WGBH, Boston MA May 10, 2013 Andrea Goethals, Harvard Library.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is HathiTrust and How Can it Make a Difference? Sourcing and Scaling brought to the collective collection.
Advertisements

Digital Preservation A Matter of Trust. Context * As of March 5, 2011.
OCLC Digital Archive: Creating Long Term Access to Digital Masters Roberta Gebhardt, Montana Historical Society Research Center Sarah McHugh, Montana State.
OCLC Digital Archive Overview Judith Cobb LIPA Meeting July 2006.
ICDL-Contentra Workshop 29 th November /11/2013 Contentra Technologies Confidential (RajuB)1.
The National Digital Stewardship Alliance: Community, Content, Commitment.
DRS 2 one in a series of periodic updates Harvard University Library Andrea Goethals October 21, 2009 DRS = Digital Repository Service.
Institutional Repositories It’s not Just the Technology New England Archivists Boston College March 11, 2006 Eliot Wilczek University Records Manager Tufts.
Coping with Electronic Records Setting Standards for Private Sector E-records Retention.
The Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences Building an Interim Digital Preservation System Nancy Silver Digital Archival Program Manager Science and.
Current Thinking on Digital Preservation: Role of Metadata Oya Y. Rieger Coordinator, Library Office of Distributed Learning Cornell University Library.
Depositing and Disseminating Digital Resources Alan Morrison Collections Manager AHDS Subject Centre for Literature, Linguistics and Languages.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) A Guide for Wisconsin State Agencies.
Digital Repository Service (DRS) Harvard University Library OIS presented by: Wendy Gogel & Andrea Goethals.
1 Public Hearings: May , 2013 Child Care Development Fund Massachusetts State Plan Federal Fiscal Years 2014 and 2015.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Registry of Digital Masters A joint project of the Digital Library Federation and OCLC Taylor Surface, OCLC ALA Annual.
BOSTO N LYRASIS Preservation Town Hall, June 24, 2014 * Andrea Goethals, Harvard Library.
Ingest and Dissemination with DAITSS Presented by Randy Fischer, Programmer, Florida Center for Library Automation, University of Florida DigCCurr2007.
Preserving Electronic Mailing Lists: The H-Net Archive H-Net Mapped to the OAIS Model Preservation AssessmentPreservation improvementsOverview How H-Net.
Mid-Michigan Digital Practitioners, March 14, 2014 The National Digital Stewardship Alliance Agenda Mid-Michigan Digital Practitioners Meeting Abigail.
Persistent Digital Archives and Library System (PeDALS) SC Department of Archives and History.
Digital Preservation: Store & Protect Laurie Sauer Information Technologies Librarian Knox College
13 September 2012 The Libraries’ Role in Research Data Management: A Case Study from the University of Minnesota Meghan Lafferty, Chemistry, Chemical Engineering,
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
International Seminary on Digitisation: Experience and Technology Lisbon, 11th May 2004 Minerva &MinervaPLUS Benefits for Cultural Institutions and Industries.
A survey based analysis on training opportunities Dr. Jūratė Kuprienė Framing the digital curation curriculum International Conference Florence, Italy.
The Library of Congress Martha Anderson Program Officer, NDIIPP Office of Strategic Initiatives Library of Congress April 2005 LC Perspective : Preservation.
Libraries, Archives, and Digital Preservation: The Reality of What We Must Do Leslie Johnston Acting Director, National Digital Information Infrastructure.
HathiTrust’s Past, Present and Future. Short- and Long-term Functional Objectives Short-term Page turner mechanism (and Mobile!) Branding (overall initiative;
1 Designing Storage Architecture for Digital Collections 2012.
Preserving eScholarship and Digitized Special Collections Distributed Digital Preservation Bill Donovan
Digital Preservation MetaArchive Cooperative.  9:00-9:45 - Session 1: Digital Preservation Overview  9:45-11:00 - Session 2: Policy & Planning Overview.
Digital preservation activities at the NLW Sally McInnes 18 September 2009.
E.Soundararajan R.Baskaran & M.Sai Baba Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research, Kalpakkam.
Katherine Skinner, Executive Director, Educopia Institute ESOPI 2013 Chapel Hill, NC April 19, 2013.
Session 3.  Now you know WHY to make policies and WHAT they should contain…  But HOW do you implement policies?  And then HOW do you implement a program.
Small steps and lasting impact: making a start with preservation or It’s not all NASA Patricia Sleeman Digital Archives and Repositories University of.
Data in the NEES Data Repository Conditions for Current and Future Use and Re-Use Quake Summit 2012, Boston, Massachusetts July 12, 2012 Stanislav Pejša.
DRS 2 Project (2008 – Present!) Andrea Goethals, Harvard Library Digital Preservation Management Workshop, MIT June 13, 2013.
VITAL at the National Library of Wales Glen Robson
Digital Preservation across the technologies, strategies, open standards & interoperability aspects including the legal issues Pratik Shrivastava Scientist.
Carcanet Case Study Fran Baker, John Rylands University Library University of Manchester SPRUCE event 19 January 2012.
NDSR Boston webinar: Digital Preservation Introduction Presenter: Nancy Y McGovern October 2015.
Archiving microdata Standards and good practices United Nations Statistics Commission New York, February 26, 2009 Olivier Dupriez World Bank, Development.
Developing a Framework for File Format Migrations iPRES 2015 Chapel Hill, NC 3 November 2015 Joey Heinen and Andrea Goethals.
Partnership for New York’s Cultural Heritage New York’s IMLS Connecting to Collections Planning Project A statewide survey of New York cultural heritage.
The Importance of Standards in Digital Preservation Tina Norris Kayla Payne Jennifer
Preserving Electronic Mailing Lists as Scholarly Resources: The H-Net Archives Lisa M. Schmidt
Infrastructure Breakout What capacities should we build now to manage data and migrate it over the future generations of technologies, standards, formats,
Leveraging the Expertise of our Staff and the Information Resources We Manage MIT Libraries Visiting Committee April 13, 2005.
Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium Sustainability and.
Data Management and Digital Preservation Carly Dearborn, MSIS Digital Preservation & Electronic Records Archivist
The National Digital Stewardship Alliance: Stewardship, Collaboration, Inclusiveness, Exchange.
DPLAfest, April 15, 2016 Chip German, Program Director, APTrust and Senior Director, Content Stewardship, at the University of Virginia Library
BOSTO N Second Round NDSA NE, UMass Dartmouth 9/25/2015.
Katherine Skinner, Martin Halbert & Matt Schultz Educopia Institute and MetaArchive Cooperative NDSA Infrastructure Committee
Digital Preservation MetaArchive Cooperative, Digital Preservation Policy Planning Workshop Boston College, Boston, MA October 26, 2010.
BOSTO N National Digital Stewardship Residency Program Cohort.
Digital Preservation What, Why, and How? Dan Albertson’s Digital Libraries Class April 13, 2016 Jody DeRidder Head, Metadata & Digital Services University.
OAIS (archive) OAIS (archive) Producer Management Consumer.
The National Digital Stewardship Alliance: Community, Content, Commitment.
Digital Stewardship Curriculum
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
Data stewardship life cycle
Video Retention and Metadata Guidelines CIO Council Update
Second Round NDSA NE, UMass Dartmouth 9/25/2015 Welcome
Storage Basic recommendations:
Research data preservation in Canada
GISELA & CHAIN Workshop Digital Cultural Heritage Network
Robin Dale RLG OAIS Functionality Robin Dale RLG
Presentation transcript:

WGBH, Boston MA May 10, 2013 Andrea Goethals, Harvard Library

 NDSA Levels of Digital Preservation  NDSR Boston

Guidelines created by the NDSA

Standards & Practices InfrastructureInnovation Outreach Content NDSA Diverse working groups

Standards & Practices InfrastructureInnovation Outreach Content Levels of Digital Preservation Common Need

Simple, practical, documented levels of preservation services reflecting best practices, broadly useful – For those just starting out & those with mature programs – Independent of formats, storage systems – Useful to educators & implementers

Niche Personal Archiving Advice … Levels of Digital Preservati on … Formal Certifications & Audits

Levels of Digital Preservation, v1 Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Level 4  Category 1  Category 2  Category 3  Category 4  Category 5 

Levels of Digital Preservation, v1 Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Level 4  Category 1  Category 2  Category 3  Category 4  Category 5  Bit-level Protection Longer-term Usability

Levels of Digital Preservation, v1 Level 1 (Protect your data) Level 2 (Know your data) Level 3 (Monitor your data) Level 4 (Repair your data) Storage and Geographic Location - Two complete copies that are not collocated - For data on heterogeneous media (optical discs, hard drives, etc.) get the content off the medium and into your storage system - At least three complete copies - At least one copy in a different geographic location - Document your storage system(s) and storage media and what you need to use them - At least one copy in a geographic location with a different disaster threat - Obsolescence monitoring process for your storage system(s) and media - At least three copies in geographic locations with different disaster threats - Have a comprehensive plan in place that will keep files and metadata on currently accessible media or systems File Fixity and Data Integrity - Check file fixity on ingest if it has been provided with the content - Create fixity info if it wasn’t provided with the content - Check fixity on all ingests - Use write-blockers when working with original media - Virus-check high risk content - Check fixity of content at fixed intervals - Maintain logs of fixity info; supply audit on demand - Ability to detect corrupt data - Virus-check all content - Check fixity of all content in response to specific events or activities - Ability to replace/repair corrupted data - Ensure no one person has write access to all copies Information Security - Identify who has read, write, move and delete authorization to individual files - Restrict who has those authorizations to individual files - Document access restrictions for content - Maintain logs of who performed what actions on files, including deletions and preservation actions - Perform audit of logs Metadata - Inventory of content and its storage location - Ensure backup and non-collocation of inventory - Store administrative metadata - Store transformative metadata and log events - Store standard technical and descriptive metadata - Store standard preservation metadata File Formats - When you can give input into the creation of digital files encourage use of a limited set of known open formats and codecs - Inventory of file formats in use- Monitor file format obsolescence issues- Perform format migrations, emulation and similar activities as needed

