Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Jan 29, 2007 LIGO Excomm, G R 1 Goal: Experimental Demonstration of a Squeezing-Enhanced Laser-Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detector in.
Various ways to beat the Standard Quantum Limit Yanbei Chen California Institute of Technology.
TeV Particle Astrophysics August 2006 Caltech Australian National University Universitat Hannover/AEI LIGO Scientific Collaboration MIT Corbitt, Goda,
Recent Developments toward Sub-Quantum-Noise-Limited Gravitational-wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005 LIGO-G R.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL Feb. 16 th, 2004 Aspen Meeting Kentaro Somiya LIGO-G Z.
White Light Cavity Ideas and General Sensitivity Limits Haixing Miao Summarizing researches by several LSC groups GWADW 2015, Alaska University of Birmingham.
Experiments towards beating quantum limits Stefan Goßler for the experimental team of The ANU Centre of Gravitational Physics.
Test mass dynamics with optical springs proposed experiments at Gingin Chunnong Zhao (University of Western Australia) Thanks to ACIGA members Stefan Danilishin.
Experimental Characterization of Frequency Dependent Squeezed Light R. Schnabel, S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, and K. Danzmann.
Optomechanical Devices for Improving the Sensitivity of Gravitational Wave Detectors Chunnong Zhao for Australian International Gravitational wave Research.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Enhanced LIGO with squeezing: Lessons Learned for Advanced LIGO and beyond.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
Quantum noise observation and control A. HeidmannM. PinardJ.-M. Courty P.-F. CohadonT. Briant O. Arcizet T. CaniardJ. Le Bars Laboratoire Kastler Brossel,
S. ChelkowskiSlide 1WG1 Meeting, Birmingham 07/2008.
LIGO-G R Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers Nergis Mavalvala PAC 12, MIT June 2002 Present status and future plans.
Some Ideas About a Vacuum Squeezer A.Giazotto INFN-Pisa.
Opto-mechanics with a 50 ng membrane Henning Kaufer, A. Sawadsky, R. Moghadas Nia, D.Friedrich, T. Westphal, K. Yamamoto and R. Schnabel GWADW 2012,
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
Optical Spring Experiments With The Glasgow 10m Prototype Interferometer Matt Edgar.
AIC, LSC / Virgo Collaboration Meeting, 2007, LLO Test-mass state preparation and entanglement in laser interferometers Helge Müller-Ebhardt, Henning Rehbein,
G R Interferometer Sensing & Control P Fritschel 8 Oct 02.
Opening our eyes to QND technical issues (workshop and open forum) “It’ll be the blind leading the blind” - Stan Whitcomb “You can see a lot by looking”
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
LIGO-G D Advanced LIGO Systems & Interferometer Sensing & Control (ISC) Peter Fritschel, LIGO MIT PAC 12 Meeting, 27 June 2002.
QND, LSC / Virgo Collaboration Meeting, 2007, HannoverH. Müller-Ebhardt Entanglement between test masses Helge Müller-Ebhardt, Henning Rehbein, Kentaro.
ET-ILIAS_GWA joint meeting, Nov Henning Rehbein Detuned signal-recycling interferometer unstableresonance worsesensitivity enhancedsensitivity.
Advanced Gravitational-wave Detector Technologies
Interferometer configurations for Gravitational Wave Detectors
Detuned Twin-Signal-Recycling
Quantum noise reduction using squeezed states in LIGO
New directions for terrestrial detectors
Reaching the Advanced LIGO Detector Design Sensitivity
Overview of quantum noise suppression techniques
The Quantum Limit and Beyond in Gravitational Wave Detectors
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
MIT Corbitt, Goda, Innerhofer, Mikhailov, Ottaway, Pelc, Wipf Caltech
Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects
Quantum noise reduction techniques for the Einstein telescope
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Quantum Noise in Advanced Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Quantum Noise in Gravitational Wave Interferometers
Quantum Noise in Gravitational-wave Detectors
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen February 2004
Homodyne or heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO?
Ponderomotive Squeezing Quantum Measurement Group
Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005
Advanced LIGO Quantum noise everywhere
Quantum Optics and Macroscopic Quantum Measurement
Squeezed states in GW interferometers
Quantum studies in LIGO Lab
Heterodyne Readout for Advanced LIGO
Squeeze Amplitude Filters
LIGO Quantum Schemes NSF Review, Oct
Nergis Mavalvala MIT December 2004
“Traditional” treatment of quantum noise
Squeezed Input Interferometer
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
RF readout scheme to overcome the SQL
Advanced Optical Sensing
Radiation pressure induced dynamics in a suspended Fabry-Perot cavity
Measurement of radiation pressure induced dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Generation of squeezed states using radiation pressure effects David Ottaway – for Nergis Mavalvala Australia-Italy Workshop October 2005

Advanced LIGO

A Quantum Limited Interferometer LIGO I Ad LIGO Seismic Suspension thermal Test mass thermal Quantum

