발표논문 1. Self-efficacy Changes in groups: effects of diversity, leadership, and group climate Choi, Price, & Vinokur, JOB, 2003 경영학과 인사조직전공 이지혜 Multilevel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Organizational Behavior?
Advertisements

Within- and Between-group Agreement in Supervisors Evaluative Behaviours: Do evaluative styles exist? Jan Noeverman Erasmus School of Economics Department.
Impact of Organizational Justice on Job Performance in Libraries: Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange Relationship Sidra Shan International Islamic.
Chapter 8 Managing Change and Innovation
1 Work in the 21 st Century Chapter 13 Teams in Organizations Ryan McVay/Getty Images.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Organizational Behavior
The Effects of Achievement Priming on Expectations and Performance Kathryn Raso Team 14 PSY 321.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
Chapter 6 Groups and Teams. Copyright © 2006 by Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 2 Purpose and Overview Purpose –To understand effective.
Changes to the economic and industrial marketplace have resulted in the emergence of virtual teams and flatter structures. Given the changing work structures,
High Involvement Management, Work Enrichment, Well-being and Productivity: An Analysis using WERS2004 Stephen Wood Institute of Work Psychology September.
ADM Leadership Lecture 23 – Culture and Leadership.
©© Disentangling Diversity and Inclusion in Organizations Quinetta M. Roberson, Ph.D. Human Resource Studies, ILR Cornell University NSF Workshop on “A.
Organizations FIGURE 4 - 1: INDIVIDUAL - BEHAVIOR FRAMEWORK
Madeline McGarey COM 339.  Junior Organizational Speech Communication major  Study buddy: Shannon Gallagher  Learning objectives: ◦ Enhance my knowledge.
Introduction: The Nature of Leadership
1 Safety Culture/Safety Climate and the Impact on Employee Safety in the Health Care Environment Robyn R.M. Gershon, MT, MHS, DrPH Mailman School of Public.
CHAPTER 12 Leadership Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology by Ronald E. Riggio.
Virtual teams These are teams that work together and solve problems through computer-based interactions. What are some benefits? Drawbacks? They save time,
Organizational Behavior 15th Ed
Introduction to Organizational Behavior
Transformational leadership, goal difficulty, and job design: Independent and interactive effects on employee outcomes Article Presentation Course 614.
Organizational Training Climate and Employees' Perception and Acceptance of Competency-based E-learning at the Workplace Bo Cheng, Minhong Wang Faculty.
1309 S. Babcock St #186 Melbourne, FL Phone: Website:
THE IMPACT OF COMPUTER SELF-EFFICACY AND TECHNOLOGY DEPENDENCE ON COMPUTER-RELATED TECHNOSTRESS: A SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY PERSPECTIVE Qin Shu, Qiang Tu.
Danielle Varda & Carrie Chapman University of Colorado at Denver, School of Public Affairs.
Leadership Chapter 9 Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 9/e
The relationship between trust, HRM practices and firm performance Dr. Shay S. Tzafrir University of Haifa, Israel.
The Role of Team Efficacy and Coaching on the Relationships between Distributive and Procedural Justice and Job Engagement Yoonhee Cho Department of Business.
Proposal Presentation. Introduction - Not much studied - Topical - Likely to continue into future - High level of political interference - Problem w/
McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Fourteen Transformational Leadership.
MGT 291C-B. Researching “value” Researching empowerment Connecting value to empowerment and empowerment to commitment.
Understanding Work Teams
Abstract: This study investigated organizational factors that motivate employees. Organizational scholars are interested in understanding how expectations.
Competitive Swimmers’ Interpretation of Motivational Climate Rebecca C. Trenz, M.A. Fordham University Psychology of Motivation.
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Lesson Objectives At the end of this lecture, you should:
Introduction Disordered eating continues to be a significant health concern for college women. Recent research shows it is on the rise among men. Media.
Janis L. Whitlock Cornell University.   Previous research show that human beings develop in multiple social ecologies but school connectedness and the.
Surveying instructor and learner attitudes toward e-learning Presenter: Jenny Tseng Professor: Ming-Puu Chen Date: April 12, 2008 Liaw, S., Huang, H.,
11-1 Leadership 06 May 2013 Chapter 11 Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 10/e Stephen P. Robbins/Timothy A. Judge.
Copyright ©2016 Pearson Education, Inc. 5-1 Essentials of Organizational Behavior 13e Stephen P. Robbins & Timothy A. Judge Chapter 5 Personality and Values.
Stephen Miller M.A. Division of Behavioral & Organizational Sciences, Claremont Graduate University Factors Associated With Higher Levels of Health Self.
Discussion Results Introduction From Lateral to Leader: A Study of Preschoolers’ Relationships with Peers Erin Podgorski & Dr. Carin L. Neitzel, The University.
BUS 660 Entire Course (2 Sets) For more course tutorials visit This Tutorial contains 2 Sets of Papers for each Assignment (Check Details.
What Is Leadership? © 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Leadership The ability to influence a group toward the achievement of goals Management.
California State University, Long Beach
Group 2: Absenteeism (which is actually Group 1 in a cunning disguise)
Work-family conflict and job turnover
MANAGEMENT RICHARD L. DAFT.
Training and Career Development
David Brougham & Associate Professor Jarrod Haar University of Waikato
Perceived Risk and Anthropogenic Environmental Change
Organizational Behavior
Organizational Behavior
Organizational Behavior
Organizational Behavior
Organizational Behavior
Organizational Behavior
BUS 660 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
BUS 660 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
BUS 660 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
BUS 660 Inspiring Innovation-- snaptutorial.com
Aidyn L. Iachini a, Allie Riley b, and Dawn Anderson-Butcher b
CHAPTER 13 Leadership Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology by Ronald E. Riggio.
Lesson 2: The Theories of Leadership
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook
Macau University of Science and Technology
Grace Orlyn SITOMPUL 5th ISC – Oct 30-31, 2017 APIU
Work in the 21st Century Chapter 13
Presentation transcript:

발표논문 1. Self-efficacy Changes in groups: effects of diversity, leadership, and group climate Choi, Price, & Vinokur, JOB, 2003 경영학과 인사조직전공 이지혜 Multilevel Analysis

Introduction Purpose of current research  How different group characteristics influences changes in self-efficacy of individual members.  Two separate routes of group influence on individuals are tested simultaneously. - Discretionary stimuli/individual level process - Ambient stimuli/cross level process 2

Background theories Different types of group stimuli (Hackman, 1992)  Discretionary stimuli - transmitted or made available to individuals differentially and selectively at the discretion of the other group members - Examples: messages of approval or disapproval, role negotiation or differentiation, LMX - bears significance only for the target recipient  Ambient stimuli - available to all group members and pervade the group setting. - Examples :group composition, shared group norms, climate, task environment. 3

Background theories Hypotheses developments  Diversity in group composition - diversity in group members’ social characteristics  interaction patterns & ind/group performance - ambient group stimuli  Supportive LDS & positive leader perception - Supportive leader behavior  trusting group environment, perception of psychological safety, more frequent positive feedback - Discretionary stimuli  Open group climate & positive group perception - open group climate  allows experimentation w/new ways of doing things, new skills w/o fear of appraisal, frequent&open exchanges of feedback - Positive group perception : perceive the group as psy. Safe environment - Ambient stimuli 4

Background theories Hypotheses Hypothesis 1: Group diversity in age, gender, race, and education is positively related to increases in job-search efficacy subsequent to the group workshop. Hypothesis 2a: Supportive leadership and positive leader perceptions are positively related to increases in job-search efficacy subsequent to the group workshop. Hypothesis 2b: Group-level aggregated supportive leadership and positive leader perception are unrelated to increases in job-search efficacy subsequent to the group workshop. Hypothesis 3a: Open group climate and positive group perceptions are positively related to increases in job-search efficacy subsequent to the group workshop. Hypothesis 3b: Group-level aggregated open group climate and positive group perception are positively related to individual members’ increases in job-search efficacy subsequent to the group workshop. 5

Method Sample - Collected from participants who attended a standardized group workshop offered by three organizations - Final sample: 1202 individuals in 169 groups - Average group size: 11.8 participants (range: 3 ~ 23) - Data collected at T1(pre-test) and T2(post-test). Measurement - Demographic variables (T1)  diversity in group composition - Supportive leadership and positive leader perception (T2) - Open group climate and positive group perception (T2)  Aggregation of leader and group characteristic variables (by using means) - Increases in job-search efficacy: dependent variable (T1 and T2) 6

Method Analytic strategy: HLM - Attend to variables at three levels of analysis 1) Within-individual level Trajectory of individual changes from pre-(T1) to post-(T2) measures 7

