CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Comments on EC 2000: Why so much detail to tell us about EC 2000? Practices of Modern Engineering – Spring 2011 You learned where things (courses) fit.
Advertisements

Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Good Afternoon Program Assessment Committee (PAC) Data Assessment Records and Analysis For the first three year Cycle Semesters Dr. Hussain Al-Zaher.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ABET 1Advisory committee of
University of Alabama Electrical & Computer Engineering Electrical and Computer Engineering Capstone Design Experience at The University of Alabama: Challenges,
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
A. ABET Update i. Overview of documents submitted to ABET (Self-Study) EWRE Retreat 8/2/2005 ii. What we need to do between now and ABET visit in November.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
A Decade of Experience On Outcome Based Accreditation: Still a Long Way To Go A. Erbil PAYZIN Bülent E. PLATIN Chair, MÜDEK Executive Board Member, MÜDEK.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
ABET Student Forum September 20, Review of the criterion Criterion 2: Objectives Criterion 3: Outcomes Criterion 5: Curriculum.
October 27, 2005ECE Department Meeting1 Assessment Plan and Notes on the ABET Program evaluator training J. Fernando Vega-Riveros, Ph.D. Dept. of Electrical.
Accreditation Evaluation of the BS-CSE Program Neelam Soundarajan Chair, Undergrad Studies Comm. CSE Department 1.
Implementing Outcomes Assessment: An Approach Based on Competencies Steve Mickelson Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering.
GLOBAL ACCREDITATION TRENDS Russel C. Jones. Ph.D., P.E. World Expertise LLC USA and UAE.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research 2010 Institutional Planning, Assessment & Research Assessment Review Committee Report College of Technology.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR Report.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingOctober 6, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
HU113_Assignment31 HU113: Technical Report Writing Prof. Abdelsamie Moet Teaching Assistant: Mrs. Rana El-Gohary Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Engineering Standards in Capstone Design William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America Washington, DC ASEE.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ABET Accreditation Criterion 4: Continuous Improvement Direct Assessment of Learning Outcomes Dr. Abdel-Rahman Al-Qawasmi Associate Professor EE Department.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. WHAT IS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS? ABET Required Program Outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING POLICIES THE WHAT, HOW AND WHY.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.
Industry Advisory Board May 30 th, 2014
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
Computer Engineering Program Outcomes Assessment Dept. of Computer Engineering King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia Dept. of Computer.
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Continuous Program Improvement
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Class Agenda Capstone Design Project Process 10 min
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Neeraj Mittal September 29, 2017
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Development of ABET Syllabus
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Presentation transcript:

CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012

ABET Role of the Advisory Board Accreditation of CHEN Program CHEN Program Objectives and Student Outcomes: –Assessment Tools and Processes –Assessment Results –Recommendations and implemented actions Program Educational Objectives Surveys Discussion and Comments Outline

ABET Accreditation means the program has: –meaningful long-term objectives that its alumni achieve; –a set of measurable outcomes for its students at the time of graduation; –a process in place for continuous assessment and improvement.

Role of the Advisory Board Meet with CHEN faculty members to discuss Program assessment results and recommendations (1-2 times a year); Help assess CHEN Program outcomes: –Evaluation of students capstone project presentations (once a year) –Exit interviews of graduating students (twice a year) Meet with ABET reviewers during accreditation and mock visits (once every 5- 6 years)

Accreditation of CHEN Program ABET-accredited in Fall 2009 for six years – Next General Review (NGR) –ABET team visited TAMUQ in Oct –Evaluator’s feedback was very favorable (no deficiencies, weaknesses, or concerns) Next visit will be in Fall 2014

CHEN Program Educational Objectives Educational objectives are few and broad, yet measurable, statements about the skills alumni should have some (e.g., five) years after graduation.

New CHEN Program Educational Objectives For CHEN at TAMUQ, they are: 1.Our graduates will apply the foundation, depth, and breadth of knowledge for successful chemical engineering careers in industry or government. 2.Our graduates will apply effective communication, leadership and teaming skills. 3.Our graduates will have a sense of responsibility, be ethical in the conduct of their profession, and have an appreciation for the impact of their profession on society.

CHEN Program Educational Objectives – Assessment Tools The Program objectives are assessed using: –Alumni Survey –Employer Survey –Surveys conducted every two years – next in the Fall, Survey Results: –Most recent

CHEN Program Educational Objectives – Assessment Results Alumni Survey Results Summary:

CHEN Program Educational Objectives – Assessment Results Employer Survey Results Summary:

CHEN Student Outcomes –Outcomes involve skills and knowledge students should have by the time they graduate; –ABET has an “A to K” list of compulsory outcomes. Programs may choose to have more. –We use “A to K”.

CHEN Student Outcomes TAMUQ CHEN graduates will have the: a)Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b)Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c)Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d)Ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams e)Ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems

CHEN Student Outcomes f)Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility g)Ability to communicate effectively h)Broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context i)Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life- long learning j)Knowledge of contemporary issues k)Ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Tools Program outcomes are assessed using several tools: –External: Capstone course evaluation form Senior exit interview Internship survey –Internal: Course-based outcome assessment sheet Senior exit survey

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Tools Capstone Project Evaluation Form (External): –Conducted by external examiners –Based on students final project presentations –Goal: At least 70% of all responses from all evaluators for each outcome should be either “Exceed” or “Meet” expectations, as opposed to “Needs Improvement”.

