International Linear Collider Program Management Committee of Visitors June 18, 2007 Paul Grannis ILC Program Manager DOE Office of High Energy Physics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Experience with Management of Research Infrastructure
Advertisements

Linear Collider Detector R&D Support John Jaros SiD Workshop at SLAC August 22, 2012.
Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Department of Energy Office of Science Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Presented to SLUO September 10, 2006 Dr. Robin.
View from the NSF: Later Years J. Whitmore (EPP-PNA) M. Pripstein (LHC) M. Goldberg, J. Reidy (EPP) LEPP – CLEO CESR Symposium at Cornell, May 31, 2008.
D. Peterson, “WWS R&D Panel Project Registry”, ALCPG, Snowmass, 20-August World Wide Study Detector R&D Panel Project Registry Web Site web site:
The ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish EPP2010 Cornell University 2-Aug-05.
September 9, 2002David Rubin/ Cornell 1 UCLC Briefing UCLC Briefing to the US LC SG Accelerator Review Committee September 9, 2002 David Rubin Cornell.
ICFA Beam Dynamics Panel Update and ABDW #49  ECLOUD`10 Mark Palmer Cornell University Laboratory for Elementary-Particle Physics.
1 Albrecht Wagner, Snowmass 0805 Albrecht Wagner DESY and Hamburg University Challenges for Realising the ILC.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Department of Energy Office of Science 1 Sisyphus, founder of Corinth, was condemned to an eternity of rolling a boulder uphill then watching it roll back.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1  Now in international R&D phase (baseline design defined); validate technology, engineering design, cost.
Charge to the Workshop (and a report from WWS) Hitoshi Yamamoto July 11, 2005 ACFA8, Daegu, Korea.
US ILC Review by DOE/NSF Apr. 4-6 at Fermilab Consultant reviewers: Ilan Ben-Zvi (BNL/ATF &RHIC) Dixon Bogert (FNAL/NUMI) Isidoro Campisi (ORNL/SNS) Tom.
Global Design Effort Americas Region Efforts and Resources Mike Harrison GDE.
Generic Detector R&D for an Electron Ion Collider RHIC & AGS Annual Users Meeting T. Ludlam, June 2011.
ILC Detector R&D at DOE High Energy Physics SiD Workshop Apr. 11, 2007 Paul Grannis DOE Office of High Energy Physics 1.
ILC ACCELERATOR AND DETECTOR TECHNOLOGY IN INDUSTRY SUPERCONDUCTING PARTICLE ACCELERATOR FORUM OF AMERICA KENNETH O. OLSEN June 12, 2013.
1 + DOE/NSF ILC Detector R&D Review June19-20, 2007 At Argonne National Laboratory Paul Grannis Jim Whitmore.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
ILC Detector R&D at DOE High Energy Physics SiD Workshop Apr. 11, 2007 Paul Grannis DOE Office of High Energy Physics.
Combined Test Beams Definition of Combined Test Beams Why would we want them? Why we might not want them? Host laboratory issues? Experimenter issues.
W. Namkung, 3 nd ILC Workshop, April 1, ILCSC Update 3rd ILC-Korea Workshop April 1, 2005 Kunkook University Seoul, Korea Won Namkung PAL/POSTECH,
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
Operations, Test facilities, CF&S Tom Himel SLAC.
Project Management Mark Palmer Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
FALC Technology Benefits study P. Grannis Beijing GDE meeting Feb. 7, 2007 FALC = Funding Agencies for Large Colliders is composed of representatives from.
Department of Energy Office of Science Paul Grannis LCFOA May 2, DOE and the ILC The ILC has been proposed as the next major high energy physics.
THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR FUTURE ACCELERATORS (ICFA) Roy Rubinstein2nd International Conference on New Frontiers in Physics - 4 September
