Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Audience: Parents, families, local community members
Advertisements

Predicting Youth Engagement: The Role of Initiating and Sustaining Factors Linda Rose-Krasnor 1, Kelly Campbell 1, Lisa Loiselle 2, Mark Pancer 3, Michael.
QPSC Overall KDA Based on Q38 – Intention to Leave.
2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Higher Education Conference. Engaging Faculty in Retention Issues Part II Presidential Summit on Retention The Need and Scope February 20, 2007 Dr. Richard.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Preliminary Analysis of the 2013 Canadian Graduate and Professional Student Survey (CGPSS) - York University Results Richard Smith Acting Director Office.
Effects of Identity Processes on College Student Self Esteem, Self Efficacy, and Satisfaction with College Self Efficacy, and Satisfaction with College.
Mary R. Callahan, Ed. D.. Study Description Mixed-methods study (April, 2013) Use of survey (PSSDS,2009) and 10 semi-structured interview questions Three.
University Admission in Russia: Do the Wealthier Benefit from Standardized Exams? Ilya Prakhov, Maria Yudkevich Center for Institutional Studies at the.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.
1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
U NIVERSITY OF M INNESOTA Measuring Student Perspectives on University Experiences.
Maria Cristina Matteucci, Dina Guglielmi
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
Student Technological Mastery: It's Not Just the Hardware Wm. H. Huffman, Ph.D. Ann H. Huffman, Ph.D.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
Registration Satisfaction Survey FAS Report, Fall Presented by: K. El Hassan, PhD. Director, OIRA.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
Improving Higher Education through Research on Students Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research Babson College.
2 Enter your Paper Title Here. Enter your Name Here. Enter Your Paper Title Here. Enter Your Name Here. ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN JOB SATISFACTION.
“Customers today are strongly value- oriented. They seek results and service process quality that far exceeds the price and acquisition costs they incur.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Presentation Outline  Introductions  Why are “price sensitivity” and “value” important?  Strategic pricing & value enhancement framework  From research.
THE IMPORTANCE OF TEACHING AT RYERSON PREDICTORS OF STUDENT SATISFACTION CHRISTOPHER EVANS VICE PROVOST ACADEMIC.
The Impact of CReSIS Summer Research Programs that Influence Students’ Choice of a STEM Related Major in College By: Alica Reynolds, Jessica.
Are those Rose-Colored Glasses You are Wearing?: Student and Alumni Survey Responses Amber D. Lambert, Ph.D. Angie L. Miller, Ph.D. Association for the.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2006 Marcia Belcheir Institutional Analysis, Assessment & Reporting.
Revisiting Retention: A Four Phase Retention Research Initiative 2012 SLOAN Conference October 10 th, 2012 Gary J. Burkholder, PhD Senior Research Scholar.
Before & After: What Undergraduates and Alumni Say About Their College Experience and Outcomes Angie L. Miller, NSSE & SNAAP Research Analyst Amber D.
The Voluntary System of Accountability (VSA SM ).
Comparative Alumni Research: What Matters in College AFTER College.
Frances Lawrenz and The Noyce evaluation team University of Minnesota 1 Acknowledgement: This project was funded by National Science Foundation (Grant#REC )
Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
Who Are Our Students? Demographic Profile Retention and Choice Student Time Use Alcohol and Drugs Student Satisfaction Academic Performance Career and.
A Practical Approach to Assessment in Service-Learning North Shore Community College.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Mentoring Mentoring embraces a philosophy about people and how important they are to educational institutions.
Selected Results of President’s Office Survey of Alumni Graduating in 1997/98 The Office of Institutional Research and Policy Studies July 15, 2003 Jennifer.
Barbara Moely and Vincent Ilustre Tulane University International Society for Research on Service Learning and Community Engagement Baltimore, September.
Investigating the role of career anchors in job satisfaction and organisational commitment; a PJ fit approach Catherine Steele & Dr Jan Francis-Smythe.
Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.
Multiple Regression Results Standardized beta weights are shown in the prediction of community involvement (CI) and next year intentions (NYI) – controlling.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
Enrolling Student Surveys: Fall 2009 November 10, 2009.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
Janis L. Whitlock Cornell University.   Previous research show that human beings develop in multiple social ecologies but school connectedness and the.
Personally Important Posttraumatic Growth as a Predictor of Self-Esteem in Adolescents Leah McDiarmid, Kanako Taku Ph.D., & Aundreah Walenski Presented.
Instructors’ General Perceptions on Students’ Self-Awareness Frances Feng-Mei Choi HUNGKUANG UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH.
Entering Student Surveys: Fall 2010 Perry Deess, Ph.D. Institutional Research and Planning November 17, 2010.
Online students’ perceived self-efficacy: Does it change? Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: July 11, 2007 C. Y. Lee & E. L. Witta (2001).
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Dyadic Patterns of Parental Perceptions of Health- Related Quality of Life Gustavo R. Medrano & W. Hobart Davies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Pediatric.
Abstract Service Learning is a useful avenue in developing agency in college students, giving them the opportunity to interact with issues linking course.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
HELEN ROSENBERG UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PARKSIDE SUSAN REED DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ANNE STATHAM UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN INDIANA HOWARD ROSING DEPAUL UNIVERSITY.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
STUDENT DIVERSITY AND HOW IT RELATES TO STUDENT SUCCESS Dr. Michael Conyette.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Summary of VCU Student Satisfaction Fall 2012
A nationwide US student survey
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing Parents’ Role in Higher Education Assessment Anne Marie Delaney Director of Institutional Research, Babson College

