MPLS Consortium Charter Meeting Welcome to UNH Durham, New Hampshire February 7, 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
Advertisements

Optical Control Plane Activities in IETF and OIF L. Ong 9 July 2002 L. Ong 9 July 2002
International Telecommunication Union Informal Forum Summit San Francisco, July 2003 PROGRESS REPORT ON ACTION ITEMS SINCE THE 2001 IFS Greg Jones.
Traffic Engineering over MPLS
Identifying MPLS Applications
USG INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM AUDIT: ACHIEVING SUCCESSFUL AUDIT OUTCOMES Cara King Senior IT Auditor, OIAC.
Deployment of MPLS VPN in Large ISP Networks
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
IEEE Conformity Assessment Program (ICAP) – An Overview Rudi Schubert Director – ICAP Prepared for: CS-SAB Meeting March.
T EACHER L EADERSHIP SEMINAR S ESSION 1 By: Carrie Pilant Presented at Imogene Gideon Elementary Thursday, October 7, 2010.
NEES Project Management Workshop June 16 June 18 1 Segment 2.
AIMS Workshop Heidelberg, 9-11 March /20 A Telecom and IP Project from ETSI Gerald Meyer
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
IEEE President-Elect Candidate Forum Region 6 September 22, 2004 IEEE Region 6 Evelyn H. Hirt, Director.
CPMA Repacking and Wholesale Food Safety Program August 14 th, 2006 Calgary, AB.
© UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE INTEROPERABILITY LABORATORY UNH InterOperability Laboratory Power over Ethernet Consortium Benefits and Testing Capability.
CIM Users Group Intro and Benefits Ralph Mackiewicz Chair, Marketing Subcommittee UCA International Users Group October 2007 Austin, TX
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) presented by: chitralekha tamrakar (B.S.E.) divya krit tamrakar (B.S.E.) Rashmi shrivastava(B.S.E.) prakriti.
Community Information Technology Engagement (CITE): Program Overview
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite Chapter 4. Multilayer communication. A series of layers, each built upon the one below it. The purpose of each layer is.
DPW BD&C Employee Performance Evaluation Guideline Discussion
Acquisitions, a Publisher’s Perspective Craig Duncan Development Manager External Development Studio Building the partnership between.
MetaArchive Distributed Digital Preservation Workshop Session 3: Costs and Operational Considerations Wednesday, May 30, 2007 Robert W. Woodruff Library.
BIS310: Structured Analysis and Design Introduction and Systems Planning Week 1.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
Org Name Org Site CMM Assessment Kick-off Meeting Dates of assessment.
1 Multi Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Petros Ioannou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCY.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Project ManagementDay 1 in the pm Project Management (PM) Structures.
Ravi Subramaniam – Technical Director, ICAP 22 September 2012 Geneva, Switzerland IEEE Conformity Assessment Program (ICAP) for SIEPON 22 September
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Information Assurance The Coordinated Approach To Improving Enterprise Data Quality.
Profiling Metadata Specifications David Massart, EUN Budapest, Hungary – Nov. 2, 2009.
Technical Assistance Grants to Communities Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 20, 2008 Steve Fischer PHMSA/Office of Pipeline Safety.