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa ILCSC Chair LCWS06 at IISc Bangalore March 9, 2006.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK ILCSC Chair GDE meeting at Frascati December 7, 2005.
SiD R&D tasks for the LOI - Subsystem R&D tasks - Summary of SiD R&D - Prioritization of R&D tasks -> Document for DoE/NSF ~Feb 2009 (Mainly based on Marty’s.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
Department of Energy Office of Science 1 Sisyphus, founder of Corinth, was condemned to an eternity of rolling a boulder uphill then watching it roll back.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 ILC R&D Program Dr. David Sutter, Senior Program Manager Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
Global design effort DOE meeting 8/10/06 Global design effort Americas 1 FY07 DOE ILC Budget recommendations G. Dugan ILC-GDE/Cornell University GDE Americas.
1J. Brau - ILCSC Meeting - Beijing - August 19, 2004 Organizing the Global Experimental Program The ILCSC has asked the Worldwide Study, as its Physics.
Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee ( May 10-12, 2005.
February, INP PAN FCAL Workshop in Cracow W. Lohmann, DESY The BCD (Baseline Configuration Document) The next calendar dates Where we are with FCAL.
Department of Energy Office of Science Paul Grannis ILC Program Manager Office of High Energy Physics Department of Energy ALCPG Workshop, July 21, 2006.
5 Nov. 07 CCAST, IHEP Global Design Effort 1 ILC accelerator related R&D in Japan K. Yokoya KEK CCAST ILC Accelerator Workshop, IHEP, Beijing, Nov
Atsuto Suzuki (KEK), Chair ICFA Report from ICFA ICFA mission and membershipICFA PanelICFA Activity.
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
Goals of the ILC-Asia Meeting at Pohang Fumihiko Takasaki PAL, Feb. 17, 2006.
ILC R&D at KEK Beam Control Technology –ATF –ATF2 Acceleration Technology –High-gradient Cavities L-band R&D Stand –Linac System  STF –Construction of.
Americas comments on Linear Collider organization after 2012 P. Grannis, for LCSGA – Aug. 24, 2011 ILCSC GDE.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC1 The View from DOE Moving ForwardMoving Forward HEPAPHEPAP FY08 “in review”FY08 “in review”
The ILC Outlook Barry Barish HEP 2005 Joint ECFA-EPS Lisbon, Portugal 23-July-05.
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Americas Regional Planning Exercises Tor Raubenheimer SLAC Beijing GDE Meeting February 4 th 2007.
P5 Potential US Accelerator Collaboration with the ILC-in-Japan Mike Harrison Mike Harrison.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
ILC Status and University Role in the R&D Program HEPAP Subpanel on University Grants Sept. 8, 2006 Paul Grannis DOE Office of High Energy Physics & State.
ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 1 European Regional R&D plan Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE) MAC Meeting.
ILC R&D Activities at KEK Superconducting Linac Development Beam-handling Technology Development.
Global design effort Americas 1 FY08-09 ILC-Americas planning G. Dugan ILC-Americas Planning meeting SLAC Sept. 13, 2006.
July 11, 2008M Ross for PM - ILC GDE - ILCDR08 closeout 1 GDE Program for the ILC Technical Design Phase Marc Ross for: Akira Yamamoto, Nick Walker GDE.
J. Alexander + Cornell accelerator group Cornell University
ILC Activities in the US Interest ILC Detector R&D
Prospects for ILC Detector R&D Funding
ICFA Report to ICHEP 2016 August 2015 to August 2016 J. Mnich (DESY)
InterActions Meeting--- October 2006 Report from Cornell
Report from ICFA ICFA mission and membership ICFA Panels ICFA and ILC
LCLS History and Science Overview Keith Hodgson, SSRL Director April 23, 2002 LCLS DOE Review, April 23, 2002 Keith Hodgson, SSRL.
Presentation transcript:

International Linear Collider Program Management Committee of Visitors June 18, 2007 Paul Grannis ILC Program Manager DOE Office of High Energy Physics

FALC = Funding Agencies LC (R. Petronzio) LCSGA = LC Steering Gp Americas (M. Tigner) LCSG Europe LCSG Asia ALCPG = Americas LC Physics Gp (J. Brau,M. Oreglia) Europe phys/det Asia phys/det oversight regional interest accelerator detector/ physics key ART = Americas Regional Team (G. Dugan → M. Harrison) Asia RT (M. Nozaki) Europe RT (B. Foster) ILCSC = International LC Steering Committee (S. Kurokawa) GDE = Global Design Effort (B. Barish) WWS = Worldwide Study (Brau, Richard, Yamamoto) ILC Global Organization

FALC (R. Petronzio) LCSGA (M. Tigner) LCSG Europe LCSG Asia ALCPG (J. Brau, M. Oreglia) Asia phys/det ART (G. Dugan → M. Harrison) Asia RT (M. Nozaki) Europe RT (B. Foster) GDE = Global Design Effort (B. Barish) WWS = Worldwide Study (Brau, Richard, Yamamoto) DOE ILC Interactions Europe phys/det Discuss strategy Accelerator R&D/design budget advice Detector planning R&D budget advice review Advise on US specific issues DOE advice ILCSC (S. Kurokawa)

HEP ILC Objectives Accelerator:  Oversee and support US ILC R&D and design activities by ART in collaboration with international GDE *  Develop budget requests and priorities for US ILC R&D  Evaluate and award university ILC accelerator R&D grants *  Guide planning for a potential US site with LCSGA  Develop materials concerning ILC for Office of Science, OSTP etc. Detector:  Support and oversee US ILC detector R&D by ALCPG *  Evaluate and award university/lab detector R&D grants * International:  Participate in FALC on international ILC program discussion * * Joint with NSF; DOE lead

R&D Program through FY2006 Prior to FY2006, ILC R&D handled within Advanced Accelerator Development program. Through FY2004, ILC (NLC) budgets were capped at $19.6M; in FY2005 was $23.75M Late FY2005: GDE and ART formed & directors named. OHEP ILC Program Manager appointed. FY2006 budget $29.7M. Recommendation from ART director based on proposals and consultations with Laboratories; iteration with labs and OHEP. Due to recent organization of ART/GDE and DOE, substantial reserve kept to address needs later in the year. FY2006

FY2007 Budget process FY2007 ART plan was based on proposals from Labs (total requested was over twice President’s budget of $54M for non-detector R&D). Extensive consultation by ART director with Laboratories and GDE R&D Board, and interaction with OHEP, led to recommendation at $60M, then at $45M (Senate mark). Special panel of LCSGA advised on ‘Regional Interest’ budgets, and on accelerator/detector splits. FY2007 Continuing resolution until Mar Final ILC R&D appropriation was $42M. Detector R&D handled separately. Growing expenditures at FNAL for SC rf infrastructure (~$20M in FY2007) off the ILC budget First DOE/NSF review held in April Consultants called for integrated multi-year R&D plan, and asked for more structured oversight and planning.

Planning for FY2008 For FY2008 and FY2009 ART management & planning was restructured; Appoint WBS level 2 managers for each major machine subsystem to direct that work package R&D.  Proposals from WBS managers to ART director for R&D plan and budgets. OHEP participation in planning meetings, evolution of recommendation.  Significant input from Labs, and GDE R&D Board on global R&D priorities.  FY2008 President’s budget opened new SCRF line ($23.455M) in addition to ILC R&D ($60M). Inclusion of program overheads at SLAC and FNAL required retune.  ART modified recommendation on basis of President’s budget; ongoing discussion with OHEP to address programmatic concerns. May 2007 ART review panel endorsed the new management structure.

University grants A program of ILC grants to universities for accelerator R&D was initiated in 2002, aiming to stimulate engagement in ILC. A parallel program for detector R&D was also started. Joint oversight/review by DOE & NSF. DOENSFDOENSF FY03$412K$0K$400K$0 FY04$700K$0K$400K$93 FY05$700K$117K$650K$119K FY06$1048K$300K$700K$235K Detector Accelerator FY2007 is the last year of grants for accelerator R&D. In future, ILC specific work will be included in the ILC line budget, as recommended by ART. More generic R&D that has application also to ILC will be included as part of the AARD program. The detector R&D program is operated through an umbrella grant to University of Oregon. First review June 19, 20. The detector grant program will continue, and is expected to grow.

