COMMUTING IN AMERICA 2013 ALAN E. PISARSKI PRESERVING THE AMERICAN DREAM Oct 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The National Household Travel Survey Heather Contrino US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Office of Highway Policy Information.
Advertisements

HAVE THE YOUNGER POPULATION LOST INTEREST IN CARS? An Interim Report Alan E. Pisarski.
Driven to Extremes Has Growth in Automobile Use Ended? May 23, 2013 The National Transportation Systems Center Advancing transportation innovation for.
Virginia’s Growing Mature & Diverse Population: Implications for the Transportation Sector Kevin F Byrnes, AICP
Prepared for: The 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 5-9, 2013 Columbus, Ohio Phillip J. Mescher, AICP, Iowa Department.
Beyond Gasoline: Drive Less. US Cars and Drivers US Population: 300 million Licensed drivers 190 million Cars and light trucks. 210 million.
Transportation, Growth and Sustainability Economic Growth with Equity Open Classroom Stephanie Pollack April 1, 2009.
1 The Economics of Congestion Brian Gregor PSU Transportation Seminar 3/12/04.
Commuting in America Using the ACS to Develop a National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends Penelope Weinberger, CTPP Program Manager, AASHTO ACS.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist Module 2: Spatial Analysis and Urban Land Planning The Spatial Structure of Cities: International Examples of the Interaction of.
Future View of Transportation: Implications for Safety Alan E. Pisarski Stakeholder Workshop August 25-26, 2010.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
American Community Survey Continuous Survey Methodology 250,000 Households sampled per month About 1 in 40 Households sampled per.
Census Transportation Planning Products (CTPP) Data Products June 18, 2010.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Changes in Daily Travel Patterns 1994 to 2007/2008 Robert E. Griffiths Technical.
K.O.R.E. Enterprises Workshop Urban Transportation Systems 10/15/08.
The Implications of Demographic Change for Transportation in Texas
21 st Century Commuting Patterns How is the Washington Area Different American Dream Coalition Alan E. Pisarski Reston Va. Dec. 4, 2008.
Driven to Extremes Has Growth in Automobile Use Ended? The National Transportation Systems Center Advancing transportation innovation for the public good.
HOW MIGHT A REDUCTION IN TRANSPORTATION COSTS INCREASE POOR PEOPLE’S EFFECTIVE INCOME? Michael Giangrande GEOG 596A Capstone Peer Review Advisor: Dr. Lakshman.
1 Commuting and Migration Data Products from the American Community Survey Journey-to-Work and Migration Statistics Branch U.S. Census Bureau 2010 State.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
1 Public Transportation Data in the American Community Survey (ACS) and Census Transportation Planning Products (CTPP) Dec 3, 2009 AASHTO Standing Committee.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
National Household Travel Survey Statewide Applications Heather Contrino Travel Surveys Team Lead Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Ed Christopher Resource Center near Chicago Federal Highway Administration Governors Drive Olympia Fields, IL 60461
Commuting to Work in the Metropolitan Washington Region Some Preliminary Results from the 2000 Census Robert E. Griffiths Cooperative Forecasting and Data.
2001 National Household Travel Survey Kentucky Add-on Ben Pierce Presentation By.
Is Transit Part of the Equation? Is Transit Part of the Equation? Travel Data Users Forum: How Will the Changing Cost of Energy Affect Personal Travel?
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
NHTS Update and Data Analysis Plans presented to Florida Model Task Force presented by Krishnan Viswanathan November 10, 2009.
Highway Information Seminar October 25, 2012 Adella Santos, NHTS Program Manager FHWA, Office of Highway Policy Information.
Evaluating the Factors Affecting Student Travel Mode Choice A Methodology to Prioritize Safe Routes to School Programs Meead Saberi, Portland State University.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Additional Findings by Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? February 2005 Public Meeting on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
CATS CONSORTIUM & THE SUSTAINABLE PLACES PROJECT CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS.
Peak Travel in America: Where Are We Going? 12 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications Houston 2009 Nancy McGuckin, Travel Behavior Analyst.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
National Household Travel Survey 2010 Introduction NHTS provides very valuable information for Transport Malta and other entities involved in transport.
Journey to Work from 1990 Census and ACS National test (C2SS) Elaine Murakami, USDOT, FHWA Nanda Srinivasan, Cambridge Systematics Inc.
DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT, LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND THE REGIONS Key Transport Facts: Trend 1: Growth in passenger transport and freight compared with.
Transportation Choices. Focus Questions/Objectives 1.What is mass transit? 2.What is the most common form of private transportation? 3.What are some of.
CEE 320 Spring 2007 Transportation Facts and Figures CEE 320 Steve Muench 26 March 2007.
AASHTO & FHWA Appeal re: DRB “rule of three” decision before the Data Stewardship Executive Policy Committee 8/28/2008.
HPMS Traffic Data Review Highway Information Seminar Oct , 2012 Patrick Zhang, P.E Office of Highway Information Policy, FHWA 1.
Learning the CTPP Data Access Software Basics Penelope Weinberger CTPP Program Manager – AASHTO Liang Long CTPP Technical Guru – Cambridge Systematics.
Pedestrian Crash Briefing Aug 2008 NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics & Analysis 1 Author: Dow Chang NHTSA Technical.
Analysis of Travel Behavior Using the ACS J.G. Berman, Siim S öö t and Susumu Kudo Urban Transportation Center, UIC.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
Carbon Footprint of the U.S. Population: Causes and Spatial-Temporal Pattern Class Project ME/ENV 449, 2007 Grace D. W. Johnson Instructor: R. Husar VMT.
Emerging Issues for Transportation Data Users of ACS Elaine Murakami, FHWA TRB Planning Applications Conference, April 26,
Mobility for Livable and Sustainable Communities: Tompkins County, NY Dwight Mengel, Chief Transportation Planner, DSS CTAA Mobility Management Conference,
CREATING A UNIFIED VISION FOR OUR COMMUNITY January 17, 2012.
Targeted Marketing.  IM in Waterloo Region  Aggregate Data  Correlate SOV change  The future of IM.
Elizabeth Garner State Demography Office Colorado Department of Local Affairs Transitions Population and Economic Trends.
King County’s Changing Demographics Investigating Our Increasing Diversity Chandler Felt, Demographer King County Office of Performance, Strategy and Budget.
Dd/mm/yyyyyRef/Title Jon Carling Head of NERIP North East Regional Information Partnership Workplace and Commuting Research – Phase 1.
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
AMERICAN DREAM COALITION Alan E. Pisarski THE COSTS OF TRANSPORTATION AUSTIN TEXAS November 7 th 2015.
Civic Forum [Region Name] [Date]. SET Purpose: Doing Better Together Guide the SET regional team in developing and implementing a High Quality Regional.
does commuting still matter?
Technical Committee Item # 9
TAMU Mode Split Survey October 2011.
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
The Business of Public Transportation
Declining Social CapitaL
Drive alone 3826 (49 %) Carpool 526 (7 %) Ride Transit 2277 (29 %)
Performance Measurement
Presentation transcript:

