Lincoln School District. Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Training for Teachers and Specialists
Advertisements

BRISTOL WARREN REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Implementation of RI Educator Evaluation System
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 5: Reflecting and Adjusting.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
RISE Principal Evaluation and Development System: Overview and Principal Effectiveness Rubric.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Collecting Artifacts: Showcasing Your Best Work!
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality.
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.
TCRP TEACHER ADVISORY PANEL MEETING December 2011 Derrick Chau, VP Instruction Diane Fiello, TCRP Coach
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Full District Pilot EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS.
Agenda Overview of evaluation Timeline Next steps.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
RI Educator Evaluation System Design ACEES Meeting October 25, 2010.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Student Growth within the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System (TPGES) Overview 1.
Teacher Evaluations Swartz Creek Community Schools.
Rhode Island Model Teacher Evaluation & Support System Preparing for your End-of-Year Conference.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
RIDE Educator Evaluation System Design ACEES Meeting December 6, 2010.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Overview of Student Growth and T-TESS. Keys of Appraisal Student growth is a part of the appraisal process: Formative Ongoing and Timely Formalize what.
Portfolios EDUC 307. Portfolio  a limited collection of student’s work used either to present the student’s best work(s) or to demonstrate the student’s.
Overview of the Texas Teacher and Principal Evaluation Systems.
An Overview of Revisions to the Rhode Island Model
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
CLASS KeysSM Module 2: Overview of the Evaluation Process Spring 2010
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Lincoln School District

Agenda  Overview of packets Observations Other Types of Evidence Mid-Year Conferences Closing and Next Steps

Teacher Evaluation and Development Process Beginning-of- Year Conference Self-assessment Set professional growth goals & create professional growth plan Set student learning objectives Mid-Year Conference Discuss professional growth plan Revisit student learning objectives Deliver feedback on performance to date End-of-Year Conference Discuss professional growth plan Deliver feedback on performance for entire year Final evaluation rating assigned Sept.-Mid Oct.May-Jun. Jan.-Feb. Ongoing feedback based on multiple classroom observations, data collection and targeted development activities

Using the RI Model Rubrics Remember that the rubrics are intended to be holistic and used for summative ratings. They are not observation rubrics. The rubrics should be used to craft feedback and guide you in prioritizing what to look for when conducting observations.

The Purposes of Observations Collect first-hand information about a teacher’s strengths and areas for development Identify the fidelity or degree of implementation of programs Observe the interactions between students and teachers Monitor the culture of the school

Gradual vs. Full Implementation for Teachers ComponentGradual ImplementationFull Implementation Evaluation Conferences 3 evaluation conferences between the teacher and the evaluator 3 evaluation conferences between the teacher and the evaluator ObservationsAt least 1 long and 1 short observation (2 total) beginning mid-year At least 4, including:  1+ long, announced  3+ short, unannounced Professional Growth Goals At least 1 set at the beginning of the year At least 3 Student Learning Objectives At least 2 set by October 2011 At least 2-4 (per teacher) RI Growth Model Rating Not applicable in Ratings assigned in school year Final Effectiveness Rating Aggregate ratings will be collected in but used for development purposes only Evaluators will combine Professional Practice, Professional Responsibilities and Student Learning rating to calculate a summative rating

Feedback - Overview The purpose of feedback after an observation is to share with the teacher what he or she is doing well and what needs to be improved. All feedback should be:  Specific -name concrete actions/behaviors  Aligned with rubric language  Timely  Actionable pp. 34

Classroom Observation Feedback Form

Observations are Only One Way to Collect Evidence pp. 85 & 97 Competencies are listed in order by domain The open, half-filled or filled circles illustrate which competencies are primarily observable.

Artifact Collection - Process Review the rubrics and the quick references tables in your guidebook as well as the Lincoln Non-observable Evidence Requirements and note which competencies may require you to submit artifacts to your evaluator. Collect and submit materials that relate directly to the competencies in the rubrics, your Student Learning Objectives and Professional Growth Plan. With each submission, include a cover sheet and maintain a copy of evidence you submit for your records.

Reviewing Student Achievement Data A key goal of the Mid-Year Conference is to monitor a teacher’s progress toward his or her Student Learning Objectives. What systems are in place that allow you to collect and analyze formative student learning data? Summative?

Looking at Evidence Holistically Example sources of evidence that may be used to inform Mid-Year Conference feedback: Classroom Observations (long and short) Review of Lesson/Unit/Annual Planning Materials Review of Student Work Samples Review of Student Assessment Data Direct Interactions with Students during an Observation Minimally, before the mid-year conference teachers should submit evidence to support progress with Student Learning Objectives and Professional Growth Plans

Sample Mid-Year Conference Agenda for Teachers