Background, achievements and challenges in the external evaluation process of Oportunidades November 19 th, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública The Oportunidades Human Development Program: lessons learned José E. Urquieta Tegucigalpa, Honduras October 09, 2006.
Advertisements

Ministry of Education & Training. Background to Programme 31% of the total population of children are OVC Challenge is to keep the children in school.
IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre Friday 31st May Monitoring for Learning and developing Capacities in WASH.
SYSTEM OF EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL RESULTS-BASED BUDGETING THE CHILEAN EXPERIENCE Heidi Berner H Head of Management Control Division Budget Office,
MerSETA Strategic Plan Derrick Peo General Manager : Innovation, Research & Development.
Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.
The United States Agency for International Development USAID, the U.S. government’s agency for assistance, works in approximately 80 countries supporting.
REFORMS IN THE HEALTH CARE FINANCING The development OF health insurance system in albania ELVANA HANA GENERAL DIRECTOR III Balkanic Forum, Montenegro.
Roma Inclusion: Monitoring and Evaluation for Results November 2010, Brussels, Belgium – DG REGIONAL POLICY Joost de Laat (PhD), Economist, Human Development.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ USAID/MEXICO 2003.
A Logic Model for the Effective Implementation of Service Coordination: Culmination of Five Years of Research Michael Conn-Powers, Indiana University Julia.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Australia’s Experience in Utilising Performance Information in Budget and Management Processes Mathew Fox Assistant Secretary, Budget Coordination Branch.
Conditional Cash Transfers for Improving Utilization of Health Services Health Systems Innovation Workshop Abuja, January 25 th -29 th, 2010.
ZHRC/HTI Financial Management Training Session 1: Financial Management Overview.
Poverty Reduction Information Systems (PRIS)
The introduction of social workers in the primary health care system and its impact on the reduction of baby abandonment in Kazakhstan 10 September 2014,
THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN WELFARE MIX MODEL CREATION Best Practice Model Social Center "Home of colors"
A “SCORECARD” REPORT BY STATES Factors that Attract Venture Capital in Mexico.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Gender and Impact Evaluation
MEXICO ’ S PROGRESA PROGRAM: WHO BENEFITS? A Presentation by Deon Filmer Of Material by David Coady.
CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAMME PAKISTAN. Hypothesis CSP Pilot Hypothesis: linking additional cash support to the FSP families with children would force them.
PUENTE PROGRAM – BETWEEN THE FAMILY AND THEIR RIGHTS October, 2009.
Pablo Ibarrarán & Juan M. Villa Inter-American Development Bank Strategy Development Division Office of Strategic Planning and Development Effectiveness.
1 Targeting and Calibrating Educational Grants: Focus on Poverty or on Risk of Non-Enrollment? Elisabeth Sadoulet and Alain de Janvry University of California.
WHAT IS YOUNG LIVES? Young Lives is an international research project that is recording changes in child poverty over 15 years and the factors affecting.
Assessing the Capacity of Statistical Systems Development Data Group.
Key elements of evaluation as a decision making tool: the Specific Performance Evaluation (EED) experience in Mexico Author(s): Hortensia.
CONSISTENCY AND RESULTS EVALUATION IN MEXICO SEMPTEMBER 2008 Gonzalo Hernández Licona.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Shaping the Future of Social Protection: Access, Financing and Solidarity Panel 4 – Social programmes, human capital and inclusion Thirty-first session.