COMMUTING IN AMERICA 2013 ALAN E. PISARSKI PRESERVING THE AMERICAN DREAM Oct 2013

New approach for CIA based on ACS structure  Not just a book – a series of 16 briefs  Briefs are backed by data sets  All are downloadable and FREE  Co-authored with Dr. Steven Polzin of USF  Housed at AASHTO; Supported by the CTPP  The intent is continuity for CIA into the future  Ability to do updates as data arrive  Reports now dated rather than numbered  Hello CIA 2013; Good-bye CIA IV

AVAILABILITY Commuting in America 2013 BRIEF NUMBER COMMUTING IN AMERICA 2013 Products ​ PDF Availability ​ Supporting Data* 1 ​ Introduction Introduction Available Nowhtmlexcel 2 ​ The Role of Commuting in Overall Travel Available Nowhtmlexcel 3 ​ Population and Worker Patterns Available Nowhtmlexcel 4 ​ Population and Worker Dynamics Available Nowhtmlexcel 5 ​ The Nature and Pattern of Jobs ​ Nov 2013 htmlexcel 6 ​ Job Dynamics ​ Nov 2013 htmlexcel 7 ​ Vehicle and Transit Availability Available Nowhtmlexcel 8 ​ Consumer Spending on Transportation ​ Nov 2013 htmlexcel 9 ​ How Commuting Influences Travel ​ Dec 2013 htmlexcel 10 ​ Commuting Mode Choice ​ Nov 2013 htmlexcel 11 ​ Commuting Departure Time and Trip Time ​ Nov 2013 htmlexcel 12 ​ Auto Commuting ​ Nov 2013 htmlexcel 13 ​ Transit Commuting ​ Nov 2013 htmlexcel 14 ​ Bicycling and Walk Commuting ​ Dec 2013 htmlexcel 15 ​ Commuting Flow Patterns ​ Dec 2013 htmlexcel 16The Evolving Role of Commuting ​ Dec 2013 htmlexcel

