State Standards Professional Learning Secondary Mathematics Cycle 2 January 13- February 7.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Era of the Common Core Standards Network Meeting, January 11, 2012 Silicon Valley Mathematics Initiative Assessment for Learning.
Advertisements

Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Elementary Principals CCSS Update Robyn Seifert & Rita Reimbold April 10, 2013.
Welcome to Smarter Balanced Math Assessment Claims EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER - NORTH LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Spring 2014 Facilitator Name.
CCSS/SBAC Update Sara Shore 1. SBAC Pilot Test Feb 20- May 10 Volunteer window closes Jan BalancedPilothttps://
Iowa Core Leadership Session 1 for Welcome!!
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Robyn Seifert February 6,  smarterbalanced.org  K-12 EDUCATION  Administrators 2.
CORE California Office to Reform Education Fall Performance Assessment Pilot October-December 2012.
ESCN – Principal Meeting Secondary Mathematics January 21, 2015.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
SMARTER BALANCED QUESTION TYPES OVERVIEW TEXT TXT EXT Assess a broad range of content. Scoring is objective, fast, and inexpensive to score. Difficult.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
Evaluating Student Growth Looking at student works samples to evaluate for both CCSS- Math Content and Standards for Mathematical Practice.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Parent Information Session Colchester Public Schools 1.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Two: November 2, 5, 6, 7, 2013.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium A Peek at the Assessment System 1 Rachel Eifler January 30, 2014.
2014 Summer Session Day 1. Today’s Agenda Stipends SCECH’s Sign-in and out! Moodle
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 1 October 13- November 8.
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 Science
Overview of English language arts (ELA) assessment Vaughn G. Rhudy, Ed.D., NBCT Assessment Coordinator Stacey Murrell, Ed.D. Interim.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) September 12, 2012.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Common Core State Standards
Tran Keys, Ph.D. Research & Evaluation, Santa Ana USD
 Connecting to the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics- Assessment Tools for Student Success Anton Jackson, OSPI Sandy Christie, Puget Sound ESD.
Smarter Balanced and Accountability Assessment and Accountability Evolution and Implications.
CORE California Office to Reform Education C ALIFORNIA E DUCATION P ARTNERS Summer Design Institute June 18-20, 2012.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 ELA January 13- February 7.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
History/Social Studies State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 2 January 22 and 24.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
State Standards Professional Learning Cycle 1 October 13 - November 8.
Using SVMI & SDCOE Resources to Support Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Smarter Balanced 103: Item Types and Instructional Implementation Rachel Aazzerah Science & Social Science Assessment Specialist
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
Assessment in Common Core. Essential Questions How is CAASPP different than STAR? How is SBAC different than CST? What do students have to know and be.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
What about the Assessment System?
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Elementary Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

State Standards Professional Learning Secondary Mathematics Cycle 2 January 13- February 7

As you arrive …  Sign in at the back tables.  Sit as a Site.  Coaches and District Support Staff please join site teams where there is space available.  Pick up the handouts.  We will begin at 8:30 a.m. Welcome Teachers! 2

Celebrations FUSD Teachers! 3

Professional Learning Design for the Year  Cycle 1: October/November 2014  Classroom Teachers Foundation Lead Teachers- December  Cycle 2: January/February 2015  Classroom Teachers Foundation Lead Teachers- February/March 4

Instructional Commitments  Engage students in complex talk, complex tasks and complex text to address reading, writing, listening and speaking standards.  Engage students in Common Core grade level standards.  Engage students in higher levels of thinking reaching levels 2, 3, and 4 using Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK).  Engage students in assessments that are standards- based and SBAC aligned. 5

Outcomes for Cycle #2 By the end of the session, participants will…  Build common vocabulary on assessment and create an assessment for use in the next instructional unit in alignment with Smarter Balanced Assessment claims.  Review the additional standards adopted by the state of California and determine implications for instruction.  Identify technology embedded within the State Standards and design classroom opportunities to teach digital literacy 6

Layers of Support Students Read, write, and speak grounded in evidence Teachers Commit to planning and implementing new learning that supports reading, writing, and speaking grounded in evidence Coaches Support teachers to plan and implement new learning Leaders Support teachers to take risks with new learning 7

Our Norms for Learning and Working Together  Be Present  Arrive On Time  Active Listener  Active Participant—Smile! Enjoy our learning.  Minimize Distractions  Technology at Break  Focus on Topics  Be Aware of the Larger Group’s Needs  Noise Levels  Site Specific Issues We can add/revise to these as needed… 8

Today’s Agenda  Welcome/Introduction  Setting Context/Building Background  Assessment Literacy  SBAC Common Vocabulary  Evidence Based Design  Task Models  Digging into the Additional CA Standards  Educational Technology  Digital Literacy  Closure and iACHIEVE Survey  Resource Exploration  Scavenger Hunt 9

