Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 Peter O’Donnell, Thompsons, Solicitors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scottish Employment Rights Network and Equality and Human Rights Commission Conference 2013: Update on employment and equality rights. 10:15Welcome and.
Advertisements

How does the FAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the FIBA Arbitration Tribunal (FAT)
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Nicholas Kissen Thomas Frith Islington Leaseholders Association 12 th June 2013.
APARTMENT OWNERS NETWORK NOVEMBER o Outline the new District Court Procedure o o Service of Proceedings – Problems o Statute of Limitations – 6.
The current landscape in the Employment Tribunal Scottish Employment Rights Network.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
The Appeals Process by Gina chandler
Landlords’ guide to Gaining Possession under Section 8 Presented by Simon King and Peter Humpherson Pickerings Solicitors LLP 23rd October 2014.
The Disciplinary Procedure Presented by Paula Fisher Practical HR Ltd.
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
Cost Effective Dispute Resolution Alana Dowley Legal Services Director Contract Intelligence Pty Ltd.
Courts and Alternative Dispute Resolution
Workshop on the Swiss Rules 2012 The Arbitral Proceedings under the Swiss Rules 2012 Prague, 5 October 2012 Czech Bar Association.
Civil Procedure Responding to a Claim.
Motion to Compel A party is entitled to secure discovery from another party without court intervention.
Comparative Law Spring 2002 Professor Susanna Fischer CLASS 29 GERMAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE III FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 26, 2002.
N ORTHERN M ARIANA I SLANDS R ULES FOR M ANDATORY A LTERNATIVE D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION.
European payment order Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
Civil Rules Update Denton County Bench-Bar Conference April 25-26, 2013 Justice Phil Johnson Texas Supreme Court 1.
The Employment Act 2008 – A Critical Overview Dispute Resolution & Tribunal Procedures: Overview of the New Procedures IER Conference 2009 _______________________.
How does the BAT Procedure work? A Guide to Arbitration Procedures before the Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (BAT)
An Overview of the Hearing Process Before the Environmental Review Tribunal April
LITIGATION COSTS IN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS AND PRINCIPLE OF OBJECTIVE INVESTIGATION MARTA OŠLEJA LEGAL DEPARTMENT,
Comparative Law Spring 2003 Professor Susanna Fischer FRENCH CIVIL PROCEDURE March 20, 2003.
Implementing the new Human Rights Code: The Tribunal’s Perspective David A. Wright Associate Chair, Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario – Social Justice Tribunals.
Small claims procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of European Parlament and of the Council of 11 July establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
Navigating the Ontario Court System By Joel Levitt Fryer Levitt Lawyers 421 Eglinton Avenue West, Suite 2 Toronto, Ontario, M5N 1A4.
Residential Eviction Quick Guide Due Process and Summary Procedure.
KEY EMPLOYMENT & DISCRIMINATION CASES 2010 Alison Collins 9 th February 2011.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
MODES OF DISCOVERY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Legal Forms Group 3 Summary.
Court Procedures Chapter 3.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Supreme Court civil pre-trial procedures: an overview
EDAD 520 Legal and Ethical Foundations of Educational Leadership.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
SERN/EHRC Conference 2015 Running the case – a practical guide to preparing a discrimination case for the Employment Tribunal Presented by Peter O’Donnell.
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 5 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
Primary Changes To The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Effective December 1, 2015 Presented By Shuman, McCuskey, & Slicer, PLLC.
Employment Act 2008 IER Conference 2009 _______________________.
1 English Legal System Civil court reforms. 2 Civil courts Civil reform Thermawear V Linton (1995) CA as per Lord Justice Henry, “…the adversarial system.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
CHAPTER 12: NEGOTIATIONS, MEDIATION, AND HEARINGS Emond Montgomery Publications 1.
FEES IN THE ET & THE EAT & NEW PROVISIONS ON COSTS Paul Stevenson.
LAW SOCIETY OF ZIMBABWE Managing labour Disputes G Makings Legal Practitioner.
1 Diocesan Canonical Changes Duncan A. Bayne Vice-chancellor Diocese of Olympia Title IV.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
ARBITRATION ACT. Challenge of arbitrator The appointment of an arbitrator may be challenged on the issues of – (i) impartiality, – (ii) independence,
Exclusions and Reviews. Key Points Permanent exclusion should only be used as last resort Decision to exclude must be lawful reasonable and fair A permanent.
CCA Adjudication Cashflow, or fair dispute resolution, or both? Opportunities for Improvement in the Act and adjudication procedure Peter Degerholm AMINZ.
Tax Court system in Germany The role of the Federal Tax Court
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
ARBITRATION AWARD.
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
The Courts: Procedure and damages for negligence cases
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Trial before court of session
Appeal Code Changes Delynn Coldiron, City Clerk; Brad Yatabe, Legal
VAT Module 10 (b) VAT Administration and Compliance
Presentation transcript:

Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 Peter O’Donnell, Thompsons, Solicitors

Relevant Legislation  Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Rules in Schedule 1 Intended to be simpler – 2004 Rules had 61 Rules and 2013 has 106 Rules  Came into effect on 29 July 2013 Except new power to make practice directions under Reg 11  In effect 1 July 2013  If respondent receives ET1 before 29 July then 2004 Rules apply to any counter-claim

Practice Directions  Renews power of the President to make practice directions Including in relation to judicial mediation  Can include different provisions for different cases, different areas or different types of proceedings

Prescribed Forms  Secretary of State has power to prescribe forms – Regulation 12  Reg 12(2) - Prescribed forms do not need to be used where:- Case referred by a court Where ET is acting as appellate court Claims under s11 ERA (statement of particulars)

Overriding objective  Rule 2 – same formulation as before Ensure parties on equal footing Deal with case proportionately Avoid unnecessary formality and seek flexibility Avoid delay Save expense  ET must give effect to objective and parties must assist in that  Rule 3 – ET to encourage use of ADR At odds with decision to charge fee for judicial mediation

Time – Rule 4  A requirement for an act to be done by a particular day may be done at any time before midnight Unless otherwise specified  If act requires to be done on a day other than a working day then it is done in time if done on the next working day ie weekend, Xmas day, Good Friday etc  Day of event is not included in calculation of time Within certain number of days of event or not less than certain number of days before/after  Rule 5 – power to extend or shorten time

Non-compliance/Irregularities – Rule 6  Failure to comply with Rules or order of ET will not of itself render proceedings void Except order under Rule 38 or 39 – unless or deposit orders  ET can take action about non-compliance Eg strike out, expenses etc

Presenting the claim(1)  Rule 8 – Must use prescribed form and include minimum info Claimant and respondent name & address  Online application currently has restricted format for address Will be rejected under Rule 10  If substantive pleading is longer than one page allowed for online application then can attach a paper apart  Presidential Direction  Claim to be presented by post, by hand or online  Rule 9 – 2 or more claimants can use same form if claims based on same set of facts If wrong then treated as irregularity under Rule 6

Presenting the claim(2)  Must include fee or remission application Or will be rejected under Rule 11 If fee paid is less than fee payable then claimant will be given time to pay balance before claim rejected If remission rejected then claimant will be given time to pay If using online application then can tick box stating making remission application  Will be taken to online remission form  Given 7 days to lodge hard copy evidence to support application

Substantive Defects  Claim can be rejected under Rule 12 if It is one that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear It is in a form that cannot sensibly be responded to or an abuse of process  Rule 13 allows for reconsideration Grounds  Decision was wrong  Defect can be rectified Must be made within 14 days  Include request for hearing in application

Response – Rule 16  Must be on prescribed form and include minimum information (eg name and address, whether resisting claim) Failure to use form or provide minimum info will mean response is rejected – Rule 17  Can include response to more than 1 claim or response from more than 1 respondent on same ET3 – Rule 16(2) & (3)  Response will be rejected if presented late – Rule days  Similar provisions for reconsideration of rejection – Rule 19