An attempt at estimating total shares of travel Table 2-1 Commuting in Perspective Travel by All Modes 2009Private Vehicle Travel 2009 Percent of Person Trips Percent of Person Miles of Travel Percent of Person Travel Time Percent of VMT Percent of Total Roadway VMT % Public and Commercial Travel Public Vehicle Travel2 Utility/Service Travel12 3 Freight and Goods Movement Travel10 4 Total100% Sources: NHTS 2009, FHWA State Statistical Abstracts, FHWA 1 FHWA estimate based on NHTS data. 2 FHWA estimate using vehicle registration data. 3FHWA estimate based on HPMS data and NHTS. 4 FHWA estimate based on HPMS data.

2/3rds of pop change in age group

Census Projections

Modal Trends

2.6 million new commuters in 2012

The major Group

The Intermediate and Minor Groups

What has happened

Testing “brand loyalty” Table 10-3 “Usual” Versus Yesterdays’ Travel Mode, 2009 NHTS “Usual” Commute ModeOn Travel Day, Percent Commuted by Drove AloneCarpoolTransitWalk Bicy cleOther Drive Alone Carpool Public Transportation Walk Bicycle Other *

Women’s mode choice moves closer to mens 2011 ACS Re departure for work At 6:30 am men 2x women 6:30 – 7:30 it’s a guy thing At 7:30 they are = After 7:30 women predominate Table 10-4 Modal Shares by Gender Commute ModeMaleFemaleF/M Ratio Car, Truck, Van86.07%86.47%100.5 Drive Alone76.19%77.00%101.1 Carpool:9.88%9.47% person carpool7.51%7.52% person carpool1.32%1.21% or-more-person carpool1.05%0.74%70.3 Public Transportation4.63%5.29%114.4 Bus or Trolley Bus2.34%2.95%126.4 Streetcar or Trolley Car0.06%0.07%120.1 Subway or Elevated1.62%1.78%109.6 Railroad0.58%0.47%80.8 Ferryboat0.03%0.02%72.8 Bicycle0.75%0.30%39.7 Walk2.85%2.68%94.1 Taxicab, Motorcycle, Other1.44%0.86%59.4 Work at Home4.26%4.40%103.1

A key guide to Commuter flows

CIA started tracking this in 1990

Figure 7-11 Distribution of Workers by Household Vehicle Availability

About the same number of households without vehicles since 1980 – 10 million 9% of hh have no vehicles; but only 3% of hh with workers have none And in only 8% are there more workers than vehicles In the rest cars = or exceed workers % %

Figure 7-9 Long-Term Trend in Households with Zero Vehicles by Racial/Ethnic Group

DRAMATIC CHANGES IN TRAVEL TIMES

SOME HELP ON VEHICLE SPENDING A guide to spending on vehicles 2011 CEX Lowest income $3,256 Average income $4,365 AttributeAllLowest Lower MiddleMiddle Upper MiddleUpper Persons Earners Vehicles Av. Annual Spending$49,705$22,001$32,092$42,403$57,460$94,551 Transportation Spending$8,293$3,256$5,142$7,592$10,205$15,264 % Trans Spending16.68%14.80%16.02%17.90%17.76%16.14% Trans Spending/Person$3,317$1,915$2,337$2,920$3,645$4,770 Trans Spending/Earner$6,379$6,512$5,713$5,840$6,003$7,632 Trans Spending/Vehicle$4,365$3,256$3,428$3,996$4,437$5,451

A QUICK VIEW OF SOME FINDINGS  Growing National Disparities  1000 counties lost population ; 1000 gained 97% of population  More of >65 population is at work = circa 15%  28% of households have no workers  2/3rds of workers (93 million) live in households with other workers  Commuting remains extremely important but it's share of travel appears to have stabilized at levels meaningfully below those in prior decades.  Personal vehicle commuting retains a dominant share; however, change is limited in share  Carpool losing market share until a 2012 uptick  Women more oriented to SOV than men  Women’s overall mode distribution moving closer to Men’s  The transportation share of consumer spending declined w recession, now in rebound  2011 travel time = 25.5 minutes; identical to 2000  Walk to work (2.77%) share half of share in 1980 (5.6%)  Work at home increases from 2 million in 80 to 6 in 2010  Workers working outside their county of residence quadrupled since 1960; now at 27%

Alan E. Pisarski Thank you Isn’t it suspicious that the problem is always individual behavior and the solution is always government action? Robert Bradley Jr.