1 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Adaptive Optics at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Stefan Hippler Markus Feldt Robert Weiß.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Subaru AO in future. Outline Overview of AO systems at Mauna Kea and in the world. Ongoing plan of AOS at Subaru and Mauna Kea. What’s in future.
Advertisements

GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
Active & Adaptive Optics AS4100 Astrofisika Pengamatan Prodi Astronomi 2007/2008 B. Dermawan.
RASC, Victoria, 1/08/06 The Future of Adaptive Optics Instrumentation David Andersen HIA.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
Page 1 Lecture 12 Part 1: Laser Guide Stars, continued Part 2: Control Systems Intro Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Laser guide star adaptive optics at the Keck Observatory Adam R. Contos, Peter L. Wizinowich, Scott K. Hartman, David Le Mignant, Christopher R. Neyman,
AO188/LGS status AO188 development group(Subaru Telescope, NAOJ) (JST)
Laser Launch System for the LBT Richard Davies Sebastian Rabien Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  Approaches of other observatories 
Laser Guide Stars by Roberto Ragazzoni INAF – Astronomical Observatory of Padova (Italy)
Intro to Stellar Astrophysics L21 The tools of astrophysics ä Virtually all information about the external Universe is received in the form of electromagnetic.
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Adaptive Optics and Optical Interferometry or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Atmosphere Brian Kern Observational Astronomy 10/25/00.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
ASTRO 2233 Fall 2010 Adaptive Optics, Interferometry and Planet Detection Lecture 16 Thursday October 21, 2010.
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory KPAO Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Keck Precision AO (KPAO) SSC Presentation January.
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
Don Gavel: Keck NGAO meeting April 25, LAO Activities Relevant To Keck NGAO Donald Gavel NGAO Team Meeting 6 April 26, 2007.
An Introduction to Adaptive Optics Mike Hein PH 464 – Applied Optics Winter 2005.
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era
MCAO A Pot Pourri: AO vs HST, the Gemini MCAO and AO for ELTs Francois Rigaut, Gemini GSMT SWG, IfA, 12/04/2002.
Blue Dot Team « Multi aperture imaging ». BDT sept MAI techniques High accuracy visibility measurement Differential interferometry Nulling.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
A visible-light AO system for the 4.2 m SOAR telescope A. Tokovinin, B. Gregory, H. E. Schwarz, V. Terebizh, S. Thomas.
Announcements No lab this week due to observing night last night There will be a lab after class next week. If the skies are clear expect to stay out until.
3D Spectroscopy Francisco Müller Sánchez Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias La Laguna, España  Introductory Review and Observational Techniques  Science.
Telescopes & recent observational techniques ASTR 3010 Lecture 4 Chapters 3 & 6.
Our Mission Visible detectors fully matching the requirements of Adaptive Optics wavefront sensors for 10m class telescopes do not yet exist: current detectors.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Adaptive Optics1 John O’Byrne School of Physics University of Sydney.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
“Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star”: An Introduction to Adaptive Optics Mt. Hamilton Visitor’s Night July 28, 2001.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
Viewing the Universe through distorted lenses: Adaptive optics in astronomy Steven Beckwith Space Telescope Science Institute & JHU.
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
Future Plan of Subaru Adaptive Optics
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
Conference “Feeding the Giants: ELTs in the era of Surveys” -- Ischia 31/08/2011 Large field of view and ELTs: an impossible marriage? Paolo Ciliegi (INAF.
1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov
SITE PARAMETERS RELEVANT FOR HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGING Marc Sarazin European Southern Observatory.
Adaptive Optics for Astronomy Kathy Cooksey. AO Basics Photons –Travel in straight lines Wavefront –Line perpendicular to all photons’ paths Atmospheric.
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Wavefront sensors, correctors François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova A study of Pyramid WFS behavior under imperfect illumination Valentina Viotto Demetrio Magrin Maria Bergomi Marco Dima.
VLT Laser Guide Star Facility Recovery DBO - ESO Status Overview – CfAO meeting 26 March 2007 ESO: E. Allaert, C. Araujo, G.Avila, D.Bonaccini Calia, E.Brunetto,
Page 1 Lectures 11 Lasers used for Guide Stars Wavefront Errors from Laser Guide Stars Projects: Discuss Performance Reqirements Claire Max Astro 289,
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes Center for Adaptive Optics.
On ESO LGS activities Domenico Bonaccini Calia, Yan Feng, Wolfgang Hackenberg, Ronald Holzlöhner, Luke Taylor Laser Guide Star group European Southern.
C n 2 profile reconstruction with Shack-Hartmann slope and scintillation data: first on-sky results J. Voyez (1), C. Robert (1), J.-M. Conan (1), V. Michau.
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
Parameters characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence: r0, 0, 0
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Characterizing the Atmospheric Turbulence & Systems engineering François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz)
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era François Wildi Observatoire de Genève Credit for most slides : Claire Max (UC Santa Cruz) Basics of AO.
Page 1 Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 March 3, 2016.
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Observational Astronomy
“Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star”: An Introduction to Adaptive Optics
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Theme 2 AO for Extremely Large Telescopes
Presentation transcript:

1 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Adaptive Optics at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy Stefan Hippler Markus Feldt Robert Weiß Elena Puga Antolin David Butler Max-Planck- Institut für Astronomie (MPIA) Heidelberg Germany September 1993 Trapezium with MAGIC and CHARM. M. McCaughrean and J.R. Stauffer, AJ 108 (1994).

