Class 5 Public Key Encryption Digital Signatures Digital Library Research

Tonight’s plan Quiz on Content, Access –Remember that prior quiz questions are always candidates for reappearance on later quizzes. Complete discussion of Encryption and Digital Signatures Look at JCDL 2012 submissions Choose a paper to read and discuss Prepare for discussion of quality next week –First look at the new Digital Library book from Fox et al

Last week We looked more closely at Dublin Core Access management –involves both legal and technical issues Policies must be formulated, then enforced Rules exist for what is in the public domain, what must have explicit permission for reuse. Fair use policies attempt to make educational and other beneficial use of materials less burdensome – but there are no quick and easy rules about when Fair Use applies

Last week, continued Technical issues concern the responsibility for enforcing laws and policies. Approaches: –Steganography Hiding information in another object –Encryption A number of approaches –Digital Wrappers –Digital Watermarks

Last week, continued Encryption –Simple or more complex substitutions –Key based approaches require secure ways to transmit a key –Public Key encryption does not require communication of a key security depends on the difficulty of factoring very large numbers (hundreds of digits)

Public Key encryption Eliminates the need to deliver a key Two keys: one for encoding, one for decoding Known algorithm –security based on security of the decoding key – note, no key delivery problem Essential element: –knowing the encoding key will not reveal the decoding key

Effective Public Key Encryption Encoding method E and decoding method D are inverse functions on message M: –D(E(M)) = M Computational cost of E, D reasonable D cannot be determined from E, the algorithm, or any amount of plaintext attack with any computationally feasible techniqueplaintext attack E cannot be broken without D (only D will accomplish the decoding) Any method that meets these criteria is a valid Public Key Encryption technique

It all comes down to this: key used for decoding is dependent upon the key used for encoding, but the relationship cannot be determined in any feasible computation or observation of transmitted data

Rivest, Shamir, Adelman (RSA) Choose 2 large prime numbers, p and q, each more than 100 digits Compute n=p*q and z=(p-1)*(q-1) Choose d, relatively prime to zrelatively prime Find e, such that e*d=1 (mod z)e*d=1 (mod z) –or e*d mod z = 1, if you prefer. This produces e and d, the two keys that define the E and D methods.

Public Key encoding Convert M into a bit stringM into a bit string Break the bit string into blocks, P, of size k –k is the largest integer such that 2 k <n –P corresponds to a binary value: 0<P<n Encoding method –E = Compute C=P e (mod n) Decoding method –D = Compute P=C d (mod n) e and n are published (public key) d is closely guarded and never needs to be disclosed

An example: Choose 2 large prime numbers, p and q, each more than 100 digits (Well, not so big for our example) –p=7; q=11; Compute n=p*q and z=(p-1)*(q-1) –n = 77; z = 60 Choose d, relatively prime to z (60, in this case)relatively prime –Could we choose 9? 8? (Why not?) –Choose d=13 (List some other possible choices) Find e, such that e*d=1 (mod z)e*d=1 (mod z) –What multiple of d, when divided by z, equals1? –e=37; We have our keys: e, d, and n are required. No amount of trying will find d if given e and n.

Using the keys We need to choose a size (k) for the blocks of code that will be sent together. –k is the largest integer such that 2 k <n –Our n is 77, what is k? 2 5 is 32; 2 6 is 64; 2 7 is 128 k is 6 How will we encode our characters? ASCII? Other? –Let’s keep it simple. A = 1, B= 10, C= 11, etc. How many bits to we need to encode all 26 letters? 26 < is 2 5. We need 5 bits to encode all 26 letters So, A = 00001, B=00010, C=00011, D= 00100, What is S?

Encode a message Let’s encode “CAT” First, convert the letters to binary –C = 00011A = T = –Our message, in binary, is Group the bits in blocks of 6 (because k is 6) – Note extra 0s needed to fill the block. Add extra 0s at the left so that the numeric value does not change

Encoding, continued We are sending this: Each 6-bit block is a chunk of plaintext, P Each block of code must be encrypted. –Our e is 37, n is 77 P 37 mod 77 is the encrypted version of our plaintext block 0 37 is 0; is mod 77 is is mod 77 is 24 We transmit the binary version of ( )

Your turn You receive this: –There will not be any convenient spacing between the blocks in the transmitted message. That is not necessary. It has been encoded with your public key. You have the private key, d = 13 n = 77 Show the decoding process

Another exercise Transmit and send a three letter message. Use the same e, d, n that we have developed here. Receive a message from someone else and decode it.

A practical note There is a lot more to security than encryption. Encryption coding is done by a few experts Understanding how the common encryption algorithms work is useful in choosing the right approach for your situation. Our interest here is in providing assurance that access to protected resources will be limited to those with legitimate rights.

On a practical note: PGP You can create your own real public and private keys using PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) See the following Web sites for full information. PGP.htmlhttp:// PGP.html

Issues Intruder vulnerability –If an intruder intercepts a request from A for B’s public key, the intruder can masquerade as B and receive messages from B intended for A. The intruder can send those same or different messages to B, pretending to be A. –Prevention requires authentication of the public key to be used. Computational expense –One approach is to use Public Key Encryption to send the Key for use in DES, then use the faster DES to transmit messages

Digital Signatures Some messages do not need to be encrypted, but they do need to be authenticated: reliably associated with the real sender –Protect an individual against unauthorized access to resources or misrepresentation of the individual’s intentions –Protect the receiver against repudiation of a commitment by the originator

Digital Signature basic technique Sender A Receiver B Intention to send E(Random Number) where E is A’s public key Message and D(E(Random Number)) = Random Number, decoded as only A could do

Public key encryption with implied signature Add the requirement that E(D(M)) = M Sender A has encoding key E A, decoding key D A Intended receiver has encoding (public) key E B. A produces E B (D A (M)) Receiver calculates E A (D B (E B (D A (M)))) –Result is M, but also establishes that only A could have encoded M

Digital Signature Standard (DSS) Verifies that the message came from the specified source and also that the message has not been modified More complexity than simple encoding of a random number, but less than encrypting the entire message Message is not encoded. An authentication code is appended to it.

Digital Signature – SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm) FIPS Pub Digital Signature Standard

Encryption summary Problems –intruders can obtain sensitive information –intruder can interfere with correct information exchange Solution –disguise messages so an intruder will not be able to obtain the contents or replace legitimate messages with others

Important methods DES –fast, reasonably good encryption –key distribution problem Public Key Encryption –more secure based on the difficulty of factoring very large numbers –no key distribution problem –computationally intense

Digital signatures Authenticate messages so the sender cannot repudiate the message later Protect messages from changes during transmission or at the receiver’s site Useful when the contents do not need encryption, but the contents must be accurate and correctly associated with the sender

Legal and ethical issues People who work in these fields face problems with allowable exports, and are not always allowed to talk about their work. Is it desirable to have government able to crack all codes? What is the tradeoff between privacy of law abiding citizens vs. the ability of terrorists and drug traffickers to communicate in secret?

Digital Library Research Review of some papers from digital library conferences –Looking at titles and abstracts to get a sense of the kind of work that is being done under the heading of digital libraries.