Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Andrea Pranti.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Advertisements

Risk Analysis Fundamentals and Application Robert L. Griffin International Plant Protection Convention Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN.
Atypical Actives PDA-FDA Conference March 9-10, 2011 David R. Schoneker
1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
ISO 9001 : 2000.
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
Determine impurity level in relevant batches1
Risk Assessment in QbD David R. González Barreto 1 QbD Risk Assessment in QbD Introduction and Few Tools David R. González Barreto.
Tony Gould Quality Risk Management. 2 | PQ Workshop, Abu Dhabi | October 2010 Introduction Risk management is not new – we do it informally all the time.
Pharmaceutical Product Quality Assurance Through CMC Drug Development Process Presented by Darlene Rosario (Aradigm) 21 October 2003 Meeting of the Advisory.
Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science July 20-21, 2004 Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Annex I: Methods & Tools
Pilot Risk-Ranking Model to Prioritize Manufacturing Sites for GMP Inspections Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Manufacturing Subcommittee.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE
Regulatory requirements and benefits converting to Continued Process Verification.
ONDQA Perspective on Post Approval Changes Eric P. Duffy, PhD Director, Division of Post-Market Evaluation, ONDQA, CDER, FDA Public Meeting: Supplements.
1 Revisions to 21 CFR Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application PhRMA Perspective FDA Public Meeting – 7 Feb 2007.
Learnings from Pre-approval Joint Inspection of a GSK QbD Product with US-FDA & EMA and the application of Continuous Verification 17 May 2011, Beijing,
Executive summary prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT.
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
Slide 1 May 2008 Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Mumbai, India Date: May 2008 QUALITY BY DESIGN.
N By: Md Rezaul Huda Reza n
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
Excipient QbD Concepts to Enhance the Development of Robust Drug Products Priscilla S. Zawislak Global Regulatory Affairs Manager - Ashland Inc. Chair.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
The Science of Quality By Design Janet Woodcock, M.D. May 19, 2004.
FDA Recommendations: Sampling Plans for Blood Establishments Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer OBRR/CBER/FDA October 19, 2012.
Quality by Design (QbD) Myth : An expensive development tool ! Fact : A tool that makes product development and commercial scale manufacturing simple !
1-7.The ICH Q8 “Minimal Approach” to Pharmaceutical Development
A Qualitative Decision Making Tool to Aid in Defining the Number of Lots for a Process Validation Campaign Leslie Sidor — Amgen Inc Midwest Biopharmaceutical.
Important informations
QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT RASHID MAHMOOD MSc. Analytical Chemistry MS in Total Quality Management Senior Manager Quality Assurance Nabiqasim Group of Industries.
1 Regulatory Aspects of Pharmaceutical Excipients PQRI Workshop Nick Buhay Acting Director Division of Manufacturing and Product Quality Office of Compliance.
Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.
1 An Update on ICH Guideline Q8 – Pharmaceutical Development FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science: 5 Oct 2006 Dr John C Berridge Senior Regulatory.
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Implementation of ICH Q8, Q9, Q10.
BioTx Pharmaceutical Sciences Movement within the design space with a robust control strategy Jon Coffman, Ph.D. Principal Engineer III BioTherapeutic.
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
Workshop Session 3 Questions 1 How would a control strategy look different in a traditional submission vs a QbD submission? How would parameters that are.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Satish Mallya January 20-22, |1 | 2-3. Pharmaceutical Development Satish Mallya Quality Workshop, Copenhagen May 18-21, 2014 May 18-21,2014.
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
Module 2Slide 1 of 26 WHO - EDM Quality Management Basic Principles of GMP Part One.
Malaysia, EVALUTION OF DOSSIERS IN WHO- PREQUALIFICATION PROJECT MULTISOURCE TB-DRUGS Evaluation of bioavailability/bioequivalence data Based,
CDER / Office of Compliance ACPS October 5, 2006 Joseph C. Famulare Acting Deputy Director Office of Compliance CDER / FDA.
Examining Drug Quality Regulation Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Public Meeting on 21 CFR February,
Topic #2: Quality by Design and Pharmaceutical Equivalence Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
QbD Technologies: Workshop for Risks Management Incorporating Risk Management for Technology Transfer.
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
QbD Technologies: Workshop for Risks Analysis Incorporating Risk Management for Technology Transfer.
Integration of Excipients into the Design of Experiments for Pharmaceutical Product and Design Space Development Chris Moreton, Ph.D. FinnBrit Consulting.
Six Sigma Greenbelt Training
An Update on ICH Guideline – Pharmaceutical Development
Quality by design (Qbd)
Uncontrolled variation is the enemy of quality
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 953, 2009
Quality Risk Management
Quality System.
QUALITY BY DESIGN Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with focus on Paediatric Formulations Mumbai, India Date: May 2008.
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER.
Quality by Design.
Radiopharmaceutical Production
SID & GP MINPROMTORG OF RUSSIA Corporate Communication Center
Presentation transcript:

Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Andrea Pranti

1: Background 2: QbD elements for vaccines product and process development 3: Process consistency and product quality along product life cycle 4: QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose). Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production

“...quality cannot be tested or inspected into a finished product, but quality, safety and effectiveness must be designed and built into a product and its manufacturing process”. ICH-Q8 defines it as “a systemic approach to development that begins with pre-difined objectives and emphasizes product and process understanding and process control, based on sound science and quality risk managment “ (1) Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Background

As stated in a recent guide from FDA (2) Quality by design means: Designing and developing manufacturing Process during the product development Stage to consistently ensure a predefined quality at the end of manufacturing process. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Background

Quality by Design (QbD) principles are applied from the onset of product definition and development, and are intended to ensure the following: Product is designed to meet patient needs including safety and efficacy requirements Process is designed to consistently meet product critical quality attributes (CQAs) Critical sources of variability are identified and controlled through appropriate control strategies Process is continually monitored, evaluated, and updated to ensure that product quality is maintained throughout the product life-cycle Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Background

Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Process consistency and product quality along product life cycle

The following passage from ICH Q8 (R2) describes the QbD elements that should be included in pharmaceutical development – at a minimum: Defining the quality target product profile (QTPP) as it relates to quality, safety and efficacy, considering e.g., the route of administration, dosage form, bioavailability, strength, and stability; Identifying potential critical quality attributes (CQAs) of the drug product, so that those product characteristics having an impact on product quality can be studied and controlled; A CQA has been defined as a « phisical, chemical, biological, or microbiological property or characteristic that should be within an appropriate limit, range or distribution to ensure the desidered product quality (3) Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD elements for vaccines product and process development

Determining the CQAs of the drug substance, excipients etc., and selecting the type and amount of excipients to deliver drug product of the desired quality. Identification of CQAs is done through risk assessment as per the ICH guidance Q9. Selecting an appropriate manufacturing process; Defining a control strategy Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD elements for vaccines product and process development

Process design space As defined by ICH Q8 (R2), design space is ‘The multidimensional combination and interaction of input variables (e.g., material attributes) and process parameters that have been demonstrated to provide assurance of quality.’ The overall approach toward process characterization involves theree key steps: - risk analysis to identify parameters for process characterization - studies are deigned using DOE such that the data are amendable for use in understandig and defining the design space. study execution with analizing of results to evaluate the relevance of the parameters into the process design space. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Process consistency and product quality along product life cycle

Control strategy is defined as a planned set of controls derived from current product and process understanding that assures process performance and product quality ( 4) The control strategy is performed with a risk assessment that takes in consideration CQA and process capability. Process validation : is an exercise to demonstrate that the process will deliver a product of acceptable quality if operated with design space life cycle managment : CQAs should be monitored to ensure that the process is performing within defined acceptable variability that served as the basis for the process disgn. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production Process consistency and product quality along product life cycle

Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

Review the current release tests and product quality attributes to determine their impact on safety and efficacy of the product.Where there is a direct impact on safety or efficacy, these attributes are defined as critical quality attributes (CQAs) Criticality will be defined according to specific impat score values Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

