne Data Archive Ken Aikin - NOAA CSD and CIRES, University.

NASA DC-8 Platform Update University of North Dakota and NASA Airborne Science

Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.

Intercomparisons of AIRS and NAST retrievals with Dropsondes During P- TOST (Pacific Thorpex Observational System Test) NASA ER-2 NOAA G-IV Dropsonde.

Improved representation of boreal fire emissions for the ICARTT period S. Turquety, D. J. Jacob, J. A. Logan, R. M. Yevich, R. C. Hudman, F. Y. Leung,

Satellite Observations of Tropospheric Gases and Aerosols Randall Martin With contributions from: Rongming Hu (Dalhousie University) Chris Sioris, Xiong.

1 NUOPC National Unified Operational Prediction Capability 1 Review Committee for Operational Processing Centers National Unified Operational Prediction.

FLIGHT PLANNING IN INTEX-A The DC-8 at MidAmerica airport.

UNH Soluble Acidic Gases and Aerosol (SAGA) during INTEX Phase A Jack E. Dibb, Eric Scheuer, and Robert W. Talbot With Thanks to the INTEX Science Team.

The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.

R C Hudman, D J Jacob, S Turquety, L Murray, S Wu, Q Liang,A Gilliland, M Avery, T H Bertram, E Browell, W Brune, R C Cohen, J E Dibb, F M Flocke, J Holloway,

Forecasting and in situ sampling of boreal biomass burning plumes over Maritime Canada during summer 2011: Flight planning and the first results from the.

SlopeInterceptR2R2 # points Average difference (pptv) Stdev of difference (pptv) Lab Canister difference max|min DC-8 vs WP-3D Ethane 0.98 ± ±

ATTREX cloud measurements & implications for dehydration in the Tropical Tropopause Layer B. Gandrud a, E. Jensen b, G. Diskin c, R. P. Lawson a, S. Lance.

The effect of pyro-convective fires on the global troposphere: comparison of TOMCAT modelled fields with observations from ICARTT Sarah Monks Outline:

2015 GLM Annual Science Team Meeting: Cal/Val Tools Developers Forum 9-11 September, 2015 DATA MANAGEMENT For GLM Cal/Val Activities Helen Conover Information.

A detailed evaluation of the WRF-CMAQ forecast model performance for O 3, and PM 2.5 during the 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS study Shaocai Yu $, Rohit Mathur +,

Image D. Anderson, NASA, from Seinfeld et al., BAMS, in press, 2003 Intercontinental Transport of Pollutants Out & Into Asia (emphasis on particles)

CARB Board Meeting San Diego, 23 July 2009 DAVID PARRISH Chemical Sciences Division Earth System Research.

MOKE RESULTS JM micron square pads 50nm Ni/ C10-dithiol / 20nm Co Line scan across Pad

P. Schlag 1,2, A. Vermeulen 3, M. J. Blom 3, A. Kiendler-Scharr 2,A. Khan 1, R. Holzinger 1 1 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht (IMAU),

Use of space-based tropospheric NO 2 observations in regional air quality modeling Robert W. Pinder 1, Sergey L. Napelenok 1, Alice B. Gilliland 1, Randall.

Data Management Plan for KORUS-AQ Airborne Field Study Dr. Jeong-Hoo Park National Institute of Environmental Research Dr. Gao Chen NASA Langley Research.

Communications Plan: Ji Young Kim, Chul Han Song, Saewung Kim, and Jim Crawford.

How accurately we can infer isoprene emissions from HCHO column measurements made from space depends mainly on the retrieval errors and uncertainties in.

2006 Graduate Student Symposium Measurement of HCl (g) in troposphere and lower stratosphere with CIMS technique Analytical characteristics and its implications.

The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Experiment Mary C. Barth (NCAR), W. H. Brune (PSU), C. A. Cantrell (U. Colorado), S. A. Rutledge (CSU),

Cryogenic Hygrometer and Filter Radiometers Ali Aknan Stephanie Vay Melody Avery Jim Plant Charles Hudgins.

Regional Chemical Modeling in Support of ICARTT Topics:  How good were the regional forecasts?  What are we learning about the emissions?  What are.

Characterization of GOES Aerosol Optical Depth Retrievals during INTEX-A Pubu Ciren 1, Shobha Kondragunta 2, Istvan Laszlo 2 and Ana Prados 3 1 QSS Group,

What data will be regularly and reliably available during the experiment? 1-Meteorological data 2-Total ozone data

The Changing Photochemistry of the North Pacific - Observations of Reactive Nitrogen from INTEX-B 2006 Ron Cohen Tim Bertram Anne Perring Paul Wooldridge.

TAbMEP Assessment: POLARCAT H 2 O Measurements. Assessment Summary Table 1. Recommended POLARCAT H 2 O measurement treatment AircraftInstrument Reported.

Global Aerosol Forecasting System Applications to Houston/Costa Rica Aura Validation Experiments Arlindo da Silva Global Modeling and Assimilation Office,

The Influence of Lateral and Top Boundary Conditions on Regional Air Quality Prediction: a Multi-Scale Study Coupling Regional and Global Chemical Transport.