Introduction This paper presents a rationale and a model for enhancing parents’ role in higher education assessment. The issue is important given the cost of higher education and the evolving nature of parent-child relationships. The model is based on a study that compared parents' and students' evaluation of undergraduate education.

Introduction The study addressed the following research questions : To what extent do parents think the undergraduate program enhanced their child's abilities? How satisfied are parents with various aspects of their child's college experience? What specific aspects of parents' evaluation predict their overall satisfaction? How do parents' evaluations compare with their children's assessments?

Background: Highlights from the Literature Rationale Administrators gain a partner who has the most at stake in their student’s well-being. (Wartman and Savage, 2008) Developments in society and parent-child relationships Our nation has an educational deficit relative to the rest of the industrialized world; we must recapture the sense of higher education as a common good (Kirwan, 2007). The evolution of parent-child relationships into partnerships is a major factor accounting for a change in the role of parents in higher education (Jackson & Murphy, 2005). The 2007 National Survey of Student Engagement results revealed that 7 out of 10 students communicated very often with at least one parent during the academic year.

Background: Highlights from the Literature (continued) Role of Parents in College Choice Parents were involved in information gathering but not necessarily in decision-making. (Smith & Bers, 1989) Parents and students identified academics as the most important criterion and shared four of the same top criteria - academics, tuition, financial aid and friendly atmosphere. (Warwick & Mansfield, 2003) However, Brokemier and Seshadri (1999) discovered that students attributed more importance to social life, friends attending an institution, and athletic programs, while parents assigned more importance to cost, program of study, facility quality, academic reputation, and safety.

Highlights from the Literature Review (continued) Comparison of Parents' and Students' Views In assessing institutional quality, parents were more likely to select faculty indicators, while students were more likely to select program related factors (Litten & Hall, 1989). In defining goals, parents emphasized managing stress and skills for self-sufficient living, while students valued gaining a sense of interdependence and involvement in community service. (Papish, 2000) Bisset et al. (1999) found that both parents and students highly valued career related goals, including acquiring skills for a special job and getting a good job after graduation. In assessing an undergraduate program, parents' and students' ratings correlated significantly on faculty teaching skills, advising, overall satisfaction, willingness to recommend the college. (Browne, Kaldenberg & Browne, 1998)

Methodology Population: 281 parents of May 2007 graduating seniors Respondents: 155 parents Response rate: 55 % Survey: administered primarily on the Internet during the 2008 spring semester Data source: 155 parent responses and 122 matched parent and child responses

Methodology Methods of Analysis - Correlation examined relationships between parents' evaluation of specific aspects of college and their overall assessment. - Regression identified specific aspects of parents' evaluation that predicted their overall assessment. - Matched pair t tests examined differences between parents' and students' assessment and satisfaction with college experiences. - Analyses were conducted with individual items and scale scores.

