Lifecycle Management Work Group Moving Toward Geospatial Portfolio Management Tuesday, August 04, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Advertisements

Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan Update
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Ivan DeLoatch FGDC OS Executive Director
Adrian Gardner National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting June 6, 2013 A-16 Portfolio Management Action Plan Status Update.
A-16 Supplemental Guidance Document FGDC Annual Report Ken Shaffer FGDC Deputy Staff Director FGDC Coordination Group November.
Enterprise Architecture. 2 Agenda What is Enterprise Architecture (EA)? Roles in EA? Why is EA Important? Tangible Benefits from EA? What Do We Need to.
IT Governance Portfolio and Project Management in State Government Chris Cruz, Chief Information Officer, California Department of Food and Agriculture.
Federal Geographic Data Committee Report NGAC Meeting Ivan DeLoatch, Executive Director March 17, 2011.
Mission Objectives & Drivers Business Services & Operations Program Budget (FY08, $M) Application Portfolio & Funding Request (FY08, $M) Core Data & Partners.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Sub-Committee on Spatial Water Data 2005 Progress and 2006 Proposed Activities.
Considering an Enterprise Architecture for the NSDI
Vers. national spatial data infrastructure training program Geospatial Business Planning Introduction to FGDC Initiatives Related to Geospatial Business.
Investment Management Concepts Portfolio Management | Segment Architecture March 25, 2009 Adrienne Walker and Kshemendra Paul
A-16 Portfolio Management Plan Update Adrian Gardner, CIO, NASA Ivan DeLoatch, Executive Director, FGDC OS September 12, 2013 Steering Committee Meeting.
11 A presentation on A-16 Themes for The FGDC Steering Committee June 5, by Wendy Blake-Coleman US EPA Lifecycle Management Work Group.
1 Geospatial Portfolio Management, Theme Lead and Dataset Manger Roles and Responsibilities, and the ‘Investment Collaboration Process’ DRAFT.
Federal Geographic Data Committee Report October 2011 NGAC Meeting Ivan DeLoatch, Executive Director October 4, 2011.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to NCHRP Project Panel presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with PB Consult Inc. Texas Transportation.
Adem.alabama.gov GIS for Water Management: Flow Data Flow Building a Framework for Alabama.
OPR100: Overview of Enterprise Project Management & Project Management Maturity Models Melinda Curtis Product Manager, Microsoft Office Project.
National Geospatial Data Asset Management Plan Update
Federal Geographic Data Committee: Coordination Group Meeting Proposal: FGDC Annual Planning Process & Monthly Performance Management Reviews Submitted.
The United States National Spatial Data Infrastructure.
NSDI Future Directions Initiative Towards a National Geospatial Strategy and Implementation Plan Ivan B. DeLoatch FGDC Staff Director.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
National Boundaries Group Update to Coordination Group Laura Waggoner, US Census Bureau and Robert Pierce, US Geological Survey, Co-Chairs March 18, 2014.
A DEPARTMENTAL PERSPECTIVE Drive Value through Compliance with the Green Book – Stop Checking the Box.
Governance Sub-Committee Report: A Proposal to Measure Progress Toward Realizing the NSDI Vision NGAC Governance Sub-Committee December 2, 2009.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update FGDC Coordination Group Meeting September 10, 2013.
National Geospatial Data Asset Management Plan (Formerly Known As the OMB Circular A-16 Portfolio Management Implementation Plan) Ken Shaffer, FGDC OS.
1 Lifecycle Management Work Group A briefing on Work Group progress by Wendy Blake-Coleman US EPA.
1 OMB Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance FGDC Steering Committee October 6, 2011.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
URISA 2004 FGDC’s Future Directions, Standards Initiatives & Regional Strategy Leslie Armstrong FGDC Deputy Staff Director.
Federal Geographic Data Committee, Coordination Group Meeting Washington, DC 7 June 2005 Study Results Geospatial Interoperability Standards: A Return-on-Investment.
1 Geospatial Line of Business National Geospatial Advisory Committee Ivan B. DeLoatch, Managing Partner October 16, 2008.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update Federal Geographic Data Committee Meeting September 12, 2013.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update NGAC Meeting September 4, 2013.
Geospatial LoB: Lifecycle WG Update November 3, 2009.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Cartographic Users Advisory Council The National Spatial Data Infrastructure and the Geospatial One Stop E-Gov Initiative May 3, 2002 John Moeller Staff.
1 Geospatial Line of Business Update A-16 Supplemental Lew Sanford Jr. & Wendy Blake-Coleman FGDC Steering Committee December 16, 2008.
Steering Committee Meeting Ivan B. DeLoatch, Acting Staff Director June 6, 2003 Future Directions Strategy.
Federal Geographic Data Committee Update Ivan DeLoatch NGAC Meeting August 26, 2009.
Federal Geographic Data Committee Update Karen Siderelis, Acting Chair Ivan B. DeLoatch, Executive Director NGAC Meeting March 24, 2010.
FGDC – Business Highlights Ivan DeLoatch Executive Director July 14, 2015 Coordination Group Meeting 07/01/2015 – v31.
11 Proposed A-16 Portfolio Metrics Lifecycle Management Workgroup Geospatial Line of Business For Preliminary Discussion FGDC Coordination Group (09/21/10)
OMB Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance (Endorsed) Ivan DeLoatch, Staff Director Lew Sanford Jr. & Wendy Blake-Coleman NGAC Meeting, February 4, 2009.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting December 11, 2013.
NSDI Future Directions Governance Report Presentation to the FGDC Steering Committee June 23, 2005.
1 Setting the Stage to Discuss the Framework for the A-16 Geospatial Data Portfolio Lifecycle WG September 1, 2009.
NSDI Strategic Plan Update August NSDI Strategic Plan – Purpose/Scope Purpose: Develop a concise, updated strategic plan to guide the Federal government’s.
Summary of June 2013 Meetings: National Geospatial Advisory Committee FGDC Steering Committee FGDC Coordination Group Meeting June 18, 2013.
Future Directions Update Project Timeline Report to the Steering Committee - 6/04 Briefing to Coordination Group - 6/1/04 Comments due - 5/14/04 Briefing.
National Geospatial Data Asset Management Plan Gita Urban-Mathieux FGDC Office of the Secretariat CDI Data Management Working Group June 9, 2014.
OMB Circular A-16, Revised NSDI Data Themes Housing Jon Sperling HUD/Office of Policy Development & Research Housing: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
FGDC GeoReovery.gov Team and Executive Committee Report Ken Shaffer FGDC Deputy Staff Director April 14, 2009 FGDC Coordination Group.
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 23, 2006.
Geospatial Line of Business FGDC Steering Committee Meeting October 24, 2007.
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
EITS Planning & Decision Support
Identify the Risk of Not Doing BA
Research Program Strategic Plan
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
Employee engagement Delivery guide
Vikki Kwan TransLink’s CAPITAL-M Program
Presentation transcript:

Lifecycle Management Work Group Moving Toward Geospatial Portfolio Management Tuesday, August 04, 2009

2 Session Purpose Provide brief update and answer Coordination Group (CG) questions on Lifecycle Work Group activities and progress Obtain CG feedback on Proposed reorganization of the current A-16 theme structure and definitions  Validate theme organization  Review approach and validate outcomes Process and scope for stakeholder review of proposed themes and associated datasets Additional stakeholder sessions to discuss lifecycle stages, roles & responsibilities, and maturity assessment tools Options for dataset walk through prior to validation of proposed themes and associated datasets Candidates for prototyping roles and responsibilities outlined in the A-16 Supplemental Guidance - with ROI in mind

3 Vision, Approach and Outcomes Attain a shift in Federal Enterprise focus from individual geospatial development efforts in agencies/business units to meeting government-wide demands/needs of the customers Develop tools, approaches and governance to encourage new behaviors for optimization of both enterprise as well as agency/business objectives with built in decision rights and accountability Tie data portfolio into overall geospatial asset portfolio management which includes data, funding, infrastructure, personnel, hardware, software, applications, services and products Intended outcome One Government-One Team (Federal, State, and Local) Geospatial data as a strategic asset managed as a portfolio Improved policy development, program decisions and business outcomes Increased ROI: dollars and business support

4 Premise Need for leadership, building and maintaining strong leadership Envision 80% development & governance accomplished through specific themes/communities; 20% being driven centrally A significant portion of portfolio management focusing on adding value to business level to meet stakeholder requirements Need synergy at both the business level and the enterprise level to achieve integrated solutions and increased ROI benefiting from economies of scale

5 Complexity / Maturity 5 Portfolio Management From Project to Portfolio Management Projects Done Right Right Projects Done Project Management Performance Management Portfolio Management Getting The Intended Benefits Activities Underway Validating stages of lifecycle & benchmarks – develop dashboards Walking datasets through the lifecycle stages – 4 completed, more to come Identifying Management Practices from walk through – many identified, 2 being developed Activities Underway Identifying benchmarks by lifecycle stage Creating performance dashboards Inserting walk through results to dashboards Framing a maturity model Creating Management Practice rating criteria and summary sheets Activities Underway Proposing candidate themes based on A-16 principles Talking with current theme managers re: prototyping A-16 roles and responsibilities Identifying and documenting Management Practices Creating portfolio dashboards Harmonizing management Portfolio Management Activities Strategic Alignment Gaps/Redundancies Identified Capability Based Planning Risk Management Enterprise Budgeting Etc. Performance Management Activities Baseline Performance Estimates Performance Indicators / Measures Performance Metrics Dashboard Reporting Etc. Project Management Activities Baseline Cost Estimates Scope Management Time Management Quality Management Risk Management Etc.