OpenSG Conformity IPRM Overview July 20, ITCA goals under the IPRM at a high level and in outline form these include: Organize the Test and Certification.
IHE IT Infrastructure: The Value Proposition HIMSS 2003 Joining the IHE in its New Enterprise Initiatives.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
Environmental Management System Definitions
© 2007 Open Grid Forum Data Grid Management Systems: Standard API - community development Arun Jagatheesan, San Diego Supercomputer Center & iRODS.org.
ISA Setting the Standard for Automation ™ Automation Standards Compliance Institute ISA Security Compliance Institute (ISCI) Prepared by: Andre Ristaino,
Sub-ip - 1 Blurring the Lines Between Circuits and Protocols: Plans to Re-Organize Sub-IP Technologies in the IETF Scott Bradner Harvard University.
© 2013 IBM Corporation OSLC WG Transition **DRAFT** Plan 8 April 2013 Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration Lifecycle integration inspired by the web.
Report on the review of ACG structure The Exchange of Information Task Force October 7-9, 2009 The 13th ACG General Meeting in Hanoi.
© UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE INTEROPERABILITY LABORATORY UNH InterOperability Laboratory Fast Ethernet Consortium Benefits and Testing Capability.
United States Standards Strategy Updating a Standards Strategy for Manufacturers in the Global Marketplace March 30, 2005 National Assn. of Manufacturers.
© UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE INTEROPERABILITY LABORATORY UNH InterOperability Laboratory Routing Consortium Benefits and Testing Capability.
© UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE INTEROPERABILITY LABORATORY UNH InterOperability Laboratory Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Benefits and Testing Capability.
© UNIVERSITY of NEW HAMPSHIRE INTEROPERABILITY LABORATORY UNH InterOperability Laboratory IPv6 Consortium Benefits and Testing Capability.
1 MPLS: Progress in the IETF Yakov Rekhter
MPLS-TP INTER-OP: WHAT, WHY, AND HOW? General Objectives for MPLS-TP Inter-Op Test Program at UNH-IOL.
Improving Networks Worldwide. UNH InterOperability Lab UNH-IOL Overview November, 2008.
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20 th, 2015 | New Orleans, LA API RP 1175 Pipeline Leak Detection Program Management – New RP Highlights.
Region 2 Industry Relations Report to Region 2 Committee February 22/ By Joe Kalasky R2 IR Chair, 2003.
1 Lecture 2.4a: SEF SE Planning and the SEP (SEF Ch 16) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
Internet Traffic Engineering Motivation: –The Fish problem, congested links. –Two properties of IP routing Destination based Local optimization TE: optimizing.
Multi-protocol Label Switching
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
Internal Audit Quality Assessment Guide
ESC achievments since Barcelona
Chapter 4 Systems Planning and Selection
Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings
The International Electrotechnical Commission
Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
LETSI The Vision and the Plan
Chapter 1 Introduction.
Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings
NGN Interoperability TIA DEL DOCUMENT #:
Participation in IEEE 802 Meetings
Presentation transcript:

MPLS Consortium Charter Meeting Welcome to UNH Durham, New Hampshire February 7, 2000

Agenda n Welcome and Introductions n Overview of the UNH InterOperability Laboratory n Establishment of the MPLS Consortium –Testing Goals Discussion –Charter and Usage Agreement

Agenda (continued) n Lunch n Election of MPLS Steering Committee n Initial Group Test Planning n Review and Closing Remarks

The Interoperability Problem and the UNH InterOperability Laboratory Scott A. Valcourt Senior Consortium Manager February 7, 2000

Overview n Understanding the Interoperability Problem n Solving the Interoperability Problem n The UNH InterOperability Laboratory

Interoperability Failures n Pushes out market acceptance of new technologies n Increases support cost n Opens windows of opportunity for different solutions n Does not enhance the reputation of a product

The Meaning of Interoperability n Plug and play operation independent of who provided the product n Works in the users environment n Works with the users applications

Foundational Issues n How is interoperability achieved? n How is interoperability demonstrated to the marketplace?

Key #1 The Standard n The standard is the foundation of interoperability. Interoperability problems will exist unless the standard: –Clearly and fully specifies external behavior –Limits options –Addresses market needs –Achieves sufficient developer support and is considered authoritative

Key #2 Technical Testing n New technologies, like new products, have bugs. Test procedures must be available which show that the: –External behavior of the product is consistent with the standard –Product works with other products in different configurations –Product works with common applications

Key #3 Reference Environment n Practical concerns make it necessary to maintain a common center in which interoperability testing can take place –A common site is needed where multiple implementations of the standard are available for testing –Developers must be able to have testing done without exposure of unannounced products or test results

Key #4 An Interoperability Metric n An accepted definition must exist that shows when a product is interoperable –A test report that may be distributed by the owner of the product within the development community –Testing must cover both conformance-like and interoperability items

The Marketing Issues n Cooperation must be achieved between developers n Interoperability intent and achievement must be demonstrated to the public n Testing needs can not significantly delay product introductions n The interoperability metric must be effective to be accepted

The Process n Creating structure to focus industry effort and obtain support n Develop testing tools and technology n Establish reference center n Coordinate demonstrations that show interoperability n Establish a visible interoperability metric

What is the UNH-IOL n Interoperability “facilitation” organization –Part of the University of New Hampshire –Provides technical experience for students in CS and EE –Develops test suites, testing tools, and provides testing services –Helps coordinate interoperability efforts within industry in a cooperative manner –Technical in nature

IOL Experience n Twelve years of helping industry bring “interoperable” technology to market 10BaseT EthernetFast EthernetFDDIGigabit Ethernet Fibre ChannelIP ProtocolSNMPBridge Functions LINUXToken RingATMADSL DOCSISWireless (IEEE )100VG-AnyLAN HDSL2MPLSNetwork Management n Test development experience at physical signaling level up to application level

IOL Acceptance n 150+ corporate memberships world-wide n IOL test reports are trusted by vendors and are often used as basis for quality assurance in OEM deals n Establishment of IOL consortiums accepted as evidence of industry commitment to interoperability within telecom, datacom and other industries

Establishing a MPLS Interoperability Effort n Formation of the MPLS consortium –members agree on charter and fee structure –members elect steering committee –members define scope of testing effort n Consortium develops testing facilities and supports demonstration efforts n Consortium must cover all direct costs of operation

Summary n Addressing the interoperability problem requires: –A good standard, and a good conformance and interoperability test suite –An interoperability reference center and interoperability test procedures –A meaningful interoperability metric n IOL consortiums address interoperability issues in specific technologies

Contact Information Scott A. Valcourt Senior Consortium Manager (603)

MPLS Consortium Testing Goals Rob Blais MPLS Consortium Manager February 7, 2000

Consortium Testing Goals n MPLS-Specific Protocols n Routing Protocols n MPLS Services n Interfaces (Layer 2)

MPLS Specific Protocols n RSVP n LDP n CR-LDP

Routing Protocols n OSPF n BGP4 n IS-IS n Others? n Focus on TE extensions

MPLS Services n Class of Service (CoS) n Traffic Engineering n VPNs

Interfaces (Layer 2) n ATM n Packet over SONET (PoS) n Frame-Relay n Gigabit Ethernet n Optical/Lambda/WDM? n Others?

Other Issues n Other things that should be tested

MPLS Consortium Structure Rob Blais MPLS Consortium Manager February 7, 2000

MPLS Consortium Charter n Structure & Terms n Fees

Structure & Terms n Overall n Section 3.1.3

MPLS Consortium Expenses n Labor –Graduate student: $25k/year –Undergraduate student: $12k/year –Full-Time UNH Staff members: $55k/year n General –Overhead: 25%/year –Other expenses: $30k/year –Special equipment needs: ??

Expenses (cont.) n Staffing needs –3 to 4 Graduate students –6 to 8 Undergraduate students –Full-time UNH Staff members

Fees n Estimated members: 20 n Estimated expenses: $290,000/year n Membership fee needed: $15,000/year

Steering Committee n Optional n Typically 3 members –1 member per company n Nominate n Vote

Group Tests n First: March , 2000 n IOL Group Test Facility, Durham, NH n Focus: RSVP n Testing Plans

Group Tests (cont.) n Future tests –LDP/CR-LDP –When?

Contact Information Rob Blais MPLS Consortium Manager (603)

Closing Remarks n Thank you for coming! n Have a Safe Trip Home!