March 29 – April 1, INTEX-NA Workshop Aerosol and Cloud Spatial Distributions and Microphysical Properties Bruce Anderson, Lee Thornhill, Gao.

SciDAC Fast Chemical Mechanism LLNL Philip Cameron-Smith Peter Connell Cathy Chuang (John Taylor) Keith Grant (Doug Rotman) NCARJean-Francois Lamarque.

Status of physics analysis Fabrizio Cei On Behalf of the Physics Analysis Group PSI BVR presentation, February 9, /02/2015Fabrizio Cei1.

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300.

Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.

Understanding and Improving Marine Air Temperatures David I. Berry and Elizabeth C. Kent National Oceanography Centre, Southampton

ATom data management plan: Data products and submission requirements Observed data and model products will be submitted in NetCDF or ICARTT format www-air.larc.nasa.gov/missions/etc/ESDS-RFC-019-v1.1_0.pdf.

Validation of HLA Source Lists Feb. 4, 2008 Brad Whitmore 1.Overview 2.Plots 3.Summary.

Daniel Tong NOAA Air Resources Lab & George Mason University

Toolsets for Airborne Data

National Wildlife Refuge

JPL Airborne Snow Observatory and SnowEx

ATom data management plan:

INTERCONTINENTAL TRANSPORT EXPERIMENT – NORTH AMERICA (INTEX-NA)

José Meitín Overview of NAME Field Catalog NAME Project Office

ICARTT: COORDINATED ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY CAMPAIGN OVER EASTERN NORTH AMERICA AND NORTH ATLANTIC IN SUMMER 2004 International, multi-agency collaboration.

Acoustic Array Systems: Theory, Implementation and Application

Asian outflow and chemical evolution of ozone and nitrogen oxides over the Pacific Mathew Evans, Daniel Jacob, Harvard Group, TRACE-P Science Team et al.

INTEX-B flight tracks (April-May 2006)

Surface Systems.

Michael Moran Air Quality Research Branch

Presentation transcript:

ICARTT Measurement Comparison NASA DC-8 vs. NOAA WP-3D Gao Chen Tom Ryerson Bill Brune and INTEX-NA Science Team

Objective To create a unified observational data set from multi-platforms (i.e., aircraft, ground, and ship) by establishing data comparability between the various platforms and verifying that different analytical techniques are mutually consistent within quantifiable uncertainties.

DC-8 Intercomparison Flights July 15, 2004 DC-8 vs. Cobra King Air July 22, 2004 DC-8 vs. WP-3D July 28, 2004 DC-8 vs. BAE 146 July 31, 2004 DC-8 vs. WP-3D August 7, 2004 DC-8 vs. WP-3D

Approach Field Data Comparison –Double-Blind comparison. –Results presented in time series and x-y plots posted at: Standard INTEX access user name and password. Final Data Comparison –On-going. –Available plots will be distributed in pdf files. –Final results will be posted on the ICARTT website. –Paper (TBD).

Comparison Locations/Periods

Chemical Overview: Intercomparison 1

Chemical Overview: Intercomparison 2

Chemical Overview: Intercomparison 3

H 2 O Comparison R 2 values: 0.99 DC-8 DLH vs. WP-3D Slope: 0.70 – 0.97 DC-8 Project vs. WP-3D Slope: 0.84 – 1.05

O 3 Comparison FlightSlopeInterceptR2R DC-8 vs. WP-3D Regression

CO Comparison FlightSlopeInterceptR2R DC-8 vs. WP-3D Regression

SO 2 Comparison FlightSlopeInterceptR2R DC-8 vs. WP-3D Regression

CH 2 O Comparison

PAN Comparison FlightSlopeInterceptR2R DC-8 vs. WP-3D Regression

Total Peroxynitrates Comparison FlightSlopeInterceptR2R WP-3D PNs = PAN + PPN + others Including, PBN, APAN, MoPAN, PBzN, MPAN, PPeN DC-8 PNs = 200°C channel - unheated channel DC-8 vs. WP-3D Regression

HNO 3 Comparison DC-8 CIMS vs. WP-3D CIMS: R 2 = 0.8 – 0.95, slope = ~0.6 WP-3D CIMS vs. DC-8 MC: R2 = 0.8 – 0.94, slope = 1.1 – 1.6

NMHC Comparison 07/22/2004

Acetaldehyde Comparison

Acetonitrile Comparison

Particulate Sulfate Comparison 07/31/2004

Comparison of Particulate Ammonium and Nitrate PILs Sampling Size Cut: < 1  m Filter Sampling Size Cut: < 8  m

Effect of Inhomogeneity DC-8 O 3 is highly synchronized with fast DLH H 2 O observations; While WP-3D O 3 is correlated with WP-3D H 2 O. The difference between DC-8 and WP-3D may be largely due to the inhomogeneity in the airmass.

Airmass Inhomogeneity ?

Summary Intercomparison process is still on-going, some final data are not submitted yet. High level of consistency is seen for many species with respect to their uncertainties. Some of the differences likely reflect airmass inhomogeniety and/or difference in sampling frequency and integration time. Intercomparisons are useful and necessary for future field mission involving multi- platforms.