Simulation Standards and Interfacing Aims: ● Do we need this at all? ● Define the accelerator description format ● Interfacing procedure (bds-detector,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design Alexander Valishev, for the FNAL LET group FNAL AP Dept. Meeting March 7, 2007.
Advertisements

4.1/9.1m L* Optics & Performance Glen White, SLAC SiD Meeting, SLAC Jan 13, 2015.
Beam Delivery Simulation Development & BDS / MDI Applications L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, J. Snuverink, L. Deacon Royal Holloway,
TUPEC057 Advances With Merlin – A Beam Tracking Code J. Molson, R.J. Barlow, H.L. Owen, A. Toader MERLIN is a.
Beam Background and Detector Layout 4th Concept Collaboration Meeting FNAL October 2006.
LCFI physics studies meeting, 28 th June 05 Sonja Hillertp. 1 Report from ILC simulation workshop, DESY June Aim of workshop: preparation for Snowmass;
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
BLM review Mario Santana Leitner OUTLOOK ON FLUKA SIMULATIONS FOR UDULATOR DAMAGE AND BLM RESPONSE Mario Santana Leitner, Alberto.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
BDSIM simulations/results: Synchrotron Radiation and Muons Motivation and History Tracking results Synchrotron Radiation Tracking of Halo Muons News from.
Update on ILC ML Lattice Design Alexander Valishev, for the FNAL LET group FNAL AP Dept. Meeting March 7, 2007.
Status of BDSIM Developments at RHUL L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, R. Kwee-Hinzmann, J. Snuverink Acknowledgments: R. Bruce, S. Redaelli.
XML I/O in ROOT S. Linev, R. Brun, H.G. Essel CHEP 2004.
1 ATF2 Tuning and its application to ILC and CLIC FFS/IR region ASTeC and MAN : working together on tuning methods for the ATF2 and ILC IR/extraction design.
Carmen Maidantchik, Felipe Fink Grael, Kaio Karam, Kathy Pommès ATLAS detector construction/commissioning During the construction and commissioning activities,
Spin Tracking Using the Bmad Software Library David Sagan Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Introduction to MCMC and BUGS. Computational problems More parameters -> even more parameter combinations Exact computation and grid approximation become.
HPS Online Software Discussion Jeremy McCormick, SLAC Status and Plans.
EuroTag Workshop, Glasgow, 1/9/08 A General Geant4 Tagger Simulation David J. Hamilton University of Glasgow ( EuroTag.
XML A web enabled data description language 4/22/2001 By Mark Lawson & Edward Ryan L’Herault.
Updating JUPITER framework using XML interface Kobe University Susumu Kishimoto.
ATF2 Tuning Updates Glen White, SLAC Sept
© GMV S.A., 2004 Property of GMV S.A. All rights reserved 2004/05/13 XML in CCSDS CCSDS Spring Meeting - Montreal Fran Martínez GMVSA 4081/04.
IBM Software Group ® Overview of SA and RSA Integration John Jessup June 1, 2012 Slides from Kevin Cornell December 2008 Have been reused in this presentation.
ATF Control System and Interface to sub-systems Nobuhiro Terunuma, KEK 21/Nov/2007.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
EPICS Collaboration Meeting, November SNS Optics Database N. Malitsky.
ACAT 2005 Workshop, May UAL Interactive Analysis Environment Interactive Analysis Environment of Unified Accelerator Libraries V. Fine, N. Malitsky,
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
Jonathan Smith/André Sopczak, June 2005, RHUL 1 Tools and Modelling of Collimators David Burton, Nick Shales, Jonathan Smith, André Sopczak & Robin Tucker.
ILC collimation using Beam Delivery Simulation (BDSIM) S. T. Boogert, L. Nevay, J. Snuverink, H. Garcia Morales ALCWS KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 20 th April 2015.
TB1: Data analysis Antonio Bulgheroni on behalf of the TB24 team.
Gabriel Musat L.L.R. – Ecole polytechnique ECFA-DESY Linear Collider Workshop Amsterdam, April 1-4, 2003.
Introduction: Tasks of “Information for simulations”, hardware specs K.Kubo
SoLID simulation with GEMC Zhiwen Zhao 2015/03/26.
Simulation & Algorithms Update Development of Simulation Tools Development of Simulation Tools Calorimetry E-Flow Algorithms Calorimetry E-Flow Algorithms.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.
Collimation for the Linear Collider, Daresbury.1 Adam Mercer, German Kurevlev, Roger Barlow Simulation of Halo Collimation in BDS.
26 Oct 2010PC Physics Requirements of Software from Chris R ~19 Oct. My.
Dec 2004 Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White, S Molloy.
Mokka, main guidelines and future P. Mora de Freitas Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet Ecole polytechnique - France Linear collider Workshop 2004, Paris.
Location of the LW detector- Simulation of the LW signals Lawrence Deacon RHUL ATF2 meeting August 23 rd 2006 KEK.
Dec 2004 Simulation of Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White,
Status of BDSIM Simulation L. Nevay, S. Boogert, H. Garcia-Morales, S. Gibson, R. Kwee-Hinzmann, J. Snuverink Royal Holloway, University of London 17 th.
Panel Discussion on Single Particle Codes 1.Catalogue of existing codes 2.Transparency of input and output between different codes: what is the status.
Update on the Status of BDSIM Steve Malton On behalf of: Grahame Blair (RHUL) Ilya Agapov (CERN) Andrea Latina (CERN) Olivier Dadoun (LAL) Anyone else.
Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo
Report from SB2009 Working Group Akiya Miyamoto 8-July-2010 DESY ILD Software and Integration Workshop.
TRIUMF HLA Development High Level Applications Perform tasks of accelerator and beam control at control- room level, directly interfacing with operators.
BDS Status Update Glen White, SLAC July ADI Fuze Meeting.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
1 Calice TB Review DESY 15/6/06D.R. Ward David Ward Post mortem on May’06 DESY running. What’s still needed for DESY analysis? What’s needed for CERN data.
Using the Grid for the ILC Mokka and Marlin on the Grid ILC Software Meeting, Cambridge 2006.
Lucretia2AML Steve Molloy 3 rd April, 2008 ( Updated 19 th June, 2008)
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
ATF/ATF2 Control System
Software Session Introduction
European Organization for Nuclear Research
Accelerator Markup Language and the ED Phase
Background study plans : from to ILC
DESY TB05: Drift Chambers simulation
Silicon Tracking with GENFIT
LHCb Detector Description Framework Radovan Chytracek CERN Switzerland
SoLID simulation with GEMC
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Use Cases Simple Machine Translation (using Rainbow)
Background Simulations at Fermilab
LHCb Detector Description Framework Radovan Chytracek CERN Switzerland
Presentation transcript:

Simulation Standards and Interfacing Aims: ● Do we need this at all? ● Define the accelerator description format ● Interfacing procedure (bds-detector, linac-bds,etc.) ● Common ILC repository

Agenda ● Introduction. Accelerator description format (Agapov) ● ILC Repository (Glen White) ● Tools and Modeling for Collimator Studies (Andre Sopczak) ● Detector-IR interfacing (John Carter) ● Discussion Sopczak

Motivation ● Simulation tools: GEANT,MARS,STRUCT,MERLIN, BDSIM, MAD,DIMAD,TURTLE,..... ● Integration of international collimation and background studies ● Integration of repositories

Where we are ● Optics repository SLAC ● Detector description (Mokka), Mokka-Geant interface ● Software repository Zeuthen (not complete) ● Simulation database (QMUL) ● Need for common accelerator specification

Accelerator description format requirments ● Standard elements: drift, sbend, etc. ● Inherit MAD functionality ● Geometry specification ● Field specification ● Beam (and background) distribution specification ● Run control

XML option 1. David Sagan's AML Nick Walker's specification

XML example

XML dtd <! Accelerator markup language DTD Draft, (C) Ilya Agapov > <!ATTLIST AcceleratorDefinition Name CDATA #REQUIRED

XML Problems ● Not yet defined ● No parser ● Need to convert existing decks

GMAD format ● Preserve (possibly) the MAD (MAD-X) lattice description ● Take out some control commands ● Provide some additional geometry- and material-related stuff ● Provide drivers to geometry and field description formats (CAD) ● flex/bison parser ● Implemented in BDSIM ● Can be changed to XML

GMAD specification Elements: :,attribute=, attribute=,...; Commands: include ; use,period= ;... Beam parameters: beam, attribute=,...; Options: option, attribute=,...;

GMAD specification Element types: marker,drift, sbend,rbend,quadrupole,sextupole,octupole, solenoid,multipole,coord_transform, rcol,ecol,element Commands: use, gas, beam, sample

GMAD example (atf 2) include atf_optics.gmad; include options.gmad; beam, particle="e-", energy= * GeV, nparticles=1e+10, distrType="gauss", sigmaX=0.01*mm, sigmaY=0.01*mm, sigmaXp=0.001, sigmaYp=0.001; use,period=ext; sample, range = startl; !sample, range = endl; option,turnInteractions=1,ngenerate=100;

GMAD example (continued) ! standard options for bdsim option, beampipeRadius = 10 * cm, boxSize = 1.9 * m, tunnelRadius= 2.0 * m, beampipeThickness = 1 * cm, chordStepMinimum = * m, deltaIntersection = * m, deltaChord = * m, lengthSafety = * m, thresholdCutCharged = 1 * MeV, thresholdCutPhotons = 1 * KeV; option,turnInteractions=1; option,ngenerate=10;

GMAD example (continued) ! kickers ; akick := ;!half-angle ; ke1x_1 : sbend, l=0.25, angle=akick, e1=0, fint=0.5, fintx=0 ; ke1x_2 : sbend, l=0.25, angle=akick, e2=2*akick, fint=0, fintx=0.5 ; ke2x_1 : sbend, l=0.25, angle=akick, e1=akick, fint=0.5, fintx=0 ; ke2x_2 : sbend, l=0.25, angle=akick, e2=akick, fint=0, fintx=0.5 ; * * * ! sextupoles ; lfftbsextupole := 0.1 ; S2 : sextupole, l=lfftbsextupole/2, aper=(2.13*0.0254)/2 ; S1 : sextupole, l=lfftbsextupole/2, aper=(1.38*0.0254)/2 ;

GMAD example (continued) colli : element,l=1*m,geometry="gmad:colli.geo", bmap="gmad:e1.bmap"; file colli.geo : Tubs { x0=0, y0=0, z0=0, rmin=6, rmax=600, z=400 material="Al", phi0=0, dphi=360, temperature=300 }

GMAD open issues ● Wakefields ● Taylor maps ● Acceleration (time-varying field specification) ● Interfacing to CAD tools

Grid update ● VO 'ilc' supported – RHUL, QMUL, DESY ● Software packages have to be installed on all nodes - suggestions?

Goals ?