First Design Project Christina Merritt, Chelci Mannarino, Mike Nowoswiat, Rylan Delap

Old Camera Features Survey Questions Survey Results Improvements How it all works Prototype Conclusion

 Polystyrene plastic casing  AA battery  About $10  25 picture film  Packaged in a cardboard cover and plastic wrapping  6x5x2 inches

 How often do you use a disposable camera?  How much are you willing to pay for a disposable camera?  When might you use a disposable camera?  Do you think disposable cameras are convenient? Yes or No Why or Why not?  Do you have a digital camera? Yes or No  Would you rather use a disposable or digital camera? Why?  Do you like the fact that disposable cameras are more durable than digital cameras?  Does the size of the disposable camera matter?  Do you like to recycle? Yes or No  Would you prefer if your disposable camera was able to be recycled?  What don’t you like able disposable cameras?  What feature would you like to be included on a disposable camera?

 Polyethylene plastic casing  Solar Cells with backup zinc-air rechargeable batteries (hearing aid batteries)  40 picture film  Recycled paper packaging  4x4.5x2 inches

Selection Criteria Paper PackagingSmaller SizeMore Film Different Battery High Density PolyethyleneSolar Panel Environmentally Safe(+)00 Durability Cost(+) (-)0(+) Ease of Use00000(+) Ease of Manufacture(+) (-)(+) 0 Convenience0(+) 00

 Polyethylene plastic casing:  Cheaper  Durable  Recyclable  Solar Cell with zinc-air battery  Inexpensive  Less e-waste  Larger roll of film  Satisfies customer’s wants  Less cameras used; cuts down on waste

 Smaller Size  Less materials used  Customers prefer  Packaging  Recyclable  Cost  Use of less materials= lower cost  About $7

 More profits because we are meeting the consumers wants  The materials used make the camera more sustainable  The use of solar cells and recyclable products cuts down significantly on e-waste

icis.com batterystuff.com kodak.com