Institutional Assessment Day: Program-Level Alumni Survey Data August 19, 2014 Pat Hulsebosch Associate Provost – Office of Academic Quality Rosanne Bangura.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meeting MSCHE Assessment Expectations
Advertisements

Academic Program and Unit Review at UIS Office of the Provost Fall 2014.
Ron Smelser Professor and Associate Dean Dean’s Office.
Assessment Plans Discussion Career Services Julie Guevara, Accreditation & Assessment Officer February 6, 2006.
American College Personnel Association March 31, 2014 Angie L. Miller, Ph.D. Amber D. Lambert, Ph.D. Center for Postsecondary Research, Indiana University.
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
Wayne Huebner, Chairman, MSE S&T Campus Project Leader Chris Weisbrook, Director of Academic Programs UM System Project Leader presented to: ITCC April.
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
The Academic Assessment Process
1 Student Learning Assessment Assessment is an ongoing process aimed at understanding & improving student learning Formative Assessment – Ongoing feedback.
QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.
Introduction to the MSP Management Information System Molly Hershey-Arista December 16, 2013.
2009 Gallaudet University Climate Survey Results Presentation to the Academic Council Dr. Pat Hulsebosch, Executive Director of Academic Quality September.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
I am ready! A look at how career classes are preparing students for career success Katy Hinz, Program Coordinator, Office for Student Engagement. Career.
Curriculum 21 SUCCEED Southeastern University and College Coalition for Engineering Education Multiple Vantage Points for Employment-Related Feedback Share.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
University Of North Alabama General Education Assessment Paradigm Shift: A plan for Revising General Education Assessment at UNA.
Student Data Reporting Tools Michele J. Hansen, Ph.D. Executive Director Student Data, Analysis, and Evaluation Enrollment Management Advisory Council.
Department Name and School or Service Division Example Department of History School of Liberal Arts Example Office/department of Student Development Division.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Helping Your Department Advance and Implement Effective Assessment Plans Presented by: Karen Froslid Jones Director, Institutional Research.
The Roles of Department Heads and Program Directors in the GRCC Faculty Evaluation System.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WORKSHOP. What is the Professional Development Plan? The Professional Development Plan is a directed planning and evaluation.
Student Learning Outcomes: Interpretations, Validity, and Factor Development Krista Soria and Laura Gorny This project was funded by the Undergraduate.
BUILDING THE VISION Gregory G. Dell’Omo FACULTY CONVOCATION August 26, 2005.
Before & After: What Undergraduates and Alumni Say About Their College Experience and Outcomes Angie L. Miller, NSSE & SNAAP Research Analyst Amber D.
Data Development and Pilots Academic Leadership Retreat August 2015.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
End of Course Evaluation Taimi Olsen, Ph.D., Director, Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center Jennifer Ann Morrow, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Evaluation,
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
Don Dodson, Senior Vice Provost Diane Jonte-Pace, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Studies Carol Ann Gittens, Director, Office of Assessment Learning Assessment.
ARE STUDENTS LEARNING WHAT WE SAY THEY ARE? THE IMPORTANCE AND PROCESS FOR CONDUCTING EFFECTIVE PROGRAM REVIEWS IN THE BUSINESS CURRICULUM Presented by:
NSSE 2013 How to Use Results (or “Why you should care about NSSE”) 8/26/
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
SHORTER COLLEGE Assessment Week Sponsored by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment & the Division of Academic Affairs.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
CIRTL Network Data Collection 3/2/2013. Institutional Portrait: Purpose Consistency with the TAR principle Accountability: – Helps us all monitor Network.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
VT University Libraries: Identifying, Teaching, and Assessing What Matters Most Office of Academic Assessment Ray Van Dyke,
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
Melanie DiLoreto.  Planning Committee ◦ Spring 2008 – Summer 2008 ◦ Internal & External Stakeholders – CAS, PCL, SoE, Academic Affairs, Supervising Teachers,
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
UK Office of Assessment. The LEARNING Initiative Dual Track Implementation Strategy Completion Dates Not actively engaged in program level assessment.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
State Development Information and tips to develop the Annual Work Plan 1.
Overview of Types of Measures Margaret Kasimatis, PhD VP for Academic Planning & Effectiveness.
The University of West Florida Reaffirmation of Accreditation Project Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
Kimberlee Pottberg.  Part 1: Why we use WEAVEonline  Part 2: How to enter components.
Assessment of Advising Linda Taylor, PhD, LPC, NCC September 9, 2011.
Institutional development and evaluation 09. June 2016.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Academic Program Review
NTNU’s quality system for education
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Welcome! Session Recording
Heather Brod, Executive Director of Faculty Affairs and FAME
Program Review Workshop
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Presentation transcript:

Institutional Assessment Day: Program-Level Alumni Survey Data August 19, 2014 Pat Hulsebosch Associate Provost – Office of Academic Quality Rosanne Bangura Research Associate – Office of Institutional Research 1

Quality Assurance Institutional Effectiveness Student Learning & Development 2

Aims: 1)generating information to improve the quality of education at Gallaudet University; 2)providing measures of student success in compliance federal, state, and accreditation requirements; and 3)providing information to consumers about postgraduation outcomes. 3 Quality Assurance