2 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Outline of this talk  The principle of Adaptive Optics.  The Earth’s atmosphere.  Current restrictions of Adaptive Optics systems.  New techniques, new ideas.  MPIA’s future contributions.  What’s next.

3 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Principle of Adaptive Optics - Basics Plane wavefront Turbulent atmosphere Distorted image Plane wavefront Turbulent atmosphere Deformable mirror compensates the atmosphere “Perfect” image

4 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Principle of Adaptive Optics - Example Closed Loop Open Loop

5 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Principle of Adaptive Optics - Sketch

6 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Principle of Adaptive Optics - ALFA Bench

7 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Principle of Adaptive Optics -ALFA/OMEGA

8 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Principle of Adaptive Optics - Summary Turbulence Phase Distortions. Phase DistortionsBlurring BlurringTelescope Resolution Order Of Magnitude Worse... The goal of Adaptive Optics is to overcome these limitations!

9 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Earth’s Atmosphere - Structure D n : Index Structure Function C n 2 : Index Structure Coefficient Kolmogorov law of turbulence: n: refractive index r: 3D position  : 3D separation : ensemble average

10 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Earth’s Atmosphere - Parameters / 1 Fried parameter r 0 characterizes the Seeing at a particular wavelength: Seeing ~ FWHM ~ / r 0 Seeing in V-band (550 nm) = 1’’ -> r 0 = 8.8 cm r 0 scales with the 6/5 power of wavelength -> r 0 at 2.2  m = 46 cm -> Seeing in K-band = 0.76’’ (Seeing scales with the 1/5 power of wavelength) r 0 scales with the -3/5 power of airmass (D/ r 0 ) 2 defines the number of sub-apertures for wavefront sensors

11 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Earth’s Atmosphere - Parameters / 2 Isoplanatic angle (or patch):  0 = 0.3 r 0 / h eff  0 characterizes the field of view that a classical AO system can compensate. Greenwood time delay (Taylor approximation): t 0 = 0.3 r 0 / v eff

12 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The Earth’s Atmosphere - Parameters / 2 Calar Alto SCIDAR campaign September 2000

 h d 1 =  ( h + h gs ) h gs 1 Scintillation Measuring C n 2 (h) with SCIDAR d 2 =  h gs 2 Autocorrelation d 2 d 1 B ** (x) =  K ( x, h+h gs ) C n 2 (h) dh + N(x) Rocca et al. 1974, Tallon 1989, Avila et al Inversion Cn2(h)Cn2(h) C N 2 (h) ( m -2/3 ) Altitude above sea level (km) Avila et al. 1998

14 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 The MPIA-LBT SCIDAR Project AO Science Data Processing Seeing Measurements Atmosphere Diagnostics Flexible Scheduling In-kind contribution, 100 TDM.

15 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Current restrictions of AO systems: Sky coverage Requirement: bright guide star within isoplanatic angle. Example: ALFA‘s current limit: m V =14.5 (20´´) => Sky coverage ~ 0.01 Solutions: Infrared Wavefront Sensor (Infrared AO!) Sky coverage ~ for embedded galactic sources, Star Formation Research! Artificial guide star Sky coverage ~ 1.0 (without tip-tilt and focus compensation!) Multi-conjugate (multi layer) AO Sky coverage depends on telescope size, isoplanatic angle up to 3’

16 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Pyramid Wavefront Sensor - Sketch Foucault-like Wavefront Sensor Ragazzoni et al MPIA: replace CCD by near- infrared detector

17 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Pyramid Wavefront Sensor - Demo

18 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Good IR-WFS target: S106 m V =21 m K =5.5 ALFA in active optics mode! Resolution: 0.35”

19 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Current restrictions of AO systems: Sky coverage Requirement: bright guide star within isoplanatic angle. Example: ALFA‘s current limit: m V =14.5 (20´´) => Sky coverage ~ 0.01 Solutions: Infrared Wavefront Sensor (Infrared AO!) Sky coverage ~ for embedded galactic sources, Star Formation Research! Artificial guide star Sky coverage ~ 1.0 (without tip-tilt and focus compensation!) Multi-conjugate (multi layer) AO Sky coverage depends on telescope size, isoplanatic angle up to 3’

