Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Advertisements

Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
Prepared by: Fawn Skarsten Director Institutional Analysis.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparisons of the survey results for UPRM Office of Institutional Research and Planning University of Puerto.
You will be familiar with the five NSSE benchmarks and the survey items that make up each benchmark. You will be familiar with the comparison groups.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
Gallaudet University Results on National Survey of Student Engagement Office of Institutional Research August, 2007.
Student Engagement In Good Educational Practices Findings From the 2004 and 2007 National Surveys of Student Engagement Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
Student and Faculty Perceptions on Student Engagement: ISU’s NSSE and FSSE Results 2013 Ruth Cain, Assessment Coordinator Dan Clark, Department of History.
National Survey of Student Engagement Department of Institutional Research and Planning December 2006.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Student Engagement and Liberal Arts at Truman State University Analyzing Faculty/Student Perceptions Spring 2006 Assessment Internship Chris Roberts and.
Promoting Student Engagement: Involving Students with NSSE Planning and Results William Woods University NSSE Users’ Workshop October 6-7, 2005.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Using What Faculty Say about Improving Their Teaching Thomas F. Nelson Laird, IUB Jennifer Buckley, IUB Megan Palmer,
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Getting Faculty Involved in the Student Engagement Conversation: The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Thomas.
Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in Your Courses Want to be first in your CLASSE? Investigating Student Engagement in.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
1 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2013 Tiffany Franks Assistant Director, Office of Planning & Analysis October 25, 2013.
Results from the 2013 Undergraduate Alumni Survey Karen Gil, Dean and Distinguished Professor, College of Arts & Sciences Lynn Williford, Assistant Provost,
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) measures faculty expectations for student engagement in educational practices that are known to be empirically.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Student Engagement: 2008 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Office of Institutional Research and Planning Presentation to Senate November 2008.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Primary Factors of Student Engagement at UTBTSC in 2002 Deborah Suzzane, Ph.D., Director Institutional Research & Planning.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Results of the 2003 NSSE and FSSE: Implications for Student Affairs Bowling Green State University.
1 Presentation of Results NSSE 2005 Florida Gulf Coast University Office of Planning and Institutional Performance.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Looking Inside The “Oakland Experience” Another way to look at NSSE Data April 20, 2009.
SASSE South African Survey of Student Engagement Studente Ontwikkeling en Sukses Student Development and Success UNIVERSITEIT VAN DIE VRYSTAAT UNIVERSITY.
Researchers Beware: Comparing FSSE with NSSE Can Be Messy Ed Rugg, Director Center for Institutional Effectiveness Kennesaw State University Presented.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Comparison on the survey results at UPRM with peers Office of Institutional Research and Planning University.
Jennifer Ballard George Kuh September 19, Overview  NSSE and the Concept of Student Engagement  Select Linfield results:  NSSE 2011  Brief explanation.
NSSE Working Student Study Assessment Day Presentation Office of Assessment Fitchburg State College.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 27% (down 5%)  First Year: 25% (down 5%)  Seniors: 28% (down 5%)  GGC  Overall: 35% (up 7%)  First.
A Profile of BGSU Students Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Summer 2008.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
+ A Case Study of Teaching Job Interviews in Introductory Public Speaking Chris Cruz-Boone California State University, Bakersfield College to Workplace:
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
The University of Texas-Pan American
The University of Texas-Pan American
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
GGC and Student Engagement
2013 NSSE Results.
Indiana University Bloomington
Presentation transcript:

Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty Senate Executive Committee November 25, 2003

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Designed by national assessment experts to provide information about undergraduates’ in- and out-of-class activities, use of time, perceptions of their institution, and self-reported learning and development First available in 2000, used at BGSU in 2000, 2001, 2003

Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) National pilot test in 2003 Designed by national assessment experts to measure faculty expectations for student engagement in educational practices that are known to be empirically linked with high levels of learning and development, along with how faculty use these practices in their work with students

FSSE Purposes focuses on: (1) Faculty perceptions of how often their students engage in different activities; (2) The importance that faculty place on various areas of learning and development; (3) The nature and frequency of faculty-student interactions; and (4) How faculty members organize class time and related activities The FSSE is not meant to be a faculty evaluation. Rather, it provides institutions with an opportunity to compare faculty perceptions and student reports about educational opportunities and practices on their campus.

