HB5 – Community and Student Engagement Accountability System Key Communicators April 24, 2014

HB 5 – Sec Each school district shall evaluate the district's performance and the performance of each campus and assign the district and each campus a performance rating of exemplary, recognized, acceptable, or unacceptable for both overall performance and each individual evaluation factor. Nine Factors: 1.Fine Arts 2.Wellness and P.E. 3.Community and Parental Involvement 4.21st Century Workforce Development Program 5.Second Language Acquisition Program 6.Digital Learning Environment 7.Dropout Prevention Strategies 8.Educational Programs for Gifted and Talented Students 9.Record of District and Campus Compliance with Statutory Reporting and Policy Requirements

CSEAS – Working Committees CSEAS FactorsCentral StaffPrincipals Fine ArtsKathy Kuddes (Chair) – Fine Arts Janice Truit – Visual Arts Jeff Turner – Instrumental Music Greg Arp – Theatre Arts/Speech Susan Hayes – Special Assignments Billie-Jean Lee – Robinson George King – Plano East Jill Stoker – Mathews Cindy Savant – Rose Haggar Sandy Muzquiz – Meadows Wellness and P.E. Melinda Smith (Chair) – P.E./Health Mary Swinton – Elementary Science Brant Perry – Murphy Kary Cooper – Jasper Katie Babb – Aldridge Lynn Swanson – Thomas Renee Rucker – Mitchell

CSEAS – Working Committees CSEAS FactorsCentral StaffPrincipals Community and Parental Involvement Mary Gorden (Chair) – Communications Gail Lundberg – Special Education Joanna Chandler – Federal Programs Robin Garcia – Campus Support Lynda Shuttlesworth – Family Education and Guidance Services Kay Glawe – Family and Social Services Rhonda Snyder, Plano ISD Council of PTAs Shurandia Holden – Frankford Kathy King – Plano West Mariea Sprott – Hightower Jane Oestreich – Hickey Michele Loper – Barron 21st Century Workforce Development Program David Hitt (Chair) – Career and Technology Education Paul Weaver – Guidance and Family Education Services Lisa Long – Hendrick Lynn Ojeda – Williams Saul Laredo – Dooley Sarika Pride – Memorial Kellie Latimer – Saigling

CSEAS – Working Committees CSEAS FactorsCentral StaffPrincipals Second Language Acquisition Program Greta Lundgaard (Chair) – Languages Other than English Emelia Ahmed – Multilingual Lisa Long – Hendrick Lynn Ojeda – Williams Saul Laredo – Dooley Sarika Pride – Memorial Kellie Latimer – Saigling Digital Learning Environment Harriet Bell (Chair) – Instructional Tech Lisa Wellborn – Elem. Social Studies Lisa Farrell – Early Childhood Jean Parmer – eSchool Chris Glasscock – Rice Renee Godi – Academy High Kristi Graham – Hedgecoxe Cindy Guinn – Daffron Toni Strickland – Huffman Dropout Prevention Strategies Gary Wilson (Chair) – Section 504 Kim Edmonds – ESL Laura Childress – Bird Education Center Sharon Bradley – Special Programs, Mike Landingham – Student Services Steve Ewing – Armstrong Sarah Watkins – Plano Senior Ben Benavides – Weatherford Jeanne Beall – Schell

CSEAS – Working Committees CSEAS FactorsCentral StaffPrincipals Educational Programs for Gifted and Talented Students Theresa Biggs (Chair) – Gifted Education Jason Myatt – Schimelpfenig Janis Williams – Clark Barbara Lange – Brinker Linda Patrick – Carlisle Tramy Tran – Forman Compliance with Statutory Reporting and Policy Requirements Joana Sorrels (Chair) – Accountability Emelia Ahmed – Multilingual Gail Lundberg – Special Education Mark Allen – Student & Family Services Kathy Dry – Student Records/PEIMS Antoine Spencer – Otto Ann Irvine – Harrington Project Manager Dr. Paul Dabbs – Assessment & Accountability

