Federalism in the 21 st Century New England Conference of Public Utility Commissioners June 11, 2013 Groton, Connecticut Susan M. Baldwin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Anne Hurley, CEO Communications Alliance Seeing beyond the horizon CommsDay Summit 2008 Industry Futures Symposium.
Advertisements

Water Utility Business Applications. 2 Agenda Industry overview and trends Our application visionary solution Business values Wireless network components.
Da State. Da State and Economic Functions Enforces law Provides services Arbitration (outside courts) Coordination Policy as Innovation.
Open Access in CCSF Report to Telecommunications Commission December 20, 1999.
The State of Missouri Public Service Commission (MPSC) An Overview.
Telecommunications Law CLE State Deregulation at the PUC December 2014 Pete Kirchhof Colorado Telecommunications Association.
COLLECTION HOT TOPICS WV HMFA Winter Educational Conference January 15, 2015.
The Potential Effects of the National Broadband Plan on Rural Communities Version 07/14/10.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
FCC Broadband Workshop “State and Local Government Toolkits and Best Practices” September 1, 2009 Commissioner Ray Baum Oregon Public Utility Commission.
Federal Communications Commission Intergovernmental Advisory Committee
John Windhausen, Telepoly Consulting Cathy Sloan, Computer and Communications Industry Association May 19, 2010.
Tele2 5 March 2008 EPP-ED Public Hearing Mikael Grape.
1 Keeping Consumers Connected Washington State and Universal Service WUTC Workshop May 5, 2010 John F. Jones CenturyLink Vice President State Government.
Net Neutrality Questions. What if? Customer Lamps for Less Luxurious Lumination Telephone Company Welcome to lamps [click] [dial tone] Welcome to Luxurious.
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
Position Paper: The Case For Universal Broadband Access By James Kim.
Net Neutrality. Tussle Who’s battling? What’s at issue? Is it contained?
National Science Foundation Symposium Ed Thomas Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission.
Overview on Broadband Mark Uncapher, Senior Vice President & Counsel, ITAA October 1, 2003.
Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
New Networks The Man-Made Perfect Storm. Sound the Alarm! Join with us to protect the rights of alarm companies and customers.
1 Telecom Regulation and Competition Law in Canada American Bar Association -Telecom Antitrust Fundamentals II – Globalization and Telecom June 27, 2007.
Before there were commissions Judicial regulation Direct legislative regulation Local franchise regulation.
12/09/2015 NGN Broadband Access: TIA Broadband Drivers, Principles, and VoIP Contact: David Thompson, TIA Dan Bart, TIA SOURCE:TIA, TITLE:NGN Broadband.
Regulatory Environment/Tribal Sovereignty Eric Jensen Four Horizons Development Company.
Statement of Findings August 30, From February through June 1999, representatives of multi-level public and private sectors convened to explore.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY AT THE FCC Henning Schulzrinne 1 LISPI.
The FCC and the Internet Robert Cannon Senior Counsel for Internet Issues FCC Office of Plans and Policy.
Questions about broadband What do we do about broadband services? –Why didn’t the ILECs deploy DSL faster? Could regulation be to blame? –How do we get.
A;sldkfj1 Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Agenda Meeting January 13, 2005.
U.S. Telecommunications Regulation and Market Developments September 2008.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC is a United States government agency and was established by the Communications Act of The FCC is.
George A. Godding, Jr. Director, Management and Communications Office of Market Oversight and Investigations Comments are the speakers and do not necessarily.