Ministry of Social Development SEDESOL Mexico Design and Evaluation of Social Programmes Gonzalo Hernandez, Gustavo Merino, Ana Santiago, Miguel Szekely.
Pilot Program: Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT) to Increase Girls’ Participation in Education Kano & Bauchi States, Nigeria Presented by Sadi Yahaya SESP.
Workshop on the Execution of IFAD Projects and Programmes General Recommendations regarding the Action Plan Bamako, 11 March 2005.
Advice on Data Used to Measure Outcomes Friday 20 th March 2009.
INTOSAI WORKING GROUP ON KEY NATIONAL INDICATORS Audit on Social Protection of Vulnerable Groups Mrs Ivanka Kesyakova, SAI Bulgaria Sofia, March.
1 REPUBLIC OF MOZAMBIQUE MINISTRY OF WOMAN AND SOCIAL ACTION “A policy dialogue and a south-south learning event on long term social protection and inclusive.
Land Market Based Interventions in LAC: Protierras in Bolivia Martín Valdivia.
Strategy on Prevention and Assistance to Unaccompanied Repatriated Migrant Boys, Girls, and Adolescents Community Leaders Regional Seminar on Integration.
Presented by Marites B. Lagarto NEDA Social Development Staff A Policy Dialogue & a South-South Learning Event on Long-Term Social Protection 13 October.
Dr. Miguel Székely, Deputy Minister for Social Developement Cape Town, South Africa, 2005.
Africa RISING M&E Expert Meeting Addis Ababa, 5-7 September 2012.
Priority policy directions for Ministry of Labour, Social Protection and Family.
Social inclusion of excluded young people and prevention of re-offending behavior
1 Validating Ex Ante Impact Evaluation Models: An Example from Mexico Francisco H.G. Ferreira Phillippe G. Leite Emmanuel Skoufias The World Bank PREM.
General Secretariat Organization of American States Development and Implementation of a Planning, Control and Evaluation System DPCE presentation to the.
Impact Evaluation of Urban Upgrading Programs Judy Baker, FEU November 19, 2007.
SEL1 Implementing an assessment – the Process Session IV Lusaka, January M. Gonzales de Asis and F. Recanatini, WBI
Evaluating Safety Net Programs Family Allowance Program-Honduras Oportunidades - Mexico Carola Alvarez, Inter-American Development Bank.
Human Development Program Oportunidades Financial Inclusion X Hemispheric Meeting Poverty and Social Protection Network, November 2008.
Conditional Cash Transfer Pilot Upper Egypt. Background Currently Egypt has a welfare regime that is comprehensive and generous but which has some limitations.
Policies to combat social exclusion: the case of Albania Forum on energy and poverty reduction strategies 26 June 2007  Athens.
Financing social protection 17 July 2009 Michael Samson UNICEF/ IDS Course on Social Protection.
DIRECCIÓN DE PLANEACIÓN Y NORMATIVIDAD DE LA POLÍTICA DE EVALUACIÓN An Independent Evaluation Unit in Mexico: CONEVAL Gonzalo Hernández Licona 2014.
SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.
Recovery and Reconstruction in India: Future Directions
MINISTRY OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ZIMBABW
Partnership with AFP in Latin America
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Audit & Risk Management
Collaborative Design for Smart Pupils STEM – IMPACT EVALUATION
Tracking development results at the EIB
11/18/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE – 02 MAY 2018.
Technical Cooperation Program Mexico-Canada: Performance Budgeting Agenda UNDERSECRETARY OF EXPENDITURE 1.
12/5/2018 ANNUAL performance PLAN (2018/19) NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Select COMMITTEE – 19 June 2018.
Monitoring and Evaluation for Poverty Reduction
Healthier Kids Foundation
Introduction to the training
Mr. Alper GÜCÜMENGİL Head of Projects Group, TURKSTAT
Presentation transcript:

Background, achievements and challenges in the external evaluation process of Oportunidades November 19 th, 2013

Background  The external evaluation process of Oportunidades (formerly PROGRESA) started at the same time the programme was implemented in rural and, eventually, urban areas.  In both areas: ­ The main objective of the evaluation process is to assess the fulfillment of its objectives and goals, as well as to determine its efficiency, effectiveness, operation and impact. ­ The external evaluation used panel data samples of households. ­ The external evaluation considered the full package of interventions among different age groups within the households, and did not take them separately (components). ­ Quantitative as well as qualitative approaches were considered in the evaluation process.

Background: Rural evaluation 1997: Original evaluation sample (randomized) Treatment (320 localities / 16,651 households) New control group 152 localities/ 6,728 selected households by matching Control – Late treatment (186 localities / 10,834 households)

Up to now 8 follow-up surveys: ENCEL 1998: March and October. ENCEL 1999: March and November. ENCEL 2000: March and November. ENCEL 2003: October – New control group. ENCEL 2007: October – Differences due to exposition time. More than 80 research papers: Increases in schooling and school attendance. Positive effects in income and increase in quality and variety of the diet in children and adults. Positive effects in children height (differences of more than 1 cm between beneficiaries and no-beneficiaries), reduction of anemin in children. Increase in health services usage. Reduction in disease days and disability. Reduction in youth risk behavior. Background: Rural evaluation

Background: Urban evaluation  Quasi-experimental methods: Propensity Score Matching (blocks).  17 states, 179 localities y 746 blocks.  States: Campeche, Chiapas, Colima, Guerrero, Guanajuato, Hidalgo, México, Michoacán, Morelos, Querétaro, Puebla, San Luis Potosí, Veracruz, Sinaloa, Sonora, Tabasco, Tamaulipas and Tlaxcala.  Methodology challenge : ­ The inclusion of households into the programme was made by self-selection. ­ Block boundaries are less clear than localities in rural areas.

Recent External Evaluation Framework The Performance Evaluation System (or SED in Spanish), is leaded by the Ministry of Finance, CONEVAL and the Ministry of Public Function. SED’s main objective is that budgetary decisions are taken considering sound and reliable information about the design, results and performance of social programmes, which stems from (i) external evaluation process and (ii) monitoring & supervision activities.. Results Based Budget (PbR) Performance Evaluation System (SED) Public expenditure quality management Programmes and Public Policy Evaluation Indicators Logical Framework Approach New management of the budget process Resources assigned by results Performance Evaluation System Components Source: SHCP. SED. Annual Evaluation Program (PAE)

Monitoring Today: Indicators Matrix Goal Contribute to brake the intergenerational transmission of poverty, by favoring the development of capacities associated to feeding, health and education of the beneficiary families of the Programme Purpose The beneficiary families of Oportunidades increase their capacities of feeding, heath and education Components School attendance certification of the scholarship holders in primary and secondary education School continuity certification of scholarship holders in high school education Promotion of the incorporation of schools with Oportunidades scholarship holders into the Quality Schools Programme Provision of health services Compliance certification in health responsibilities of the elderly beneficiaries Compliance certification in health responsibilities of beneficiary families EDUCATION Beneficiary families with children and adolescents that complied with their responsibilities in primary, secondary and high school education received the school grants HEALTH Beneficiary families that complied with their health responsibilities, received the Basic Health Kit and the in-kind grants NUTRITION Beneficiary families that complied with their responsibilities, received the cash transfer Activities Transversal Activities Beneficiary families coverage Good assistance to the beneficiary female head of family in the Assistance Centers and Oportunidades Services Resources transferred

Achievements and challenges in the external evaluation process Documentation of Oportunidades’ impacts and results led to:  It’s continuity through three different presidential administrations.  It´s expansion to urban areas & the increase in its coverage  More transparency and accountability in public expenditure  Support several improvements in design and operative issues  Better identification of the external elements that hinder the impact of the Programme Also, with the information provided by external evaluation, supervision & monitoring it is possible to identify:  Methodology challenges: (i) attrition in panel data samples (rural and urban areas), (ii) loss of control groups, (iii) combination of quantitative as well as qualitative methodologies in the evaluation process, (iv) external validity in the results  Need to monitor the program’s results using data from national surveys  Improve the coordination of the increasing actors involved in the evaluation process  Increase the opportuneness of the results in order to be taken into account into the decision making process

External evaluation  Advice from government experts, academics, researchers in technical and methodology topics  Coordination among the actors involved in the evaluation process → Improve planning activities  Search for new approaches and methodologies  Increase the participation of institutions and researchers in the evaluation activities: (i) design and interventions analysis, (ii) surveys, (iii) look over the studies.  Continuity of the panel data samples and implementation of specific surveys to evaluate new interventions.  Samples in national surveys: ENSANUT, ENIGH, ENOE.

Thank you