Key Milestones September 23CSEAS Launch Meeting by October 4Committee Literature Review October 8Central Staff Meeting: review drafts by November 21Central Staff/Principals: draft diagnostics November 25Proposal to District Committee December 4Review diagnostics with all principals and assistant principals January 8Final review by all principals January 14Presentation to Board February 17Campus level documents available April 9Presentation and review of documents and procedures with all principals and assistant principals May 23Campus evaluations completed, results posted to web-based system June 27District-level evaluation complete August 8District and campus ratings submitted to TEA

Programs for Gifted and Talented Students: 135 Teachers serving gifted/talented students have not had the 30 hour state mandated gifted training. Teachers serving gifted/talented students have received the 30 hour state mandated gifted trainings and the 6 update hours. Administrators and counselors have received the minimum initial 6 hour gifted training. Teachers serving gifted/talented students have received the 30 hour state mandated gifted trainings and the 6 update hours. Administrators and counselors have received the minimum 6 hour gifted training and most of the administrators and counselors have received an annual 6 hour update. Professional Development

Diagnostic Indicators for Evaluation CSEAS FactorsElementaryMiddleHSSHS Fine Arts Wellness and P.E. 13 Community and Parental Involvement 16 21st Century Workforce Development Program 5467 Second Language Acquisition Program Digital Learning Environment 7777 Dropout Prevention Strategies 15 Educational Programs for Gifted and Talented Students 6655 Record of District and Campus Compliance with Statutory Reporting and Policy Requirements 13

Summarizing Diagnostic Indicators for a Rating Performance Rating Rating System (with 10 diagnostics) Exemplary 9/10 Indicators 3 or Higher + At Least 1 Indicator Above 3 Recognized 8/10 Indicators 3 or Higher + At Least 1 Indicator Above 3 Acceptable7/10 Indicators 3 or Higher Unacceptable4/10 or More Indicators Below 3

Example of Summary Report CSEAS FactorsRating Fine Arts Exemplary Wellness and P.E. Recognized Community and Parental Involvement Acceptable 21st Century Workforce Development Program Exemplary Second Language Acquisition Program Recognized Digital Learning Environment Exemplary Dropout Prevention Strategies Recognized Educational Programs for Gifted and Talented Exemplary Compliance with Statutory Reporting and Policy Recognized Overall Campus Evaluation Rating _____________

Overall Campus Evaluation Rating Campus Evaluation Rating From Factor Ratings Exemplary All Factors are Acceptable/Met or Higher + 3/8 Factors Exemplary Recognized All Factors are Acceptable/Met or Higher + 3/8 Factors Recognized or Higher Acceptable8/9 Factors are Acceptable/Met or Higher UnacceptableTwo or More Factors Not Acceptable/Not Met

DISTRICT LEVEL Evaluation of Community and Student Engagement Accountability System

District Level CSEAS Process Goal is to evaluate how well the district designs, supports, and continues improvements to programs that enable campuses to perform satisfactorily in all the program areas The key practices evaluated are: – Leadership and Capacity Building – Monitoring Performance and Progress – Intervention and Adjustment

Programs for Gifted and Talented Students: 135 District leaders do not establish a process to evaluate programs or strategies based on evidence of effectiveness and efficient use of resources. District leaders establish a process to evaluate programs or strategies based on limited evidence of effectiveness and efficient use of resources. District leaders establish a process to evaluate programs or strategies based on clear evidence of effectiveness and efficient use of resources. Professional Development

CSEAS – Schedule – Campuses can begin using the diagnostic system to evaluate starting February 17 As most diagnostic indicators are on programs, implementation, and participation of students, this information is already available for evaluation – Campuses will complete the diagnostics in June – District diagnostic will be in June and will review campus diagnostic information as input – August 8 – Report data to TEA

CSEAS – Schedule – Campuses can begin using the diagnostic system to evaluate starting February 17 As most diagnostic indicators are on programs, implementation, and participation of students, this information is already available for evaluation – Campuses will complete the diagnostics in June – District diagnostic will be in June and will review campus diagnostic information as input – August 8 – Report data to TEA

HB5 – Community and Student Engagement Accountability System Key Communicators April 24, 2014