How to optimize the treatment of HCV-4 patients? Nabil Antaki MD, FRCPC Aleppo, Syria Paris, January 30, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Optimal therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients Antonio Craxì Liver & GI Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Italy
Advertisements

Testing of Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C: What do I really need? Hepatitis C Choices in Care Greg Everson, MD.
Management of non naïve patients with hepatitis C Relapsers Alessandra Mangia Liver Unit & Division of Gastroenterology “CSS” San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 REALIZE (Study 216) Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Naïve GT-1 ADVANCE (Study 108) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et. al. N Engl J Med.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-2 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Manns M, et al. Lancet.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et al.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study PEG alfa-2a + RBV versus PEG alfa-2a versus INF + RBV APRICOT STUDY Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV and HIV.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study 3D (Paritaprevir-Ritonavir-Ombitasvir + Dasabuvir) +/- RBV in GT1b PEARL-II Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Andreone.
Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Paris 2012 Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology Queen Marys School of Medicine Barts and The London.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin in HCV GT 4 Egyptian Ancestry Trial Phase 2 Ruane PJ, et al. J Hepatol. 2015;62:
 During his annual physical in Dec 2007, Mr. A, a 42 y old pilot, presented with elevated liver enzymes and positive antibodies to HCV.  He had no symptoms.
Controversies: Lead in or no lead in ? PRO Controversies: Lead in or no lead in ? PRO Lawrence Serfaty Hôpital Saint-Antoine Paris 5th Paris Hepatitis.
Stefan ZEUZEM.
Management of side effects Cirrhotic on telaprevir Vincent LEROY Clinique Universitaire d’Hépato-Gastroentérologie INSERM U823 CHU de Grenoble.
Predictors of response with boceprevir and telaprevir combined with pegylated interferon and ribavirin Paul Y Kwo, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director,
Kwo PY. NEJM 2014;371: CORAL-I  Design OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV Open label Phase II years Chronic HCV infection, genotype 1 Liver transplantation.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir BID versus q8 in Treatment Naïve GT-1 OPTIMIZE (Study C211) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Buti M, et al. Gastroenterology.
ATOMIC  Design  Objective –SVR 24 by ITT-analysis, detection of a 30% or 25% difference between two treatment groups, 2-sided significance level of 5%,
Alessio Aghemo First Division of Gastroenterology Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Università degli Studi di Milano 5 th Paris.
OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV Placebo Randomisation** 3 : 1 Double blind years Chronic HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml Failure to pre-treatment with.
Response Guided Therapy Fabien Zoulim Hepatology Department & INSERM Unit 1052, Lyon University Lyon, France.
No prior therapy with PI
Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Vall Hebron Barcelona-. Spain Relapser or Non Responder? Chronic Hepatitis C.
SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV Open-label W12 W24* or W48* N = years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 4 Treatment-naïve or experienced with relapse or partial.
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
Predictors of treatment response, baseline and on-treatment A case study of telaprevir therapy Alex Thompson.
How to manage G1 relapsers and non-responders George V. Papatheodoridis, MD Associate Professor in Medicine & Gastroenterology 2nd Department of Internal.
5 th Paris Hepatitis Congress Workshop 30/1/2012 Managing complications of DAAs: Case 1 Dr Samuel S. Lee University of Calgary.
SMV 150 mg QD + SOF 400 mg QD Randomisation 1 : years HCV genotype 1 Naïve or pre-treated with IFN-based regimen No cirrhosis HCV RNA ≥
Sulkowski MS, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 23, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/25/09.
Placebo + PR W48 Placebo + PR Yes Hezode C. Gut 2015;64: COMMAND-1 COMMAND-1 Study: daclatasvir + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 or 4 DCV60 + PEG-IFN.
Clinical case Laurent CASTERA 5th PHC, Paris, January Service d’Hépatologie Hôpital Beaujon, Université Paris-7, Clichy, France.
W24 ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment naïve Early fibrosis to compensated cirrhosis No HBV or HIV co-infection N = 10 SOF + weight-based.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg bid  Objective.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg BID –RBV.
No randomization N = 59 W12W24 Arm B : compensated cirrhosis N = 31 N = 29 Arm C : compensated cirrhosis Arm A : No cirrhosis AGATE-II Study: OBV/PTV/r.
SMV + DCV + SOF Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 or 4 Treatment-naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN ± RBV Portal hypertension or liver decompensation.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin in Genotype 2 or 3 LONESTAR-2 Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Lawitz E, et.
Triple Therapy Today Phase III Results in G1 Relapsers and Non Responders – Telaprevir 5 th Paris Hepatitis Conference Paris, 30. January 2012 Stefan Zeuzem.
OBV/PTV/r + DSV Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Treatment-naïve HCV RNA > 1,000 IU/ml Chronic kidney disease with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m 2.
No randomisation Open-label years HCV genotype 1 Naïve or null-response to PEG-IFN + RBV HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/ml No cirrhosis No HBV or HIV co-infection.
Asselah T. AASLD 2015, Abs OSIRIS  Design SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 4 Treatment-naïve Mild to moderate fibrosis.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, next observation carried backward DCV + SOF + RBV Randomised* 1:1 Open-label ALLY-3+ study: DCV.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, by ITT, descriptive analysis OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV No randomisation Open-label CORAL-I Study cohort.
Placebo + PR W24 DCV + PR Placebo + PR Yes Dore GJ. Gastroenterology 2015;148: COMMAND GT2/3 COMMAND GT2/3 Study: daclatasvir + PEG-IFN + RBV for.
Dore G. J Hepatol 2016; 64:19-28 MALACHITE TVR + PEG-IFN + RBV Randomisation Open-label years HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/ml Naïve (MALACHITE-I)
 Design Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a vs 1b) and ILB28 genotype (CC or non-CC) N = 134 N = 257 W24W48.
 Design Open-label years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/mL HIV co-infection Stable ART* with HIV RNA < 50 c/mL ≥ 24 weeks.
36 year old HCV+ woman, Risk factor: occasional IVDU 15 years ago First treatment with PEG-IFN/RBV in 2002 –only qualitative PCR available : positive at.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), by ITT OBV/PTV/r + SOF + RBV OBV/PTV/r + SOF Not randomised Open-label QUARTZ-II Study: OBV/PTV/r + SOF for HCV.
Journal Conference Hepatology 2009;50: Background.
SOF + RBV GT2 Japanese SOF + RBV Open-label Japanese SOF + RBV Study: SOF + RBV in genotype 2  Design W12 Japanese patients ≥ 20 years Chronic HCV infection.
بنام خداوند مهربان. دکتر نرگس نجفی دانشیار دانشگاه.
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis * No HBV or HIV coinfection
TOPAZ-II Study: OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV for genotype 1
Design No randomisation Open-label W12 W years HCV genotype 1
CONCERTO-2 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2a + RBV for genotype 1
GARNET Study: OBV/PTV/r + DSV 8 weeks in genotype 1b
No cirrhosis or compensated cirrhosis** No HBV or HIV co-infection
ARV-trial.com RUBY-I Study, cohort 2: ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir + RBV for HCV genotype 1 with renal impairment Design Open label W12.
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
LEAGUE-1 study: daclatasvir + SMV + RBV for genotype 1
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
ASPIRE Study: SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 experienced patients
COMMIT Study: SMV + DCV in genotype 1b
CONCERTO-4 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2b + RBV for genotype 1
ENDURANCE-4 Study: glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in genotype 4, 5 or 6
Sequencing cohorts Open-label Design W8 W12 ≥ 18 years
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
Presentation transcript:

How to optimize the treatment of HCV-4 patients? Nabil Antaki MD, FRCPC Aleppo, Syria Paris, January 30, 2012

Case Presentation A 39-year-old Syrian male was diagnosed 6 months ago with genotype 4 HCV infection discovered during screening before blood donation.  He had no symptoms. BMI 27. No alcohol  His physical examination revealed no abnormalities and his liver was not enlarged.

The patient's initial laboratory results WBC: 5000 cells/mm3 Hemoglobin:15.4 g/dL Platelet count: 168,000 cells/mm3 AST: 72 U/L ALT: 101 U/L Total bilirubin: 0.4 mg/dL Albumin: 4 g/L HCV RNA: 900,000 IU/mL Genotype 4c/d

The patient's initial laboratory results Prothrombin time: 10.9 seconds; INR 1 TSH: 2.5 IU/mL (normal: IU/mL) Ferritin: 150 ng/mL (normal: ng/mL) Iron saturation: 30% Alpha-fetoprotein: 2.5 ng/mL liver biopsy :grade 2 and stage 2 (Metavir score) IL28B: rs :CT

He was started on Peg-INF alfa-2a 180 µg/week plus RBV 1000 mg/day, and treatment was planned for 48 weeks.

What are the pre-treatment predictors of response in this patient? Ethnicity? Viral load? Genotype sub-type? Fibrosis? IL28B?

Fibrosis Stage and SVR Rates PEG-IFN-α-2b (1.5 μg / kg / week) plus RBV (1,000 – 1,200 mg / day) for 48 weeks Roulot et al, J Viral Hepatol 2007 p=0.01 SVR (%) Fibrosis score

Baseline Viral Load and SVR Rates Huepper et al, AASLD 2007 Patients (%) _

HCV-4 Subtypes & SVR Rates Better SVR rates observed in patients with HCV-4a subtypesBetter SVR rates observed in patients with HCV-4a subtypes Roulot et al, J Viral Hepat 2007 n=242, p=<0.05 SVR (%) PEGIFN α-2b (1.5 mg / kg / week) plus RBV (1000 – 1200 mg / day) for 48 weeks (4a) (4a,4d)(Multiple)

Factors Associated with SVR in 108 HCV-4 Patients: Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis VariableOdds Ratio95% CIP value Geographical Origin (Egyptian)13.119(3.089 – )<0.001 Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-IR < 2)5.314(1.953 – )0.001 Non-Severe Fibrosis (F0 - F2)8.059(2.512 – )<0.001 Factors associated with SVR rates Moucari, J Hepatol 2009