Limiting Noise Sources: Optical Noise  Shot Noise  Uncertainty in number of photons detected   Higher circulating power P bs  low optical losses  Frequency dependence  light (GW signal) storage time in the interferometer  Radiation Pressure Noise  Photons impart momentum to cavity mirrors Fluctuations in number of photons   Lower power, P bs  Frequency dependence  response of mass to forces  Optimal input power depends on frequency

Initial LIGO

Sub-Quantum Interferometers

Some quantum states of light  Analogous to the phasor diagram  Stick  dc term  Ball  fluctuations  Common states  Coherent state  Vacuum state  Amplitude squeezed state  Phase squeezed state McKenzie

Squeezed input vacuum state in Michelson Interferometer X+X+ XX X+X+ XX X+X+ XX X+X+ XX  GW signal in the phase quadrature  Not true for all interferometer configurations  Detuned signal recycled interferometer  GW signal in both quadratures  Orient squeezed state to reduce noise in phase quadrature

Back Action Produces Squeezing a1a1 a2a2 b ab a  Vacuum state enters anti-symmetric port  Amplitude fluctuations of input state drive mirror position  Mirror motion imposes those amplitude fluctuations onto phase of output field b1b1 b2b2  Squeezing produced by back- action force of fluctuating radiation pressure on mirrors

Frequency-dependent coupling constant Radiation PressureShot Noise a b Amplitude  b 1 = a 1 Phase  b 2 = -  a 1 + a 2 + h Couples radiation pressure to mirror motion Newton’s law Cavity pole

Sub-quantum-limited interferometer Quantum correlations X+X+ XX Input squeezing Narrowband Broadband Broadband Squeezed

Squeezing – the ubiquitous fix?  All interferometer configurations can benefit from squeezing  Radiation pressure noise can be removed from readout in certain cases  Shot noise limit only improved by more power (yikes!) or squeezing (eek!)  Reduction in shot noise by squeezing can allow for reduction in circulating power (for the same sensitivity) – important for power- handling

Squeezed vacuum  Requirements  Squeezing at low frequencies (within GW band)  Frequency-dependent squeeze angle  Increased levels of squeezing  Generation methods  Non-linear optical media (  (2) and  (3) non-linearites)  crystal-based squeezing  Radiation pressure effects in interferometers  ponderomotive squeezing  Challenges  Frequency-dependence  filter cavities  Amplitude filters  Squeeze angle rotation filters  Low-loss optical systems

Squeezing using back-action effects

The principle  A “tabletop” interferometer to generate squeezed light as an alternative to nonlinear optical media  Use radiation pressure as the squeezing mechanism  Relies on intrinsic quantum physics of optical field  mechanical oscillator correlations  Squeezing produced even when the sensitivity is far worse than the SQL  Due to noise suppression a la optical springs

The Ponderomotive Interferometer

Key ingredients  High circulating laser power  10 kW  High-finesse cavities   Light, low-noise mechanical oscillator mirror  1 gm with 1 Hz resonant frequency  Optical spring  Detuned arm cavities

Optical Springs  Modify test mass dynamics  Suppress displacement noise (compared to free mass case)  Why not use a mechanical spring?  Displacements due to thermal noise introduced by the high frequency (mechanical) spring will wash out the effects of squeezing  Connect low-frequency mechanical oscillator to (nearly) noiseless optical spring  An optical spring with a high resonant frequency will not change the thermal force spectrum of the mechanical pendulum  Use a low resonant frequency mechanical pendulum to minimize thermal noise  Use an optical spring to produce a flat response out to higher frequencies

Detuned cavity for optical spring  Positive detuning  Detuning increases  Cavity becomes longer  Power in cavity decreases  Radiation-pressure force decreases  Mirror ‘restored’ to original position  Cavity becomes shorter  Power in cavity increases  Mirror still ‘restored’ to original position

Assumed experimental parameters

Noise budget

Noise budget – Equivalent displacement

What do we already know?  Detailed simulation of noise couplings  Uses first fully quantum mechanical simulation code for a GW interferometer (Corbitt)  Used in AdLIGO simulations (Fritschel and Popescu)  “Exported” to Hannover and Glasgow (Schnabel and Strain)  Location and infrastructure  LASTI laser, vacuum envelop and seismic isolation  Cavity geometrical parameters  Mini-mirror suspensions

What’s next  Design completion  Suspension  Control system  High finesse cavity tests  Suspended-mirror high-finesse cavity – optical tests, laser characterization  Suspended mini-mirror – includes mirror dynamics and radiation-pressure coupling  Complete interferometer

Why is this interesting/important?  First ever (?) demonstration of radiation-pressure induced squeezing  Probes quantum mechanics of optical field- mechanical oscillator coupling at 1 g mass scales  Test of low noise optical spring  Suppression of thermal noise  Simulations and techniques useful for AdLIGO and other GW interferometers  Quantum optical simulation package  Michelson detuning  Role of feedback control in these quantum systems

Conclusions  Advanced LIGO is expected to reach the quantum noise limit in most of the band  QND techniques needed to do better  Squeezed states of the EM field appears to be a promising approach  Factors of 2 to 5 improvements foreseeable in the next decade  Not fundamental but technical  Need to push on this to be ready for third generation instruments