Storage and Geographic Location Level 1 Protect your data Level 2 Know your data Level 3 Monitor your data Level 4 Repair your data Two complete copies that are not collocated For data on heterogeneous media (optical discs, hard drives, etc.) get the content off the medium and into your storage system At least three complete copies At least one copy in a different geographic location Document your storage systems(s) and storage media and what you need to use them At least one copy in a geographic location with a different disaster threat Obsolescence monitoring for your storage system(s) and media At least three copies in geographic locations with different disaster threats Have a comprehensive plan in place that will keep files and metadata on currently accessible media or systems

File Fixity and Data Integrity Level 1 Protect your data Level 2 Know your data Level 3 Monitor your data Level 4 Repair your data Check file fixity on ingest if it has been provided with the content Create fixity info if it wasn’t provided with the content Check fixity on all ingests Use write-blockers when working with original media Virus-check high risk content Check fixity of content at fixed intervals Maintain logs of fixity info; supply audit on demand Ability to detect corrupt data Virus-check all content Check fixity of all content in response to specific events or activities Ability to replace/repair corrupted data Ensure no one person has write access to all copies

Information Security Level 1 Protect your data Level 2 Know your data Level 3 Monitor your data Level 4 Repair your data Identify who has read, write, move and delete authorization to individual files Restrict who has those authorizations to individual files Document access restrictions for content Maintain logs of who performed what actions on files, including deletions and preservation actions Perform audit of logs

Metadata Level 1 Protect your data Level 2 Know your data Level 3 Monitor your data Level 4 Repair your data Inventory of content and its storage location Ensure backup and non-collocation of inventory Store administrative metadata Store transformative metadata and log events Store standards technical and descriptive metadata Store standard preservation metadata

File Formats Level 1 Protect your data Level 2 Know your data Level 3 Monitor your data Level 4 Repair your data When you can give input into the creation of digital files, encourage use of a limited set of known open formats and codecs Inventory of file formats in use Monitor file format obsolescence issues Perform format migrations, emulation and similar activities as needed

Some Uses Identify community consensus on best practices Preservation service choices Assessments – how do we compare with best practices? – What should we improve next? – Where do we excel? – How will we improve after project X? – How have we improved over time?

Self-assessment example Level OneLevel TwoLevel ThreeLevel Four Storage & Geographic Location File Fixity and Data Integrity Information Security Metadata File Formats = satisfied with implementation = will be satisfied with implementation after current enhancement project = implemented but could be improved = not implemented

How you can help: provide feedback! Revisions will continue until the Levels stabilize on a broad professional consensus. Comments received by 8/31/2013 can affect the next revision Send comments by ing the addresses listed at

IMLS-funded Residency Project

 National Digital Stewardship Residency  New residency program created by the Library of Congress (LC) with the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS)  To develop the next generation of stewards to collect, manage, preserve and make accessible our digital assets

 Cohort model (social learning)  Focus on digital stewardship  Graduates of any masters program  Round out what’s needed for a successful career ◦ Hands-on experience with real projects in real world settings ◦ Building of portfolio, professional network, presentation skills  Directly beneficial to host institutions ◦ Projects proposed by them ◦ Collaborate with the other host institutions ◦ Exposure to program training material, resident tools

 10 Washington D.C.-area hosts ◦ Project proposals  10 recent master’s graduates ◦ Apply and choose top 3

Developing and promoting policies and services to make digital assets of research libraries accessible (Association of Research Libraries) Management and preservation of digital assets (Dumbarton Oaks) Born-digital preservation (Folger Shakespeare Library) Taking action to mitigate format obsolescence (Library of Congress) Developing a thematic web archive collection (National Library of Medicine) The digital dissemination challenge (National Security Archive) Broadcast media archive: appraisal and evaluation of at-risk media to support digitization initiative (PBS) Time-based media art: specialized requirements for trustworthy digital repositories (Smithsonian Institution Archives) Accessing born-digital literary materials (University of Maryland Libraries and MITH) eArchives: memory of the world bank (World Bank Group Archives)

 Begins with an intensive 2-week immersion workshop at LC on digital stewardship  Residents transfer to 1 of 10 Wash. D.C. institutions for 9 months ◦ Hands-on experience working on digital stewardship project(s) ◦ With the cohort attend guest lectures, field trips, make presentations ◦ Start to build portfolio and professional network

 Hosts already identified  Selected residents will be notified next week  Sept. 2013: Immersion workshop  Sept 2013 – May 2014: Residency

 IMLS-funded grants  Two geographic areas ◦ NDSR Boston (Harvard / MIT) ◦ NDSR New York (METRO)

 Timeframe (June 2013 – June 2016) ◦ Year 1: planning ◦ Year 2: 1 st round of residents  April 2014: Hosts identified for 1 st round ◦ Year 3: 2 nd round of residents  April 2015: Hosts identified for 2 nd round

 Coordinated by an academic inst. (Harvard)  Produce curriculum resources and model documents  Train-the-Trainers workshop  Great environment for residents ◦ Public transportation system ◦ Rich with potential host institutions ◦ Many potential guest lecturers, site visits

Thanks!