Results: Perceived Impact on Abilities

Results: Parents’ Satisfaction with College Experiences

Results: Overall Assessment

Results: Willingness to Recommend the College

Results: Significant Correlates of Parents’ Overall Satisfaction

Results: Significant Correlates of Parents' Willingness to Recommend the College

Predicting Parents’ Overall Satisfaction Regression analysis addressed the question, “What specific aspects of parents' evaluation predict their overall satisfaction?” Regression results identified 3 predictors of overall satisfaction: perceived impact on ability to acquire new skills and knowledge; satisfaction with academic advising; and satisfaction with career services. These variables explained 51% of the variance in overall satisfaction.

Predicting Parents' Overall Satisfaction

Predicting Parents’ Willingness to Recommend the College Regression addressed the question, “What specific aspects of parents' evaluation predict their willingness to recommend the college?” Results identified three significant predictors of parents’ willingness to recommend the college: perceived impact on ability to acquire new skills and knowledge satisfaction with student housing; and satisfaction with extra-curricular programs. These variables explained 49 % of the variance in parents’ willingness to recommend the College.

Predicting Parents' Willingness to Recommend the College

Comparison of Parents’ and Students’ Assessment Matched pair t tests were conducted with responses from 122 parents and their children to answer the question: “How do parents’ evaluations compare with their children’s in terms of the College’s impact on students’ abilities and satisfaction with aspects of college life?”

Comparison of Parents' and Students' Assessment

Recommendations The following recommendations were formulated based on the study results: Use parent testimony to portray the UG program as a wise investment. Promote parents' assessment of the program’s impact on students' abilities. Publicize parent's high level of satisfaction with the undergraduate program. Intensify the program's focus on enhancing students' ability to write. Review and enhance the undergraduate academic advising program. Closely monitor student housing to ensure high quality maintenance.

Discussion – Linking this Study to Previous Research This study is based on the belief that parents ought to be involved in assessing higher education’s effectiveness given: the investment they make; their expectation to be involved; and the significant role they play in their children’s lives. (Kirwan, 2007; Scott & Daniel, 2001).

This study found no significant differences between parents' and students' satisfaction with faculty attitude and quality of business courses; both reported Satisfied to Very Satisfied ratings. Browne, Kaldenberg and Browne (1998) found significant positive correlations between parents’ and students’ ratings on faculty teaching skills and satisfaction with overall value of the education. Discussion – Linking this Study to Previous Research

Perceived impact on ability to acquire new knowledge was a predictor of parents’ overall satisfaction and willingness to recommend the College. Other predictors of these outcomes varied. Satisfaction with advising and career services predicted overall satisfaction. Satisfaction with housing and extracurricular programs predicted willingness to recommend the College. Discussion – Linking this Study to Previous Research

Previous research with graduating seniors found different predictors of overall satisfaction and willingness to recommend the college. Satisfaction with the quality of business courses and faculty attitude and the perception of enhanced ability to think analytically significantly predicted seniors’ overall satisfaction. (Delaney, 2005) Satisfaction with campus life and campus safety significantly predicted their likelihood of choosing the same college again. (Delaney, 2005) In both parent and student studies, academic factors predicted overall satisfaction and student life factors predicted choosing same college. Discussion – Linking this Study to Previous Research

Conclusion Parents perceive a greater impact than students on the ability to learn to relate well to different races and understand ethical issues. Parents’ perceived impact on students’ ability to acquire new skills and knowledge significantly affects their overall assessment. Parents’ satisfaction with academic advising and career services also significantly influences their overall satisfaction. Parents’ satisfaction with student housing and extra-curricular programs significantly affects their willingness to recommend the college.

Thank you