THE FOURTH ANNUAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SUMMIT APRIL 21-23, 2004 “The Use of Hazardous Materials in Human Subject Research” Kenneth L. Dretchen, Ph.D. Georgetown.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

THE NIH RECOMBINANT DNA 2002 GUIDELINES East Carolina University September 5, 2007.
Safety Guidelines Illness and Injury Prevention Safety Guidelines Illness and Injury Prevention 2.01 Understand safety procedures 1.
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF RESEARCH LINDA M. GARDINER, Ph.D. DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT AND COMPLIANCE SERVICES.
Sharon Harris, Clinical Research Coordinator. SEND PROTOCOLS TO: Clinical Trials Review Committee (CTRC) University Research Administration (URA) Institutional.
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE PROGRAM WORKSHOP OFFICE OF RESEARCH LINDA M. GARDINER, Ph.D. DIRECTOR RESEARCH ENHANCEMENT.
Responsible Conduct of Research & Research Compliance Adam J. Rubenstein, Ph.D. Director of Research Compliance Old Dominion University Office of Research.
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
Biological and Radiological Regulatory Concerns for Research Administrators Megan G. Marks, Ph.D. Biological and Radiological Safety Manager Carnegie Mellon.
Biosafety Program Development Presented by: Lisa Wisser, CIH AIHCE - June 6, 2001.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
Office of the Vice President for Research
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
Principles and Practices of Biosafety Environmental Health and Safety San Diego State University.
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
EnvironmentalSafety 2.01 Understand safety procedures 1.
Environmental Health and Safety Radiation Control and Radiological Services.
Research and Biological Safety Office Environmental Health and Safety
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Research Office (HSRO) University of Miami and Affiliated Institutions.
Safety Review and Approval Process for Research Proposals Robert Emery, DrPH, CHP, CIH, CBSP, CSP, CHMM, CPP, ARM Vice President for Safety, Health, Environment.
Federalwide Assurance Presentation for IRB Members.
Introduction to US Health Care
NC A&T STATE UNIVERSITY
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
LABORATORY BIOSAFETY FOCUS FORUM (LBFF). Delia Wolf Office of Regulatory Affairs & Research Compliance Dana Burns Leslie Howes Stanley Estime Jennifer.
Yesterday, today, and tomorrow
Research Protocol Registration at WUStL Institutional Biological and Chemical Safety Committee/ Environmental Health and Safety Joe Kanabrocki Biological.
IACUC and IBC PROCESS. Office of Research Services Resource Center Building Room Kenneth Kratz, PhD –Director Staff: Nicole Barron – Pre-award.
R ESEARCH P ROTECTIONS R EVIEW & F UNDING Nancy Stalnaker, Director & Donna Silver, Assistant Director UVM Research Protections Office 6/3/2013UVM Research.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
1.02 Advanced Compliance Strategies for Academic Medical Centers Kenneth L. Dretchen and Shelia Zimmet Georgetown University Medical Center.
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
Primary Care and Community Outreach Research VCOM Institutional Review Board Jim Mahaney, PhD Associate Dean for Biomedical Affairs, Virginia Campus Past.
Copyright  Business & Legal Reports, Inc. BLR’s Safety Training Presentations Bloodborne Pathogens 29 CFR
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF BIOSAFETY RESEARCH Review of Institutional Biosafety Committee Application Form Robert J. Hashimoto The University of Kentucky.
Introduction to Workplace Safety
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
KATHY MAGRUDER, MPH, PHD DIRECTOR MUSC Office of Research Integrity.
Research Compliance: An Overview of the Players and Issues Involved in Emory’s Research Compliance Programs.
Legal & Ethical Issues. Objectives At the completion of this session the participant will be able to: ◦ Describe the ethical principles associated with.
Tulane University - Office of Environmental Health & Safety (OEHS) Environmental Health & Safety Compliance Management System & Departmental Safety Representative.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER NEW ORLEANS.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
Paul Kelly Facility Research Compliance Officer for the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center.
 Welcome ◦ Amanda Athey, Director, Graduate School  Student Experience  Funding Opportunities ◦ Rebecca Drake, Research Administrator, Office of Research.
R EGULATORY A GENCIES What are regulatory issues? Types of agencies How they affect you Top 10 regulatory issues.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP): Part I – Which Entities/Offices are Involved ? J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.
PRIMER: Human Subjects, Past, Present, and Future Susan Metosky, Arizona State University Debra Murphy, Arizona State University.
Research as defined by DHHS A systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable.
NIH Guidelines for Research Involving rDNA Molecules (NIH Guidelines) and Institutional Biosafety Committees.
The IBC is: The Institutional Biosafety Committee (aka Biohazards Committee)
Session 2 IRB Training  What is the Principal Investigator’s role in Human Subject Research?  What is the role of the Investigator’s staff in Human Subject.
Regulatory Agencies What are regulatory issues? Types of agencies How they affect you Top 10 regulatory issues.
NC A&T STATE UNIVERSITY
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC)
Research Compliance and Institutional Review Boards
ROLE OF THE INSTITUTIONAL BIOSAFETY COMMITTEE
Training Requirements for PI and Research Staff
Institutional Biosafety Committees
THE FOURTH ANNUAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SUMMIT APRIL 21-23, 2004
Institutional Biosafety Committees
Safety Guidelines Illness and Injury Prevention
Human Gene Therapy Institutional Review Procedures
Safety Guidelines Illness and Injury Prevention
Safety Guidelines Illness and Injury Prevention
Presentation transcript:

THE FOURTH ANNUAL MEDICAL RESEARCH SUMMIT APRIL 21-23, 2004 “The Use of Hazardous Materials in Human Subject Research” Kenneth L. Dretchen, Ph.D. Georgetown University Moderator Susan M. Martin, MS, CSHM Georgetown University Sheila Cohen Zimmet, BSN, JD Georgetown University Susan L. Rose, Ph.D. Univ. of Southern California

How to Facilitate Research Efforts While Maintaining Regulatory Compliance Susan Martin, MS, CSHM Director, EH&S Georgetown University

Georgetown University Office of Regulatory Affairs Five Oversight Committees for Hazardous Materials IBC (Institutional Biosafety Committee) CSRC (Chemical Safety Review Committee) RSC (Radiation Safety Committee) IACUC (Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee) IRB (Institutional Review Board: Human Subject Research) Georgetown University

Biological Safety Program Subject: All Research Involving Use of:  Infectious/Biohazardous Agents  Recombinant DNA Molecules  Transgenic Animals (Creation of) Regulated By:  Center For Disease Control (CDC)  National Institutes of Health (NIH)  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)  US Patriot Act Requirements:  Protocol Approval  5 Year Protocol Renewal  Annual Registration  Training  Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) & Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) Georgetown University  Inspections  Medical Surveillance  Emergency Response  Disposal & Waste

Biological Safety (Cont.) Subject: Standard applies to any employee who has a reasonably anticipated exposure to human blood, and/or body fluids. Regulated By: OSHA Standard Requirements:  Develop Exposure Control Plan & Policy  Training: Initial & Annual  HBV Vaccination (Offered)  Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)  Inspections  Medical Surveillance  Emergency Response  Disposal & Waste “Bloodborne Pathogens; Exposure Program Georgetown University

Chemical Safety Subject: Any research involving use of Particularly Hazardous Chemicals Regulated By:  Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)  National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Requirements:  Laboratory Specific Chemical Hygiene Plan  Standard Operating Procedures  Training  Personal Protective Equipments (PPE)  Inspections  Medical Surveillance  Emergency Response  Disposal & Waste Georgetown University Chemical Safety Review (CSR)

Radiation Safety Subject: All Research Involving the Use of  Radioactive Materials  Radiation Producing Devices  Cesium-137 Research Irradiator Regulated By:  US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (10 CFR)  District of Columbia – Department of Health Requirements:  Authorized User and Protocol Approvals  RSO Policy and Procedure Approvals  3 Year Renewals  Training  Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)  Inspections  Medical Surveillance  Emergency Response  Disposal & Waste Georgetown University Radiation Safety Committee (RSC)

Hazardous Materials Interrelationships NIH/Recombinant Advisory Committee (RAC) Georgetown University Regulatory Affairs IBC & CSRC IRBIACUC RSC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission & EPA Georgetown University

 Applications Filed Simultaneously  Cross representation by committee members  Communication among administrative personnel  Grants and Contracts Submission Form  Cross References In Application Forms Functional Relationships Georgetown University

Protocols for all research at Georgetown University involving Biological Hazards must be submitted to the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) for review. For purposes of the IBC, Biological Hazards include: A) Recombinant DNA, B) Infectious Agents, C) Hazardous/Carcinogenic Chemicals, and D) Transgenic Animals. Research protocols involving the use of any of these entities must contain a detailed description of potential danger(s) posed by the agent(s), And a summary of safeguards, training, and procedures which will be employed to protect both laboratory personnel and the GU community. Will this protocol involve the use of Radioactive Materials? (1) Will this protocol involve the use of Animals?(2) Will this protocol involve Human Subjects? (Clinical Trials)(3) (1)For research involving the use of Radioactive Materials or Radiation Producing Equipment..., a copy of this protocol must also be submitted to the Radiation Safety Office. (2)For research involving Animals, a copy of this protocol must also be submitted to the GUACUC. (3)For research involving Human Subjects, IRB [prior] approval must be demonstrated. Institutional Biosafety Committee Protocol for Research Involving Biological Hazards & Chemical Safety Review Georgetown University

