Case management – building student achievement and teacher capacity Robert Dunn November 1, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benchmark Assessments in Literacy
Advertisements

Kindergarten Reading at PS 11
Continuing Comprehension Teaching and Learning Loddon/Mallee October 2009.
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
LITERACY IN PRIMARY/JUNIOR DIANE NEWMAN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OECTA.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
Effective Intervention Using Data from the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI-5) Developed by the authors of the Qualitative Reading Inventory (QRI) -5,
Standards, data and assessment. Links to Tfel 1.6 Design, plan and organise for teaching and learning 2.4 Support and challenge students to achieve high.
It defines acceptable evidence of student’s attainment of desired results. It determines authentic performance tasks that the student is expected to do.
27/02/09 AiZ - Sandra Pizaro 1 AiZ Secondary School Learning Leaders Session 1 Reading.
Balanced Literacy and Data Collection – Making Informed Instructional Decisions Dr. Roseanne K. Meyer Calallen ISD April 3, 2009.
Balanced Literacy J McIntyre Belize.
November, 2011 In-Service. What is Guided Reading? Guided Reading offers small-group support and explicit teaching to help students take on more challenging.
A Review of Instructional Methods in Reading (Based on the NRP Report summary by Shanahan) Shanahan, T (2005). The National Reading Panel Report: Practical.
Developmental Reading Assessment-NEW TEACHERS 2012.
Breakout Sessions Self review Preparing for ALL. Purpose To meet other schools in your ALLS cluster To critically inquire into the effectiveness of current.
What’s Left to Learn? Using Classroom Based Assessments in Early Childhood Literacy Programs The American Institutes for Research Council for Exceptional.
Section VI: Comprehension Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Session 5 – Small Group Instruction   Guided Reading – purpose  Preparing for the small group  Book Orientations  Reading and conferencing  Book.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
INTRODUCTION TO THE MINISTRY OF EDUCATION’s ACHIEVEMENT CHART Bedford Park PS September 2013.
The Planning and Assessment Cycle
Chapter 4 Evaluating and Creating Interactive and Content- Based Assessment.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
First Steps Reading Developmental Continuum  Provide a language rich environment with a wide range of reading materials  read to children everyday modelling.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
The Developmental Reading Assessment
Practical Ideas On Alternative Assessment For ESL Students Jo-Ellen Tannenbaum, Montgomery County Public Schools (MD)
Literacy Achievement for Secondary Students Exemplary teaching behavior Domains of expertise Anne G Liguori.
Claire Ridsdale, Teaching & Learning Adviser (Literacy
Guided Reading: A Critical “Piece” in the Literacy Block Adapted from NJDOE IDEAL presentation by Doreen Beam & Jaime Frost, IDEAL Coordinators.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Literacy Framework Spring Valley. Reader’s Workshop  Segment 1: Direct Instruction (15 – 20 minutes)  Teacher  Conducts interactive read aloud with.
Collaborative Inquiry “Teachers possess tremendous knowledge, skill, and experience. Collaborative inquiry creates a structure for them to share that expertise.
SLAV Conference Jennifer Hall BSSC Library Coordinator 17 March 2005.
First Grade Reading Workshop
First Lessons 2.2 Essential Concepts & Practices for Building a Community of Readers The 1st Lessons.
Constructivism Theory and Assessing and Teaching Literacy Across the Curriculum Dr. Elaine Roberts.
Buckstone Primary School School Improvement Plan Summary A copy of the full Standards and Quality Report and the full Improvement Plan are available on.
READING: AT SCHOOL & AT HOME Ms. Godlien Mrs. Carriere Mrs. Stimming Tuesday, October 13, 2015.
Assessment and Differentiation of Instruction. Assessment for Learning.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Literacy Partner 2007 – 2008 The literacy partner supports student learning by collaborating with teachers and administrators to model best practices and.
+ Entrance Slip 1 What are the main issues, questions or concerns you have about students learning to read (curriculum, instruction and assessment) in.
SHARED READING P-12. Effective Reading Instruction Teachers must have: Knowledge of reading curriculum Knowledge about learners- What do they do and what.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
Purposeful teaching and Learning Improving Student learning.
Development Team Day 5a October Aim To explore approaches to evaluating the impact of the curriculum on pupil learning.
Retelling Fieldwork Assignment
GOING DEEPER WITH INDEPENDENT READING AND FURTHER THAN INDEPENDENT READING.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
OCTOBER 16, 2014 Milton School. Decoding Inferential Comprehension Critical Comprehension Love of Reading Literal Comprehension Word Study, Vocabulary,
ORAL LANGUAGE UNDERPINS ALL READING STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES
Parent University # 2 Grades K-5 Reading and Language Arts
How can we help children become confident readers?
Comprehensive Balanced
Kindergarten Balanced Literacy
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
AGENDA Discussing Field Experiences (Students & Teachers)
Creating an Active Learning environment
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Section VI: Comprehension
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Journeys Reading Program Harcourt/Houghton Mifflin
Meet Me at The Table Guided Reading K-2.
Presentation transcript:

Case management – building student achievement and teacher capacity Robert Dunn November 1, 2012

2

Why Case Management? Shared Belief: All students can learn… Reaching Students who are struggling in reading Differentiated Instruction Building Collaborative Teaching Teams Implementation Tool for Professional Learning, Job Embedded PD (Assessment & Instruction, AFL, Critical Thinking, Oral Language) Strategy in SPCI, to increase student reading achievement

Sources

Case Management Process Group analysis of student learning Plan instructional next steps

Case Management Process Embedded in schedule Meet every 2 weeks 20 min. per student, 2 students per session (40 min.)

Case Management JK/SK - Gr. 8, including DD, Gifted, MID Students Level 1 or ‘stuck’ at Level 2 in Reading Grade partners, SERT, Literacy Teacher, Administrator, invited experts such as Speech and Language Pathologist Audio/video evidence, written/scribed reading responses, anecdotal notes

Discussion of Student Learning What’s working? Where is it working? How do we know? Student Learning Evidence (to be analysed at next meeting) How / Where to deliver? Guided Independent Modeled / Shared Cross-curricular One to One with teacher Instructional Assessment Strategy Method activating prior knowledge * graphic organizer predicting * story map visualizing * journals questioning * readers theatre drawing inferences * anticipation guide finding important ideas * close summarizing * jigsaw  synthesizing * place mat  evaluating *other  monitoring & repairing comprehension Tool Method * rubric * conference * running record * essay * checklist * exhibition/demo * rating scale * interview * anecdotal *learning log * conference *observation * modified miscue * performance task *other * portfolios * questions/answers (oral) * quizzes/tests/exams * response journal * select response * self assessment * classroom presentation *other Refer: to Tracking of Student Learning chart Instructional Next Steps What instructional methods were implemented to help this student? Where in the Literacy Block was this done? Was it implemented across the curriculum? Who was involved? FOCUS: Reading Proficiencies That Need More Consideration Consider what reading proficiency/comprehension strategy(s) would most benefit the student. 1. REVISIT 1. REVISIT (as determined at previous meeting) Analyse Student Learning Based on the Focus & Instructional Next Steps Where in the Literacy Block is this working (e.g. Guided, Independent, One-on-One)? Is this happening in other areas of the curriculum? Who is involved? (teacher, student, SERT, ELL) What part of the student learning evidence supports this? What does this analysis tell you about: 1. The focus? 2. The instructional methods implemented? 3. The student learning evidence used to determine understanding? 4. What feedback should be given to the student? What does the student understand? What misconceptions are present? 2. REVIEW 3. REFLECT What Next? Focus for the student Focus includes: a comprehension strategy, an instructional method and a plan for giving feedback to the student. Consider: How do we involve the student in understanding their learning? 4. REVISE Draft- Maple Network