Analytical assessment process List all the CQAs and evaluate analytical methods in relation to the CQAs. Verify gaps in terms of assay performance vs current specification ranges Input for this assessment: Analytical method validation reports & documentation related to analytical method failures -Method performance vs. current specifications -Historical data for both release and stability Review the Critical Process Parameters against the analytical tests to determine any risk areas or discrepancies between the required control limits / performance required or impact of timing on the process and the validated performance of the assay. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

Process parameters assessment Operational parameters are identified as critical and non-critical based on their ability to affect product critical quality attributes, if not appropriately controlled inside a predefined range. If there is a direct impact within the tested range with a low uncertainty score, the process parameters is defined as critical process parameters (CPP). CPPs variability have an impact on critical quality attribute and therefore should be monitored or controlled to ensure the process produced the desired quality. A CPP has a high risk of falling outside the design space. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

Determining CPPs from the identified CQAs 1 – Determine which processing steps influence the CQAs  Review the impact of each process step on every critical quality attribute.  During this process, additional critical quality attributes may be identified, which should be recorded. 2 – Determine which specific process parameters within the processing steps affect the CQAs  Score each process parameter using cause and effect scoring. 3 – Based upon the scoring, determine which process parameters are CPPs. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

Determining CPPs from the identified CQAs The scoring determines the criticality of the parameter: –If there is a known direct relationship between the process parameter and a critical quality attribute, the process parameter is critical. –If there are multiple relationships suspected but unknown, the parameter is probably critical and needs to be discussed. –If a relationship is suspected but unknown for one CQA, the parameter is potentially critical and needs to be discussed. –If there is no suspected or known relationships then the parameter is not critical. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

Review the relevant data to support the processing ranges for each CPP to determine what range is appropiate to ensure the CPP will not adverely affect and brach the CQA specification. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

FMEA assessment of CPPs Conduct an FMEA to determine the failure scenarios associated with each Critical Process Parameter –Score based upon severity, occurrence and detectability to calculate an overall Risk Priority number (RPN) and determine what actions are appropriate to address the main risk ScoreSeverityOccurrenceDetection 5 Direct significant impact on one or more CQAs. Product recall. Failure almost inevitable No way to detect, not tracked or alarmed 4 Impact on product quality / process performance. Critical deviation. Repeated failuresRemote chance of detection 3 Slight impact on product quality / process performance. Major deviation. Occasional failuresModerate chance of detection 2 Negligible impact on product quality / process performance. Minor deviation. Few failuresHigh chance of detection 1 No impact on product quality / process performanceFailure is unlikelyExcursion is obvious, always detected prior to impacting process Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

Gaps and actions  Bring together the FMEA and analytical gap assessment  Review gaps / risk areas / knowledge gaps  Review potential actions to address the gaps, categorising into importance  Assess the extent of control for each CQA in the current specification range, and define associated risk taking into account:  the impact of high risk process steps / parameters on the CQA  the analytical capability for testing the CQA  the uncertainty score (critical quality attributes with low uncertainty should be prioritized in importance) Evaluate the rationales for current CQA ranges and verify the opportunity of actions aimed at their refinement. Generated an overall prioritised action plan according to product and process output. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

QUALITY BY DESIGN SUMMARY better design of process and prducts reducing number of PTC reduced cost assocated to manaufacturing operations implementation of new technology to improve manufactruing without regulatory scrutiny Operation excellence robusteness of the quality system wit respect to the process perfomance and product quality monitoring. Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production QbD: Overview of the assessment process (commercial purpose).

(1) ICH Q8 : Pharmaceutical Develpoment FED.reg 71(98) 2006; pdf. (2) US food and drug ADMINISTRATION.Giudiance for industry: Q10 quality system approach to pharmaceutical c GMP regulations (FDA, Rockville, MD, septemebrer 2006) US FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATIONS (3) Guidance for industry : Q8 pharmaceutical develpoment, US DEPARTMENS OF Helath and human servies (FDA, rockville, MD june) Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production References

Application of the principles of QbD in vaccines production