The fossil record 2
The fossil record 2 What is a fossil? Where do we find fossils? Why study fossils? Palaeobiology Geochronology Palaeoenvironments/climates How are fossils formed? Types of fossil preservation Quality of the fossil record
Taphonomy - ‘fossilization’ The manner and cause of death Processes of decay and decomposition Transportation of fossils/potential fossils Burial of remains Diagenesis of remains
NB text-book, p. 8-17
Taphonomic information life position, clustering articulation, breakage, sorting, orientation population structure - age and size frequency trace fossils sedimentology
Types of preservation ‘Unaltered’ remains Altered remains Imprints Soft parts - very rare Freezing Mummification amber, etc. Hard parts Altered remains Petrifaction Permineralization Recrystallization Replacement Carbonization Imprints Moulds/casts impressions Tracks, trails and burrows
Unaltered remains - freezing 1999
Unaltered remains - freezing Lyuba (age 4 months, 40kya old) - discovered in 2007 in Siberian permafrost
Unaltered remains - freezing Dima (age 7 months, 40kya old) - discovered in 1977 by gold diggers in a lump of ice near the Kirgilyakh Creek
Unaltered remains - amber Oligocene (~30Ma) amber, Baltic
Unaltered remains - amber Oligocene (~30Ma) amber, Baltic
Altered remains - permineralization Triassic (~230 Ma) trees, Petrified Forest NP, Arizona
Altered remains - recrystallization NB. mineralogy is unchanged gastropod/snail
Altered remains - replacement, e.g. aragonite to calcite Peronoceras fibulatum Placenticeras meeki ammonites
Altered remains - replacement, e.g. aragonite to pyrite Jurassic (135-205 Ma) ammonites
Altered remains - carbonization fossil fern frond (Neuropteris)
Imprints - moulds and casts internal mould external mould imprints
Chemical/molecular fossils degree of alteration may be difficult to determine
Quality of the fossil record Chances of fossilization Soft parts vs. hard parts Lagerstätten Biases Sedimentary environment e.g. marine vs. continental Stratigraphic bias older rocks - less exposure, tectonized Collection bias towards commonest and most accessible sedimentary facies (~environments) NB. oldest ocean crust 165 m.y.
Chances of fossilization ~60% of marine animals are soft bodied and usually unrepresented in the fossil record (NB shell and coral carbonate is also broken down by bioerosions - up to 60% in coral reef settings) Discalioides jellyfish, Oligocene, Provence, Southern France
Chances of fossilization marine vs. continental environments + scavengers, decomposition
Lagerstätten deposits of exceptional value - conservation - concentration Solnhofen (Jurassic, S Germany) - a conservation lagerstätte Shrimp - Aeger tipularius
Lagerstätten Solnhofen (Jurassic, S Germany) Dragonfly - Libellulium
Lagerstätten Solnhofen (Jurassic, S Germany)
Lagerstätten Messel (Eocene, Germany) beetle
Lagerstätten Messel (Eocene, Germany) snake
Lagerstätten Messel (Eocene, Germany) Fish - Cyclurus kehreri
Lagerstätten Messel (Eocene, Germany) Turtle - Allaeochelys crassesculptata
Lagerstätten Messel (Eocene, Germany) Mammal - Propalaeotherium parvulum Messel (Eocene, Germany)
Lagerstätten Messel (Eocene, Germany) Marsupial - Leptictidium nasutum
Lagerstätten Messel (Eocene, Germany) Bat - Archaeonycteris trigonodon
Lagerstätten Holzmaden (Jurassic, Germany) marine reptile - ichthyosaur Holzmaden (Jurassic, Germany)
Quality of the fossil record Chances of fossilization Soft parts vs. hard parts Lagerstätten Biases Sedimentary environment e.g. marine vs. continental Stratigraphic bias older rocks - less exposure, tectonized Collection bias towards commonest and most accessible sedimentary facies oldest ocean crust 165 m.y. UP TO HERE!!
Stratigraphic bias
Collection bias e.g. oceans vs. shelf sediments Europe vs. Asia, etc.
Quality of the fossil record - biases but ……
Quality of the fossil record Palaeobiology and the Fossil Record Benton & Harper
Quality of the fossil record ‘corrected’ for sampling biases Sepkoski data PBDB data Alroy et al. 2008, Science