FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.
Advertisements

Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
How to Evaluate Your Health Literacy Project Jill Lucht, MS Project Director, Center for Health Policy
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011 Billings, MT Data Collection Planning.
Chapter Three: Determining Program Components by David Agnew Arkansas State University.
Developing a Questionnaire. Goals Discuss asking the right questions in the right way as part of an epidemiologic study. Review the steps for creating.
Presentation Methods HPER )Understand Focus Population Assets & Needs  Needs Assessments  Provide direction for matching objectives to the selection.
Evaluation of Training and Education Activities. Objectives By the end of this presentation, participants will be able to List reasons why evaluation.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Coaching Workshop.
For more information, please contact Jonny Andia at 1.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Qualitative Research MKTG 3342 Fall 2008 Professor Edward Fox.
Introduction to Survey Research. What kind of data can I collect? Factual Knowledge Factual Knowledge Cognitive Beliefs or Perceptions Cognitive Beliefs.
CONDUCTING PROGRAM EVALUATIONS FOR FEDERAL PROGRAMS Brooke Blair, ALSDE Mark Ward, ALSDE Erin McCann, SEDL Mary Lou Meadows, SEDL.
Administrator Checklist Research and Training Center on Service Coordination.
Needs Analysis Session Scottish Community Development Centre November 2007.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Process Evaluation Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011 Billings, MT.
Opioid Misuse Prevention Program “OMPP” Strategic Planning Workshop
Topic 4 How organisations promote quality care Codes of Practice
Presented by Becky Leiter, EC Consultant.  Who are we?  Supervisors  Home Visitors  Nurses  Family Workers  Parents.
The Evaluation Plan.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
Lecture 8A Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations English Study Program FKIP _ UNSRI
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Building a Toolkit of Skills and Resources Sarah Lampe, Rebecca Rapport & Mary Wold Paige Backlund Jarquín.
Ensuring Fair and Just Schools: a focus on Evidence-based, Preventive Interventions at the School and District Level Oakland Unified School District A.
Module 2 Stakeholder analysis. What’s in Module 2  Why do stakeholder analysis ?  Identifying the stakeholders  Assessing stakeholders importance and.
Caregiver Resource & Development Project (CARED Presented by Janet Mwitiki and Maggie Kamau-Biruri Kenya.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Chapter 6 Determining System Requirements. 2 2 What are Requirements? “Requirements are … a specification of what should be implemented. They are descriptions.
Qualitative Research an inquiry process of understanding a social or human problem based on building a complex, holistic picture formed with words, reporting.
The importance of a preliminary analysis in the course production process Prepared by: Beatrice Ghirardini, Chiara Nicodemi, Fabiana Biasini Instructional.
EVALUATION OF HRD PROGRAMS Jayendra Rimal. The Purpose of HRD Evaluation HRD Evaluation – the systematic collection of descriptive and judgmental information.
Communicating Culture interviewing. Interviewing: Definition  Interviewing is a meeting of two persons to exchange information and ideas through questions.
TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT Dr. Anil Mehta DEFINITION OF TRAINING “A PLANNED ACTIVITY TO MODIFY ATTITUDE, KNOWLEDGE OR SKILL THROUGH LEARNING EXPERIENCE TO.
Kendall & KendallCopyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall4-1 Interactive Methods to collect Information Requirements Interviewing.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Facilitate Group Learning
Facts and Figuring it Out How to Complete the Healthy School Report Card.
The Curriculum Development Process Dr. M
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Designing Effective Trainings 1. Steps to Creating Learning Objectives At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Identify ways to get.
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
New Supervisors’ Guide To Effective Supervision
Research Methods Observations Interviews Case Studies Surveys Quasi Experiments.
By: Dalila Ochoa Mary S Garcia
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
The purpose of evaluation is not to prove, but to improve.
1 Key Roles of River Basin Planners Integrators of Knowledge and People Trade-offs analysts and presenters Communicators and Facilitators CORE COMPETENCIES.
Training on Safe Hospitals in Disasters Module 3: Action Planning for “Safe Hospitals”
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
4 th Biennial SAMEA Conference Meaningful Evaluation: Improving Use and Results Evaluation of Teacher-Directed ICT Initiatives Presenter Mokete Mokone.
Pharmacy in Public Health: Community Health Course, date, etc. info.
PROMOTING SPECIALTY CROPS AS LOCAL Module 5: How do you talk to consumers about your locally grown food? – Part 1.
Improved socio-economic services for a more social microfinance.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Provide instruction.
Training on Infection Prevention and Control
Planning a Learning Unit
Presentation transcript:

FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT

Session Goal To provide participants with a basic knowledge of formative evaluation and its use when developing an injury prevention program.