Setting the Context 10

1. Applying knowledge of the purposes, characteristics, and uses of different types of assessments 2. Collecting and analyzing assessment data from a variety of sources to inform instruction 3. Reviewing data, both individually and with colleagues, to monitor student learning 4. Using assessment data to establish learning goals and to plan, differentiate, and modify instruction 5. Involving all students in self-assessment, goal setting, and monitoring progress 6. Using available technologies to assist in assessment, analysis, and communication of student learning 7. Using assessment information to share timely and comprehensible feedback with students and their families 12 CSTP 5: Assessing Students for Learning

FUSD Continuum of Standards 13 H/O

Activator: 14 H/O

Activator- Assessment Terms  Assessment literacy is a broader topic than what we are focusing on today. 1. Here is a glossary of terms– see how many terms you are familiar with! 2. Use the scale to rate your familiarity with this term. 3. Use the notes column to write down definitions or examples of the terms you know 4. Fill any blank spaces in the notes column as you hear the presentation. 15

Assessment Literacy 16

The Assessment Challenge How do we get from here......to here? All students leave high school college and career ready Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness...and what can an assessment system do to help? 17

Two Dimensions of Assessment  Formative and Summative  Embedded and Transfer of Learning 18

Formative or Summative?  Formative  Intention – inform next steps for teaching / learning  During an instructional sequence (lesson, module, unit)  Feedback is descriptive  Not for grading/ accountability  Summative  Intention - determines status of learning  After instructional sequence  Evaluative feedback  Ok for grading / accountability 19

Embedded or Transfer of Learning?  Embedded Within the unit/lesson A part of the teaching/ learning  Transfer of learning Can students transfer what is learned through teaching to a new context, without teaching support? 20

21 SUMMATIVE EMBEDDED FORMATIVE EMBEDDED SUMMATIVE TRANSFER OF LEARNING

Scope and Sequence Vocabulary  District Key Assignment- A task charging students to engage in content and skills distinguished by a Pre assessment, teacher analysis, a follow up prescribed lesson, and then Post assessment. an assignment is intentionally taught and focused on student achievement. (FUSD Common Assignment includes the above definition for K-12)  Previously known as the Common Assignment  AC analysis, calibrations, and collaboration for planning  Usually used for planning instructional sequence and given approximately 2/3 of the way through a unit. 22

Formative Assessment Lessons  Interactive Scope and Sequence  Identify the FAL for Semester 2 23

Mini- task FAL End of Unit Mini-task Lesson Lesson Lesson Lesson Lesson Lesson Common Assignment

Unit Design One Example Unit Focus Facts – Concepts - Skills Common Key Assignment FAL Mini-Tasks Lessons Activities Assessments Mini-Tasks Lessons Activities Assessments Assignment Mini-Tasks Lessons Activities Assessments Assignment 25

What Assessment Type AM I? Checking our Understanding  Determine if the following assessments are :  Formative or Summative  Embedded or a Transfer of Learning  Use the card sort activity to check your understanding  What Assessment Am I? 26

Shifts in Summative Assessment  Each state procured their own assessments  Measured proficiency against state, not agreed upon standards  Results often delivered months after the test  Most administered on paper  Common, comparable scores across states measuring college and career readiness  Providing achievement and growth information for educational decisions and professional development  Administered online, with timely results From: To: 27

A Balanced Assessment System- Smarter Balanced Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness All students leave high school college and career ready Teachers and schools have information and tools they need to improve teaching and learning Interim assessments Flexible, open, used for actionable feedback Summative assessments Benchmarked to college and career readiness Teacher resources for formative assessment practices to improve instruction 28

SMARTER BALANCED Digital Library Resource For Formative Assessment 29

Taught Curriculum The Aligned Instructional System Written Curriculum Assessed Curriculum CCSS Content Standards ELA Anchor Standards Mathematical Practices Instructional Shifts Materials/resources Depth of Knowledge In Addition to classroom formative and summative assessments: SMARTER Balanced Assessment Blueprints 30

Evidence-Centered Design 31 Traditional Item Development versus Evidence-Centered Design Task Models Claims Assessment Targets Evidence

Now it’s your turn 32 Identify standard, create a multiple-choice question, an answer, and three distractors

SMARTER Balanced Test Blueprints Components include:  Claim  Content Category (Cluster)  Assessment Target  Item Type  DOK level 33 H/O

Understanding the SBAC Blueprints Overarching Claims 3-8 and High School Targets Standards Assessment Claims 34

