The GMFCS and GMFM in Clinical Practice Dianne Russell and Peter Rosenbaum CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research McMaster University, Hamilton, ON. Canada www.canchild.ca Watch Videoconference, Friday June 6, 2008
Why use standardized measures anyway?
Measurement Purposes of measures To discriminate/describe To prognosticate To evaluate change over time
GMFCS “Gross Motor Function Classification System” Palisano et al., 1997, 2008
GMFCS What is it? 5 level classification system describing levels of gross motor function of children/youth with CP Based on their current functional abilities and limitations and their need for assistive technology Function is emphasis, not quality of movement
GMFCS Why is the GMFCS important? Previous subjective, clinical judgment (i.e. ‘mild’, ‘moderate’, ‘severe’) meaningless, unreliable, not valid Based on observation, parent report – quick and easy Functionally based, not impairment-based (consistent with ICF framework)
GMFCS Clinically useful: Communication tool (clinicians, families) Goal setting/planning interventions With motor centile curves, to determine how a child is doing compared to children of similar age and GMFCS level
GMFCS consistent language describing samples conveying results Research: consistent language describing samples conveying results Administration: manage caseloads/ resource allocation
Further work with the GMFCS Parents’ use of the GMFCS – reliable The addition of an adolescent band to the GMFCS Dutch colleagues will be adding more detail to the under 2 years band (Gorter et al, in press DMCN)
Gross Motor Function Classification System GMFCS-E & R GMFCS – E & R Gross Motor Function Classification System Expanded and Revised http://www.canchild.ca/Portals/0/outcomes/pdf/GMFCS.pdf
Questions?
GMFM or GMFM-88 What is it? observational measure of how much of an activity a child with cerebral palsy can do (but not how well they can do it – i.e. quality or performance) What is the purpose of the GMFM? evaluative & descriptive
GMFM “Gross Motor Function Measure” Russell et al., 2002
GMFM or GMFM-88 88 items 5 dimensions (grouped together for ease of administration) Items were ordered in each dimension using best judgment as to difficulty
GMFM or GMFM-88 Standardized 4 point ordinal scale (0-3 for each item) Raw scores for each dimension, a total “percent” score; goal area scores; change scores
GMFM-88
GMFM-88
GMFM-66 How is the GMFM-66 different from the GMFM-88? 66 items of the original 88 items The “ability continuum” ranging from 0 (low motor ability) to 100 (high motor ability) An interval scale where change over time comparisons are more meaningful (difference of “x” points is the same at the lower and upper ends of the scale)
GMFM-66
GMFM-66 Requires GMAE (“Gross Motor Ability Estimator”) computer program to score: Provides an estimate of score even when not all items administered Can track scores over time (database) Produces item maps – arrange items by order of difficulty
Russell et al., 2002
Russell et al., 2002
Clinical Use of Item Maps and Case Summaries Understand/interpret change Identify relatively easier and more difficult ‘next steps’ for a child Discuss and communicate with parents about a child’s progress Set appropriate goals and plan interventions
Current work with the GMFM GMFM Algorithms (Item sets) Developed to identify subsets of the 66 items which give a good estimate of a child’s score while shortening the time for administration of the GMFM-66
Questions?
Exploring Gross Motor Development Prospectively (JAMA 2002; 288; 1357-63) OMG study: 5 years, NIH funding, 682 kids from across Ontario, 2632 GMFMs First study of its type in the world Main findings: a series of ‘motor growth’ curves for prognostication and treatment planning Published Sept 2002 to good critical notice
Taken from Rosenbaum et al. (2002). JAMA; 288; 1357-63 Motor Growth Curves Taken from Rosenbaum et al. (2002). JAMA; 288; 1357-63
How can the Motor Growth Curves be used? Describe patterns of gross motor function for children with cerebral palsy over time Estimate a child’s future motor capabilities
Current work with motor measures Adding centiles to the motor growth curves (Hanna et al. 2008 Phys Ther 88:596-607) Extending the motor growth curves into adolescence (ASQME study)
Current work with motor measures Development of parent educational materials …my child is GMFCS level III, what does that mean in terms of outcomes, interventions Qualitative study with parents “If I knew then what I know now”
Putting the measures all together….. Several distinct purposes (all validated): discriminative (descriptive) evaluative prognostic (predictive) Can be used together to describe, to track and evaluate change over time, and to determine how the rate of change compares to children of similar abilities and ages
Scenario of Beth Beth was born prematurely Almost 2 years old and still not walking Diagnosis of cerebral palsy
Beth’s parents want to know How bad is it? Will Beth walk? How will we know if therapy is working?
Beth’s therapist wants to know What evidence-based measures are available to help me answer Beth’s parents’ questions? How will I find the time to learn these measures?’ How can I use these measures to assist with realistic goal setting and collaborating with Beth’s parents?
The administrator at Beth’s treatment centre wants to know How do we ensure that resources (therapy time and equipment) are optimized? How can we document the effectiveness of our interventions to improve motor function?
“Our Child Has CP…” Parents’ First Questions, and Ways to Respond Classifies gross motor function in children with CP GMFCS “How bad is it?” Motor Growth Curves Relates age & GMFCS level to prognosis “Will our child walk?” GMFM-66 & GMFM-88 Measures change over time due to treatment or maturation “How do we know if therapy is working?”
Questions?
Our Challenge as Researchers and Clinicians How do we improve the uptake of these validated measures into clinical practice?
Knowledge translation
Current work Exploring issues in knowledge translation 3 year CIHR study of moving the Motor Measures into Clinical Practice using a Knowledge Broker (KB)
Role of the Knowledge Broker (KB) The job of knowledge brokering is to bring people (researchers, decision-makers, practitioners and policy-makers) together and build relationships among them that make knowledge transfer more effective CHSRF (2003) The practice of Knowledge Brokering in Canada’s health system
Questions?