6 Lifecycle Stages - Walk Through Outcomes

7 Management Practices Identify Evaluate Rank Implement Share Maturity Model

8 Moving Toward Portfolio Management OMB Circular A-16 Appendix E identified 34 themes September 2008 data call resulted in approx. 140 “nationally significant” datasets under these themes In May 2009, a small group evaluated the A-16 framework against the principles and other existing geospatial organizational frameworks Participants from: DOD, EPA, FGDC, GSA, Census, NOAA, USGS Facilitated by: Ken Shaffer (FGDC) The goal was to collaboratively consider options for re- organizing OMB Circular A-16 themes and associated datasets

9 Creating Geospatial Themes Process: The group conducted a brainstorming exercise to organize themes Map themes to multiple frameworks including ISO, A-16, The National Map, GIS for the Nation, GOS Communities, DHS Feature Base, HSPD-7, and TIGER Applied the geospatial data principles (from A-16 Supplemental Guidance) to evaluated this initial list of themes, identified “no brainers”, and discussed organizational options for the remaining themes Results: A list of potential new themes and definitions

10 Organization of Datasets by Themes – Example Boundaries (DRAFT) Boundaries Estuarine and Marine Reserves DOC-NOAA Voting District Boundaries DOC-Census Statistical Area Boundaries (tracts, blocks, UAs, CDPs, etc) DOC-Census State (+ Territories) Boundaries DOC-Census School District Boundaries DOC-Census Metropolitan/micropolitan area boundaries DOC-Census FIPS/ANSI codes for states,counties, congressional districts & metro/micropolitan areas DOC-Census County, place, MCD Boundaries DOC-Census Congressional District Boundaries DOC-Census AIR, ANVSA, Hawaiian Homelands Boundaries DOC-Census Territorial Sea DOC-NOAA Contiguous Zone DOC-NOAA Sanctuaries DOC-NOAA Continental Shelf Boundary Data DOI-MMS Enterprise Zones, Empowerment Communities, Revitalization Areas, Qualified Census Tracts, etc. (census geography based) HUD-Policy Development & Research Assisted Housing (census geography or point-based) see HUD-Policy Development & Research Exclusive Economic Zone DOI-MMS and DOC-NOAA

11 Proposed New Organization of A-16 Themes Geology Imagery Land Use-Land Cover Structures & Facilities * Transportation Utilities & Communications * Water – Inland Water – Oceans & Coasts *Framework working session participants flagged this theme as “needing further discussion” Agriculture & Food * Biology Boundaries Cadastre Climate and Weather Cultural & Demographic Statistics * Cultural Resources Elevation Geodetic Control

12 Coordination of A-16 Themes The A-16 Supplemental Guidance discusses an approach for coordinating datasets within and across themes A theme manager is a person designated for each theme per the A-16 Supplemental Guidance Nationally significant datasets are defined in the A-16 Supplemental Guidance A theme manager is responsible for working with theme stakeholders to identify specific datasets they consider “nationally significant” A process for adopting dataset recommendations is found in the A- 16 Supplemental Guidance

13 Potential A-16 Reorganization – Review Proposal Existing Agencies with A-16 responsibilities 10 FGDC Sub-Committee Chairs Agency Geospatial Committees (DOI EGIM, EPA GIS Work Group Steering Committee, etc.) Agency Enterprise Architecture Work Groups Others?

14 Linking Dataset Assessments to Maturity Models

15 Complexity / Maturity 15 Portfolio Management From Project to Portfolio Management Projects Done Right Right Projects Done Project Management Performance Management Portfolio Management Getting The Intended Benefits Recommendations for Proceeding Continue walking datasets through lifecycle Develop consistent evaluations process and tools Continue development of Management Practices tools & dashboards Recommendations for Proceeding Test benchmarking & develop stage assessment tool Develop Management Practices dashboard and tools Complete maturity model Identify performance metric gaps Evaluate efficiency using ROI methods Stakeholder sessions on lifecycle stages, roles & responsibilities, and dashboards Recommendations for Proceeding Stakeholder review of proposed themes and associated datasets Stakeholder sessions on lifecycle stages, roles & responsibilities, and dashboards Prototype roles & responsibilities in Supplemental Guidance with ROI Assess & recommend policy development Portfolio Management Activities Strategic Alignment Gaps/Redundancies Identified Capability Based Planning Rish Management Enterprise Budgeting Etc. Performance Management Activities Baseline Performance Estimates Performance Indicators / Measures Performance Metrics Dashboard Reporting Etc. Project Management Activities Baseline Cost Estimates Scope Management Time Management Quality Management Risk Management Etc.

16 Discussion & Questions