A Healthy University: Getting Started

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Post 16 Citizenship Liz Craft Valuing progress Celebrating achievement.
Advertisements

Healthy Schools, Healthy Children?
RESPONSE TO THE THEMATIC EVALUATION: INCREASING WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP AND PARTICIPATION IN PEACE AND SECURITY AND IN HUMANITARIAN RESPONSE Saraswathi Menon,
Assessing student learning from Public Engagement David Owen National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Making the Links A Whole University Approach
Developing an Evaluation Strategy – experience in DFID Nick York Director – Country, Corporate and Global Evaluations, World Bank IEG Former Chief Professional.
Head of Learning: Job description
Embedding Public Engagement Sophie Duncan and Paul Manners National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement Funded by the UK Funding Councils, Research.
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
Awareness Raising Session. Aims for the Session To raise awareness of the context, rationale, aims and objectives and outcomes of the CRED Policy.
Student Induction Student Representation
Public engagement and lifelong learning: old wine in a new bottle, or a blended malt? Paul Manners Director, National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement.
Professor Ian Anderson & Ms Debra Knoche Centre for Health & Society – Onemda VicHealth Koori Health Unit University of Melbourne National Workforce Strategy.
SAFER CITIES MODEL. SAFER CITIES TOOLS SAFER CITIES TRAINING MANUAL AND TOOLKIT Overall development objective is to facilitate effective strategy development.
Drug Awareness for Primary Schools Richard Boxer Drug Education Consultant Health & Well-Being Team (CSF) Safeguarding: Drug Education Richard Boxer, Drug.
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Recognition as a Professional Teacher in Higher Education: The Higher Education Academy professional recognition scheme Helen Barefoot Deputy Head of the.
1 Every Child Matters National and Local Perspectives Rolle College 29 th June 2007 Geoff Tew Devon CPD Adviser.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
QuestionsIndicative information / Evidence 1) Does your school have a vision for PE and school sport? Have you ensured that your school vision recognises.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Live Healthy Napa County Creating and Sustaining a Common Agenda.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Cross-sector collaboration for healthy urban environments Evaluating the protocol between Bristol City Council’s planning department and the local public.
Health Promoting Universities: Developments and Networking in Europe Dr Mark Dooris University of Central Lancashire Developing.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
Strategic Commissioning
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Student Partnership Agreement. Background QAA Chapter B5 – Expectation – ‘Higher education providers take deliberate steps to engage all students, individually.
Planning for Continuing Professional Development – A Whole School Approach A step by step guide to planning CPD including a framework for Teacher Induction.
STRATEGIC DIRECTION UPDATE JANUARY THE VISION AND MISSION THE VISION: ENRICHING LIVES AND CREATING SUCCESSFUL FUTURES. THE MISSION: EDUCATION EXCELLENCE.
Local Transport Plan 3 Vision and Issues. The Local Transport Plan Will replace LTP2, which expires 31 March must have LTP3 approved and operative.
Nef (the new economics foundation) Co-producing Lambeth what’s possible? Lucie Stephens and Julia Slay nef, October 2011.
1 Women Entrepreneurs in Rural Tourism Evaluation Indicators Bristol, November 2010 RG EVANS ASSOCIATES November 2010.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: University of Bath Roadmap for EPSRC Catherine Pink Institutional.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
MERTON LOCAL INVOLVEMENT NETWORK MEETING 27 March 2008 Richard Poxton Centre for Public Scrutiny National Team.
Governance and Commissioning Natalie White DCSF Consultant
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
A Better Start A bid for between £30 - £50million over 10 years, to achieve: A step change in outcomes for 0-3 year olds and their families, specifically.
Healthy Schools. The Strategic Aims of the Healthy Schools Programme: To support children and young people in developing healthy behaviours To help raise.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
The Higher Education Academy - enhancing the student experience Teaching, learning and the disability agenda Yvonne Dickinson Adviser: Disability NADO.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
An Introduction to Becoming a Commissioning Organisation 30 April 2012 APACE Commissioning Event Simon Marshall Offender Services Co-Commissioning Group.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Inspection and Sustainable Development Melanie Hunt Director, Learning & Skills.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Equality Standard Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Equality Standard Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Equality Delivery System (EDS2) 2015/18 Ricky Somal:
National Healthy School Standard The National Healthy School Standard is the result of a number of important policy drivers: Excellence In Schools (1997)
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
5-19 Children’s Public Health Service. Who are Provide? We provide a broad range of community services across Essex, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough,
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
Nursing for School aged children and young people.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Strategic Plan: Goals, Objectives & Success Measures Administrative Forum, South Campus June 17,
Grant Writing 2012 Grant Writing for Digital Projects September 2012 IODE Project Office IODE Project Office Oostende, Belgium Oostende, Belgium.
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
CILIP Performance Framework – Business metrics & KPI
Healthy UON The University of Newcastle Healthy University Initiative
SPHERE Study Visit: University of Edinburgh (October 2017)
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Student QEP Workshop Developing Student Engagement in Quality Assurance and Enhancement Eve Lewis Director.
Knowledge Translation
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Building Capacity for Quality Improvement A National Approach
Presentation transcript:

A Healthy University: Getting Started www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

What is a Healthy University? “aspires to create a learning environment and organisational culture that enhances the health, well-being and sustainability of its community and enables people to achieve their full potential.” www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

