Slides by Prof. Brian L. Evans and Dr. Serene Banerjee Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE345S Real-Time.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Helsinki University of Technology,Communications Laboratory, Timo O. Korhonen Data Communication, Lecture6 Digital Baseband Transmission.
Advertisements

1. INTRODUCTION In order to transmit digital information over * bandpass channels, we have to transfer the information to a carrier wave of.appropriate.
EE445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Spring 2014 Lecture 15 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Transmitter Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical.
ECE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 13 Mar. 3 rd, 2014.
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Spring.
Outline Transmitters (Chapters 3 and 4, Source Coding and Modulation) (week 1 and 2) Receivers (Chapter 5) (week 3 and 4) Received Signal Synchronization.
Dr. Uri Mahlab1. 2 Informationsource TransmitterTransmitter Channel ReceiverReceiver Decision Communication system.
Digital Data Transmission ECE 457 Spring Information Representation Communication systems convert information into a form suitable for transmission.
3F4 Optimal Transmit and Receive Filtering Dr. I. J. Wassell.
1 Dr. Uri Mahlab. INTRODUCTION In order to transmit digital information over * bandpass channels, we have to transfer the information to a carrier wave.
3F4 Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) Dr. I. J. Wassell.
Digital communications I: Modulation and Coding Course Period Catharina Logothetis Lecture 6.
Matched Filters By: Andy Wang.
BASEBAND DATA TRANSMISSION by Dr. Uri Mahlab Dr. Uri Mahlab.
1 Digital Communication Systems Lecture-3, Prof. Dr. Habibullah Jamal Under Graduate, Spring 2008.
Communication Systems
Carrier-Amplitude modulation In baseband digital PAM: (2d - the Euclidean distance between two adjacent points)
Introduction to Spectral Estimation
Formatting and Baseband Modulation
Modulation, Demodulation and Coding Course
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE345S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Spring.
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE345S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall.
Digital Communication I: Modulation and Coding Course
Digital Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM)
Digital Baseband Transmission S Transmission Methods in Telecommunication Systems (5 cr)
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall.
Dept. of EE, NDHU 1 Chapter Three Baseband Demodulation/Detection.
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE 382C-9 Embedded Software Systems Lecture 14 Communication.
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC 4307/ENTC 5307.
EE345S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall 2006 Lecture 16 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Receiver Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical.
I. Previously on IET.
Interpolation and Pulse Shaping
Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Transmitter
Baseband Demodulation/Detection
1 Dr. Uri Mahlab. 1.א1.א תוכן עניינים : Introduction of Binary Digital Modulation Schemes 2-10 Probability of error Transfer function of the optimum.
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE345S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Spring.
Continuous-Time Convolution EE 313 Linear Systems and Signals Fall 2010 Initial conversion of content to PowerPoint by Dr. Wade C. Schwartzkopf Prof. Brian.
Performance of Digital Communications System
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall.
Chapter 4: Baseband Pulse Transmission Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu1/46 CHAPTER 4 BASEBAND PULSE TRANSMISSION.
Matched Filtering and Digital Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM)
EE 3220: Digital Communication
Digital Communications Chapeter 3. Baseband Demodulation/Detection Signal Processing Lab.
EE445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Spring 2014 Lecture 16 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Receiver Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical.
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE345S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall.
ECE 4371, Fall, 2015 Introduction to Telecommunication Engineering/Telecommunication Laboratory Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
DIGITAL CARRIER MODULATION SCHEMES Dr.Uri Mahlab 1 Dr. Uri Mahlab.
Outline Transmitters (Chapters 3 and 4, Source Coding and Modulation) (week 1 and 2) Receivers (Chapter 5) (week 3 and 4) Received Signal Synchronization.
Baseband Receiver Receiver Design: Demodulation Matched Filter Correlator Receiver Detection Max. Likelihood Detector Probability of Error.
Performance of Digital Communications System
WAVELET NOISE REMOVAL FROM BASEBAND DIGITAL SIGNALS IN BANDLIMITED CHANNELS Dr. Robert Barsanti SSST March 2010, University of Texas At Tyler.
SungkyunKwan Univ Communication Systems Chapter. 7 Baseband pulse Transmission by Cho Yeon Gon.
INTERSYMBOL INTERFERENCE (ISI)
Slides by Prof. Brian L. Evans and Dr. Serene Banerjee Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE445S Real-Time.
UNIT-2 BASEBAND TRANSMISSION
Lecture 1.30 Structure of the optimal receiver deterministic signals.
Principios de Comunicaciones EL4005
Lecture 1.8. INTERSYMBOL INTERFERENCE
Digital Pulse Amplitude Modulation
Digital Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM)
Error rate due to noise In this section, an expression for the probability of error will be derived The analysis technique, will be demonstrated on a binary.
Lab #5.1 Pulse Amplitude Modulation/ BPSK
INTERSYMBOL INTERFERENCE (ISI)
Lab #5.1 Pulse Amplitude Modulation/ BPSK
Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Transmitter
S Transmission Methods in Telecommunication Systems (5 cr)
Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Transmitter
Lab 6: Week 1 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Transmitter
Malong Wang Ting-change
Presentation transcript:

Slides by Prof. Brian L. Evans and Dr. Serene Banerjee Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE345S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall 2006 Lecture 13 Matched Filtering and Digital Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM)

Outline PAM Matched Filtering PAM System Transmit Bits Intersymbol Interference (ISI) –Bit error probability for binary signals –Bit error probability for M-ary (multilevel) signals Eye Diagram

Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) Amplitude of periodic pulse train is varied with a sampled message signal m –Digital PAM: coded pulses of the sampled and quantized message signal are transmitted (next slide) –Analog PAM: periodic pulse train with period T s is the carrier (below) t TsTs TT+T s 2T s p(t)p(t) m(t)m(t)s(t) = p(t) m(t) Pulse shape is rectangular pulse T s is symbol period

Pulse Amplitude Modulation (PAM) Transmission on communication channels is analog One way to transmit digital information is called 2-level digital PAM bb t A ‘1’ bit Additive Noise Channel inputoutput x(t)x(t)y(t)y(t) bb -A-A ‘0’ bit t receive ‘0’ bit receive ‘1’ bit bb -A-A bb t A How does the receiver decide which bit was sent?

Matched Filter Detection of pulse in presence of additive noise Receiver knows what pulse shape it is looking for Channel memory ignored (assumed compensated by other means, e.g. channel equalizer in receiver) Additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with zero mean and variance N 0 /2 g(t)g(t) Pulse signal w(t)w(t) x(t)x(t) h(t)h(t) y(t)y(t) t = T y(T)y(T) Matched filter T is pulse period

Matched Filter Derivation Design of matched filter Maximize signal power i.e. power of at t = T Minimize noise i.e. power of Combine design criteria g(t)g(t) Pulse signal w(t)w(t) x(t)x(t) h(t)h(t) y(t)y(t) t = T y(T)y(T) Matched filter

Power Spectra Deterministic signal x(t) w/ Fourier transform X(f) Power spectrum is square of absolute value of magnitude response (phase is ignored) Multiplication in Fourier domain is convolution in time domain Conjugation in Fourier domain is reversal and conjugation in time Autocorrelation of x(t) Maximum value at R x (0) R x (  ) is even symmetric, i.e. R x (  ) = R x (-  ) t 1 x(t)x(t) 0TsTs  Rx()Rx() -Ts-Ts TsTs TsTs

Power Spectra Power spectrum for signal x(t) is Autocorrelation of random signal n(t) For zero-mean Gaussian n(t) with variance  2 Estimate noise power spectrum in Matlab N = 16384; % number of samples gaussianNoise = randn(N,1); plot( abs(fft(gaussianNoise)).^ 2 ); noise floor

Matched Filter Derivation Noise Signal f Noise power spectrum S W (f) g(t)g(t) Pulse signal w(t)w(t) x(t)x(t) h(t)h(t) y(t)y(t) t = T y(T)y(T) Matched filter AWGN Matched filter

Matched Filter Derivation Find h(t) that maximizes pulse peak SNR  Schwartz’s inequality For vectors: For functions: lower bound reached iff  a b

Matched Filter Derivation

Matched Filter Given transmitter pulse shape g(t) of duration T, matched filter is given by h opt (t) = k g*(T-t) for all k Duration and shape of impulse response of the optimal filter is determined by pulse shape g(t) h opt (t) is scaled, time-reversed, and shifted version of g(t) Optimal filter maximizes peak pulse SNR Does not depend on pulse shape g(t) Proportional to signal energy (energy per bit) E b Inversely proportional to power spectral density of noise

t=kT T Matched Filter for Rectangular Pulse Matched filter for causal rectangular pulse has an impulse response that is a causal rectangular pulse Convolve input with rectangular pulse of duration T sec and sample result at T sec is same as to First, integrate for T sec Second, sample at symbol period T sec Third, reset integration for next time period Integrate and dump circuit Sample and dump h(t) = ___

Transmit One Bit Analog transmission over communication channels Two-level digital PAM over channel that has memory but does not add noise hh t 1 bb t A ‘1’ bit bb -A-A ‘0’ bit Model channel as LTI system with impulse response h(t) Communication Channel inputoutput x(t)x(t)y(t)y(t) t -A T h receive ‘0’ bit t h+bh+b hh Assume that T h < T b t receive ‘1’ bit h+bh+b hh A T h

