1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The PRR: Linking Assessment, Planning & Budgeting PRR Workshop – April 4, 2013 Barbara Samuel Loftus, Ph.D. Misericordia University.
Advertisements

Using Baldrige to Create Organizational Alignment & Integration
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Introduction to the Baldrige Criteria Baldrige Performance Excellence Program |
Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Strategic Plan Briefing Session Progress and Challenges Spring
A Commitment to Excellence: SUNY Cortland Update on Strategic Planning.
AQIP ACTION PROJECTS AQIP Action Project Community Forum Mott Community College.
LCCC AQIP Action Project No 3 Cycle 1- Fall 2002/2005 Cycle 2- Fall 2005/2008 Presented by Assessment Design Team.
AQIP: “Academic Quality Improvement Program” Same Great Quality, Less Filling.
Higher Learning Commission (North Central Association) Comparison/Evaluation of AQIP and PEAQ Michelle Johnston.
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Gold Overview - Jeri Reinhardt Ed McMahon Tim Case.
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
AQIP Status Report An Overview and Discussion. Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey November 2000 AQIP admission 2002 First action projects submitted September.
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
Do You Know ???.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Building Performance Excellence in Health Care James R. Evans Professor of Quantitative Analysis and Operations Management College of Business University.
Assuring and Improving Quality: Higher Education Accreditation in the United States Stephen D. Spangehl Director, Academic Quality improvement Project.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Assessing Current Institutional Practices: The ALFI Toolkit PLA with a Purpose Symposium Columbus, Ohio April 29, 2014.
University Accreditation AQIP Update November 2, 2011 Christa Walck Associate Provost.
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
SAR as Formative Assessment By Rev. Bro. Dr. Bancha Saenghiran February 9, 2008.
April 26, 2012 ISPC Meeting INSTITUTIONAL ACCREDITATION AT EMU.
EASTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Eastern Washington University EWU ODP Maps EWU ODP Maps
Strategic Planning Process History Information gathering with key stakeholders Staff Students Parents Community Members Plan development with focus groups.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
AQIP ACADEMIC QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Higher Learning Commission’s Program for Systematic Improvement and Continuing Accreditation.
Creating a Learning Community Vision
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Goals of AQIP Help our member organizations improve their performance and maximize their effectiveness Reshape the relationship with members of our Commission.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
1 Implementation of AQIP and the Possible Implications for TSR Presented by Rosemary Jones, Executive Director Institutional Planning and Evaluation April.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Quality and San Juan College Dr. Carol Spencer. About San Juan College.
Department and Program Review: The Key to Student Success Lakeland Community College June 2008.
May, 2010 Southeast Technical Institute, Sioux Falls, SD.
2008 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Step III Overview - Jon Frantsvog Ira Schoenberger Tim Case.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
AQIP? Where Do We Fit? Presentation for 2008 Kansas Library Conference Robert Kelly, Hutchinson Community College
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
The Balanced Scorecard
MINERAL AREA COLLEGE AQIP DAY. Disclaimer Gyolai is not here representing HLC I am here as a friend of the college.
Baldrige National Quality Program Baldrige Background l Results l Baldrige Program Impacts Legal Aid Group March 11, 2002.
1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
1 1 Richland College The Role of Leadership and Culture in Richland College’s Baldrige Journey Michigan Community College Assn October 7, 2011 Stephen.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Pulaski Technical College Accreditation Overview November 19,
Promoting the Vision & Mission of the School Governing Board Online Training Module.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Richland College Teaching, Learning, Community Building ThunderWater Organizational Learning Institute: Faculty Professional Development Richland College.
HLC Criterion One Primer Criterion One. Mission August 27, 2015.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Anna Parkman New Faculty Orientation ◦ ACCOUNTABILITY in Higher Education ◦ ASSESSMENT as validation of learning ◦ ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION ◦
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Presentation transcript:

1 Focus on Quality and the Academic Quality Improvement Program At Cuyahoga Community College

2 Overview of Session History AQIP CQI AQIP Processes Criteria Resources

3 National Perspective NCA Accreditation Federal reporting requirements Baldrige in Education

4 State Perspective OBOR reporting requirements Managing Improvement Program Securing the Future Service Expectations OBOR Performance Report Ohio Award for Excellence (OAE)

5 College Perspective College planning Accountability Budgeting Special studies Knowledge Management Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Ohio Award for Excellence (OAE)

6 AQIP Academic Quality Improvement Program

7 Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) Higher Learning Commission accreditation alternative Baldrige-based (Continuous Quality Improvement)