Assessment Claims for Mathematics (not yet released) Total mathematics (Grades 3-8) “Students can demonstrate progress toward college and career readiness in mathematics.” Total mathematics (High School) “Students can demonstrate college and career readiness in mathematics.” 35

Claims for Mathematics 36 Claim #1 Concepts & Procedures: Students can explain and apply mathematical concepts and interpret and carry out mathematical procedures with precision and fluency. Claim #2 Problem Solving: Students can solve a range of complex well-posed problems in pure and applied mathematics, making productive use of knowledge and problem solving strategies. Claim #3 Communicating Reasoning: Students can clearly and precisely construct viable arguments to support their own reasoning and to critique the reasoning of others. Claim #4 Modeling and Data Analysis: Students can analyze complex, real-world scenarios and can construct and use mathematical models to interpret and solve problems.

SBAC Blueprint- Math 37

SBAC Blueprint- Math 38

Getting to Know Task Models (Formats)  Selected Response  Multiple Choice  Multiple Answer  Binary Options (T/F)  Constructed Response  Short Response  Extended Response  Performance Task 39

Information Processing/ Constructed Response Items Short Answer Increasing Rigor Information Processing/ Constructed Response Items Short Answer Increasing Rigor SBAC-Aligned Performance Task Cognitive Ramp Performance Task/Product Analytic Essay Prompt Quantitative Problem Scoring Rubric Performance Task/Product Analytic Essay Prompt Quantitative Problem Scoring Rubric Cognitive Demand Student Performance Level Item “Stimulus” Text Data Set Analytic Tools “Stimulus” Text Data Set Analytic Tools Low Mid High Annotated Student Work Exemplars Annotated Student Work Exemplars Teacher Directions 40

Creating a Common Assessment  Determine whether this assessment is to be embedded or transfer of knowledge  Determine whether this assessment is to be formative or summative  Identify the Standards to be addressed  Identify the range of complexity (DOK)  Determine which item type(s) support the standard(s) to be assessed 41

Accountable Community Teamwork Task: From the menu of assessment designs below, each AC creates an assessment for use in the next instructional unit  Formative-embedded  Formative- Transfer of Learning  Summative- Embedded  Summative- Transfer of Learning 42

Mini- task FAL End of Unit Mini-task Lesson Lesson Lesson Lesson Lesson Lesson

When Creating a Common Assessment: Create questions based on each of the criteria:  Selected Response  Multiple Choice  Multiple Answer  Binary Options (T/F)  Constructed Response  Short Response  Extended Response  Or a Performance Task 44

Gallery Walk 45 Walk around the room with your AC and take a look at the work of others Discuss what you observe, take pictures, get contact information.

Summarizer: Revisiting the Vocabulary 46 H/O

60 Minutes LUNCH 47

Additional CA Standards 48

mathapr2014.doc

Additional CA Standards 50 How are you already addressing the additional standards? H/O

Educational Technology 51 Poll Everywhere Poll Everywhere video and model a survey edcite.comedcite.com create an assessment

Educational Technology 52  Technology, used effectively, can help all students meet and exceed the rigorous learning goals embedded in the Common Core State Standards  Focus on developing the necessary technology integration skills for mastery of content, development of College and Career Ready skills, and performing well on the Smarter Balanced Assessments  Will promote students who are engaged and empowered to be inquisitive, creative, and resourceful problem-solvers who discover, collaborate and interact in meaningful ways

Digital Literacy Instructional Technology  Prerequisite computer skills  Online Assessment Literacy  Common Core standards enhanced and supported by technology Educational Technology: Areas of Focus 53

Digital Literacy Instructional Technology  Students are explicitly taught the skill of how to input numbers and create a spreadsheet on the tablet  During a math lesson, students create a spreadsheet to demonstrate understanding of information from a data set pulled from math text Mathematics Example 54

 Prerequisite Computer skills  Scope & Sequence  Modules Digital Literacy 55

Digital Literacy- Quick Survey  How are you embedding digital literacy skills into your instruction?  Keyboarding Skills?  Linked to writing?  Using classroom tablets? 56

Challenges  As a table write down some of your continued challenges.  Listen to the sorting categories. 57

Technology Scope & Sequence 58 H/O

Embedded in State Standards minute read and discussions regarding technology within secondary math standards.

Technology Scope & Sequence Resources 60 Coming Soon! H/O

Resource Exploration Smarter Balanced Blueprints 2. SBAC Digital Library 3. Additional CA Standards 4. Educational Technology Scope & Sequence Use the scavenger hunt to find some of the essential components of the resources listed above. If you finish early, spend the time exploring your favorite resources and determining how to use it. H/O

iACHIEVE Survey 62

Closure  Report out any interesting resources or features of a resource that your grade level found. 63