Transit Long Range Financial Scenario Assumptions: 1 st and 2 nd quarter existing sales tax growing at 5% In 2020 and again in 2030, another ¼ cent sales.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Salt Lake City Downtown Transportation Master Plan Light Rail & Bus; Presentation Background and Introduction August 23, 2006.
Advertisements

Gateway Corridor Alternatives Analysis Findings Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee November 26, 2012.
“A P3 Success Story” RTD’s EAGLE P3 Project. 2 East Corridor 22.8 miles of commuter rail between Denver Union Station and Denver International Airport.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
Northwest Rail Update Nadine Lee, Northwest Rail Project Manager Regional Transportation District March 21, 2012.
Rescue Muni’s 3-Phased Plan For Geary Corridor Rapid Transit Presented by Dan Krause, Andrew Sullivan & David Vasquez.
OHIO & LAKE ERIE REGIONAL RAIL CLEVELAND HUB STUDY Ohio Rail Development Commission TMACOG Annual Transportation Summit September 29, 2003.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
Upstart to Start Up: Colorado’s High Speed & Intercity Transit Vision & State Rail Plan September 2014.
Passenger Rail Development Activities AASHTO Annual Meeting October 18, 2013 Serge Phillips, MnDOT Federal Relations Manager.
North Corridor Commuter Rail The Case For Tax Increment Financing Mecklenburg County May 2007.
BART Briefing for Mayor’s Transportation 2030 Task Force April 30, 2013.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Meeting Rick Clarke, Assistant GM – Capital Programs June 20, 2012.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
Utah’s Collaborative Approach to Transportation and Community Michael A. Allegra, President/CEO Utah Transit Authority October 9, 2014.
1 Program of Projects Study The Impacts of Regional Transit Investment Forum March 21, 2013 Move LA - "LA's Got Lines"
Structure of Presentation Federal Requirement Methodology WMATA Expenditures and Core Capacity Constraint Draft Revenues and Expenditures for 2015 – 2040.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Update Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning September 19, 2012.
Special Transit Advisory Commission “STAC” STAC commissioned by CAMPO and DCHC –“Capital Area MPO” & “Durham, Chapel Hill, Carrboro MPO” Regional cross.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
North Utah County Transit Study
1 Senate Transportation & Housing Committee December 13, 2005 Orange County Transportation Authority.
1. New Starts Program Debate Preserving the American Dream Conference Washington, DC October 27, 2013 Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public.
Proposed New School District Does it make sense for Draper?
February 24, “Moving Transit Forward”  A fiscally responsible, community-driven vision for restoring, enhancing, and expanding the Metro Transit.
1 MetropolitanCouncil Transit CapitalImprovement ProgramOctober 22, 2008.
PROJECT UPDATE PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #3 OCTOBER 17 4:30 PM – 6:30 PM Dakota County Northern Service Center.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
Purpose To develop and evaluate a range of transit and transportation alternatives throughout the MPO area, considering: u Regional Goals and Objectives.
1 High-Speed Rail Evaluation October 12, 2007 Planning Committee.
1 Current Funding of Surface Transportation Infrastructure Briefing for the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission April 25,
Initiated the discussions that led to Measure R on the November 2008 ballot:  a ½ cent sales tax increase to raise $40 billion for LA County transportation.
Regional Transit Study Final Recommendations March 15, 2010.
Mercer Corridor Stakeholder Committee November 4, 2015 Sound Transit.
Prepared for Presentation to the American Dream Coalition By Emory Bundy, Jim MacIsaac and Doug Simpson November 11, 2007 Defeated on Nov 7, 2007.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee Overview of RCTC’s Major Projects December 8, 2015.
Briefing for Transportation Finance Panel Nov 23, 2015 Economic Analysis Reports: 1.I-84 Viaduct in Hartford 2.I-84/Rt8 Mixmaster in Waterbury 3.New Haven.
Cornelius Candidate Projects For Funding Total Candidate Projects$ 22 million –Rail Improvements ($10 million) –Local CIP Projects NC-115 upgrades ($ 1.9.
Metropolitan Council 1 Twin Cities Region Transportation Policy Plan Nacho Diaz Metropolitan Council Evaluating Economic and Community Impacts of Transit.
The 2006 Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan: Plan Performance Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item #7.
CTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. FY FY 2019 CIP Preliminary Marks.
AMPO October 22, South Florida Region.
Draft Action Plan for Public Transportation in Wake County June 22, 2009.
FY Annual Transit Performance Report Maricopa Association of Governments Transportation Review Committee February 26, 2004.
Regional Transportation Plan Draft Hybrid Scenario Transportation Policy Committee 7/22/03.
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
Counties Transit Improvement Board: Program of Projects & Transit Investment Framework Workshop 3 Board Workshop October 16, 2013.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
Transit Capital Project Revenue Advisory Board June 16, 2016 Virginia Department of Rail & Public Transportation Transit Resource Allocation Plan Capital.
2018 – 2023 Strategic Budget Plan
Northwest Area Mobility Study FasTracks Monitoring Committee
Review of 2018–2023 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and
Regional Roads Committee
Future Construction FasTracks Corridors Federal Funding Analysis
The State of the Utah Valley Economy
“A P3 Success Story” RTD’s EAGLE P3 Project
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
Orange County Board of County Commissioners January 24, 2017
North-South Corridor Bus Rapid Transit Project
Durham and Orange Transit Plan Funding Needs
February 2017 New Starts Financial Plan
The State of the Utah Valley Economy
North Suburban Planning Council
2020 RTP Update - Proposed Changes to Transit Projects
NCRR is helping build a strong economy that benefits the people of North Carolina. We do this most visibly with steel and wood. Even more important, we.
Presentation transcript:

Transit Long Range Financial Scenario Assumptions: 1 st and 2 nd quarter existing sales tax growing at 5% In 2020 and again in 2030, another ¼ cent sales tax for transit Introduction of new State of Good Repair (SOGR) cost Federal Funding limited to 1 project at 50% beyond BRT Provo/Orem BRT is already included in UTA real funding scenario

The Travel Model is used to determine ridership The Travel Model is used to determine ridership Draper to Spanish Fork traversing the urban core warrants Light Rail in phase 2 Draper to Spanish Fork traversing the urban core warrants Light Rail in phase 2 Provo to Payson warrants Commuter Rail in phase 2 Provo to Payson warrants Commuter Rail in phase 2 Commuter Rail to Santaquin has low ridership Commuter Rail to Santaquin has low ridership BRT to Eagle Mountain has strong ridership BRT to Eagle Mountain has strong ridership Transit Modeling Further study is proposed for South County Rail Options Further study is proposed for South County Rail Options Currently studying light rail alignment through Orem Currently studying light rail alignment through Orem LRT / CR Rail CR Rail / BRT Bus Riders High Low

Draft Listing of Transit Projects Projects shown as when needed Projects shown as when needed Cost and financial constraint to be presented later Cost and financial constraint to be presented later Vision or yellow projects need further study Vision or yellow projects need further study Project needed by… Need to add: Positive Train Control $ 7.5 m CR Additional Siding $ 12.7m

What do the projects cost? $413.6 m $2.27m $180.9m $.9m $871.3m $6.4m (fed money possible) $150m $3.5m $30.2m $4.8m $38.8m $6.2m $23.7m $3.8m $2.5m $4.5m $2.5m $3m Projected Costs Capital Annual O&M Total $1.75b in Capital projects $28.5m in Annual O&M

Revenue Funds Combined 1 st and 2 nd quarter cent Transit Sales Tax Phase 1 $435.2m ( ) Phase 2$708.9m ( ) Phase 3$624.4 ( ) Total$1.76b New 2020 Sales Tax Generation Only money available for new Projects $717,782,622

What do the projects cost? $413.6 m $2.27m $180.9m $.9m $871.3m $6.4m (fed money possible) $150m $3.5m $30.2m $4.8m $38.8m $6.2m $23.7m $3.8m $2.5m $4.5m $2.5m $3m Projected Costs Capital Annual O&M Total $1.75b in Capital projects $28.5m in Annual O&M New 2020 Sales Tax Generation Only money available for new Projects $717,782,622

State of Good Repair (SOGR) UTA cost for system wide state of good repair $4.3 billion Utah County’s share is 15% or $645M UTA is assuming 100 % depreciation value of its current infrastructure

Bottom Line The financial scenario is such that even after a quarter cent tax increase in 2020, we are unable to build a significant transit capital project within the time frame of the Long Range Plan. In summary, the plan will likely include a 70% increase in bus service and construction of commuter rail operational and station upgrades. Additional, revenue would change that.

Transit Long Range Financial Scenario Assumptions: 1 st and 2 nd quarter existing sales tax growing at 5% In 2020 and again in 2030, another ¼ cent sales tax for transit Introduction of new State of Good Repair (SOGR) cost Federal Funding limited to 1 project at 50% beyond BRT Provo/Orem BRT is already included in UTA real funding scenario

From November 2014 MPO Finance Committee meeting

Current Project List w/o and with SOGR

Ridership as if we built it all as LRT 2040 Modeled Ridership: CR South to Payson 7,637 CR South to Santaquin 648 LRT Draper to Orem 20,851 LRT Draper to Lehi BRT AF to EM 1,754 BRT AF to Provo 7,826 BRT Provo to SF 2,979 BRT SF to Payson 413

Option 2: SOGR at 50% w/o 4 th Qtr. Can build Segmented LRT and other BRT projects. No Commuter Rail South

Option 3: SOGR at 50% with 4 th Qtr. Can Build LRT to Orem OR Commuter Rail South and BRT Projects with Significant Bonding

Option 4: SOGR at 100% with 4 th Qtr. Can build LRT to Orem OR Commuter Rail South with BRT Projects. Reasonable Bonding

Option 5: SOGR at 100% with 4 th QTR Can build Commuter Rail South OR LRT to Orem with BRT Projects. Reasonable Bonding

Option 6: SOGR at 100% with 4 th Qtr. Build segmented LRT to Lehi AND Commuter Rail South and one BRT along State Street between American Fork and Provo.