ITS 302 Purposes of the course –Review the history of US telecommunications as a case study –Examine the basics of regulation, especially as they apply.
Voice over Internet Protocol and its implications in Oregon SOMMER TEMPLET STAFF ATTORNEY JUNE 10, 2013.
Changes in State and Federal Telecommunications Policies: How Do They Affect US All? SCAN NATOA 16 th Annual Spring Conference and Star Awards Long Beach,
Wireline Competition Bureau State of the Bureau Presentation January 20, 2006.
Financial Considerations in the New World!! GTA Annual Meeting Hilton Head, SC June 19, 2012 Leo Staurulakis – Executive Vice President.
Office of Communications Business Opportunities Commission Meeting January 15, 2004 Federal Communications Commission.
NASUCA June TELCO COMPETITION: THE LACK OF ESSENTIAL CONSUMER PROTECTIONS Barbara R. Alexander Consumer Affairs Consultant 83 Wedgewood Dr. Winthrop,
1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.
Legal & Regulatory Classification of Broadband Demystifying Title II.
Overview of Network Neutrality Kyle D. Dixon Senior Fellow & Director, Federal Institute for Regulatory Law & Economics The Progress & Freedom Foundation.
Competitive Implications of Forbearance Petitions (Cost Assignment and ARMIS) and the Special Access Debate Presentation to NARUC Staff Subcommittee on.
1 Wireline Competition Bureau Competition and Universal Service in a in a Dynamic Marketplace.
VoIP Regulation: State and Federal Developments LAMPERT & O’CONNOR, P.C K Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC (202)
Presentation By R K Arnold I.T.S. Secretary, TRAI TDSAT Seminar, Chennai on Dispute Resolution in Telecom.
Applications of Cost Proxy Models Universal Service William W. Sharkey* and D. Mark Kennet** November 2000 * FCC and The World Bank ** George Washington.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2006 Annual Report January 17, 2007.
+ BY: Falynn Elizabeth Lannert AP American Government 1 st Hour.
The Three Rs: The Need for Reliable, Redundant and Resilient Telecommunications in the New Age Presentation for the National Association of State Utility.
PRESENTED AT THE STAKEHOLDERS FORUM ON QUALITY OF SERVICE AND CONSUMER EXPERIENCE LAICO REGENCY HOTEL Creating Space for Consumer Rights in.
VoIP Regulation Klaus Nieminen TKK Table of Contents Background EU Regulatory Framework Objectives, PATS and ECS definitions VoIP Classification.
Law Seminars International Spectrum Management Conference NTIA: SPECTRUM POLICY FOR THE 21 st CENTURY The Federal Government Spectrum Management Perspective.
Federal Communications Commission TC 310 May 14, 2008.
Constructing An Effective Statutory & Regulatory Framework for Broadband Networks Phoenix Center Symposium December 1, 2005 Disclaimer: Views presented.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 1 Overview of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Roland W. Wentworth Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates.
Mec1224 EETT: From Telecommunications to Electronic Communications Athens, 28 March 2005 “Investment and competition in electronic communications services.
Defining Market Power and Competition* ANRT & ITU Rabat Workshop on Competition Jake E. Jennings, FCC December 19-21, 2005 * The views expressed are solely.
The IP Transition – What is it, and why is it important? Prepared for NASUCA Mid-year meeting, New Orleans, LA June 7, 2016 David C. Bergmann Telecom Policy.
JOHN M. HUFF NAIC PRESIDENT DIRECTOR, MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE JUNE 16, 2016 NAIC CYBERSECURITY INITIATIVES.
Da State.
Policies that Fuel New Technology Adoption
External Influences on Telecommunications in the Enterprise
NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF REGULATORY ATTORNEYS
CS at Regulatory agencies
Consumer Protection Under Statewide Video Franchises
Federal Communications Commission
Presentation transcript:

Federalism in the 21 st Century New England Conference of Public Utility Commissioners June 11, 2013 Groton, Connecticut Susan M. Baldwin

Acknowledgments Overview Acknowledgements: Helen Golding and Sarah Bosley - colleagues (Voice Link, rural call completion, state telecom legislation, IP trials, and more) We work with many consumer advocates. My comments today reflect my views and not necessarily those of the agencies I work with. Responding to “NARUC Federalism Task Force Report: Cooperative Federalism and Telecom in the 21 st Century,” June 2013 Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

State Legislation Matters Good things and bad things happen in the State Legislature NARUC paper is quiet about state legislation Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

Voice Link – A Call for State Action Unique opportunity and responsibility: states should investigate Voice Link tariffs  Evidentiary hearings  NYPSC Staff has already issued discovery to Verizon  Opportunities for stakeholders to vet the policy  As opposed to federal proceedings, which, as Paper observes, are often driven by the ex parte process, stakeholders are on more equal footing Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

Voice Link: State Trumps Federal Verizon is using spectrum to provide Voice Link But Voice Link is a fixed wireless service Federal pre-emption of CMRS/mobile wireless services (OBRA) did not contemplate carriers abandoning copper and replacing it with fixed wireless Therefore it would be inappropriate to construe OBRA so as to govern wireless offerings when they are used as a substitute for basic telephone exchange service. Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

Federal/State: Voice Link Principles 3 and 5: Competition and Broadband access, affordability and adoption  One fewer supplier of broadband Internet access  Pre Voice Link - broadband markets at best a duopoly.  Without DSL, the only wireline broadband is the incumbent cable company.  Who’s minding the broadband store?  Rates – FCC’s Form 477 should collect pricing information – how else can federal and state regulators monitor the market?  Service quality  4G LTE is metered. Not a substitute for wireline broadband service. Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

Federal: Section 214 Section 214 application to the FCC for authority to “grandfather and discontinue provision of its interstate wireline telecommunications services, including interstate interexchange and exchange access services in some limited parts of New York and New Jersey where copper wireline facilities were destroyed or rendered inoperable by Superstorm Sandy and where the new deployment of wireline facilities is impractical,” filed June 7, 2013 Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

Voice Link – for now, just a band-aid, or is it? Voice Link – emergency response to western part of Fire Island  BUT – the PSC allowed a provision to take effect that may encourage premature neglect of copper plant  Verizon may offer Voice Link as its sole service whenever it “(a) certifies and demonstrates that a substantial portion of its facilities in the area is destroyed, rendered unusable, or beyond reasonable repair.”  Does the PSC intend that this provision could apply anywhere in New York? Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

Voice Link – State Concerns – Public Safety Principle 2: Network reliability and public safety:  Incompatible with medical Life Alert Systems  Incompatible with home security systems  Limited battery back up for power outages  Geographic coding is “fixed” to the resident’s location – what if consumer moves and takes Voice Link equipment with her?  Verizon’s proposed tariff creates incentive to neglect its outside plant, which, in turn, weakens the link to emergency services Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

Voice Link – State Concerns Economic Development and Information Age  Does not support wireline broadband – DSL  4G LTE is a separate and metered service; less affordable than DSL and not necessarily available  Reduces broadband options in a market that already is not competitive.  Does not support credit card transactions, faxing Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

Voice Link – A Call for State Guidance Should Verizon be allowed to deploy Voice Link without regulatory approval? No. – Section 214 from FCC; tariff review by states. What do states have to offer when it comes to Voice Link and similar services? Evidentiary hearings. Discovery. Cross-examination. Informed decision-making. “More equal” footing for stakeholders than the FCC’s ex parte-driven process Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

Voice Link – A Call for State Guidance What is happening now? Parallel fed/state tracks  May 3 rd Verizon filing with the NYPSC  June 7 th Section 214 filing with the FCC  FCC IP trial proceeding – NPRM mentions Fire Island Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

“Make available to all the people of the United States, without discrimination…” NARUC Paper at 2 quoting Section 1 47 U.S.C. 151 Voice Link discriminates. “….some level of regulatory intervention available as a backstop to remedy problems caused by a lack of competitive choice or other issues associated with the broader public interest (e.g., public safety and privacy).” NARUC Paper, at 4. States should intervene in and as necessary – Voice Link is a perfect example of when to intervene. Voice Link – A Call for State Guidance Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

“…it appears that the FCC often focuses its efforts more on the information provided in the ex parte submissions….” NARUC Paper, at 7. This is troubling. State process is more open. States should take the lead in investigating Voice Link “Diversity of regulatory input and evidence-based decision making are the cornerstones for ensuring that regulation meets the needs of end users and industry.” NARUC Paper, at 8 Hear, hear! Voice Link – A Call for State Guidance Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,

For more information: Susan M. Baldwin 17 Arlington Street ▪ Newburyport, MA (978) Susan M. Baldwin – 66th Annual NECPUC Symposium – June 11,