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Results Capstone Project Evaluation Form (External): –Outcome B (“design and conduct experiments”) is not assessed in the capstone project evaluation. Success %2010/112011/12 Average8788 Lowest81 - c79 - j c) Ability to design a system, component, or process… j) Knowledge of contemporary issues

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Tools Senior Exit Interview (External): –Conducted by external examiners –Two examiners jointly interviewed each senior student –Goal: At least 70% of all responses to each outcome should be either “Well” or “Adequately” prepared, as opposed to “Needs Improvement”.

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Tools Senior Exit Interview (External): Success %2010/112011/12 Average96 Lowest71 - b80 - f b) Ability to design and conduct experiments… f) Understanding of professional and ethical responsibility

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Tools Internship Survey (External): –Supervisors of trainees are asked questions about the performance of our students. –Does not assess all outcomes – conducted usually after sophomore or junior year –Goal: At least 70% of all responses to each outcomes should be either “Exceed” or “Meet” expectations, as opposed to “Needs improvement.

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Results Internship Survey (External): Few students reported doing internship in the Summer, A survey of internships in the Summers of 2011 and 2012 will be conducted in the Fall, 2012.

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Tools Course-Based Outcome Assessment Sheet (Internal)Course-Based Outcome Assessment Sheet (Internal) –Prepared by faculty members –Each “A to K” outcome is assessed using 2-3 courses –Specific tools, e.g., exam question, project, etc. are used –Goal: At least 70% of all students should pass each outcome in all courses assessed

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Results Course-Based Outcome Assessment Sheet (Internal)Course-Based Outcome Assessment Sheet (Internal) –A lot of data is generated and analyzed in this process; –All courses pass the goal of at least 70% of the students achieving the outcomes they measure.

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Tools Senior Exit Survey (Internal): –Students are asked how they feel the CHEN Program prepared them with respect to the outcomes. –Students are also asked questions related to other areas, such as advising, courses, etc. –Goal: At least 70% of all responses for each outcome should be either “Well” or “Adequately” prepared.

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Results Senior Exit Survey (Internal): Success (A-K) %2010/112011/12 Average100

CHEN Student Outcomes - Assessment Results Senior Exit Survey (Internal): Recent answers to survey questions allowed us to detect a specific issue: several students have concerns about career mentoring. Action: every semester, when students come for academic advising, faculty members discuss with them career options and opportunities.

Continuous Improvement: Recommendations and Actions Taken Based on 2010/2011 Cycle At the end of each semester, faculty members submit their course reports. Among other items, these reports contain: –recommendations for future course editions; –comments on compliance with previous recommendations. Courses are well established - typical recommendations are: Minor changes in the number hours dedicated to a topic; Inclusion/exclusion of specific examples; Changes in work load (home works, number of exams).

Summary of Program Assessment Results – 2011/2012 Cycle Program Objectives: –The process of changing the CHEN Program Educational Objectives, now approved, delayed our surveys: will take place in the Fall, Student Outcomes: –All external assessment tools of Student outcomes demonstrate satisfactory performance with respect to all outcomes. –Internal tools (course-based and exit survey) reinforce the same conclusion.

New tools to assess the Program Educational Objectives We have new surveys to assess the Program Educational Objectives, not used yet. We tried to keep the surveys short, yet informative, with three open questions. We would like to have your feedback on them.

CHEN Program Educational Objectives For CHEN at TAMUQ, they are: 1.Our graduates will apply the foundation, depth, and breadth of knowledge for successful chemical engineering careers in industry or government. 2.Our graduates will apply effective communication, leadership and teaming skills. 3.Our graduates will have a sense of responsibility, be ethical in the conduct of their profession, and have an appreciation for the impact of their profession on society.

Employer survey On average, approximately how many graduates from Texas A&M University at Qatar, Chemical Engineering Program, does your company hire per year? ______________ TAMUQ graduates have the foundation, depth, and breadth of knowledge for successful chemical engineering careers in industry or government. strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree no basis for answering TAMUQ graduates communicate effectively and have leadership and teaming skills. strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree no basis for answering TAMUQ graduates have a sense of responsibility, are ethical in the conduct of their profession, and have an appreciation for the impact of their profession on society. strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree no basis for answering

Employer survey What qualities do you like about our graduates? Have you identified areas in which improvements are needed? If so, what are these areas? Based on the performance of TAMUQ graduates, would you be willing to hire more in the future?

Alumni survey I have the foundation, depth, and breadth of knowledge for a successful chemical engineering career in industry or government. strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree no basis for answering I can communicate effectively and have leadership and teaming skills. strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree no basis for answering I have a sense of responsibility, am ethical in my professional conduct, and have an appreciation for the impact of my profession on society. strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree no basis for answering The educational experience at TAMUQ prepared me well for a successful professional career. strongly agree agree disagree strongly disagree no basis for answering

Alumni survey What skills you gained at TAMUQ that you found most useful in your professional career? What recommendations would you make to the Chemical Engineering Program at TAMUQ to improve the preparation of its graduates for successful professional careers? Would you recommend the Chemical Engineering Program at TAMUQ to a friend or family member?

Comments or Suggestions? Thank you