Analysis for November,2014 BGPI HSSE Department Monthly HSSE Performance

1.Statistics 2.Incidents and Analysis 3.RWP Analysis Contents

1. Statistics Monthly Proactive Indicators Land & TZMarine HSSE Inspections/Audits/Visits Emergency Drills7632 Meetings Percentage of RWP Completed87%85% Trainings Hazard Reporting Unsafe Acts-UA Unsafe Conditions-UC Near Misses123 First Aid Cases – FAC270

Monthly Reactive Indicators 1. Statistics Land & TZMarine Fatalities – FAT00 Permanent Total Disability-PTD00 Permanent Partial Disability-PPD00 Lost Work Day Cases-LWC00 Restricted Work Cases – RWC10 Medical Treatment Cases -- MTC10 Damage-DAM20 Fire/Explosion10 Security Incidents -SEC30 Environmental Incidents -ENV00 Health Case ( Medvac to hospital)00 Road Transport Accident-RTA20

1. Statistics Other Indicators Land & TZMarine Exposure Hours 5,947, ,856 Kilometers Driven3,889,7980 Total Recordable Cases Frequency-TRCF0.340 Lost Time Injury Frequency-LTIF00 Motor Vehicle Accident Frequency-MVAF0.510

1. Statistics Total Man-hours （ Till the end of Nov.) FARLTIFTRCF 70,412,

1. Statistics Total Man-hours （ Till the end of Nov.) FARLTIFTRCF 70,412,

1. Statistics Number of Total Recordable Cases (TRC) by Month Month Total MTC RWC LTI TRC

1. Statistics Number of Total Recordable Cases (TRC) by Country CountryFATLWCRWCMTCTRCRTAWTA Indonesia Tajikistan Cameroon 33 1 Iraq 331 Bolivia 2 21 Uganda 22 BGP Pioneer 112 KSA 22 Sudan 1121 Nigeria 22 8 Algeria 11 Ecuador 1 1 Malaysia 02 Congo 01 Pakistan 01 Oman 03 Total

1. Statistics

BGP Marine HSE Performance of 2014 (Accumulatively)

1. Statistics BGP International Motor Vehicle Accident Analysis of 2014 (Accumulatively) Total Km driven (Till the end of November) MVAF TargetMVAF 46,716,

1. Statistics

2. Incidents and Analysis CountryClientDateClassification Iraq Kurdistan (Crew 8637B) DNONov. 7, 2014RTA Brief description of incident At about 13:05 on Nov. 7, 2014, a cable layout crew pickup T32 was failed to turn around from west to east on one blacktop road, then the driver reversed the vehicle only seeing the side-mirrors. At the same time, another cable layout crew vehicle D14 was coming from west to east, whereas, the driver was chatting without concentrating to the road. When he noticed the reversing T32, the distance was too short. Although the driver braked immediately, its front-left part still collided on the left rear side of T32. Nobody was injured. T32-the left compartment was slight damage. The left rear lamp was damage. The left part of bumper was deformed. D14-some paint was lost on the front bumper.

2. Incidents and Analysis

Causes: T32 driver reversed on the blacktop road without banks men. D14 driver was chatting while driving without concentrating the road. The driver was lack of the safety awareness while driving. Inadequate supervision in the field. Lessons Learned : The vehicle reverse must be conducted with the guide of banks men. The driver must concentrate on the road while driving. The driver must have good safety awareness. The adequate supervision must ensured in the field.

2. Incidents and Analysis CountryClientDateClassification Tajikistan (Crew 0141) BOCNov.24th, 2014RWC Brief description of incident At about 15:30 on Nov. 24 th, 2014, portable rig group 1 completed one shot point and moved to the next. The terrain between the shot points was a small valley with 2 steep slopes. The drilling group persons tied rope on the power unit of the portable rig and lowered down the unit along the slope with 2 persons grasped the rope on the top of the slope and 2 persons held the unit with hand going down with the unit together. When the unit was descended near 2m to the bottom of the slope, one person of the unit holders lost his foot on the edge of one small animal track and rolled down about 2m to the bottom of the valley. Depending on the CT scan result, the IP had sustained only contusion (bruising with no puncture wounds) to the soft tissues around waist area and no further internal damage. The IP was restricted 7 work days.