Response - Extension of time  Rule 20 allows for application to extend time to lodge response  Can be made before or after time limit expires If time limit expired a copy of the response must be provided (or explanation why it cannot)  Must be copied to claimant 7 days to object

Rule 21 – No response  If no response, response rejected or employer does not contest claim  EJ can decide whether they can make determination on info available and if so make a judgment  Otherwise a hearing shall be fixed Respondent entitled to Notice of any hearing but not to participate  Except to extent allowed by Judge

Counter-Claim  Rule 23 – must be made as part of response  Can be rejected on same basis as claim  Claimant must respond within 28 days of the date ET3 sent to them

Initial Consideration – Rule 26  EJ will consider all documents to confirm that there are arguable claims and defence Can make order for further information to be provided  Can dismiss claim/response or part of claim/response – Rule 27/28 Must give reasons Must give notice that dismissal will take place on certain date unless written representations made why should not be dismissed If response being dismissed make Order as to effect  If no dismissal then can make case management orders including listing of preliminary or full hearing etc

Case Management Order  Broad power in Rule 29  Rule 30 deals with how parties make an application Similar to current provisions Still requirement to copy to other side – Rule 92  Rule 31 – disclosure of document  Rule 32 – attendance to give evidence, produce documents or provide further info  Rule 34 – add, remove or substitute parties  Rule 35 – permit other persons to participate where they have legitimate interest

Lead Cases – Rule 36  New (express) power to specify one claim as a lead claim and sist others Common or related issues of fact or law  Decision on issues on lead case is binding on other parties  Non-lead party can apply for order that decision does not bind them 28 days

Other Case Management Powers  Rule 37 – Power to strike out Similar to power under 2004 rules  Rule 38 – Unless Orders  Rule 39 – Deposit Orders Increase to max of £1000  Rule 40 – non-payment of fees If fee not paid or remission application not made then ET will send notice of date to comply If not complied with by date then automatic dismissal of claim, counter-claim, application or judicial mediation  But not response

Rules Common to All Hearings(1)  Rule 41 sets out, general, broad power for ET to regulate own procedure  Rule 42 requires any party not attending and relying on written representations to lodge those not less than 7 days before hearing  Rule 43 – any witness statement is taken as evidence in chief Unless ET orders otherwise  Rule 45 – power for ET to impose time limits on parties in leading evidence, cross and making submissions

Common Rules (2)  Rule 46 – power to conduct hearings by electronic communications Just & equitable to do so  Rule 48 – can convert preliminary hearing to full hearing and vice versa No material prejudice to parties  Rule 50 – privacy & restrictions on disclosure Broader power than before Interests of justice or the protect Convention rights Must give full weight to principle of open justice and freedom of expression Party or person with legitimate interest can made representations for order to be revoked or discharged

Withdrawal & Dismissal  Automatic dismissal of withdrawn claims under Rule 52 unless:- Claimant must express wish to reserve right at time of withdrawal and ET consider it is legitimate to do so Not in interests of justice

Preliminary hearings  Replace CMDs and PHRs  Rules  ET has same powers as had at PHR Case management Deposit, striking out etc Preliminary issue  Judge alone Unless considering preliminary issue and party makes written request – Judge considers it desirable

Judgements  Rule 62 – ET must give reasons on any disputed issue  Rule 64 – provision for consent order/judgments  Rule 65 – Judgment takes effect on day given  Rule 66 – 14 days to comply with judgment or order for payment of money Unless different date specified  Rule 69 – correction of clerical errors or slips

Reconsideration  Replaces Reviews  Rules  Only single ground for application Interests of justice  14 days to apply from date written decision sent to parties  Procedure set out in Rule 72

Costs & Preparation Time Orders  Rules  Very similar to 2004 rules  Increase of sum that can be ordered without assessment to £20,000  Power to order reimbursement of fees Rule 75(1)(b) – test in Rule 76(4)

Miscellaneous  Rules – Delivery of Documents Expressly allows for delivery by electronic means  Rule 99 – transfer of proceedings between Scotland and England