Maximizing SWPBS Sustainability & Implementation Fidelity: Basics George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut June

PURPOSE Consider factors associated with accurate, fluent, & durable PBIS implementation

“Notes to Self”

PURPOSE Consider factors associated with accurate, fluent, & durable PBIS implementation

“BIG PICTURE”

SWPBS Implementation “Infidelity”

Problem Statement “We give schools strategies & systems for improving practice & outcomes, but implementation is not accurate, consistent, or durable, & desired outcomes aren’t realized. School personnel & teams need more than exposure, practice, & enthusiasm.”

4 “Big Idea” Basics

Basic #1 Foundational basics

Basic #1A Invest in prevention Basic #1A Invest in prevention

Redesign of teaching environments…not students

Basic #1B Emphasize implementation framework, not curriculum Basic #1B Emphasize implementation framework, not curriculum

SWPBS (aka PBIS/RtI) is Framework

Basic #1C Integrate outcome, data, practices, & systems Basic #1C Integrate outcome, data, practices, & systems

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making Integrated Elements

Basic #1D Label behavior & intervention….not person Basic #1D Label behavior & intervention….not person

Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT ALL SOME FEW

All Some Few Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007

Continuum of Support for ALL “Theora” Dec 7, 2007 Science Soc Studies Reading Math Soc skills Basketball Spanish Label behavior…not people

Continuum of Support for ALL: “Molcom” Dec 7, 2007 Prob Sol. Coop play Adult rel. Anger man. Attend. Peer interac Ind. play Label behavior…not people Self-assess

Basic #2 W/in effective & efficient implementation framework, differentiate academic & behavior support

Basic #2A Adopt doable implementation “blueprint” or approach Basic #2A Adopt doable implementation “blueprint” or approach

Implementation Levels Student Classroom School State District

Dean Fixsen Karen Blase UNC

SWPBS Implementation Blueprint

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: “Getting Started”

Basic #2B Embed “Response-to- Intervention” logic & principles Basic #2B Embed “Response-to- Intervention” logic & principles

RtI

1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Responsiveness to Intervention Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems Circa 1996

Responsiveness to Intervention

Continuum of Support for ALL “IFB School” Dec 7, 2007 School Climate Specials Social Studies Literacy Attendance Science Numeracy Align supports Technology Writing

Ex: Less time to do more 19 (11%) fewer inst. days

Continuum of Support for ALL “District: Literacy” Dec 7, 2007 Bianchi M.S. Specials Serrota E.S. Trek E.S. Davidson M.S. Science Masi H.S. Align supports Look M.S. Jamis E.S. Look M.S.

CONTEXT or SETTING CONTEXT or SETTING Teacher Practice Student Behavior School Reform District Operations Continua of Responsiveness & Support

Basic #2C Integrate literacy & behavior implementation & supports Basic #2C Integrate literacy & behavior implementation & supports

Elementary School Suspension Rate PBIS in Virginia

Elementary School PBIS in Virginia Improvements in behavior can be associated with improvements in academic outcomes

NC Positive Behavior Support Initiative Bob Algozzine Schools w/ Low ODRs & High Academic Outcomes Office Discipline Referrals per 100 Students Proportion of Students Meeting State Academic Standard PBIS in North Carolina

Algozzine, B., Wang, C., & Violette, A. S. (2011). Reexamining the relationship between academic achievement and social behavior. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 13, Burke, M. D., Hagan-Burke, S., & Sugai, G. (2003). The efficacy of function-based interventions for students with learning disabilities who exhibit escape-maintained problem behavior: Preliminary results from a single case study. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 26, McIntosh, K., Chard, D. J., Boland, J. B., & Horner, R. H. (2006). Demonstration of combined efforts in school-wide academic and behavioral systems and incidence of reading and behavior challenges in early elementary grades. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 8, McIntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D. J., Dickey, C. R., and Braun, D. H. (2008). Reading skills and function of problem behavior in typical school settings. Journal of Special Education, 42, Nelson, J. R., Johnson, A., & Marchand-Martella, N. (1996). Effects of direct instruction, cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of students with behavioral disorders: A comparative analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, Wang, C., & Algozzine, B. (2011). Rethinking the relationship between reading and behavior in early elementary school. Journal of Educational Research, 104, Academic-Behavior Connection

“Viewed as outcomes, achievement and behavior are related; viewed as causes of each other, achievement and behavior are unrelated. In this context, teaching behavior as relentlessly as we teach reading or other academic content is the ultimate act of prevention, promise, and power underlying PBS and other preventive interventions in America’s schools.” Algozzine, Wang, & Violette (2011), p. 16.