Getting Started – “Tracking of Student Learning” Current Knowledge & Reading Proficiencies: Strengths: Oral skills (expressive and receptive) High frequency sight words vocabulary in reading and writing Letter Knowledge, phonological awareness skills (i.e. rhyming, blending, segmenting sounds) Concepts about print including directionality, one-one matching, Ability to read patterned text or simple non-patterned text Use reading cues (meaning, structure and visual information) in an integrated way when reading Comprehension (listening vs. reading comprehension) Ability to retell a short story in sequence using text vocabulary, Ability to make relevant personal connections to text Ability to predict Ability to visualize

Focus: Reading Proficiencies That Need More Con sideration Consider what next reading ability/comprehension strategy(s) would most benefit the student

Revisit Setting Direction through: Curriculum expectations Strengths & needs determined at previous meeting Instructional focus & methods previously set

Instructional Next Steps What instructional approaches are you going to implement to help this student? What interventions need to be made? How are they going to be made? Consider the gradual release of responsibility: modeled reading/think aloud (read aloud), shared reading, guided reading, literature circles/book clubs, independent. Where in the Literacy Block will this be done? Who is involved?

Student Learning Evidence What evidence will be assessed to determine the student’s current state of achievement? What do you expect to see as a result of the instructional intervention? What is the timeline given for this intervention?

Initiating the Dialogue

Review & Reflect Leading the Instructional Program through: Analyzing student learning Determining strengths & needs Evaluating instructional methods used

Evidence of Oral language

SK Reading Evidence

SK Review & Reflect

Revise Determine instructional focus Formulate instructional next steps

SK Revise

Remind Securing Accountability through: Establishing student learning evidence, to be analyzed at next meeting

SK Remind

Results By the end of the school year –75% of CM students whose focus is decoding, will be able to decode text at the instructional level (90-95% accuracy) on texts at or approaching grade level. * Includes developmentally delayed students who are significantly below grade level but did make reading gains.

Results By the end of the school year –75% of CM students, whose focus is decoding and/or literal comprehension, will achieve a L3 in Retell (primary) or Summary (J/I) on texts at or approaching grade level.

Results By the end of the school year –75% of CM students, whose focus is using comprehension strategies in order to comprehend texts beyond the literal level will achieve a L3 in reading responses on texts at or approaching grade level.

Results Student M Grade 5

Impact on Student Learning “Case Management helps the student focus on their area of need. They are developing an understanding of what helps them and enables them to generalize the strategies they’ve learned over other curriculum areas”

Impact on Student Learning “You can see how Case Management impacts on student learning by looking at the confidence of children…their reading abilities are growing.” “Because of Case Management, I can see that students’ attitude towards reading has improved.”

Impact on Teacher Practice Building Relationships and Developing People: Asset Model-build on strengths to improve weaknesses Use of formative assessment to inform instruction Guided reading lessons more focused Greater variety of formative assessment tools Differentiated instruction increased Feedback more descriptive, specific, frequent

Impact on Teacher Practice Building Relationships and Developing People: More collaboration with Grade Partner, Literacy Teacher, Reading Recovery, Special Education Teachers, Administrator PD differentiated for teacher needs, determined from CM sessions Teacher moderation skills increased Teachers more accountable to individual students

Reflection on the Process Team work & collaboration produces results Feedback important Must be embedded in schedule Protocol and norms: a must Time needed for effective change Tool for school planning-strengths & needs of students and staff

Challenges Timetabling and scheduling Assessing student work or teacher instruction? 20 minute time restriction Following evidence of student learning protocol Bringing new staff ‘up to speed’ Other initiatives that require for job- embedded time

Next Steps Further Developing the Organization: Increase knowledge of how students learn to decode and comprehend a variety of texts Increase understanding of the power of Oral Language instruction on reading/writing development Phonological Awareness embedded in primary grade’s assessment and programming Assessing Critical Thinking

Case Management Simulation In pairs of schools, present your student who is slightly below grade level – What evidence do you have of current achievement? – Use the case management document – “Tracking of student learning” organizer to begin.