Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Sorafenib Pharmacokinetics: Results of a Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Phase I Trial J Lettieri, A Mazzu,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Treatment of hypertension in patients with peptic ulcer and liver pathology DM Leonid Lazebnik DM Leonid Lazebnik DM Olga Mikheeva The Central Research.
Advertisements

Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE) trial.
High-density lipoprotein subclasses in subjects with impaired fasting glucose Filippatos TD 1, Barkas F 1, Klouras E 1, Liontos A 1, Rizos EC 1, Gazi I.
Basic Design Consideration. Previous Lecture Definition of a clinical trial The drug development process How different aspects of the effects of a drug.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
CREATININE AND CYSTATIN-C BASED GFRs VS 51 Cr-EDTA GFR IN PATIENTS WITH DECOMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS 1 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokration General.
…in an academic collaboration with ISRCTN
BHS Guidelines for the management of hypertension BHS IV, 2004 and Update of the NICE Hypertension Guideline, 2006 Guidelines for management of hypertension:
©2007 RUSH University Medical Center Hyperuricemia in adolescents with primary hypertension: how and when to intervene? Farahnak Assadi, M.D. Professor.
12/10/02Harry Bushar1 Computerized Thermal Imaging Breast Cancer System 2100 (CTI BCS2100) Radiological Devices Advisory Panel December 10, 2002 Statistical.
Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Ezetimibe Coadministered with Atorvastatin in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Heart.
ASTEROID A Study To evaluate the Effect of Rosuvastatin On Intravascular ultrasound- Derived coronary atheroma burden.
Low level of high density lipoprotein cholesterol in children of patients with premature coronary heart disease. Relation to own and parental characteristics.
SERUM VISFATIN CONCENTRATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ATHEROGENIC METABOLIC PROFILE T.D. Filippatos 1, A. Liontos 1, F. Barkas 1, E. Klouras 1, V. Tsimihodimos.
Efficacy and Safety of Deferasirox (Exjade®) during 1 Year of Treatment in Transfusion-Dependent Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Results from.
The National Kidney Foundation’s Kidney Early Evaluation Program TM “The Greater New York Experience” Ellen H. Yoshiuchi, MPS Division Program Director.
Dose Adjustment in Renal and Hepatic Disease
Blood Pressure Lability During Cardiac Surgery Is Associated With Adverse Outcomes Solomon Aronson, Edwin G. Avery, Cornelius Dyke, Joseph Varon, Jerrold.
1 The Study of Trandolapril- verapamil And insulin Resistance STAR determined whether glycaemic control was maintained to a greater degree by an RAS inhibitor/non-DHP.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
Clinical trial 2. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of varenicline for smoking cessation compared with sustained-release bupropion (bupropion.
1. Relation between dietary macronutrient and fiber intake with metabolic syndrome in Tehranian adults: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study Hosseinpour S,
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Sorafenib Plus TACE for the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma - Final Results of the Socrates Trial - A Erhardt, FT Kolligs, MM Dollinger,
To assess the prognostic value of variability in home-measured blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in a general population. Objective: Methods: BP.
Lipoatrophy and lipohypertrophy are independently associated with hypertension: the effect of lipoatrophy but not lipohypertrophy on hypertension is independent.
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
Clinical trial 2. Objective To evaluate efficacy and safety of varenicline for smoking cessation compared with sustained-release bupropion (bupropion.
The effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics, and safety of ivabradine in healthy subjects Adina Popa 1, Laurian Vlase 2, Maria Neag 3, Dana Muntean.
Rivaroxaban Has Predictable Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) When Given Once or Twice Daily for the Treatment of Acute, Proximal Deep Vein.
APRIL AYERS JEFF GIBBERMAN MELISSA HSU EL-KAMARYA SS, SHARDELLA MD, ABDEL-HAMID M, ET AL. A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL TO ASSESS THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY.
Lesotho STEPS Survey 2012 Fact Sheet John Nkonyana Director Disease Control.
1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence September–October 2015.
1 A review of the safety of Moxifloxacin Hydrochloride Leonard Sacks MD Medical officer/DSPIDP.
INPULSIS® trial design and baseline characteristics
Angelo L Gaffo Kenneth G Saag Core Evidence 2009:4 25–36
SMV + DCV + SOF Open label Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 or 4 Treatment-naïve or pre-treated with PEG-IFN ± RBV Portal hypertension or liver decompensation.
GIDEON (Global Investigation of therapeutic DEcisions in hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] and Of its treatment with sorafeNib) second interim analysis in.
Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Adult Oncology Patients Hadeel Al-Kofide MS.c; Iman Zaghloul PhD; and Lamya Al-Naim PharmD Department of Clinical Pharmacy,
Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of Rivaroxaban: A Comparison of Once- and Twice-daily Dosing in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement.
Copyright © 2008 Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA All rights Reserved Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) Analyses for Raltegravir.
From: PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseaseJanuary 2014 Presented by Pavitra Charoensrisakkul and Peeraya Permkarnjaroen 3 rd year medical cadet Phramongkutklao.
Manufacturer: Relypsa Inc. FDA Approval Date: October 21, 2015
COMPARISON OF ADVERSE EFFECT PROFILES OF PAIN REGIMENS WITH AND WITHOUT INTRAVENOUS ACETAMINOPHEN IN TOTAL HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY PATIENTS Alyssa J.
1 Effect of Ramipril on the Incidence of Diabetes The DREAM Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 2006;355 FM R1 윤나리.
Risk Factors for Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia in Adult Patients Cristina Gervasoni Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milano.
Clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis NAFLD and NASH Prevalence in US Cohort Slideset on: Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty.
Charles Oo / ASCPT March 06 1 Repeated evaluation of the measured urinary creatinine clearance (CrCL), the predicted creatinine clearance based on Cockcroft-Gault.
Clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Effect of Telaprevir on the Pharmacokinetics of Cyclosporine and Tacrolimus Slideset on: Garg V, van Heeswijk R, Lee JE,
Budesonide induces remission more effectively than Prednisone in a controlled trial of patients with Autoimmune Hepatitis GASTROENTEROLOGY 2010;139:1198–1206.
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib as first-line therapy : A Korean multicenter.
Metabolic Comorbidities of Young Children
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Figure 1: Mean comparative midazolam plasma concentration-time plot
Dr. Iram Shad PGT-Medicine MU-1, HFH,RWP
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Trial profile for the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics study in patients with dyslipidaemia (A) and the ambulatory blood pressure study (B) *Participants.
Senior Medical Director, Cardiovascular
The ASSERT Study.
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Tolerability of Isoniazid Preventive therapy Among HIV infected Cohort in Nigeria Folajinmi Oluwasina Strategic Information Unit AIDS Healthcare Foundation,
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
Poster available online at:
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Major classes of drugs to reduce lipids
PRESENTER: Quynh vu, pgy-2
Clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters in relation to dose of oral sodium bicarbonate. Clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters in.
Presentation transcript:

Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Sorafenib Pharmacokinetics: Results of a Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Phase I Trial J Lettieri, A Mazzu, L Huang, and C Lathia Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Montville, NJ 1

Healthy volunteers (control) Study Design Multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, Phase I study to evaluate the PK profile and safety of oral sorafenib in noncancer participants with hepatic impairment and in healthy volunteers as a control group. All participants were treated with a single 400-mg dose of sorafenib There were 3 cohorts of participants in the study, each with 15 members: Cohort Participants 1 Child-Pugh Class A 2 Child-Pugh Class B 3 Healthy volunteers (control) PK=pharmacokinetic. Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL. 2 2 2

Study Design (cont’d) Blood samples for the determination of plasma concentrations of sorafenib and metabolites were collected following study drug administration on Day 1 Blood samples were collected at 0 hour (pre-dose), and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post‑dose. The following PK parameters were derived: AUC, Cmax, tmax, and t½ Safety evaluations included results of physical examination, electrocardiographic evaluation, vital sign assessment, adverse events monitoring, laboratory tests, and use of concomitant medications AUC=area under curve; Cmax=peak concentration; tmax=time to peak concentration; t½=half-life. Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Inclusion Criteria All participants Aged 50 to 75 years Body mass index (BMI) >20 and ≤35 Patients with liver disease* Child-Pugh Class A or B Control participants Healthy volunteers with normal liver function were matched to participants with liver disease with regard to age, weight, gender, and ethnicity * Liver disease was primarily due to hepatitis C (93% of Child-Pugh A patients and 100% of Child-Pugh B patients). Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Exclusion Criteria All Participants Malignancy other than squamous- or basal-cell carcinoma in situ or other malignancies not considered cured according to the criteria of the American Cancer Society Uncontrolled blood pressure (defined as systolic BP ≥160 mm Hg and diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg) Creatine kinase levels >3 times the upper limit of normal at screening Hematocrit <32% at screening Serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL at screening Other abnormal laboratory parameters determined to be clinically significant (in the opinion of the investigator and the sponsor); laboratory values that were slightly outside the normal ranges may have been allowed Major surgery, open biopsy, or significant trauma within 4 weeks of Day 1 BP=blood pressure. Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Exclusion Criteria (cont’d) Patients With Liver Disease Failure of a major organ system other than the liver Elevation of AST, ALT, LDH, bilirubin, and/or all other laboratory parameters related to liver function to levels beyond what would be considered consistent with the diagnosis of liver disease at screening Inability to completely abstain from alcohol consumption for 24 hours before the start of the study (Day 1) and during the study ALT=alanine aminotransferase; AST=aspartate aminotransferase; LDH=lactate dehydrogenase. Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Exclusion Criteria (cont’d) Control Participants Failure of a major organ system or presence of a medical disorder that would impair the participant’s ability to complete the study AST, ALT, and/or LDH >1.2 times the upper limit of normal at screening History of drug or alcohol abuse Positive test for human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Patient Demographics Characteristic Child-Pugh Class A (n=15) Child-Pugh Class B (n=15) Healthy Volunteers (n=15) Total (N=45) Male, n (%) 10 (66.7) 13 (86.7) 11 (73.3) 34 (75.6) Female, n (%) 5 (33.3) 2 (13.3) 4 (26.7) 11 (24.4) White, n (%) 14 (93.3) 12 (80.0) 40 (88.9) Black, n (%) 1 (6.7) 4 (8.9) Asian, n (%) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.2) Mean age, years (range) 54.4 (50-58) 57.8 (50-67) 55.8 (51-61) 56.0 (50-67) Weight, kg, (mean+SD) 84.1 (16.9) 78.5 (14.1) 82.8 (6.56) 81.8 (13.2) Height, cm (mean+SD) 171 (7.6) 172 (9.7) 172 (6.0) 172 (7.8) SD=standard deviation. Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Pharmacokinetics PK Assessment of Sorafenib Following a Single 400-mg Dose (geometric mean, % CV) PK Parameter Child-Pugh Class A (n=15) Child-Pugh Class B (n=15) Healthy Volunteers (n=15) AUC, mg-h/L 124 (57%) 107 (75%)* 102 (67%) Cmax, mg/L 4.01 (67%) 3.31 (50%) 3.03 (59%) t½, hours 27.5 (38%) 27.9 (37%) 27.0 (33%) * n=14. CV=coefficient of variation. Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Pharmacokinetics (cont’d) PK Assessment of Metabolite M2 Following a Single 400-mg Dose (geometric mean, % CV) PK Parameter Child-Pugh Class A (n=15) Child-Pugh Class B (n=15) Healthy Volunteers (n=15) AUC, mg-h/L 23.5 (88%)* 30.0 (121%)* 21.1 (72%) Cmax, mg/L 0.89 (84%) 0.97 (87%) 0.78 (59%) t½, hours 27.0 (31%) 25.6 (38%) 27.3 (33%) tmax, hours† 3 (3-12) 5 (2-24) 3 (2-5 ) * n=14; †median (range). Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Pharmacokinetics (cont’d) PK Assessment of Metabolite M4 (demethylated sorafenib) Following a Single 400-mg Dose of Sorafenib (geometric mean, % CV) PK Parameter Child-Pugh Class A (n=15) Child-Pugh Class B (n=15) Healthy Volunteers (n=15) AUC0-tn, mg-h/L 2.29 (217%) 1.68 (1081%) 1.33 (239%) Cmax, mg/L 0.076 (129%) 0.079 (184%) 0.053 (77%) t½, hours 33.9 (78%) 26.9 (38%) 25.8 (53%) tmax, hours* 12 (3-24) 16 (3-24) 9 (3-24) * Median (range). Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Pharmacokinetics (cont’d) Plasma Concentrations of Sorafenib (geometric means) Following a Single 400-mg Dose 10 Child-Pugh A Child-Pugh B Healthy Plasma Concentration (mg/L) 1 0.1 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time (hours) Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Pharmacokinetics (cont’d) Results of Statistical Analysis of AUC and Cmax Ratios Between Different Participant Groups Participant Groups Estimated Ratio 90% Confidence Interval A/C AUC 1.22 (0.84-1.77) Cmax 1.32 (0.95-1.85) B/C 1.06 (0.73-1.54) 1.09 (0.78-1.53) B/A 0.86 (0.59-1.26) 0.83 (0.59-1.16) A=Child Pugh A; B=Child Pugh B; C=Healthy. Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.

Conclusions No evidence for any clinically relevant or statistically significant differences in PK between the 3 participant cohorts (CPA and CPB, and a matched healthy control group) was found in this study, with respect to either sorafenib or its most significant metabolites For unchanged sorafenib, which is the principal drug-related moiety in plasma, slight increases in AUC and Cmax were seen in CPA patients but were not seen in CPB patients, suggesting that these effects are not related directly to hepatic function The 400-mg dose of sorafenib given to the CPA and CPB liver disease patients and to the matched control group of healthy volunteers appeared to be safe and well tolerated based on the review of typically standard protocol- specified safety variables collected and/or monitored in this study. No new or unexpected adverse events were reported Based on these data, no adjustment of sorafenib dose is required in patients with mild to moderate hepatic impairment CPA=Child-Pugh A; CPB=Child-Pugh B. Adapted from Lettieri J et al. Presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting; June 3-7, 2011; Chicago, IL.