FSSE Purposes The results of the FSSE, when used in concert with the results of the NSSE, are intended to be a catalyst for productive discussions related to teaching, learning, and the quality of students' education experience.

FSSE Methodology More than 16,000 faculty members at 147 colleges and universities participated the 2003 pilot test of the survey. BGSU faculty who subscribed to the faculty listproc were asked to respond to the survey online this spring. A total of 270 of the surveys were completed. The response rate is about 25%, which is lower than the estimated average institution response rate of 43%. There is a high degree of race/ethnicity similarity between survey respondents and the overall faculty population. Females (54% for sample vs. 44% for population) and full-time faculty members (83% for sample vs. 73% for population), however, were over-represented.

FSSE Methodology Respondents were asked to identify a particular undergraduate course that they teach and use it as the basis for responding to the survey. Of the total 270 BGSU faculty respondents, 122 of them identified themselves as lower division faculty (the students in their identified course sections are mostly first year students and sophomores) and 137 of them identified themselves as upper division faculty (the students in their identified course sections are mostly juniors and seniors).

FSSE Methodology The class size for most of the identified course sections, both at lower division and at upper division, is between 10 and 49 students. The course subjects for most of lower division classes are Arts and Humanities (29.8%), Other (22.3%), Social Science (18.2%), and Physical Science (16.5%). The course subjects for most of upper division classes are Education (19.9%), Arts and Humanities (19.9%), Other (16.2%), Social Science (14.0%), and Business (12.5%). Roughly 60% of the respondents reported that they have taught the identified course sections four times or more prior to this spring.

FSSE Methodology Responses were compared –Between faculty teaching lower-division and upper-division courses –With freshman and senior responses to the NSSE –With responses from faculty at two peer universities (George Mason University and Northern Arizona University)

Results

Conclusions The fact that this was the first administration of the FSSE, its low response rate, and the over- representation of full-time and female faculty require that the results be interpreted with caution. Nevertheless, some findings were unexpected.

Conclusions Compared with faculty (both lower division and upper division) in peer universities, BGSU faculty were less likely to report that it is important or very important for undergraduate students to work on a research project with them outside of course or program requirements.

Conclusions Compared with the upper division faculty in peer universities, BGSU upper division faculty were less likely to feel that it is important or very important for students to participate in a learning community or some other formal program where groups of students take two or more classes together.

Conclusions Gaps exist between faculty responses and student responses in all the items related to educational and personal growth listed on the survey.all the items related to educational and personal growth Undergraduates at BGSU were more likely than expected by faculty to have done or plan to do community service or volunteer work, but less likely to have done or plan to do a culminating senior experience, to study abroad, and to take foreign language coursework.

Conclusions Compared with students, faculty were also more likely to report that they often or very often give prompt feedback to students on their academic performance; that students often come to class without finishing readings or assignments; and that their courses emphasized synthesis and application.

Conclusions Faculty were less likely than students to indicate that students often ask questions in class or contribute to class discussions, use to communicate with them, discuss grades/assignments and career plans with them, discuss ideas from readings or classes with them outside of class, and work harder than they usually do to meet an instructor's standards; that their courses emphasize memorization, that BGSU emphasizes studying and academic work; and that relationships between students at BGSU are friendly and supportive.

Implications The Academic Assessment Office at Southwest Texas University has provided a number of resources to assist FSSE users in considering implications of their results –An annotated bibliography relates peer reviewed research studies to each of the NSSE items. –A list of potential actions that faculty and institutions can use to enhance student engagement is also provided.

References NSSE/NSSE03/2003.htmhttp:// NSSE/NSSE03/2003.htm SSE/2003.htmhttp:// SSE/2003.htm

Discussion