A Conceptual Model www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Underpinning Principles The Healthy University approach is underpinned by a range of core principles, which derive from the values that characterise higher education and public health. The integrity of the approach will be ensured by applying the following principles: Equality and diversity Participation and empowerment Partnership Sustainability Holistic and whole system health Evidence-informed and innovative practice Evaluation, learning and knowledge exchange www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Processes and Methods A ‘whole university approach’ combines high visibility health-related projects with system-level organisation development and change, balances multi-stakeholder engagement with high-level commitment and leadership, and is driven by both higher education and public health agendas. Adapted from Dooris, M. (2004) Joining up settings for health: a valuable investment for strategic partnerships? Critical Public Health 14 (1): 37-49. www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Typical Range of Activities Policy/procedures Needs assessments/audits Training Establishing Curriculum links Health Campaigns Project development External partnerships Service audits and developments www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

An Operational Process Monitoring & Evaluation Recognition & Celebration Working Groups Action Plan Delivery SMT Commitment & High Level Steering Group Named Co-ordinator Stakeholder asset mapping & needs assessment Entry Points/Catalysts: The approach also requires a proactive, systematic process that designates responsibilities and accountabilities, harnesses and connects health-related activities, and utilises an operational planning and implementation process. www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Stage 1: SMT Commitment This stage of the process includes: Formal SMT Commitment Decision on branding (if any) Formalisation of governance structures Consideration of how HU work can be embedded into university structures/strategies/planning Formulation of steering group with broad membership (eg faculties/schools, services, staff and students) Initial engagement of external partners in the steering group www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Stage 2: Named Coordinator This stage of the process includes: Consideration of where a Healthy University Coordinator would best be located within your organisation (see slides 17-19 for examples of healthy university structures) Decision about the level at which your coordinator will work, whether it is a full or part time role Decision about whether a the coordinator post is a new role, or existing role(s) within the organisation could be changed to reflect Healthy University work www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Stage 3: Assets & Needs Assessment This stage of the process includes: Decision about methods, resources and time available for an audit eg Focus groups, Team meetings, Questionnaires Identification any current audit information that relates to health Identification of internal and external stakeholders/partners Identification of current activity Identification of need – staff, students and wider community Securing buy-in and systems for on-going involvement www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Stage 4: Working Groups This stage of the process includes: Responding to mapping and audit by developing working group(s) that are action-focused groups determined by need – not ‘for own sake’ Following normal protocol for working groups, eg terms of reference, membership, timing, agreeing action plan Ensuring working groups are linked into governance structure(s) Consideration of who should lead/be on groups- Often the HU co-ordinator will facilitate groups but key members of steering group could also have this role www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Stage 5: Action Planning This stage of the process includes: Development of an action plan that fits into the institution's planning cycle. Each working group usually develops their own action plan feeding into a larger HU action plan Clarification of objectives, outcomes and evaluation Anticipation and connection to internal/external drivers and forging of links to relevant expertise Ensuring links to local and national targets Ensuring plans addresses local/national/ international standards and accreditation criteria www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Stage 6: Delivery This stage of the process includes: Ensuring your action plan is robust enough to support delivery and demonstrate ‘deliverables’ within a set timescale Identifying named leads and support/resources Regular reporting on progress through working groups and HU Steering Groups www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Stage 7: Monitoring & Evaluation This stage of the process includes: Planning for monitoring and evaluation – not an after-thought. Evaluation can be linked to external standards, e.g. Fair Trade Status, Clean Air Award Remembering the dual agendas – public health and ‘core business’ – and consideration of what counts as evidence in the setting Consideration of types of evaluation – not only to demonstrate outcomes, but to understand what works in which situations and why www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Stage 8: Recognition & Celebration This stage of the process includes: Internal and external dissemination of Healthy University achievements Inclusion of information into key university documents, prospectus, web pages, annual reports Write up of work into Case Study for HU website Write up of research/practice based work as journal articles www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Structure: UCLan www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk UCLan Strategic Planning/Committees Healthy University Staff & Student Well-being Healthy & Sustainable Food Alcohol & Drugs Chlamydia Bicycle User Group Environment & Sustainability UCLan Sport www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Structure: University of Bristol Planning & University Resource Committee Registrar Sport, Exercise & Health Advisory Group Healthy University Working Group Stress Action Group Food Action Group Drugs & Alcohol Action Group Active Campus Action Group Personal Staff Development Committee Positive Working Environment Steering Group Positive Working Environment Development Group www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Structure: Leeds Metropolitan University Leeds Student Health & Wellbeing Group (ext. partnership group) Leeds Metropolitan University Services to Students, Health Centre Health Faculty Carnegie Faculty of Sport www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Action Plan Example Nottingham Trent University: Sexual Health Theme To establish baseline data relevant to NTU students Strategic vision and partnership working To improve access to information on sexual health for students To improve access to sexual health services To review and develop this theme Dooris, M. and Doherty, S. (2009) National Research and Development Project on Healthy Universities: Final Report. London: Higher Education Academy Health Sciences and Practice Subject Centre www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

Action Plan Example Leeds Metropolitan University: Smoking and Alcohol To expand access to Leeds Stop Smoking Service To develop peer led smoking cessation interventions in university and college settings in line with NICE guidance To reduce alcohol/drug related harm in student population To continue to develop and expand 14-21 campaign To work with SU bars to encourage adoption of 'sensible drinking programme' and train staff to serve responsibly To develop drug use/harm reduction campaigns drawing on expertise of SU and agencies working in the field Dooris, M. and Doherty, S. (2009) National Research and Development Project on Healthy Universities: Final Report. London: Higher Education Academy Health Sciences and Practice Subject Centre www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk

References www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk Dooris, M. and Doherty, S. (2009) National Research and Development Project on Healthy Universities: Final Report. London: Higher Education Academy Health Sciences and Practice Subject Centre. Dooris, M. (2004) Joining up settings for health: a valuable investment for strategic partnerships? Critical Public Health 14 (1) www.healthyuniversities.ac.uk