Sustaining Agronomy Outcomes Assessment Michelle D. Cook Graduate Research Assistant May 18, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Advertisements

Mission Statement Benedictine Values The Business Division
Assessment Report Computer Science School of Science and Mathematics Kad Lakshmanan Chair Sandeep R. Mitra Assessment Coordinator.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Great Lakes Council of Business Schools and Programs Regional Conference October 6 – 7, Dr. Reginald J. Gardner Campus College Chair – School of.
Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Graduate Expectations. Critical Thinking & Life Management. IBT graduates are expected to: identify and demonstrate the essential employability skills.
Bringing the World to UNO: Global Learning & Engagement Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) SACSCOC Committee Presentation.
CCTC Background Process coordinated by NASDCTEc 42 states, DC, and one territory involved in development Modeled the process and outcomes of Common Core.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
Educational Outcomes: The Role of Competencies and The Importance of Assessment.
Learning Outcome Management System This is a Windows application that interacts with a database to manage learning outcomes for College of Business courses.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
1. An ability to:  Understand the academic requirements you need to obtain your degree  Calculate your GPA  Prepare a draft schedule 2.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Fostering Continuous Improvement of Curriculum - Learning Outcomes Peter Wolf Director, Centre for Open Learning Educational Support University of Guelph.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
Venue: M038 Date: Monday March 14,2011 Time: 10:00 AM JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.1 Guidelines on: I- Department’s Mission, PEOs and SOs II- The Preparation of.
GROUP DYNAMICS AND TEAM DEVELOPMENT Radu RĂDUCAN.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Reflective Pathways from Theory to Practice Brewton-Parker College Education Division.
Introduction to Business Courses The proposed Introduction to Business Courses consist of three one-credit courses. – BUS 100: Functional Areas of Business.
MBA Experience. Assessment of Learning Assessment of Experience Assessment of Market Conditions and Alumni/Employer Feedback MBA Experience.
CAA’s IBHE Program Review Presentation April 22, 2011.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Program Level Outcomes Jessica Carpenter Elgin Community College.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
ACGME OUTCOME PROJECT : THE PROGRAM COORDINATOR’S ROLE Jim Kerwin, MD University of Arizona.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Tusculum College School of Business. Tusculum College Program is: –Approved…Regionally by Southern Association of Colleges and Schools –Flexible & cost.
Foundations of Educating Healthcare Providers
OBE Briefing.
Embedding Agronomy Learner Outcomes in Courses and Course Syllabi Agronomy Outcomes Assessment Michelle D. Cook Iowa State University Graduate Research.
21st Century Skills Initiatives
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Southern Regional Education Board Welcome What Does Academic Integration Really Mean in the Career-Technical Classroom? Nancy Headrick, Director State.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
Writing Student Learning Outcomes Consider the course you teach.
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
ABET Student Forum September 20, Review of the criterion Criterion 2: Objectives Criterion 3: Outcomes Criterion 5: Curriculum.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
BUSINESS INFORMATICS descriptors presentation Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST) Linkoping.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
EE & CSE Program Educational Objectives Review EECS Industrial Advisory Board Meeting May 1 st, 2009 by G. Serpen, PhD Sources ABET website: abet.org Gloria.
Chapter 1 The Nature of Strategic Management
Connecting Learners to their Career, Community & the Future
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
Model for Sustaining Departmental Student Outcomes Assessment Russ E. Mullen, Mary H. Wiedenhoeft, Thomas A. Polito, Sherry L. Pogranichniy, and Michelle.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Use of Surveys N J Rao and K Rajanikanth
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Social Work Competencies Social Work Ethics
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
Competencies for the 21 st Century LEMA VISION MISSION & STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLO)
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
Robert P. King Department of Applied Economics April 14, 2017
AOC Program Report November 28, 2016
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Information Technology (IT)
Assessment and Accreditation
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Presentation transcript:

Sustaining Agronomy Outcomes Assessment Michelle D. Cook Graduate Research Assistant May 18, 2004

Opening Go-Round  Please tell us your name, area of specialty, and one personal or professional goal you have for the summer