 Electronic links  Who, What and Where?  Program Orientation and Review (Initial and Annual)  Annual Training Sessions for All Faculty and Research Staff  New P.I. (one on one)  New Research Staff  New Employee Support Staff Overall Approaches to Facilitate These Interactions Georgetown University  Monitoring to Insure Compliance  Pre-Inspection  Quarterly Review  Annual Review  Close-Out Inspection  Disciplinary Action (If necessary)  Suspension  Termination

Georgetown University

Sheila Cohen Zimmet Director, Research Assurance and Compliance Georgetown University

What did they do wrong? No IRB review No OBA/RAC review A dministration of a Recombinant DNA molecule to a human requires prior OBA/RAC review. NIH Office of Biotechnology Activities (Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee) Any questions: Phone: FAX:

Georgetown University Institutional Review Board Application Protocol for Biomedical IRB Review Section Two: Additional Georgetown University Regulatory Information 1.Does this project involve the use of biohazardous materials, recombinant DNA and/or gene therapy? Yes. If so, Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) approval must be obtained. No Has the Institutional Biosafety Committee approved the protocol? ApprovedDate Approved: Application PendingDate Submitted: 2.Does this project include the use of radioisotopes and/or radiation-producing devices regardless of whether the use is incidental to the project? Yes. If so, all protocols must be submitted to the RSC along with a completed RSC-4 or RSC-5 form. The forms require information on the use of radioisotopes and radiation- producing devices and must include dose calculations. No Has the Radiation Safety Committee approved the protocol? ApprovedDate Approved: Application PendingDate Submitted:

Study#1: Study of early immune response in advanced cancer patients with CEA expressing carcinomas to vaccination with CEA-based vaccines using infectious agents, Vaccinia virus and Fowlpox, as viral vectors. Scientific review, including animal studies OBA/RAC approval Adequacy of safety precautions for subjects, family members and other close contacts, pharmacy, and medical and nursing staff – including opt out for staff, especially those with small children at home or pregnant staff;

What did they do wrong? No IACUC Review Vertebrate Animal Animal Welfare Act Was there adequate animal testing before initiating human clinical trial? Was animal data accurate and complete?

Georgetown University Animal Care and Use Committee (GUACUC) Proposal to Use Laboratory Animals in Research and Teaching Special Concerns Yes No Does the project involve recombinant DNA (including) transgenic animals), toxic, carcinogenic or infectious agents in animals ? If yes, submit one copy of the Protocol for Research involving Biologic and Chemical hazards Form to the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC). If yes, provide: a. A copy of the signed approval letter from the IBC must be provided. b. a completed IBC application with description of potential dangers, and safety precautions and levels relevant to the animal colony and personnel to the GUACUC. c. a safety strategy meeting is required before animals can be ordered.

What did they do wrong? No reporting Of: Adverse Event Unexpected Occurrence

Study #2 Cancer vaccine trial using sequential vaccination with ALVAC-CEA and Vaccinia-CEA. ALVAC-CEA supplied by NCI. Shipped ALVAC-IL2 – package labeled ALVAC-CEA and administered to 6 subjects. (No injury subject Resulted) Telephone notification from NCI; followed by written notice Notice to IRB; approved written notice to subjects and supplemental consent; written reports from PI Written notice to subjects and supplemental consent forms. Office of Biologic Activities notified; verified FDA, NIH, OPRR notified. Sentinel event investigation, report and recommendations - new pharmacy procedures OHRP investigation and criticism for lack of direct notice of unanticipated occurrence. Subject of Congressional inquiry into adequacy of government oversight of adverse event data from gene therapy trials.

Pre-Belmont Report and Pre-Common Rule Tuskegee syphilis study Intentional exposure of soldiers to radiation in the 1940s and 1950s Secret administration of LSD to soldiers by the CIA and Army in the 1950s and 1960s Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study (injection with cancer cells) [Japanese “plague bombs”] [Nazi experimentation] Stuttering as a learned condition

We hold that … a parent, appropriate relative, or other applicable surrogate, cannot consent to the participation of a child or other person under legal disability in nontherapeutic research or studies in which there is any risk of injury or damage to the health of the subject. Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, et al., 366 Md. 29, 782 A.2d 807 (Ct App Md 2001)

Paul Gelsinger, addressing a meeting of the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee on December 10, 1999: “All these people who participated in this trial did a wonderful thing. They came in with the same intent my son had. It doesn’t get any purer.” (quoted by Sheryl Gay Stolberg in “Tribute and Apologies in Gene Therapy Death,” December 10, 1999) ___________________________________________________________________ Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 479, 48 S.Ct. 564, (1928), cited inhttp:// Grimes v. Kennedy Krieger Institute, et al. “Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government’s purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” (Brandeis dissenting)

Georgetown University Office of Regulatory Affairs (IRB, IBC, IACUC, Radiation Safety, HIPAA, complaints/concerns) Office of Biotechnology Activities (Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee) “Compliance with the NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules” NIH Guidelines stipulate biosafety and containment measures Office for Human Research Protection (OHRP) OHRP Compliance Activities: Determination Letters Office of Research Integrity OIG