8 CQI Continuous Quality Improvement

9 Concepts Focus on process, not individuals Collaborative decision-making Environment that empowers employees Trained employees serve as change agents Measurable performance

10 Cultural Changes Anticipating student needs Preventing rather than correcting problems Data-based decision-making Process re-engineering Long and short term plans/goals

11 Challenges of Quality Initiatives Data integrity User friendly data and information access Coordination Communication Benchmarking, trend analysis Accountability Closing the Loop

12 AQIP’s Processes Initial Interest Exploration and Self- Assessment Four-year cycle, consisting of Strategy Forum and Systems Appraisal Annual Update on Action Projects Formal Reaffirmation of Accreditation every seven years, based on pattern of participation

Systems AppraisalStrategyForum Systems Portfolio Annual Update Action Projects Re-affirm Accreditation

14 Each AQIP Criterion asks: How stable, well-designed, and robust are your systems and processes? How consistently do you employ and deploy your systems and processes? How satisfying and good are the results your systems and processes achieve? How do you use your performance data to drive improvement?

Measuring Effectiveness Understanding Students’ and other Stakeholders’ Needs Building Collaborative Relationships Planning Continuous Improvement Accomplishing Other Distinctive Objectives Leading and Communicating Valuing People Helping Students Learn Supporting Institutional Operations

16 Overall, the AQIP Criteria ask: Are you doing the right things — the things that are most important in order to achieve your institution’s goals? Are you doing things right — effectively, efficiently, in ways that truly satisfy the needs of those you serve?

17 Criterion: Understanding Students’ and other Stakeholders’ Needs Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory Community Assessment Employer Needs Advisory Committees

18 Criterion: Leading and Communicating College Goals Succession Planning Leadership Development Decision-making Communication Internally Externally

19 Criterion: Valuing People Hiring Processes Training and development Performance Management Health and Well-being Recognition and rewards

20 Criterion: Building Collaborative Relationships Internally Across campuses Campuses and District Faculty and administration Full-time and Part-time faculty Externally K-12 Universities Businesses Vendors Economic and social development

21 Criterion: Planning for Continuous Improvement Resource allocation Alignment of initiatives Action plans Mission/Vision

22 Criterion: Supporting Institutional Operations Finance and Business Services Administrative offices/functions Student services Admissions and records Financial aid Bookstores Food service

23 Criterion: Accomplishing Other Distinctive Objectives Corporate College WEDD Cultural arts

24 Criterion: Measuring Effectiveness Within each criterion Balanced Scorecard

25 What is a Balanced Scorecard? A “scorecard” is any set of key performance indicators or measures (KPI’s) A Balanced Scorecard is a set of KPI’s that are aligned with, and prioritized by, strategic goals and objectives, as viewed from multiple perspectives

26 Tri-C Perspectives 1.How effectively are our students learning? 2.How effectively are we serving our customers? 3.How effectively are we managing our resources?

27 Advantages of Balanced Scorecard Alignment of Initiatives College Goals Noel-Levitz, CCSSE OBOR Performance Reporting National Benchmarking Initiatives Setting Targets Tracking Progress

28 Criterion: Helping Students Learn Student outcomes assessment Community College Survey of Student Engagement Curriculum development Remedial/developmental education Counseling Tutoring

29 Alliance for Teaching and Learning Student Outcomes Assessment

30 Student Outcomes Definition (Nichols) Student outcomes are what academic departments expect students to know (cognitive), do (behavioral), or feel (attitudinal) when they have completed a program or degree

31 A Guiding Principle The basic purpose for student outcomes assessment is providing feedback for enhancing the teaching-learning process (educational program improvement) and improving institutional effectiveness.

32 Components of Assessment Program Review Student Outcomes Assessment General Education By Program or Discipline Group Classroom Assessment (Enhancing the Teaching/Learning Process)

33 Aligning Initiatives

34 Program Review

35 Process—Year 1 Career programs  Program productivity  Program need  Student Characteristics  Student Outcomes  Program Quality

36 Process—Year 2 Arts and Sciences  Program productivity  Student Characteristics  Student Outcomes  Program Quality

37 Results Action plans for improvement  Marketing/Recruitment  Persistence/Retention  Building Career Ladders

38 Summary AQIP is not an event or series of activities It is a way of doing our business to make us better in all arenas of the organization: Classroom (both teaching and learning) Administration Internal and external relationships It is a way of keeping ourselves accountable to ourselves and to others

39 Resources Institutional Planning and Evaluation folder on K:drive  Data and Special Studies  Reports  Guidelines

40 Challenge What is your role in the journey?