PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT Technical Workshops Contextual questionnaires 10 th April 2014 OECD Secretariat 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Advertisements

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Leicestershires Vision for short break transformation Leicestershire is committed to the transformation and expansion of short break services for disabled.
From e-Government to e-Governance: The OECD Experience Elizabeth Muller E-Government Project OECD SitExpo February 1004, Casablanca - Morocco.
A.Review of PISA constructs and indices (and variables) to identify those that are likely to be operable and not operable in developing country contexts,
Regoverning Markets Workshop, Warsaw Component 3 of the Regoverning Markets Programme: L earning Alliances and Policy Dialogue TOR for the.
Environment case Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009 Hellen Foster, Jarlath Molloy NATS, Imperial College London.
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT Technical Workshops Components and input for ToR of the International Contractor(s) 9 th April 2014 OECD Secretariat 1.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
METHODOLOGY FOR THE REVIEW/EVALUATION OF POLICY DOCUMENTS By Kwami DADJI, Health Officer HIV/AIDS, TB, Malaria & OID African Union Commission.
Deborah Cobb-Clark (U Melbourne) Mathias Sinning (ANU) Steven Stillman (U Otago)
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
1 Regulatory Impact Assessment: Methodology and Best Practices David Shortall INMETRO International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SKILLS DEVELOPMENT: CALL FOR TENDER PROCESS An Overview.
Types of Evaluation.
PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT Technical Workshops Project up-date 8 th April 2014 OECD Secretariat 1.
ICT and Education Indicators S
Introduction to Standard 2: Partnering with consumers Advice Centre Network Meeting Nicola Dunbar October 2012.
PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT International Advisory Group Meeting Closing Session May 2014 OECD Secretariat 1.
1 Types of Evaluation. 2 Different types of evaluation Needs assessment Process evaluation Impact evaluation Cost-benefit analysis.
DIVISION Landstingsdirektörens stab Coral Interreg Europe proposal Project proposal addresses objective 1.2 of the Interreg Europe Programme: Improve the.
Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Raising Academic Standards for all School Development Planning Initiative.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
mSCOA : Position Paper – Reporting (Draft)
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
Addressing methodological challenges: measuring resilience + international coherence Juliet Field Climate and Environment Dept.
A Review of the Standing Committee of Caribbean Statisticians (SCCS) as a Mechanism for Statistical Development and Harmonisation The Second Meeting of.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Guidelines for Impact and Adaptation Assessment Design versus Implementation Issues RICHARD J.T. KLEIN POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH (PIK)
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
Partnership Analysis & Enhancement Tool Kit Cindy S. Soloe Research Triangle Institute (RTI) April Y. Vance Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Community-Driven Development: An Overview of Practice Community Development Strategies – how to prioritize, sequence and implement programs CommDev Workshop.
DECEMBER 2010 EUROPEAN MODULES ON MIGRANT INTEGRATION OUTCOMES & REFLECTIONS FROM THE FIRST MODULE ON LANGUAGE AND INTRODUCTORY COURSES.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Quality Assuring Deliverers of Education and Training for the Nuclear Sector Jo Tipa Operations Director National Skills Academy for Nuclear.
Comments on the Washington Group Position Paper Proposed Purpose of an Internationally Comparable General Disability Measure Alicia Bercovich IBGE Brazil.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
G544 – Practical project SELF REPORT. Revision  Socrative quiz  In pairs – answer each question.  We will then discuss each answer given.
Independent Office of Evaluation IFAD’s Approach to Evaluation of Agriculture programmes Presentation at ECD Workshop, Addis Ababa, 6 November 2015.
The Marine Stewardship Council: A Multi- Stakeholder Fisheries Assessment Programme for Sustainable Fisheries Oluyemisi Oloruntuyi (MSC)
A practical methodology for technology needs assessment: Introduction and overview of preliminary issues Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and.
Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT Technical Workshop Out-of-School 15 year old 1 st and 2 nd October 2014 OECD Secretariat 1.
Progress made by countries of Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia in producing Indicator-based Environment Assessment Reports: Review Report Merab.
2016ECA Partners Opinion Survey j 2016 UNECA Partners Survey 2016 Conference of Ministers, March 31 st to April 5 th, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 1.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
Global Programme Framework Document Tiina Vähänen, UN-REDD Programme Secretariat.
Development Account: 6th Tranche Strengthening the capacity of National Statistical Offices (NSOs) in the Caribbean Small Island Developing States to fulfill.
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
New Survey Questionnaire Indicators in PISA and NAEP
School Health Research Network Surveys 2017/18
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
GEF Familiarization Seminar
INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS IN QATAR TIMSS
5 April 2016 Briefing to the Higher Education Portfolio Committee on review of the draft APPs.
Government Spending to Achieve Sustainable Development Policy Goals
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
16 May 2018 Briefing to the Portfolio Committee of the Department of Sport and Recreation portfolio on the review of the draft APP.
Predetermined Objectives – 2013/14
Ex-ante evaluation: major points and state of play
Introduction on the outline and objectives of the workshop
PISA for Development Technical Workshops Contextual questionnaires
Presentation transcript:

PISA FOR DEVELOPMENT Technical Workshops Contextual questionnaires 10 th April 2014 OECD Secretariat 1

Questions for bidders How would you capture the experiences of countries regarding their own variables regarding ESCS? How would you propose the feasibility of arriving at a global measure of poverty that could be used consistently across countries for comparative purposes in the context of the PISA for Development project? How are you going to ensure comparability of results of the project on ESCS scales with international results, even if scales are extended? What would be the options with benefits and draw backs of having a cross-country poverty scale versus a country specific one? Country-by country and across countries who are the best informants to collect data on poverty and extend the ESCS to measure poverty? If a measure of ESCS is constructed how would you ensure the empirical evidence to ensure that it is valid? How are you going to address the fact that the target population may not be living at home? Constraints Ensure comparability of results of the project on ESES scales with international results, even if scales are extended. Requirements ESCS measures have to be internationally comparable. Contextual questionnaires: ESCS

Questions for bidders What would be your definition of school resources, particularly those related to student learning outcomes? How would you propose to capture data on school infrastructure (availability and use of)? What mechanisms would you use to validate this data? How would you establish the condition (quality) of infrastructure? How would you measure the extent to which resources meet the norms and standards set by the country? Constraints Information has to be collected from all institutions in the sample, public, private, religious schools, etc. Requirements Data and analysis must enable the assessment of equity and the distribution of school infrastructure and resources? 3 Contextual questionnaires: School infrastructure

Questions for bidders What would you propose to effectively manage the cost: information ratio for the various questionnaires? How would you propose to achieve a questionnaire that is fit for purpose bearing in mind the reading skills of the target population? How would you approach the potential trade off between comparability and information? What would you propose as the best way of extracting relevant indices and variables from other assessments being done in the country and combining them with the PISA data? What is your justification for using a parent questionnaire and what is the cost-benefit of this? How would you propose the most effective and cost: benefit way of triangulating the questionnaires? In case of students in boarding schools, what is the most feasible approach for delivery and ensuring sufficient response rate for parent questionnaire? How would you ensure the highest possible response rates and lowest missing variables? How would you identify those students that are at risk of dropping out without an additional questionnaire? How would you capture in a robust way the parental perceptions of the school? Constraints The length of the questionnaire needs to be kept within the bounds that is relevant and feasible to be answered by the students in the countries. Requirements 4 Contextual questionnaires: Parent and Student questionnaires

Questions for bidders How will you capture the lessons of national assessments for PISA for Development? How will you make use of the national assessments to inform PISA for Development? How would you propose to link PISA for Development with national and other assessments? How would a review be conducted of the country specific education policies that are most relevant to student learning outcomes? How would you address country specific importance given to comparison of curriculum content and PISA frameworks? How would you propose innovative and modern methods of data collection, ensuring quality and comparability? Constraints Requirements Stratification variables used for the sampling have to follow PISA standards but also incorporate country specific variables. 5 Contextual data collection and national assessments and systems

OECD to make PISA parent, teacher, student and school questionnaires available for review and comment OECD to collect and make available questionnaires from other programmes and countries Group provides feedback on paper by 25 April to OECD Paper finalised and distributed two weeks before International Advisory Group meeting, May First rough draft of ToR for International Contractor (s) distributed two weeks before International Advisory Group meeting, May Some decisions to be taken at the International Advisory Group meeting, May – virtual consultations will follow for other decisions and input. 6 Next steps