20 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 VLT LGSF Overview

21 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Mission: give the ESO AO systems (NAOS+CONICA, SINFONI) on UT4 an artificial laser guide star (LGS), to boost their sky coverage and science throughput. Present:LGS-AO is being implemented on all large (  8m) telescopes. Keck II is likely to be the first one this year. Gemini, LBT, Subaru to follow. 40% K-Strehl demonstrated at Lick Obs., 20% K-Strehl demonstrated with ALFA. Future:Multiple LGS: promise “full” sky coverage through Turbulence Tomography VLT Laser Guide Star Facility ESO, MPE, MPIA

22 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 LGSF on the VLT: Quick Look LGSF on the VLT: Quick Look 4 subsystems: Laser and Laser Room Beam relay (fiber modules) Launch Telescope + diagnostics LIDAR Facility (=ALFA/LIDAR)

23 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Allows diffraction limited beam relay Flexible, compact, better than mirrors Non linear effects due to high power densities (up to 25 MW/cm 2 ) Input beam matching and alignment critical, servoed Laser Beam Relay using a single mode fiber module

24 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 PARSEC Laser Choice P aranal A rtificial R eference S ource for E xtended C overage  Original ESO proposal was to combine two 6.5W CW laser modules. ESO Messenger No. 99, December 1999  This concept (backup solution) is an ALFA modification tested at Calar Alto. ESO Messenger No. 100, July 2000  ESO concept moved to backup solution.  MPE/MPIA propose new MOPA (Master Oscillator Power Amplifier) laser concept, better performing, more stable CW dye laser (October 2000).  MPE/MPIA PARSEC HAS BEEN ADOPTED AS BASELINE CHOICE >10W CW output power (goal 15 W), solid state pump lasers.  MPIA contribution: 600 TDM, 2 man-years; return: 8 nights with LGS-AO instruments!

25 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 PARSEC - Sketch

26 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Current restrictions of AO systems: Sky coverage Requirement: bright guide star within isoplanatic angle. Example: ALFA‘s current limit: m V =14.5 (20´´) => Sky coverage ~ 0.01 Solutions: Infrared Wavefront Sensor (Infrared AO!) Sky coverage ~ for embedded galactic sources, Star Formation Research! Artificial guide star Sky coverage ~ 1.0 (without tip-tilt and focus compensation!) Multi-conjugate (multi layer) AO Sky coverage depends on telescope size, isoplanatic angle up to 3’

27 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Current restrictions of AO systems: Compensated Field of View Wish Make Compensated Field of View infinite (get rid of the atmosphere!) Solution Increasing of the isoplanatic angle with Multi-conjugate adaptive optics = Atmospheric Tomography.

28 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Atmospheric Tomography Ragazzoni et al., Nature 403, 2000 The intensity distribution on each individual defocused pupil is given by a linear combination of the wavefront perturbation contributions of each single turbulent layer. ConfigurationPupil images Calculated wavefront map of central star and difference of ref. stars to central star

29 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 AO for ELTs Research and Training Network Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) Projects: 30 m CELT (California ELT) the m MAXAT (MAXimum Aperture Telescope) the 30-m ELT (McDonald Observatory) Swedish 50-m Telescope (Lund Observatory) 100 m OWL (ESO Overwhelmingly Large Telescope) è High angular resolution (V-band: 1.4 mas). è Huge photon gathering capability (V~38).

30 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January arcsec Resolution Comparison

31 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 Primary goal: investigate Natural Guide Star (NGS) and Laser Guide Star (LGS) tomography methods coupled with multi-conjugate AO. Technology: deformable mirrors (DM) with about actuators, e.g. MEMS micro mirrors. cophasing of mirrors with accuracy compatible with AO in the visible. Study of novel techniques of on-sky segment phasing using AO wavefront sensors to minimize the loss of telescope time. MPIA contribution and funding from EU commission: Man-power and infrastructure from MPIA, 340 TDM from EU (2 postdocs). Turbulence simulator with ferroelectric LCD spatial light modulator. Simulations to find “best” MCAO configuration for ELTs. Side project: MCAO-demonstrator for the VLT. MPIA’s role in the AO-ELT network

32 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 European Southern Observatory (ESO), Germany (N. Hubin) Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri (OAA), Italy (S. Esposito) Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova (OADP), Italy (R. Ragazzoni) Office National d’Etudes et de Recherches Aerospatiales (ONERA), France (G. Rousset) MPIA (S. Hippler) Observatoire de Marseille (OM), France (M. Ferrari) Gran Telescopio Canarias (GRANTECAN), Spain (N. Devaney) Associated partner: Lund Observatoy Sweden Total Network Budget from EU commission: 1.4 M€. Members of the AO-ELT network

33 Adaptive Optics at MPIA, Heidelberg, 26 January 2001 What’s next?