2. Incidents and Analysis The place where the injured person slip down, where is about 2m high from the ground. Reconstruction of accident scenario

2. Incidents and Analysis Causes: Didn’t scout the access before moving the portable rig. Didn’t observe the procedure while moving the portable rig. Didn’t implement the risk control measures of fall from height. Inadequate supervision in the field operation. Lessons Learned : The access must be scouted and designed before moving the portable rig. The portable rig moving procedures must be observed in the hilly area. All the control measures about the FFH risk in the hilly area must be implemented. The supervision must be enhanced for high risk operation.

2. Incidents and Analysis CountryClientDateClassification Iraq Kurdistan (Crew 8637B) DNONov. 27, 2014Security(Property Damage) Brief description of incident At about 14:50 on Nov.24, 2014, the drilling group stopped the field work and went back to base camp due to raining. The drilling group Dongfeng bus D22 blasted one anti-personnel land mine on the back way and caused the right front tyre flat. The driver wasn’t realized that it was an AP mine blasting. With the request of D22 driver, the crew assigned 1 driver with 3 mechanics to send a new tyre to D22 by pickup T39. When T39 approached the location of D22, the second AP mine blasted. The driver suspected it was mine blasting and went back to gravel road without stopping. Then they reported to the camp. Depending on the field investigation by experts, it was confirmed that the two explosions were caused by AP mine. D-22: front-right tyre punctured, and triangle piece of right side window broken. T39 rear-right tyre punctured. Total loss was about 280USD.

2. Incidents and Analysis

Causes: Vehicles entered mine field but considered as “safe zones”; Mine maps and relative information not provided to crew by client. No appropriate response after mine blasting. Lack of the UXO knowledge for the employees. Lessons Learned : Not fully depending on the information from client. The adequate information such as mine maps must be provided by client. The employees need to know the proper response plan. The UXO knowledge must be trained to the employees in the risky operation.

2. Incidents and Analysis CountryClientDateClassification Indonesia (Crew 8626) ENINov. 27, 2014Fire (Property Damage) Brief description of incident At about 6:55am on Nov. 27, 2014, when the motorist of JM1 Longboat was attempt to start the engine, the carburetor flooded the engine with fuel. The motorist opened the engine cover instead of cleaning the engine and the carburetor first. During the course of engine starting, a spark caused the engine to catch fire. The skipper attempted to extinguish the fire by wet coveralls instead of using fire extinguisher. Then he put sea water onto the engine with the bailer. When the fire was failed to put off, he pulled out the fuel pipe from the engine and it caused the oil spilt on the deck of the boat. 20minutes later, the boat was sunk and the fire was extinguished on starvation. The outboard engine, the long boat cabin, VTS Unit and rig radio was damaged. Nobody was injured.

2. Incidents and Analysis

Causes: Fuel from the carburetor was spilled on the engine. The fire fighting was not carried out properly. The sea water caused the fire spread a lot. The fuel pipe pulled out escalated the fire spread on the deck. No safety procedure to shoot the engine trouble. The motorists was lack of the fire-prevention skill. Lessons Learned : Before starting the engine, the spilt oil must be cleaned first. The fire prevention skill training should be given to the motorists. The fire response procedure should be mastered the motorists. The safety procedure for the engine trouble-shooting should be developed and implemented. The training results will be evaluated by drills or exercises.

2. Incidents and Analysis CountryClientDateClassification Saudi Arabia (Head Office) Nov. 27, 2014RTA Brief description of incident At 19:00 on Nov. 27 th, 2014, BGP Saudi Arabia office assigned one rented car to send a Chinese staff to Damman Airport for rotation holiday. It was a three-lane road with less traffic on the way. BGP rented car was driving on the right lane with about 105km/h (speed limit of BGP is 110km/h). About 5km far from the checkpoint, one local vehicle with high speed from back turned to left to overtake BGP’s car. Unfortunately, it hit on the left rear side of BGP car, which caused BGP car out of control and rushed over from the road with 360 degree roll-over. The local vehicle went towards the left side and crashed on the median barrier. Nobody was injured. The bonnet, front bumper, lights, mirror etc was damaged. The rear trunk, chassis, left A pillar etc. was deformed. The total loss was about 7800USD.

2. Incidents and Analysis Second vehicle attempte d to shift lane BGP Rental Vehicle First vehicle passed from left lane

2. Incidents and Analysis Causes: The third party vehicle was driven too fast. The third party driver didn’t overtake the vehicle properly (the distance to the front vehicle is not enough). The 3 rd party driver was lack of safety awareness. Lessons Learned : The drivers should be alert with the risk from the third party vehicle. Keep safe distance with the third party vehicle. Give way to the third party vehicle.

3. RWP Analysis

Thank you for your effort and contribution to HSSE! HSSE is the responsibility of all of us!