Method Analytic strategy: HLM - Attend to variables at three levels of analysis 2) Individual level Involves individual factors: age, race, etc. + individual experiences with the group Question: whether disparate group experiences actually produce different rates of change in job- search efficacy over time 8

Method Analytic strategy: HLM - Attend to variables at three levels of analysis 3) Group level Entails features of the group workshop, such as membership diversity  Current analysis, entered group-level variables, to predict individual changes in job search self-efficacy 9

Result HLM analysis  H1 supported: of the four, diversity in education was positively significant  H2a & H2b supported: LDS -individual level process  H3a & H3b supported: group climate -both individual level and cross-level process 10 H2a H3a H1 H2b H3b

발표논문 2. The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: aggregating across people and time Pirola- Merlo & Mann, JOB, 2004 경영학과 인사조직전공 이지혜 Multilevel Analysis

Introduction  Research question How the creativity of individual team member is related to team creativity? Influence of organization and team climate for creativity in the workplace on individual and team creativity.  Previous literature Many organizations have turned to team-based work systems to increase their ability to foster innovation Such org, need to not only foster ind.creativity, but also develop team creativity However, it is unclear how organizational support for creative teams differs from support for creative individuals Previous studies tend to use as outcomes either only individual creativity or only group creativity  The present study uses both level of creativity measures to investigate the relationship between creativity at these two levels + the impact of org, and team climate for creativity 12

Background theories Team creativity as an Aggregate of creativity across individuals  Relationship between individual creativity and the creativity of group- produced outcomes can be as in below three types 1) Additive 2) Disjunctive 3) Between  The proposal that team creativity is influenced and to some extent determined by individual/creativity seems uncontroversial  However… - Is team crt is completely determined by individual’s? - Is team crt same as the total of the members’ crt? 13

Background theories Hypotheses developments  Emergence of team climate H1: Measures of climate for creativity will show high within-group agreement and significant variance attributable to team membership.  The impact of climate on individual creativity H2: Team-level measures of climate for creativity will significantly predict ratings of team member creativity.  The relationship between team member creativity and team creativity H3: Team creativity will be positively correlated with average team member creativity. H4: Scores on climate for creativity will have a significant relation with a time-general measure of team creativity, even after accounting for the effect of recent team member creativity. 14

Background theories Hypotheses developments  The relationship between team member creativity and team creativity H5a: Climate for creativity will not significantly predict recent team creativity after accounting for the effect of recent team member creativity. H5b: Climate for creativity will not significantly predict recent team member creativity after accounting for the effect of recent team creativity.  The aggregation of monthly creativity towards the creativity of project outcomes H6: The creativity of final project outcomes will be positively correlated with monthly ratings of team creativity, and with the average of monthly creativity ratings. 15

Background theories Research model 16

Method Sample - Collected from 15 divisions of 4 large R&D organizations in AU - Final sample: 319 employees in 54 teams - Average team size: 6.9 people (range: 2 ~ 18) - Sent a set of questionnaires each month for 1 year  Only the first 9 months are reported. (Low response in final 3) - Time 1: Creativity climate + Individual & Team creative performance - Time 2 ~ 12: Only creativity measures Measurement - Team climate for innovation (T1)  Participative safety  Support for innovation  Task orientation  vision - Organizational encouragement of innovation (T1) - Individual and team creativity  Recent team member creativity (Each month)  Recent team creativity (Each month)  Time-general creativity (T1:climate measurement time)  Creativity of project outcome (six months after the study) 17

Method Analytic strategy: HLM - Relationship between climate and individual creativity was tested (individual level) - Uses team-level predictors to account for between-groups variance at the individual level (team-level) ↑The impact of climate on individual creativity The relationship between team member creativity and team creativity → 18

Result – Part1 19

Result – Part2 ① Team creativity could be explained by aggregation processes ② Team climate influences team creativity directly 20

Critic Choi et al. (2003) - Superiority of current model above alternative model: another possible group process variables - Data measurement issue : 5-day workshop groups - Centering issue Pirola-merlo & Mann (2004) - Data driven approach of selecting the highest correlated variable - Level 2a: Organizational encouragement of innovation - Level 2b: Organizational support for innovation - time as an additional? - Centering issues 21

Critic Pirola-merlo & Mann (2004) - Data driven approach of selecting the highest correlated variable - Level 2a: Organizational encouragement of innovation - Level 2b: Organizational support for innovation 22