Transmit Two Bits (Interference) Transmitting two bits (pulses) back-to-back will cause overlap (interference) at the receiver Sample y(t) at T b, 2 T b, …, and threshold with threshold of zero How do we prevent intersymbol interference (ISI) at the receiver? hh t 1 Assume that T h < T b t bb A ‘1’ bit ‘0’ bit bb *= -A T h t bb ‘1’ bit ‘0’ bit h+bh+b Intersymbol interference

Transmit Two Bits (No Interference) Prevent intersymbol interference by waiting T h seconds between pulses (called a guard period) Disadvantages? hh t 1 Assume that T h < T b *= t bb A ‘1’ bit ‘0’ bit h+bh+b t -A T h bb ‘1’ bit ‘0’ bit h+bh+b hh

Digital 2-level PAM System Transmitted signal Requires synchronization of clocks between transmitter and receiver TransmitterChannelReceiver bibi Clock T b PAMg(t)g(t)h(t)h(t)c(t)c(t) 1 0 a k  {-A,A} s(t)x(t)y(t)y(t i ) AWGN w(t)w(t) Decision Maker Threshold Sample at t=iT b bits Clock T b pulse shaper matched filter

Digital PAM Receiver Why is g(t) a pulse and not an impulse? Otherwise, s(t) would require infinite bandwidth Since we cannot send an signal of infinite bandwidth, we limit its bandwidth by using a pulse shaping filter Neglecting noise, would like y(t) = g(t) * h(t) * c(t) to be a pulse, i.e. y(t) =  p(t), to eliminate ISI actual value (note that t i = i T b ) intersymbol interference (ISI) noise p(t) is centered at origin

Eliminating ISI in PAM One choice for P(f) is a rectangular pulse W is the bandwidth of the system Inverse Fourier transform of a rectangular pulse is is a sinc function This is called the Ideal Nyquist Channel It is not realizable because the pulse shape is not causal and is infinite in duration

Eliminating ISI in PAM Another choice for P(f) is a raised cosine spectrum Roll-off factor gives bandwidth in excess of bandwidth W for ideal Nyquist channel Raised cosine pulse has zero ISI when sampled correctly Let g(t) and c(t) be square root raised cosines ideal Nyquist channel impulse response dampening adjusted by rolloff factor 

Visualizing ISI Eye diagram is empirical measure of quality of received signal Intersymbol interference (ISI): Raised cosine filter has zero ISI when correctly sampled See slides and 13-31

Bit Error Probability for 2-PAM T b is bit period (bit rate is f b = 1/T b ) v(t) is AWGN with zero mean and variance  2 Lowpass filtering a Gaussian random process produces another Gaussian random process Mean scaled by H(0) Variance scaled by twice lowpass filter’s bandwidth Matched filter’s bandwidth is ½ f b h(t)h(t) s(t)s(t) Sample at t = nT b Matched filter v(t)v(t) r(t)r(t)r(t)r(t)rnrn r(t) = h(t) * r(t)

Bit Error Probability for 2-PAM Binary waveform (rectangular pulse shape) is  A over nth bit period nT b < t < (n+1)T b Matched filtering by integrate and dump Set gain of matched filter to be 1/T b Integrate received signal over period, scale, sample 0 - Probability density function (PDF) See slide 13-13

Bit Error Probability for 2-PAM Probability of error given that the transmitted pulse has an amplitude of –A Random variable is Gaussian with zero mean and variance of one Q function on next slide PDF for N(0, 1)

Q Function Q function Complementary error function erfc Relationship Erfc[x] in Mathematica erfc(x) in Matlab

Bit Error Probability for 2-PAM Probability of error given that the transmitted pulse has an amplitude of A Assume that 0 and 1 are equally likely bits Probablity of error decreases exponentially with SNR

PAM Symbol Error Probability Average signal power G T (  ) is square root of the raised cosine spectrum Normalization by T sym will be removed in lecture 15 slides M-level PAM amplitudes Assuming each symbol is equally likely 2-PAM d -d 4-PAM Constellations with decision boundaries d -d 3 d -3 d

PAM Symbol Error Probability Noise power and SNR Assume ideal channel, i.e. one without ISI Consider M-2 inner levels in constellation Error if and only if where Probablity of error is Consider two outer levels in constellation two-sided power spectral density of AWGN channel noise filtered by receiver and sampled

Alternate Derivation of Noise Power Noise power T = T sym Filtered noise 2 (1–2)2 (1–2) Optional

PAM Symbol Error Probability Assuming that each symbol is equally likely, symbol error probability for M-level PAM Symbol error probability in terms of SNR M-2 interior points2 exterior points

Eye Diagram PAM receiver analysis and troubleshooting The more open the eye, the better the reception M=2 t - T sym Sampling instant Interval over which it can be sampled Slope indicates sensitivity to timing error Distortion over zero crossing Margin over noise t + T sym t

Eye Diagram for 4-PAM 3d d -d -3d