Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Goals Just Arent Enough: Strategies for Putting Learning Outcomes into Words Dr. Jill L. Lane Research Associate/Program Manager Schreyer Institute.
Advertisements

GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
General Education Assessment 2013: Introduction
Special recognition: University of Florida.  Participants will be able to: ◦ Articulate specifications for learning outcomes ◦ Classify learning outcomes.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
Student Learning Outcomes Curriculum Change Request Academic Council Presentation Gary Howard Rosemary Hays-Thomas October 22, 2004.
Department Plans for Assessment of Student Learning Teachers Talking February 16, 2011.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
Outcomes-Based Accreditation: An Agent for Change and Quality Improvement in Higher Education Programs A. Erbil PAYZIN Founding Member and Past Chairman.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Writing Measurable Student Learning Outcomes
TaskStream Training Presented by the Committee on Learning Assessment 2015.
Core Curriculum and Transfer Students Summer 2015.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Eportfolio: Tool for Student Career Development and Institutional Assessment Sally L. Fortenberry, Ph.D., and Karol Blaylock, Ph.D. Eportfolio: Tool for.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost Gainesville, FL THE BASICS OF STUDENT LEARNING.
Undergraduate Academic Assessment Plans: What’s New for Timothy S. Brophy, Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH. Outcomes assessment can tell us if our students are really learning what we think they should be able to do.
Assessment 101: A Review of the Basics Jill Allison Kern, PhD Director of Assessment Christopher Newport University January 2013.
The Basics of Student Learning Outcomes Assessment SACSCOC Summer Institute July 20, 2015 handout for this session is in the online program Timothy S.
Periodic Program Review Guiding Programs in Today’s Assessment Climate LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Cross Cutting Initiatives - Education William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
16 OCTOBER 2015 JOACHIN ARIAS, SLO COORDINATOR EDWARD PAI, DEAN OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
Saddleback College In-Service August 18, We are at a distinct disadvantage because few of our programs require students to follow a sequence of.
Identifying Outcomes Peggy Maki Senior Scholar Assessing for Learning American Association for Higher Education
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
Developing Program Learning Outcomes To help in the quality of services.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, January 9, 2013 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
Curriculum Mapping: Academic Faculty & Subject Librarians Working Together By Barbara Tierney, Head Research & Info Services, UCF Libraries With some content.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
DEFINING AND REFINING LEARNING OUTCOMES UK Office of Assessment.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
SACSCOC Coordinators Meeting Academic Units September 14, 2015 Timothy S. Brophy, Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater, Assistant Provost and.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Writing Measurable Student Learning Outcomes
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Program Learning Outcomes
Have you earned an ? Associate of Arts degree, A.A
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Inculcating “Parallel Programming” in UG curriculum
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Development of ABET Syllabus
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Assessment 101 EWU New Faculty Orientation Workshop
Assessment and Improvement
Presentation transcript:

Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost

Today’s Goals Describe and explain assessment systems Review UF’s program assessment components Discuss program assessment systems and steps to strengthen them Review examples

Assessment Systems A system is a complex whole in which there are multiple parts or phases that can stand alone but are stronger when linked logically into a cohesive combination The system can use linear and nonlinear sequences of events or processes, or a combination of both Assessment systems consist of curricular, educational, and procedural components The UF Assessment System is one example

UF Assessment System Establish Mission, Goals, and Outcomes Assessment Planning Implement the Plan and Gather Data Interpret and Evaluate the Data Modify and Improve May – Assessment Plans and Effectiveness Documentation Reports submitted for the next AY October - Assessment Data, results, and use of results for previous AY entered into Compliance Assist! Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness Data Reporting

Elements of program assessment systems Catalog ALCs Graduation requirements Assessment Plans SLOs Measurement tools Curriculum Maps and Assessment matrices Compliance Assist! Goals Results Use of results Student work samples

The Academic Learning Compact UF Undergraduate Catalog Academic Learning Compacts identify the skills students should acquire if they follow their major’s prescribed course of study. These skills, known collectively as Student Learning Outcomes, describe the core learning expectations that UF is required to assess for each baccalaureate degree program. Core learning expectations identify communication, critical thinking, and content knowledge skills, as well as additional learning outcomes specific to the major.