Describe the purpose of formative evaluation Describe several formative evaluation methods Provide resources for each formative evaluation method Session Objectives

The 4 Stages of Evaluation Review Formative  Will this work? Process  Are we doing what we set out to do? Impact  Can we see any changes? Outcome  Have we reduce injuries?

The 4 Stages of Evaluation Review Process Evaluation Impact Evaluation Outcome Evaluation Long-term: Timely Feedback Baseline Data Collection Project Implementation Pre-TestingMonitoring Health Outcomes Looks at Changes in Target Audience Formative Evaluation Short-term: Knowledge, Attitudes & Practice

Formative Evaluation Defined The process of testing and /or obtaining expert review of program plans, messages, materials, strategies, or modifications, for weaknesses and strengths before they are put into effect.

Formative Evaluation Purpose Get target audience perception of the possible interventions Gain community support Ensure program materials & activities are acceptable or culturally appropriate Identify problems with program concepts or design Used in conjunction with process evaluation

Formative Evaluation When to Conduct New program New materials Existing program is:  modified,  having problems, or  adapted for a new setting, population, problem, or behavior Ongoing at all stages of program

Formative Evaluation Who to Involve - Stakeholders The people with a vested interest in a program and the future use of its evaluation

Formative Evaluation Categories of Stakeholders Implementers Partners Participants Decision makers

Formative Evaluation Stakeholders Example: Car seat distribution program Who should we include? Implementers Partners Participants Decision makers

Formative Evaluation Data Collection Methods 1.Focus Groups 2.Key Informant Interviews 3.Town Hall Meetings 4.Expert Reviews 5.Surveys

Formative Evaluation Focus Groups - Purpose To gather information on a particular topic by conducting an informal discussion between 6 to 10 individuals similar to target population

Formative Evaluation Focus Groups 8 Important Steps Secret Ingredients: -Focus group similar in makeup to target population -Requires an experienced facilitator

Formative Evaluation Key Informant Interviews - Purpose To obtain detailed information by asking broad open-ended questions and by probing interviewee

Formative Evaluation Key Informant Interviews 7 Important Steps Secret Ingredients: -Take care to select informants with various points of view -Remember to first establish rapport

KEY INFORMANT EXERCISE Scenario: Local IPS is seeking to determine attitudes and beliefs about ATV related injuries and possible interventions. They will interview two key community members.

Formative Evaluation Town Hall Meetings - Purpose To gather a diverse group of community members together to think and talk about an issue

Formative Evaluation Town Hall Meetings 8 important steps Special Ingredients  Plan early  Make sure there is plenty of time for interaction between audience and presenters

Formative Evaluation Expert Reviews - Purpose To identify mistakes, concerns, and general areas for improvement.

Formative Evaluation Expert Reviews 7 important steps Special Ingredients  The committee should be continuously involved in the process.  Include detailed instruction in the job description.

Formative Evaluation Surveys - Purpose To obtain SPECIFIC information from a targeted group of people using a set of defined questions.

Formative Evaluation Surveys 7 important steps Special Ingredients  Avoid overloading the survey  Design questionnaire such that its clear and simple.

Formative Evaluation Examples in IHS Sleep Safe and Ride Safe Curriculums – Focus Groups, Key Informant Interviews, Expert Review Animal Control Project - Surveys Child Passenger Safety Training - Expert Review IHS Area Injury Prevention Program Evaluations - Expert Review

Formative Evaluation Conclusion Formative evaluation  Tests program plans, messages, materials, strategies, or modifications for weaknesses and strengths before they are put into effect.  Allows the evaluator to probe the feelings, beliefs, and impressions of participants.  Generates community support for the proposed project or program.