 Introductions  Subcommittee Updates  Info on Data Summit 2013  Roundtable Discussion  Successes and Challenges in 2012  Informal Assessment of our Progress  Strategic Planning for 2013

 DRCOG Chair: Christine Connally  Co-Chair: Kirk Hayer  DRCOG purchased business and residential data for the region to help with our initiatives (Land Use Model and MetroVision).  DRCOG is working on sharing agreements right now.  The Land Use Model is now working in draft form and we’ll continue to refine it for the next year.  Decisions have been made to consolidate some building types for model purposes. The data model is being updated based on subcommittee recommendations.  No upcoming meetings are scheduled.

 We dashed the data dash -receiving data up to the last minute -not overwhelmed by RSVP’s! -lots going on around the region that Friday  Data Complexity -how to distill the process to “Three Easy Pieces” -send a group of editors home feeling good -end up with a product at the end of the day Draft Data Schema developed

 Where we are Today Data merge…to regional layer Editing template…to share ID top three editing tasks Determine future objectives  Contact: Robin Reilley at

 DRCOG Chair: Josh Pendleton  Co-Chair: Greg Baca  Pilot Project Involving Adams, Broomfield, Denver Counties; and Commerce City  144 Boundary Discrepancies – 100 were fixed using NCR agreement points. (69.4%)  Committee agreed in November to adopt this strategy for a Region Wide County Dataset  NCR Agreement Point strategy will be incorporated into DRCOG 2013 Municipal Boundary Collection/Dataset

 DRCOG Chair: Josh Pendleton  Co-Chair: Dave Murray  Met in September  Identified 20 SF1 Census Tables and 78 ACS tables to download, format, and load into DRCOG’s Regional Data Catalog.  Data tables will be linkable to Census Geographies already available  The target geography for this data are Census Block Groups  This Data will be coming soon  DRCOG already offers Basic Census Attributes at 6 different levels of geography on the Regional Data Catalog  CBSA, Tracts, Counties, Places, Block Groups, Blocks (Centroid & Polygons)  Census GIS data including 186 SF1 Attributes has been released on DRCOG’s Regional Data Catalog  4 of the geographies previously available will also include the 186 attributes (CBSA, Tracts, Counties, Places)  5 new geographies are now available (State, Zip Codes, County Subdivisions, School Districts, CSA)  Next meeting: week of Dec 10th

 Chair: Paul Tessar  Co-Chair: Ashley Summers  Status:  Phase 3A: Snapping to Agreement Points at County Boundaries  6 counties have already snapped; remaining 4 expected by end of ’12  Phase 3B: Agreement point City Boundaries  % of Agreement Points Created – 46% (was 34% in Sept)  % of Agreement Points in Progress – 54% (was 66% in Sept)  NCR Repository  Now includes 8 Weld County layers.  Meetings:  Last Meeting: August 8, 2012  Next Meeting: TBD

 Progress meeting today at 11:30am.  Imagery will be shipping to DRAPP members 12/1 – 1/15.  Final Imagery for Areas 2 and 4 (Eastern Plains and Weld) is already available in the WMS.

 Tech Team met several times in the past year to brainstorm about how to best share, collaborate on, and merge datasets.  In limbo until subcommittees are at a point that they need technical guidance.

 Challenges:  Determining a strategy for encouraging data sharing.  Focus:  Data Sharing Policy  Strategic Planning for the Data Consortium  Last Meeting - July 11  Next Meeting - Dec 12 th

Open Data/Data Sharing Technical Implementations Successful Policies Benefits Realized Across the Region

 Expert panel to discuss data sharing in the region  Representation from state and federal government, as well as the private sector and academia  Presentations from our peers across the region  Specific examples of successes and challenges with sharing data  An interactive map challenge  Audience participation  Museum admission  Lunch and break time to network with peers SIGN UP TODAY!

 What do you think the Data Consortium did right this year?  Where do you see areas of improvement?  What was a challenge that you encountered this year in regards to the DRDC?  What do you want to see this group accomplish in 2013?  What new strategies would you like to see implemented?  What strategies would you like to see retired?