C Allele is Associated with SVR (HCV-1) Percentage SVR by Genotype of rs C/C T/C T/T SVR Combined European Americans African Americans Hispanics n = 70 n = 14 n = 102 n = 91 n = 35 n = 433 n = 186 n = 559 n = 392 n = 30 n = 26 n = 336 P = 1.37 x vs T/T Ge D, et al. Nature. 2009;461:

IL28B in HCV-4 EthnicityCC (%)CT(%)TT(%)SVR(%) Stättermayer 1 n=102 98% Egyptian De Nicola 2 n= % Egyptian 32% European Asselah 3 n= 82 51%Egyptian 34% European 13%African Antaki 4 n= % Caucasian Worldwide distribution in Caucasian Stättermayer et al,Clin Gastro and Hepatol, De Nicola et al. Hepatology Assellah et al. J Hepatol Antaki et al. submitted article

SVR in HCV-4 stratified by IL28B genotype (rs )

SVR in HCV-4 stratified by IL28B genotype (rs )

Week 4 Following 4 weeks of HCV treatment, the patient presents with no anemia (Hb: 12.5 g/dL; HCT: 37.5%) and mild neutropenia (WBC: 2600 cells/mm3; ANC: 1600 cells/mm3). Neither condition requires dose reduction or addition of epoetin at this time. ALT and AST normal The patient's HCV RNA is now undetectable.

How would you manage his treatment at Week 4? A. The patient is a responder and treatment should continue for 48 weeks B. The patient achieved RVR and 24 weeks of therapy is recommended C. The patient achieved RVR but his rs genotype is CT. He should continue therapy for 48 weeks

Optimizing the response: RESPONSE GUIDED THERAPY The faster after initiating treatment, HCV RNA becomes undetectable, the higher is the SVR rate and shorter is the duration of treatment.

Shorter treatment in HCV-4? Yes, If.....

Impact of RVR RVR, EVR as a guide for 24 w, 36 w or 48w 358 patients Adaptive N=308 Fixed N=50 24 w RVR N=69 36 w cEVR N=79 48 w pEVR N= w Kamal et al, Hepatology. 2007

EOT and SVR rates in HCV-G4 patients with RVR & EVR Kamal et al, Hepatology % Response

RVR in HCV HCV-4 patients, Peg IFN α 2a and RBV RVR achieved in 45% 26 RVR patients (86.7%) achieved an SVR when treated for 24 weeks only No relation: with baseline viral load with dose of RBV Ferenci P, et al. Gastroenterol. 2008

SVR rates in HCV-G4 patients with RVR & EVR Ferenci P, et al. Gastroenterol ≤ 400,000400, ,000 > 800,000 SVR in Patients Achieving RVR (%) All Genotype 1 F0-F2F3-F4 By Baseline HCV RNA (IU/mL) By METAVIR Fibrosis Stage Genotype n/N =61/7452/649/1037/4525/3112/1417/2412/185/697/11974/9323/2618/243/415/20

Impact of RVR and IL28B on SVR RVR achieved in 25.4 to 41% of patients. In De Nicola study: RVR 34% SVR 80% (CC100%, CT/TT 70%, p= 0.06) No RVR 66% SVR 32% (CC 75%, CT/TT 23%, p= 0.001)

Pre-treatment predictors of response Univariate analysis: 1.Fibrosis (yes 1, 2, 4; no 3) 2.Ethnicity ( yes 2, no 3) 3.IL28B CC 4.Viral load

On-treatment predictors of response Univariate analysis: 1.Fibrosis (yes 1, 2, 4 no 3) 2.Ethnicity ( yes 2, no 3) 3.IL28B CC 4.Viral load 5.RVR

predictors of response Multivariate analysis: 1.Fibrosis 2.IL28B CC 3.RVR : the strongest predictor of SVR

W 24 At Week 24 of HCV therapy, the patient is tolerating treatment and remains fully compliant. The patient's liver enzymes are normal (AST: 23 IU/mL; ALT: 19 IU/mL). His current HCV RNA is undetectable

What would you do? A. The patient should continue his current regimen through 48 weeks B. The patient should discontinue treatment and be monitored for the next 6 months to determine whether he has achieved SVR

What would you do? The patient has no advanced fibrosis His pre-treatment viral load was 900,000 IU but this is not a poor predictive factor of response if he achieves RVR Although his IL28B genotype is CT, he achieved RVR (no statistical significance in SVR between CC and CT/TT in RVR patients) Treatment was stopped at W 24

W 24 after ETR The patient returns 6 months after stopping treatment to determine whether he has achieved SVR. His liver enzymes remain within the normal range and HCV RNA remains negative, indicating that he has achieved SVR.

The HCV- 4 algorithm: weeks 48 weeks 72 Weeks ? Week 4 Week 12 Week Or + >2log <2log - Mild Fibrosis LVL

Week 4_++ Week 12_(- )or > 2 log and CC (+) or < 2 log CC or (-) but CT/TT Week 24___ Mild Fibrosis 24 weeks 48 weeks 72 Weeks ??? The HCV- 4 proposed algorithm: 2012