Backup information

Accelerator grants in FY2006 Ohio StateRad hard 500 MHz digitizer UC Berkeley, Notre DameRF beam pos’n monitors Cornell, SUNY AlbanySynch. radiation imaging BPM UC DavisRadiation damage studies MITBeam loss mitigation in klystrons Illinois, CornellInjection/ejection kicker magnets Cornell, IllinoisFast kicker prototypes Colorado StateLinac element girder movers New Mexico, NM StateEffects of coherent synch. rad’n CornellSimulation of linac, BDS optics Cornell, MinnesotaExpt, simulation, design for damp rings (Many grants have Lab partners)

WisconsinPhotocathodes for pol. electron source WisconsinHigh purity Nb for cavities NorthwesternAtom probe microscopy in Nb Old DominionPlasma etching for Nb cavities Michigan St, Texas A&MChemical polishing Nb studies William and Mary, Va TechElectropolishing studies CornellUndulator prototyping for e + polarization Northern IllinoisLongitudinal phase space monitor CornellDesign for CESR damping ring tests PennsylvaniaReal time simulator for low level rf 21 current grants Average grant ≈ $50K Accelerator grants in FY2006

University-lab partnerships The laboratories team with university partners on a variety of high priority R&D projects for ILC (sometimes augmented by DOE/NSF grants, sometimes on University or Lab MOU funds): FermilabMichigan StHigh pressure rinse facility, materials, cavity vendor development, TIG welding UICC damping ring fast kickers Cornell BCP and EP cavity processing, materials PennsylvaniaLow level rf Northern Illcooperative grad student research WisconsinSCrf materials NorthwesternSCrf materials ArgonneUIUC Damping ring studies Northern Illphase space manipulation in e- DR

University-lab partnerships SLACSo. Californiaelectron cloud simulations Texas A&Msecondary emission yields, e-cloud UC Berkeleycavity BPM energy spectrometer Notre Damecavity BPM energy spectrometer Oregonsynchrotron stripe energy spectrometer (+ various universities in UK, Germany, Japan) JLabWm & MaryNb surface treatment, EP processing Boston Univ.Nb surface treatment Old Dominionplasma treatment of Nb surfaces NC Statecrystalline characterization of Nb Univ. Virginiasurface impedance measurements of Nb

Iowa StateCerenkov luminosity monitor OregonExtraction line energy monitor Notre DameBPM based energy monitor IowaPolarimetry studies TuftsCompton polarimeter backgrounds Wayne StateIncoherent and coherent beamstrahlung YalePixel vertex detector R&D UC BerkeleyMonolithic pixel detector prototype U. WashingtonVertex detector mechanical structures HawaiiCMOS pixel detector Lousiana TechGEM-based tracking CornellMicro pattern gas detector for TPC Detector grants in FY2006

MichiganTracker alignment and simulations UC Santa CruzLong shaping time Si microstrip readout ColoradoSiD barrel reconstruction studies Kansas StateCalorimeter-based tracking for PFA PurdueThin silicon sensors for tracking CornellTPC signal digitization simulation Northern IllinoisScintillator based hadron calorimetry ColoradoScintillator forward calorimetry IowaPFA studies OregonSiW EM calorimeter test module U. Texas ArlingtonGEM based hadron calorimetry Northern IllinoisPFA algorithms and simulations Detector grants in FY2006

KansasEM calorimeter concepts for PFA Argonne Prototype RPC hadron calorimeter Iowa State4 th concept design PrincetonCalorimeter and muon ID U. WashingtonScintillator/Cerenkov calorimetry YaleElectronics standards Wayne StateSolid state photomultiplier development Wayne StateScintillator based muon detector Colorado State Geiger mode avalanche photodiodes 33 grants Average grant ≈ $35K Detector grants in FY2006

NSF/DOE position on University R&D activity “Both DOE and NSF recognize the high priority placed by HEPAP and the recent NRC EPP2010 report on conducting a vigorous R&D program that could lead to the ILC project. Both agencies currently fund university grants for both detector and accelerator research with applicability to the ILC. These programs have been modest but have grown over the past several years. “Both agencies respond to grants through the peer review process. They welcome proposals for which ILC detector or accelerator R&D is the whole or a component of the effort, as well as for generic research that may have some bearing on ILC issues. In addition, there is often some latitude within existing grant funds to consider new directions. The use of existing grant funds for ILC-related research depends upon the details of each proposal and grant holders are encouraged to speak with their program monitors on the appropriate extent of such activities.”