4

Quality Assurance: Alumni Surveys search/alumni_survey.html search/alumni_survey.html 5

 Research shows that student self-reports are valid and reliable provided five conditions are met:  The information requested is known to respondents;  The questions are phrased clearly;  The questions refer to recent activities;  The respondents think the questions merit serious thought;  Answering the questions does not threaten the privacy of the respondent. (Borden and Zak-Owens, 2001) Alumni Survey Challenges – Student Self-Reports: Valid and Reliable 6

 Few schools across the U.S. report greater than 40% response rate (GU’s was 55% last year)  Experts maintain that reliable results can be based on as few as respondents  Evidence suggests that differences in response between responders and non- responders are not significant  For programs with small numbers, aggregate data across several years Kuh, 2006, p Alumni Survey Challenges: Response Rates 7

 Mixed evidence about impact of length of survey on response rates  Recommendation to aim for 4-5 pages  Approximately one page for each type of question (Background, Institutional, Program) Volkwein, 2009, p Alumni Survey Challenges: Survey Length 8

 U.S. Dept of Ed requires we gather basic postgraduation outcomes data  “Assessment for curricular and program improvement needs feedback from recent graduates.” (Volkwein, 2010, p. 128.)  “Long-term career outcomes requires a longer time frame. (Volkwein, 2010, p. 128.) Volkwein, J.F. (Ed.); 2010; Assessing Student outcomes: Why, Who, What How?; New Directions for Institutional Research ; A. Wiley Company. Alumni Survey Challenges: How Often to Survey? 9

 Gallaudet’s Alumni Survey has administered annually as part of our measurement of post-graduation outcomes.  One of the measures we are required to report to the U.S. Dept. of Education.  Government Performance and Results Act Report (GPRA) – Measure 3.2 and 3.3  0for%20Distribution% pdf 0for%20Distribution% pdf  University Dashboard  nal_research/strategic_plan_dashboard.html nal_research/strategic_plan_dashboard.html The GU Alumni Survey 10

 Institutional Effectiveness: U.S. Dept of Education  % of graduates employed a year after graduation  % of graduates pursuing further education a year after graduation  Field of employment  Related to deaf/ hard-of-hearing people?  Income  Satisfaction with employment  Value of GU to employment  Institutional Effectiveness: Gallaudet Strategic Plan  % of graduates who completed internships  Value of internship to employment  % of graduates who took on-line courses CURRENT GU Alumni Survey: Institutional Postgraduation Outcomes 11

 We use the GU Alumni Survey as PART of data gathering to provide data to the U.S. Dept of Education  Alumni Survey  Addresses from Alumni Office, Career Center, Programs  National Clearinghouse Student Tracker (further education)  Social Media  Employees and students at Gallaudet Alumni Survey: Institutional Postgraduation Outcomes : DOE 12

 GU Alumni Survey results posted at the Office of IR website  ional_research/alumni_survey.html ional_research/alumni_survey.html  Departmental/program results are also disaggregated and become part of your program’s outcomes portfolio  Blackboard -  Program Outcomes Assessment Information  Department -  Alumni Outcomes  Example: Education Alumni Survey: Institutional Postgraduation Outcomes 13

 Student Learning and Development : Experiences and Impact 1.Participation in campus experiences (e.g., athletics) (1/2 page)  Overall contribution to learning and development (1/2 page) 2.To what extent did your experience as a student contribute to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas: (1 ½ pgs)  Contribution in Liberal Arts areas (Institutional Outcomes)  Contribution to your knowledge, skills and personal development. e.g., “ Problem solving: designing, evaluating, and implementing a strategy to answer questions or achieve a goal.” 3.Contribution to knowledge, skills, and personal development of program-based outcomes PROPOSED Alumni Survey: add Student Learning and Development 14

 Improve the consistency of responses from ALL programs  The GU Alumni Survey is not receiving adequate responses for all programs. Information from the IR field says that program level alumni surveys fare better if they’re sent from the program level  Deepen our understanding of the impact of GU programs on students learning and development  Add items to the Alumni Survey that ask about the impact of the program on program outcomes GU Alumni Survey Goal 15

 Summer 2014: Department Chairs will review the institutional alumni survey that’s been in use and consider what department- level questions to generate; OIR will work with campus database holders to attempt to increase validity of alumni addresses; departments will seek addresses from recent graduates.  Fall, 2014: On Institutional Assessment Day Department Chairs and OIR will meet to plan how they will work together on this year’s Alumni Survey; then department will meet together to generate draft departmental questions for the alumni survey.  Mid-September: Department-based questions drafted; submitted to OIR; OIR begins formatting survey to be sent with Department cover letter and signature in late September. Surveys will be returned to OIR. OIR will summarize data and distribute to departments and programs (along with Provost, Deans, and to meet external requirements). GU Alumni Survey Plan 16

 September 12: Department-based questions drafted  Approximately one page  Approximately 10 questions that address program SLO’s  Following the same format used in the institutional outcomes section of the Alumni Survey:  “To what extent did your experience as a student contribute to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas:”  Send to Rosanne Bangura, Office of Institutional Research GU Alumni Survey Plan 17

Questions? 18