RTI Integrated Continuum Mar Academic Continuum Behavior Continuum

Basic #2D Align professional development & support with implementation phase Basic #2D Align professional development & support with implementation phase

Where are you in implementation process? Adapted from Fixsen & Blase, 2005

Basic #3 Invest in accurate, fluent, & relevant implementation of evidence-based practices

Basic #3A Implement evidence- based practice with fidelity Basic #3A Implement evidence- based practice with fidelity

Detrich, Keyworth, & States (2007). J. Evid.-based Prac. in Sch. Start w/ What Works Focus on Fidelity

“Making a turn” IMPLEMENTATION EffectiveNot Effective PRACTICE Effective Not Effective Maximum Student Benefits Fixsen & Blase, 2009

Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Thornton, L.A., & Leaf, P.J. (2009). Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10(2), Bradshaw, C.P., Koth, C.W., Bevans, K.B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). The impact of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), Bradshaw, C. P., Mitchell, M. M., & Leaf, P. J. (2010). Examining the effects of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, Bradshaw, C.P., Reinke, W. M., Brown, L. D., Bevans, K.B., & Leaf, P.J. (2008). Implementation of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in elementary schools: Observations from a randomized trial. Education & Treatment of Children, 31, Horner, R., Sugai, G., Smolkowski, K., Eber, L., Nakasato, J., Todd, A., & Esperanza, J., (2009). A randomized, wait-list controlled effectiveness trial assessing school-wide positive behavior support in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, Horner, R. H., Sugai, G., & Anderson, C. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42(8), RCT & Group Design PBIS Studies

Reduced major disciplinary infractions Improvements in academic achievement Enhanced perception of organizational health & safety Improved school climate Reductions in teacher reported bullying behavior

Basic #3B Work smarter by doing a few things very well Basic #3B Work smarter by doing a few things very well

Classroom SWPBS Practices Non-classroom Family Student & Family School-wide Smallest # Evidence-based Biggest, durable effect

SCHOOL-WIDE 1.1. Leadership team 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation EVIDENCE- BASED INTERVENTION PRACTICES CLASSROOM 1.All school-wide 2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment 3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. 4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidence- based instructional curriculum & practices 5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior. 6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior. INDIVIDUAL STUDENT 1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels 2.Function-based behavior support planning 3.Team- & data-based decision making 4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes 5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction 6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations NONCLASSROOM 1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged 2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, move, interact) 3.Precorrections & reminders 4.Positive reinforcement FAMILY ENGAGEMENT 1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families 2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements 3.Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner 4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources

~80% of Students ~5% ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Positive reinforcement Effective instruction Parent engagement ~15%

Basic #3C Organize by important & measurable outcomes Basic #3C Organize by important & measurable outcomes

Initiative, Committee PurposeOutcomeTarget Group Staff Involved SIP/SID Attendance Committee Increase attendance Increase % of students attending daily All studentsEric, Theora, Ellen, Marlee Goal #2 Character Education Improve character All studentsMarlee, Marcellus, Max, Ellen Goal #3 Safety Committee Improve safetyPredictable response to threat/crisis Dangerous students Has not metGoal #3 School Spirit Committee Enhance school spirit Improve moraleAll studentsHas not met Discipline Committee Improve behaviorDecrease office referrals Bullies, antisocial students, repeat offenders Ellen, Eric, Marlee, Marcellus, Otis Goal #3 DARE Committee Prevent drug useHigh/at-risk drug users Don EBS Work GroupImplement 3-tier model Decrease office referrals, increase attendance, enhance academic engagement, improve grades All studentsEric, Ellen, Marlee, Otis, Emma, Barney Goal #2 Goal #3 Sample Teaming Matrix Are outcomes measurable?

Basic #3D Guide decisions with data Basic #3D Guide decisions with data

Data Decision Making

Basic #4 Always consider local context & culture

4 “Big Idea” Basics