Workshop Overview  Learning Outcomes  Participants will  Be aware of planned changes within courses based on TEACH Grant activities  Be able to identify three changes that need to made in the undergraduate curriculum as a result of the Alumni, Employer, and Faculty Survey Report  Be aware of how and where Agronomy learner outcomes are embedded in the curriculum  Understand their role in the proposed plan for systematic and continuous student outcomes assessment

Workshop Overview  Workshop Activities  TEACH Grant  Alumni, Employer, and Faculty Survey  Curriculum Map  Proposed plan for systematic and continuous student outcomes assessment

TEACH Grant Overview  Purpose  Activities  Planned course changes  Course  Assignment or experience  Enhancement  Feedback from colleagues

TEACH Grant Reflection  What assignment or experience would I like to enhance in one of my classes?  What resources would I need in order to improve an assignment or experience for my students?

Alumni, Employer, and Faculty Survey Report  Purposes  Methods  Samples: Alumni, Employers, and Faculty  Measures: Agronomy Alumni Survey, Agronomy Employer Survey, and Undergraduate Teaching Faculty Survey  Analysis  Your perspective…

Which Learner Outcomes Have Higher Alumni Performance?  Access and use electronic mail  Prepare a resume  Communicate effective using electronic media  Organize, manage, and communicate information using computer tools (three outcomes combined)  Work effectively in a team situation as a participant  Understand and use terminology appropriate to your profession  Perform mathematical calculations appropriate to your profession  Understand the soil as a resource upon which ecosystems, agriculture, and other land uses depend

Which Learner Outcomes Have Lower Alumni Performance?  Understand basic strategies for efficient and abundant production, harvest, and storage of high-quality forage and pasture crops (three outcomes combined)  Understand basic technical principles and methods relating to crop marketing methods and strategies  Construct an enterprise budget  Understand agronomic practices used in other parts of the world in their political, cultural, and economic contexts  Calculate and interpret a simple ANOVA, linear regression, and correlation  Understand basic technical principles and methods relating to crop storage  Access and use electronic bulletin boards  Value the humanities, arts, and recreation as meaningful activities that enrich our culture

Which Learner Outcomes Have Higher Importance?  Understand and use terminology appropriate to your field of expertise  Demonstrate high standards of achievement  Work effectively in a team situation as a participant  Demonstrate effective time management  Perform mathematical calculations appropriate to your profession  Manage, organize, and interpret information using computer tools (three outcomes combined)  Identify resources needed to solve a problem  Answer oral questions extemporaneously and understandably

Which Learner Outcomes Have Lower Importance?  Understand basic strategies for efficient and abundant production, harvest, and storage of high-quality forage and pasture crops (three outcomes combined)  Understand basic technical principles and methods relating to crop marketing methods and strategies  Construct an enterprise budget  Understand agronomic practices used in other parts of the world in their political, cultural, and economic contexts  Calculate and interpret a simple ANOVA, linear regression, and correlation  Understand basic technical principles and methods relating to crop storage  Access and use electronic bulletin boards  Value the humanities, arts, and recreation as meaningful activities that enrich our culture

Which Learner Outcomes Are Important and Alumni Performance Is High?  Access and use electronic mail  Communicate effectively using electronic media  Organize, manage, interpret, and communicate information using computer tools (four outcomes combined)  Access and use databases  Understand basic soil principles  Present an effective oral report  Perform mathematical calculations appropriate to your profession

Which Learner Outcomes Are Important and Alumni Performance Is Lagging?  Recognize a conflict of interest involving oneself and one’s client or employer  Propose and evaluate alternative solutions to a problem based on the resources of the client  Identify resources needed to solve a problem  Assess and evaluate the credibility and biases of different sources of information  Debate issues in a professional manner  Answer oral questions extemporaneously and understandably  Work effectively in a team situation as a leader  Define a problem  Demonstrate high standards of achievement  Analyze and interpret simple research data