Student Learning Outcomes What students are expected to learn by the completion of their baccalaureate degree

Individual Student Assessments The different ways in which UF will measure whether students have successfully completed the learning outcomes for a major. These assessments can include a passing score on a particular test or final project, term paper, portfolio, etc UF Undergraduate Catalog

Academic Learning Compact What we sometimes have SLO Assessment Course

What we should have in all programs Academic Learning Compact SLOAssessmentCourseAssessmentCourse SLOAssessmentCourseAssessmentCourseSLOAssessmentCourseAssessmentCourse

How do we get from ALC SLOAssessmentCourseAssessmentCourse SLOAssessmentCourseAssessmentCourseSLOAssessmentCourseAssessmentCourse SLOSLO Asse ssm ent C o ur se Academic Learning Compact SLOSLO SLOSLO Asse ssm ent C o ur se THIS TO THIS?

And avoid this when dealing with assessment? SLOs!! Plans!!! Rubrics!!!

Start with the ALC program description Components of a strong ALC program description: Establishes learning goals for the degree program – the “core learning expectations” Addresses the relationship of the degree to the job or career

Characteristics of Program Learning Goals found in program descriptions These are broad statements that present multiple measurable components so the statement itself may be “unmeasurable” These often use verbs like “understand” and “learn” and “gain the ability to…” etc. in the program description Why? These are the broad LEARNING GOALS of the program – not the LEARNING OUTCOMES SLOs represent the measurable components of the SLOs – they are “S.M.A.R.T.” SLOs are stated using active verbs However, the SLOs and goals share common language and intent

This model allows you to develop assessments that measure the outcomes, and that then connect directly to the program goals Specific Learning Outcome – the course-level SLO General Learning Outcome – the program-level SLO – these describe what students will do to demonstrate the learning goals Learning Goal Level – programs establish learning goals for the degree – at UF these are described in the Academic Learning Compact Developing an Assessment System: A Three-level Model (Carriveau, 2010)

A sample description: Materials Science Engineering The major enables you to develop an understanding of materials systems and their role in engineering. Emphasis is placed on the ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering principles to materials science and engineering; to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data; and to design a system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability. Learning Goals Connection to the job or career

Students who complete the MSE degree will: Understand materials systems and their role in engineering Gain the ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering principles to materials science and engineering Level 1: Learning Goals based on the MSE ALC

Content Knowledge Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering principles to materials science and engineering. Design and conduct materials science and engineering experiments and analyze and interpret the data. Critical Thinking Design a materials science and engineering system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability constraints. Communication Communicate technical data and design information effectively in speech and in writing to other materials engineers. Level 2 – Program Student Learning Outcomes for MSE

Learning Goals: Understand materials systems and their role in engineering Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering principles to materials science and engineering. Student Learning Outcomes: Design a materials science and engineering system, component or process to meet desired needs within realistic economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability and sustainability constraints. Communicate technical data and design information effectively in speech and in writing to other materials engineers MSE: Connecting Goals to Outcomes Goal SLO

Learning Goals: Understand materials systems and their role in engineering Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering principles to materials science and engineering. Student Learning Outcomes: Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering principles to materials science and engineering. Design and conduct materials science and engineering experiments and analyze and interpret the data MSE: Connecting Goals to Outcomes Level 1 Level 2

Connecting Program SLOs to Courses MSE Curriculum Map Assessments in the boxes marked A are conducted using specific homework, exam, or assignment questions aligned with that SLO. Source: MSE Academic Assessment Plan

Completing the System Align course objectives with program SLOs Develop assessments of the course objectives Select course assessments as assessments of the program SLOs – vet these with the program faculty

Completing the System Collect data Analyze and interpret Modify Report to Compliance Assist!

A synopsis… Program Description Learning Goals Program SLOs Course objectives and assessments Data collection, analysis, and interpretation Annual Reporting and Planning

All of this leads to SUCCESS!