Which Learner Outcomes Are Unimportant and Alumni Performance High?  Be able to use the metric system of weights and measures  Access and use electronic bulletin boards  Acknowledge differences in political, cultural, religious, and ethic beliefs and practices  Appreciate the family as an interdependent and supportive unit  Value the humanities, arts, and recreation as meaningful activities that enrich our culture  Appreciate that our cultural diversity adds richness to our lives  Apply fundamental concepts of economics and the social sciences to human interaction and organization  Understand, in modern perspective, the basic principles important to sustained production and land use  Understand agronomic practices used in other parts of the world in their political, cultural, and economic contexts  Recognize the interdependence of economies, cultures, and politics at all scales from local to international

Which Learner Outcomes Are Unimportant and Alumni Performance Is Lagging?  Understand basic technical principles and methods relating to crop marketing methods and strategies  Interpret laws and regulations as they related to agriculture and the environment  Understand the structure and process of governments as they influence agricultural policy  Recognize the potential effects of amelioration of stresses on plants at various stages of crop development  Recognize options for amelioration of stresses with minimal disturbance to the environment  Interpret a financial statement  Construct an enterprise budget  Recognize common biotic stresses  Adopt a professional code of ethics such as A Federation of Certifying Boards in Agriculture, Biology, Earth, and Environmental Sciences (ARCPACS) Code of Ethics  Calculate and interpret a simple ANOVA, linear regression, and correlation

Critical Learner Outcomes in the Future?  Both Alumni and Employers: Communication Skills, Technical Skills, Problem Solving, Basic Agronomic Knowledge, Business Skills, Motivation, Understanding how government policies and forces affect farmer actions, Ability react to real-world situations  Employers: Computer Skills  Alumni: General Professional Issues, Practical Technical Knowledge, and “Hot Topics”

Knowledge Foundation, Career Advancement, and Adapt to Change  Alumni rated their ability to adapt to change significantly higher than did employers  Both alumni and employers rated alumni knowledge foundation as somewhat to mostly strong  Alumni rated their aptitude for career advancement as mostly strong while employers rated the same areas as somewhat strong (not statistically significant)

Alumni Degrees, Certifications, and Professional Development  Pursuing or have completed:  Graduate education (26%)  Certified Crop Advisor certification (26%)  Pesticide Applicator certificate (8%)  Participation in professional development (42%)  Professional organization membership and/or meeting attendance, workshops and training, continuing education, sales training, and field days

Employer Professional Development Expectations  Continuing Education  Workshops and training  Skill development  Sales training  Keep current with changes and new concepts  Extension meetings and field days  Read literature  Professional organization membership and/or meeting attendance  Self-directed

Faculty Perceptions  Percentage of graduates comfortable hiring  Range of 10% to 90%  M = 61.75%  Reasons for hiring  Technical competence, strong work ethic, initiative, communication skills, leadership skills, critical thinking/problem solving, and time management  Reasons for not hiring  Poor work ethic, poor communication skills, marginal technical knowledge/skills, lack of professional/personal ethics, shallow depth of understanding, lack of critical thinking skills, and attitude

AEF Survey Report Reflection  List three changes that will need to be made in the curriculum as a result of this report

Agronomy Curriculum Map  Description  Group assignment  Assign roles: facilitator, recorder, reporter/ timekeeper  Review assigned learner outcomes  Technical Knowledge  Professional Skills  Perspective, Ethics/Values, and Diversity  As a group, review and answer questions  Be prepared to report back to the larger group

Discussion  Report by group  Based on this discussion  What changes should be made in the curriculum?  What changes should be made in the learner outcomes?  As the undergraduate teaching faculty  What four outcomes would you like to focus on over the next academic year?  What embedded measures could be used to assess student achievement of the outcomes?  What additional resources or support are necessary for achieving these outcomes?

Personal Reflection  As an individual faculty member  What outcomes would you like to focus on in one or more in your classes?  What embedded measures could be used to assess student achievement of the outcome?  What additional resources or support are necessary for assessing these outcomes?

Systematic And Continuous OutcomesAssessment Develop measures to assess student’s achievement of the outcomes Collectdepartmental- and course-level data Annually, share results summary with appropriateaudiences Identify and document changes to curriculum, learner outcomes, and measures based on assessment results Calendar

Organizational Chart

Closing Reflection  How will you use the information presented today in your courses?  What aspect of sustaining Agronomy outcomes assessment do you need to know more about?